Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550107
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference |
| Date | 2016-02-03 02:49 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1f68oc-2ga.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <K5SdneLyYqxEhCzLnZ2dnUU7-QUAAAAA@giganews.com> <ovp7oc-d99.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <_tednUFgbZpzzSzLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8c08oc-bt9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <_tednX1gbZqEyCzLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 7:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, > your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, that is tough shit, ass hole. Snip yet another idiotic repaste. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:45 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-02 00:54 -0500
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 06:07 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 09:26 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 13:25 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:35 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 14:21 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 20:54 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:04 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 23:16 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:59 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 01:05 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 19:17 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 02:49 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:17 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:04 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:34 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:49 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-02 17:25 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-03 16:18 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:32 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-04 17:26 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 19:35 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 20:02 -0600
csiph-web