Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #696994 > unrolled thread

Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-04 05:24 -0400
    Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change K33333nSt0mp <K33333nSt0mp@er.com> - 2018-08-04 11:27 +0000
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Cornelius Crane <corneliufdsas1@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 23:48 +0000
    Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-08-04 11:56 -0400
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:35 -0400
        Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:13 +0000
    Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-08-04 13:52 -0600
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:53 -0700
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 16:37 -0400
        Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-04 16:04 -0500
          Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:29 -0400
          Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 05:42 -0400
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 11:48 +0000
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:03 -0400
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 05:40 -0400
        Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 11:47 +0000
          Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 07:56 -0400
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 13:02 +0000
              Re: Heatwave made me more than twice as horny by climate change "Gunner Asch" <gunnerasch@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 10:22 -0400
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 13:02 +0000
              Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 09:29 -0400
                Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 14:04 +0000
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:08 -0400
        Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:00 -0400
    Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Frank <frank@frank.net> - 2018-08-05 11:48 -0400
      Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:15 +0000
        Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 20:20 +0000
          Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:25 +0000
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 13:27 -0700
            Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 21:47 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#696994 — Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change

The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
“unambiguous”:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/27/heatwave-made-more-than-twice-as-likely-by-climate-change-scientists-find

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#697000

On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 05:24:32 -0400, kensi wrote:

> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is
> “unambiguous”:
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/27/heatwave-made-more-
than-twice-as-likely-by-climate-change-scientists-find

Koooooooooooooooooooooooooooki Kensi says: there's a fifty percent chance 
it's getting warmer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697042

K33333nSt0mp wrote

> Koooooooooooooooooooooooooooki Kensi says: there's a fifty percent chance 
> it's getting warmer.
> 

Wrong.  Trump says it's a big lie.  A conspiracy by the Chinese.

He knows better than you.   If it's what you say or what he says, I'll trust 
what he says.

No offence bro, but you need to open your eyes to the facts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697012

On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 05:24:32 -0400, kensi wrote:

>The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
>“unambiguous”:
>
>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/27/heatwave-made-more-than-twice-as-likely-by-climate-change-scientists-find

This site offers antidotes to kensi's Daily OT Downers:
http://www.dailyquote.eu/
„Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.“
/ Andre Gide /

Can anyone say, "The science is settled?"

How much does it pay to be a spammer-for-hire to post links from lists
of talking points downloaded from the mothership?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697016

On 8/4/2018 11:56 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 05:24:32 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is
>> “unambiguous”:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/27/heatwave-made-more-than-twice-as-likely-by-climate-change-scientists-find
> 
> This site offers antidotes to kensi's Daily OT Downers:
> http://www.dailyquote.eu/
> „Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.“
> / Andre Gide /
> 
> Can anyone say, "The science is settled?"
> 
> How much does it pay to be a spammer-for-hire to post links from lists
> of talking points downloaded from the mothership?

Must pay pretty well. The Failed Cartoonist got a degree (in psychology 
not real science) paid for by his SPAMMING job. And Remember Sam Wormley 
and his one man "foundation"? I'm sure he got a good "donation" for each 
post. Bet "kensi" does as well. It's probably more profitable than 
making YouTube videos for advertisers.

But not that the people providing the list of links are total liberal 
science idiots whose idea of "science" are liberal puff pieces in 
various liberal and propaganda rags. Post something like the NASA paper 
showing CO2 is just a minor greenhouse gas and "Kensi" and her handlers 
don't know enough science to even reply.

To the collective left the ends always justify the means. Lies are fine 
so long as they help you "win".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697132

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:35:57 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 8/4/2018 11:56 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 05:24:32 -0400, kensi wrote:
>> 
>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is
>>> “unambiguous”:
>>>
>>> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/27/heatwave-made-more-
than-twice-as-likely-by-climate-change-scientists-find
>> 
>> This site offers antidotes to kensi's Daily OT Downers:
>> http://www.dailyquote.eu/
>> „Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.“
>> / Andre Gide /
>> 
>> Can anyone say, "The science is settled?"
>> 
>> How much does it pay to be a spammer-for-hire to post links from lists
>> of talking points downloaded from the mothership?
> 
> Must pay pretty well. The Failed Cartoonist got a degree (in psychology
> not real science) paid for by his SPAMMING job. And Remember Sam Wormley
> and his one man "foundation"? I'm sure he got a good "donation" for each
> post. Bet "kensi" does as well. It's probably more profitable than
> making YouTube videos for advertisers.

Proof, kook?

> "Kensi" and her handlers

Proof, kook?

> To the collective left the ends always justify the means. Lies are fine
> so long as they help you "win".

I didn't know the GOP were considered to be "the collective left" nowadays.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697020

On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of 
> climate change is “unambiguous”:

Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697021

On 2018-08-04 12:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
>> “unambiguous”:
> 
> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
> 
> 
yea

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697023

On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
>> “unambiguous”:
> 
> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
> 
> 
Hey, knuckle-dragger "kensi" do you see the "Sci." part of Sci.physics?

The Guardian is journalist science which has nothing to do with reality. 
In real science weather is not climate.

Lying k9ok-trool!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697027

On 8/4/2018 3:37 PM, benj wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
>>> is “unambiguous”:
>>
>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>
>>
> Hey, knuckle-dragger "kensi" do you see the "Sci." part of Sci.physics?
> 
> The Guardian is journalist science which has nothing to do with reality.
> In real science weather is not climate.
> 
> Lying k9ok-trool!
> 
> <snicker>


analysis of kensi pupa post;

"The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
"is “unambiguous” "

    what a piss poor sentence!

 PRELIMINARY.  why ?   waiting for something to PROVE IT ?

(what is "THE SIGNAL" ?)
(What specifically is "climate change" ?)
(who is "they" ?  and how do they "say" this ?)



=> to me this is simply repeating buzzwords to the crowd with a buzz on.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697030

On 8/4/2018 5:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 3:37 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
>>>> is “unambiguous”:
>>>
>>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>>
>>>
>> Hey, knuckle-dragger "kensi" do you see the "Sci." part of Sci.physics?
>>
>> The Guardian is journalist science which has nothing to do with reality.
>> In real science weather is not climate.
>>
>> Lying k9ok-trool!
>>
>> <snicker>
> 
> 
> analysis of kensi pupa post;
> 
> "The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
> "is “unambiguous”"
> 
>      what a piss poor sentence!
> 
>   PRELIMINARY.  why ?   waiting for something to PROVE IT ?
> 
> (what is "THE SIGNAL" ?)
> (What specifically is "climate change" ?)
> (who is "they" ?  and how do they "say" this ?)
> 
> 
> 
> => to me this is simply repeating buzzwords to the crowd with a buzz on.

Hmmmm. Last I heard "the SIGNAL" of climate change was a 15-20 (some say 
30) year average of weather. Why is "kensi" and her journaliss trying to 
hard to prove there is "climate change"? Virtually all real scientists 
agree that there is climate change. It's 100% certain. Settled science!

But what "kensi" and journalist science is trying to do is prove that 
there is "anthropogenic global warming" as was predicted by all the 
computer models and which all proved to be so devastatingly wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697069

On 8/4/2018 5:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
> analysis of kensi pupa post;
> 
> "The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
> "is “unambiguous”"
> 
>      what a piss poor sentence!

You're welcome to your opinion -- but you're really posting it in the 
wrong place, as I doubt that Damian Carrington, the author of that 
Guardian article and of the sentence you're criticizing, reads 
talk.politics.guns.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697074

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gq1$2mr$4
@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 8/4/2018 5:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> analysis of kensi pupa post;
>> 
>> "The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
>> "is “unambiguous”"
>> 
>>      what a piss poor sentence!
> 
> You're welcome to your opinion -- but you're really posting it in the 
> wrong place, as I doubt that Damian Carrington, the author of that 
> Guardian article and of the sentence you're criticizing, reads 
> talk.politics.guns.
> 

i doubt you do either troll...piss off cunt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697101

On 8/5/2018 5:42 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 5:04 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> analysis of kensi pupa post;
>>
>> "The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change
>> "is “unambiguous”"
>>
>>      what a piss poor sentence!
> 
> You're welcome to your opinion -- but you're really posting it in the 
> wrong place, as I doubt that Damian Carrington, the author of that 
> Guardian article and of the sentence you're criticizing, reads 
> talk.politics.guns.
> 
It's also obvious that as a journalist he knows no science either.

Do you ever link anything but propaganda sites and journalist 
pseudoscience?  Just who is providing you with this list of articles to 
link?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697068

On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
>> “unambiguous”:
> 
> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?

Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the process 
of gunpowder manufacture?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697073

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gmo$2mr$3
@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is 
>>> “unambiguous”:
>> 
>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
> 
> Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the process 
> of gunpowder manufacture?
> 

only take a few grains to put you out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697075

On 8/5/2018 7:47 AM, elpyes1969@outlook.com wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gmo$2mr$3
> @gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change is
>>>> “unambiguous”:
>>>
>>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>
>> Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the process
>> of gunpowder manufacture?
> 
> only take a few grains to put you out.

Hmm, the cardboard box where I store all the death treats I've received 
from Skeeter is getting full. What am I going to do about storage for 
them all?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697086

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:pk6oki$h59$1@gioia.aioe.org: 

> On 8/5/2018 7:47 AM, elpyes1969@outlook.com wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gmo$2mr$3
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>> 
>>> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate
>>>>> change is “unambiguous”:
>>>>
>>>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the
>>> process of gunpowder manufacture?
>> 
>> only take a few grains to put you out.
> 
> Hmm, the cardboard box where I store all the death treats I've
> received from Skeeter is getting full. What am I going to do about
> storage for them all?
> 

Shove them up your ass..

Who is Skeeter?

Someone who scares you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697093 — Re: Heatwave made me more than twice as horny by climate change

On Sun, 05 Aug 2018 09:02:47 -0400, elpyes1969@outlook.com  
<elpyes1969@outlook.com> wrote:

> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
> news:pk6oki$h59$1@gioia.aioe.org:
>
>> On 8/5/2018 7:47 AM, elpyes1969@outlook.com wrote:
>>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gmo$2mr$3
>>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>>>
>>>> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate
>>>>>> change is “unambiguous”:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the
>>>> process of gunpowder manufacture?
>>>
>>> only take a few grains to put you out.
>>
>> Hmm, the cardboard box where I store all the death treats I've
>> received from Skeeter is getting full. What am I going to do about
>> storage for them all?
>>
>
> Shove them up your ass..
>
> Who is Skeeter?
>
> Someone who scares you?


All these talk about guns, violence and ass is getting me horny again.

Is it OK I suck on your dick while you talk?



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#697087

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:pk6oki$h59$1@gioia.aioe.org: 

> On 8/5/2018 7:47 AM, elpyes1969@outlook.com wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:pk6gmo$2mr$3
>> @gioia.aioe.org:
>> 
>>> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate
>>>>> change is “unambiguous”:
>>>>
>>>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns?
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea how much greenhouse gas is emitted by the
>>> process of gunpowder manufacture?
>> 
>> only take a few grains to put you out.
> 
> Hmm, the cardboard box where I store all the death treats I've
> received from Skeeter is getting full. What am I going to do about
> storage for them all?
> 

Shove them up your ass..

Who is Skeeter?

Someone who scares you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web