Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #697030
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change |
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:29 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pk55sk$96u$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <pk3rcn$1vq6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Btn9D.4734$1E6.114@fx07.iad> <pk52q5$417$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pk54df$6pq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 8/4/2018 5:04 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 8/4/2018 3:37 PM, benj wrote: >> On 8/4/2018 3:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 8/4/2018 3:24 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change >>>> is “unambiguous”: >>> >>> Do you see the "guns" part of talk.politics.guns? >>> >>> >> Hey, knuckle-dragger "kensi" do you see the "Sci." part of Sci.physics? >> >> The Guardian is journalist science which has nothing to do with reality. >> In real science weather is not climate. >> >> Lying k9ok-trool! >> >> <snicker> > > > analysis of kensi pupa post; > > "The result is preliminary but they say the signal of climate change > "is “unambiguous”" > > what a piss poor sentence! > > PRELIMINARY. why ? waiting for something to PROVE IT ? > > (what is "THE SIGNAL" ?) > (What specifically is "climate change" ?) > (who is "they" ? and how do they "say" this ?) > > > > => to me this is simply repeating buzzwords to the crowd with a buzz on. Hmmmm. Last I heard "the SIGNAL" of climate change was a 15-20 (some say 30) year average of weather. Why is "kensi" and her journaliss trying to hard to prove there is "climate change"? Virtually all real scientists agree that there is climate change. It's 100% certain. Settled science! But what "kensi" and journalist science is trying to do is prove that there is "anthropogenic global warming" as was predicted by all the computer models and which all proved to be so devastatingly wrong.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-04 05:24 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change K33333nSt0mp <K33333nSt0mp@er.com> - 2018-08-04 11:27 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Cornelius Crane <corneliufdsas1@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 23:48 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-08-04 11:56 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:35 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:13 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-08-04 13:52 -0600
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:53 -0700
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 16:37 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-04 16:04 -0500
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:29 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 05:42 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 11:48 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:03 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 05:40 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 11:47 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 07:56 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 13:02 +0000
Re: Heatwave made me more than twice as horny by climate change "Gunner Asch" <gunnerasch@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 10:22 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 13:02 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-05 09:29 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 14:04 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:08 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 12:00 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Frank <frank@frank.net> - 2018-08-05 11:48 -0400
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:15 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 20:20 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-08-05 20:25 +0000
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 13:27 -0700
Re: Heatwave made more than twice as likely by climate change "elpyes1969@outlook.com" <elpyes1969@outlook.com> - 2018-08-05 21:47 +0000
csiph-web