Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #563318 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-18 00:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-06 06:59 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 106 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 00:07 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-18 08:50 -0500
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:24 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 16:58 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:22 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 06:45 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:48 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 20:19 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:36 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 21:10 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:02 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 08:56 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 01:24 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:56 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:11 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 03:46 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:51 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 05:51 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:47 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:18 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 17:19 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 16:39 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 12:54 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:11 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 01:30 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
Fakey admits to counting lines in his obsessed way. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 10:32 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 13:05 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:33 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 08:08 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 04:11 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:33 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:50 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 11:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 19:04 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 16:16 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 15:03 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 19:52 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:57 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:03 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:30 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:38 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:28 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 13:50 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 10:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 06:57 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 02:20 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-24 00:23 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 03:25 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:06 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 19:39 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 17:34 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 06:21 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 01:35 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 17:55 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-25 10:03 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:14 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:13 +0100
CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 13:25 -0400
Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:03 -0700
Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 06:43 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 14:12 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:09 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:16 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:05 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:34 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:30 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:30 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:40 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:31 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:09 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 07:36 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:12 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 09:25 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:37 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:40 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 08:58 -0600
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 12:53 -0400
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 05:12 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-23 17:09 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:08 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:57 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:04 +0000
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:38 +0800
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:05 +0100
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 22:53 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 21:29 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 17:59 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 13:01 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:00 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 23:27 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 18:57 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 10:26 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 07:34 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:57 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 18:18 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 18:28 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 08:17 +0200
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:15 -0700
Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 06:59 +0200
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 15:18 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <li7vebtjp9jvjijt8nahq6q3r7e060tluq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564057 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > Hi, laughingstock who thinks i need to solve for d in d/dx. > > What temperature is the red-body emission from your > > blistered ass? > > LOL! > > Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)? Wooohoooo! Fakey googled a derivative, and now admits i'm right, which means: _____ __ _____. Hint: Fakey is _____. C'mon fakey? A least you're creeping up the IQ ladder, fakey, i have to give you credit for that. You must be up to your hawt wife's age by now. Do you know what 'd' means now? > > > If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he > > > smarter than you? > > > > No matter how many people are smarter than me, fakey, you > > have proven i'm way smarter than you. > > > > What does that make you? <crickley-dickets> > > > You can't even figure out vector summation, because > > > you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math. > > > > I just showed you how to add phasors. You didn't have any > > idea, Sir Dy/dx. Go ahead, solve it with your Euler > > Sooper-Sekrit Sinewave Summation Series. > > > > Can you define 'd' yet? > > > > What's the electronegativity of oxygen? > > > > What's the "fourier transform of a circle"? > > > > What's the RMS value of an RMS sinewave? <crickley-dickets>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <65ba7d4c67cab5eda408af15ce150a9e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564084 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:li7vebtjp9jvjijt8nahq6q3r7e060tluq@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>>> Hi, laughingstock who thinks i need to solve for d in d/dx.
>>> What temperature is the red-body emission from your
>>> blistered ass?
>>> LOL!
>> Oh, you mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)?
> Wooohoooo! Fakey googled a derivative, and now admits i'm
> right, which means: _____ __ _____.
Which means you're desperately trying to divert attention away from
your having defended DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation
for weeks, to include your cowardly snipping out the proof that you've
proven yourself a Mathematical Moron twice in the past week. LOL
> Hint: Fakey is _____. C'mon fakey?
Drop-kicking a cowardly Mathematical Moron. LOL
> A least you're creeping up the IQ ladder, fakey, i have to
> give you credit for that. You must be up to your hawt
> wife's age by now.
>
> Do you know what 'd' means now?
It means you're desperate to divert attention away from the fact that
you proved yourself a Mathematical Moron, and you Google-rape harder
than I do. LOL
> <crickley-dickets>
> <crickley-dickets>
Liar. Do you think your cowardly snipping out that giant whomping
SPNAK! and prok'laming 'victolly' means you've actually won, you
delusional spankard? LOL
I also notice you're running just as fast from all the SPNAK!s you
took, as outlined in my .sig.
Spankard. Coward. Moron. Poltroon. Halfwit. Monobrow.
<snicker>
============================================================
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
<snicker>
===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================
And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."
There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...
<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green
See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.
Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.
In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.
Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.
Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
But wait! It gets even better!
<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
SPNAK!
<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.
I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
SPNAK!
You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
<snicker>
===============================================================
Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
Run, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, run! Bwahahahaaaa!
SPNAK!
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
> What's the electronegativity of oxygen?
Aren't you the moron who k'lames that elemental oxygen has a constant
electronegativity?
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity>
=================================================
As it is usually calculated, electronegativity is not a property of an
atom alone, but rather a property of an atom _in_ _a_ _molecule_.[4]
The property of electronegativity of an atom in a molecule is
different from the electrode potential of the element, which depends
on the difference in free energy of the element in its standard state
and in ionic solution, and it is different from the ionization
potential of the atom, and from its electron affinity; although it is
related to these properties in a general way.
It has been found possible to formulate an electronegativity scale of
the elements by the analysis of the values of delta and delta_umlaut
given by the single-bond energies. In Table 3-6 values of delta_umlaut
are listed for the bonds between nonmetallic atoms whose energies are
given in Table 3-4. These are obtained in the same ways as those in
Table 3-3. It is seen on inspection that the values of delta_umlaut do
not satisfy an additivity relation; they cannot be represented as
differences of terms characteristic of the two atoms in a bond.
However, the square roots of the delta_umlaut values do satisfy
approximately a relation of this sort.
The method just described for formulating the electronegativity scale
cannot be used for the remaining elements in general because of a lack
of knowledge of enthalpies of formation of their compounds as gases
and of the values of single-bond energies for the elements themselves.
Except for nitrogen and oxygen, which are discussed below, the
elements in their standard states do not differ much in energy from
states involving normal single covalent bonds between the atoms.
It is the unusual stability of multiple bonds for oxygen and nitrogen,
stabilizing their normal states, that often leads to negative values
of the enthalpy of formation of substances.
By the use of Equation 3-13 the difference in electronegativity of two
elements can be calculated from the enthalpy of formation of the
compounds formed by them.
Table 3-8: The values given in the table refer to the common oxidation
states of the elements. For some elements variation of the
electronegativity with oxidation number is observed.
[4] Pauling, Linus (1960). Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell
University Press. pp. 88–107. ISBN 0-8014-0333-2.
=================================================
How do you oxidize *oxygen* except with fluorine to figure out its
enthalpy of formation and thus its exact electronegativity, you
fecking *moron*? *No* *one* wants to formulate FOOF (O2F2) to find out
the exact oxidation state of elemental oxygen. You know, FOOF,
Lucifer's Gas? That shit makes *ice* explode. It makes asbestos
*burn*. It reacts with gold. Hit it with a CO2 fire extinguisher, you
just make it mad.
So... your bleating about oxygen's electronegativity means you're
bleating about an approximation, Moron. Even Pauling himself admitted
that elemental electronegativity is an approximation, and thus isn't
all that accurate, which is why he only presented them with single
decimal accuracy. Moron.
Further, oxygen's affinity for itself in forming multiple bonds means
that for a lot of substances, the enthalpy of formation is negative,
thus the electronegativity is dependent upon which substance oxygen is
interacting with and whatever other factors contribute to or detract
from that interaction.
Nitrogen is the same way, nitrogen trichloride isn't unstable because
of weak N-Cl bonds, but rather because nitrogen is constantly trying
to reform into triple-bonded N2, with a negative enthalpy of formation
and thus exothermic reaction of nitrogen trichloride.
You know, Linus Pauling... the guy who developed the first accurate
electronegativity scale for molecules... you think *he* might know a
bit more about electronegativity than a moronic bleatfarting retard
like you, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
SPNAK!
Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
<snicker>
============================================================
Still don't understand that answer, huh, Moron. LOL
> What's the "fourier transform of a circle"?
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>
Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL
<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups,
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT,
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier*
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle
periodic functions."
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."
Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't
it?
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"
Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.
SPNAK!
=========================================================
Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.
Spankard. Moron. LOL
SPNAK!
> What's the RMS value of an RMS sinewave?
Non sequitur. How does one calculate and graph the L-L RMS if one does
not first calculate and graph the L-N RMS in a graphing calculator,
Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 16:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkgzkp.16cfbxe812ijkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564172 |
Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
(Snickerturd) furiously scribbled:
> [460 lines]
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 12:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yeoo9amvtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564175 |
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:39:58 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
> (Snickerturd) furiously scribbled:
>
>> [460 lines]
>
http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564181 |
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:39:58 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Fake Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > > (Snickerturd) furiously scribbled: > > > >> [460 lines] Hmm... my newsreader counted 461. Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better. Spew: ____________________________ > http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv LOL. I wonder if fakey is a meth addict? I bet he's as toothless as emmett.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 06:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c2f89da4c80497b18975c75bb9065938@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564226 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>>> [460 lines]
> Hmm... my newsreader counted 461.
And once again, DildoRider proves he can't count. I am surprised,
though, that *you* got it right, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. I guess
that's why DildoRider is the Mathematical Mega-Moron, whereas you're
only a Mathematical Moron. LOL
> Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the
> lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better.
>
> Spew: ____________________________
Spankard. LOL
>> http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
Translation:
"I'm melting down so badly after FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass
across Usenet again that I'm creating *more* tributes to my Usenet
Lord and Master." LOL!
> LOL. I wonder if fakey is a meth addict?
> I bet he's as toothless as emmett.
Translation:
"FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass so hard I stand amazed at his
ability to copy-n-paste the SPNAK!s I've run away from in the past,
thereby proving that I'm a perpetual coward. Here's some fanfic to
show how butthurt I am."
Bwahahahaaa! Here, Spankard... give your running away another go...
Look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full sprint
from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical Moron.
LOL
SPNAK! #1:
=========================================================
>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard. I realize phasors
> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic. It's not.
> Did you see any complex numbers?
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"
Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
which you'll run away.
=========================================================
SPNAK! #2:
=========================================================
> Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>
> Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
> 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
> right twice per cycle.
Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
<http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
SPNAK!
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
> Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
> right. You can't understand any of it.
Translation:
"I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
<backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
SPNAK!
=========================================================
SPNAK! #3:
=========================================================
Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.
If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
<snicker>
===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================
And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."
There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...
<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green
See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.
Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.
In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.
Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.
Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
But wait! It gets even better!
<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
SPNAK!
<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.
I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
SPNAK!
I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
<snicker>
And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
SPNAK!
You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
<snicker>
===============================================================
Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
SPNAK!
RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!
--
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.
That superposition is the same as wave interference.
That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.
That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.
That RMS isn't a DC voltage.
That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.
That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.
The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.
That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.
What a positive or negative vector is.
That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.
That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".
That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.
What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.
That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.
That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.
That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.
That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.
That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".
That water can be plasmized.
That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.
And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================
SPNAK!
<snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 01:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yepn9rx2tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564391 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:59 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> <news:8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>
>>>>> [460 lines]
>
>> Hmm... my newsreader counted 461.
>
> And once again, DildoRider proves he can't count.
fakey proves that he can't figure out who said what.
> I am surprised,
> though, that *you* got it right, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. I guess
> that's why DildoRider is the Mathematical Mega-Moron, whereas you're
> only a Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
>> Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the
>> lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better.
>>
>> Spew: ____________________________
>
> Spankard. LOL
>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
>
> Translation:
> "I'm melting down so badly after FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass
> across Usenet again that I'm creating *more* tributes to my Usenet
> Lord and Master." LOL!
>
>> LOL. I wonder if fakey is a meth addict?
>> I bet he's as toothless as emmett.
>
> Translation:
> "FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass so hard I stand amazed at his
> ability to copy-n-paste the SPNAK!s I've run away from in the past,
> thereby proving that I'm a perpetual coward. Here's some fanfic to
> show how butthurt I am."
>
> Bwahahahaaa! Here, Spankard... give your running away another go...
>
> Look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full sprint
> from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical Moron.
> LOL
>
> SPNAK! #1:
> =========================================================
>>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>
>> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard. I realize phasors
>> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic. It's not.
>> Did you see any complex numbers?
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
> Formula"
>
> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>
> Euler wrote:
> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
>
> SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
> Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
> which you'll run away.
> =========================================================
>
>
> SPNAK! #2:
> =========================================================
>> Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>>
>> Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
>> 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
>> right twice per cycle.
>
> Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
> <http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
>
>> Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
>> right. You can't understand any of it.
>
> Translation:
> "I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
> understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
>
> SPNAK!
> =========================================================
>
>
> SPNAK! #3:
> =========================================================
> Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
> you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
> a coward and ran away from.
>
> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>
> <snicker>
>
> ===============================================================
> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
> =====================================================
> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
> components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
> =====================================================
>
> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
> this topic...
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>
> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>
> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
> will hopefully understand...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>
> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
> Blue: Red + Green
>
> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>
> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
> equal zero.
>
> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>
> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
> Red and the Green lines.
>
> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
> volts.
>
> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
> that point on the X axis.
>
> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>
> But wait! It gets even better!
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>
> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>
> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>
> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>
> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>
> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
> moronic asses across Usenet.
>
> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>
> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
> formulas used:
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>
> <snicker>
> ===============================================================
>
> Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
> your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b7df84bfd3a191cc6cd69c7b24600dce@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564394 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yepn9rx2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:59 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>> <news:8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>>>>> [460 lines]
>>> Hmm... my newsreader counted 461.
>> And once again, DildoRider proves he can't count.
> fakey proves that he can't figure out who said what.
It was 461 lines, DildoRider. You've just demonstrated that you can't
even count. LOL
>> I am surprised, though, that *you* got it right, Shiny Tinfoil
>> Spankard. I guess that's why DildoRider is the Mathematical
>> Mega-Moron, whereas you're only a Mathematical Moron. LOL
Gee... I guess I *do* know "who said what", DildoRider, you pathetic
backpedaling Mathematical Mega-Moron who can't even count. LOL
>>> Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the
>>> lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better.
>>>
>>> Spew: ____________________________
>> Spankard. LOL
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
>> Translation:
>> "I'm melting down so badly after FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass
>> across Usenet again that I'm creating *more* tributes to my Usenet
>> Lord and Master." LOL!
>>> LOL. I wonder if fakey is a meth addict?
>>> I bet he's as toothless as emmett.
>> Translation:
>> "FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass so hard I stand amazed at his
>> ability to copy-n-paste the SPNAK!s I've run away from in the past,
>> thereby proving that I'm a perpetual coward. Here's some fanfic to
>> show how butthurt I am."
>>
>> Bwahahahaaa! Here, Spankard... give your running away another go...
>>
>> Look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full sprint
>> from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical Moron.
>> LOL
>>
>> SPNAK! #1:
>> =========================================================
>> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>>
>> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard. I realize phasors
>> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic. It's not.
>> > Did you see any complex numbers?
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>> Formula"
>>
>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>> > = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>>
>> Euler wrote:
>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
>>
>> SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
>> Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
>> which you'll run away.
>> =========================================================
>>
>>
>> SPNAK! #2:
>> =========================================================
>> > Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>> >
>> > Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
>> > 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
>> > right twice per cycle.
>>
>> Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
>> <http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
>>
>> > Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
>> > right. You can't understand any of it.
>>
>> Translation:
>> "I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
>> understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
>> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
>>
>> SPNAK!
>> =========================================================
>>
>>
>> SPNAK! #3:
>> =========================================================
>> Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
>> you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>
>> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
>> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
>> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
>> a coward and ran away from.
>>
>> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
>> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
>> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
>> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
>> =====================================================
>> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
>> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
>> components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
>> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
>> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
>> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
>> =====================================================
>>
>> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
>> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
>> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
>> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
>> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
>> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
>> this topic...
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
>> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
>> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>>
>> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>>
>> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
>> will hopefully understand...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>>
>> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
>> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
>> Blue: Red + Green
>>
>> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
>> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
>> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
>> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>>
>> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
>> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
>> equal zero.
>>
>> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>>
>> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
>> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
>> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
>> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
>> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
>> Red and the Green lines.
>>
>> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
>> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
>> volts.
>>
>> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
>> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
>> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
>> that point on the X axis.
>>
>> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>>
>> But wait! It gets even better!
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>>
>> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
>> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
>> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>>
>> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
>> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>>
>> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
>> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
>> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>>
>> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>
>> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
>> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>>
>> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
>> moronic asses across Usenet.
>>
>> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
>> formulas used:
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>>
>> <snicker>
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
>> your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!
Bwahahahaaa! I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard *and* DildoRider (aka
Mathematical Moron and Mathematical Mega-Moron) on the run.
SPNAK!
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 10:32 -0600 |
| Subject | Fakey admits to counting lines in his obsessed way. |
| Message-ID | <vrs2fb9et4utu3gqh01i9pj1dv4q2ivlm0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564504 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:46:55 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> fakey proves that he can't figure out who said what. > >It was 461 lines, DildoRider. You've just demonstrated that you can't >even count. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 13:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yeqkesuwtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564504 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:46:55 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yepn9rx2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:59 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>>> <news:8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>>> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>
>>>>>>> [460 lines]
>
>>>> Hmm... my newsreader counted 461.
>
>>> And once again, DildoRider proves he can't count.
>
>> fakey proves that he can't figure out who said what.
>
> It was 461 lines, DildoRider. You've just demonstrated that you can't
> even count. LOL
i didn't post anything about line counts, dildo.
>
>>> I am surprised, though, that *you* got it right, Shiny Tinfoil
>>> Spankard. I guess that's why DildoRider is the Mathematical
>>> Mega-Moron, whereas you're only a Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
> Gee... I guess I *do* know "who said what", DildoRider, you pathetic
> backpedaling Mathematical Mega-Moron who can't even count. LOL
>
>>>> Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the
>>>> lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better.
>>>>
>>>> Spew: ____________________________
>
>>> Spankard. LOL
>
>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv
>
>>> Translation:
>>> "I'm melting down so badly after FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass
>>> across Usenet again that I'm creating *more* tributes to my Usenet
>>> Lord and Master." LOL!
>
>>>> LOL. I wonder if fakey is a meth addict?
>>>> I bet he's as toothless as emmett.
>
>>> Translation:
>>> "FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass so hard I stand amazed at his
>>> ability to copy-n-paste the SPNAK!s I've run away from in the past,
>>> thereby proving that I'm a perpetual coward. Here's some fanfic to
>>> show how butthurt I am."
>>>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! Here, Spankard... give your running away another go...
>>>
>>> Look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full sprint
>>> from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical Moron.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #1:
>>> =========================================================
>>> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>>>
>>> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard. I realize phasors
>>> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic. It's not.
>>> > Did you see any complex numbers?
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>>> Formula"
>>>
>>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>>> > = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ +
>>> sin(-120°)y^]
>>>
>>> Euler wrote:
>>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
>>>
>>> SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
>>> Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
>>> which you'll run away.
>>> =========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #2:
>>> =========================================================
>>> > Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>>> >
>>> > Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
>>> > 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
>>> > right twice per cycle.
>>>
>>> Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
>>>
>>> > Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
>>> > right. You can't understand any of it.
>>>
>>> Translation:
>>> "I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
>>> understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
>>> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>> =========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #3:
>>> =========================================================
>>> Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
>>> you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
>>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>>
>>> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
>>> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
>>> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
>>> a coward and ran away from.
>>>
>>> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
>>> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
>>> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
>>> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>>>
>>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
>>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
>>> =====================================================
>>> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
>>> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
>>> components by using trigonometry. We can *add* the horizontal
>>> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
>>> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
>>> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
>>> =====================================================
>>>
>>> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
>>> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
>>> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
>>> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
>>> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
>>> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
>>> this topic...
>>>
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
>>> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
>>> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>>>
>>> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>>>
>>> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
>>> will hopefully understand...
>>>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>>>
>>> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
>>> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
>>> Blue: Red + Green
>>>
>>> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
>>> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
>>> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
>>> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>>>
>>> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
>>> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
>>> equal zero.
>>>
>>> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>>>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>>>
>>> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
>>> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
>>> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
>>> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
>>> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
>>> Red and the Green lines.
>>>
>>> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
>>> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
>>> volts.
>>>
>>> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
>>> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
>>> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
>>> that point on the X axis.
>>>
>>> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>>>
>>> But wait! It gets even better!
>>>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>>>
>>> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
>>> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
>>> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>>>
>>> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
>>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
>>> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>>>
>>> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
>>> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
>>> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>>>
>>> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>>
>>> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
>>> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
>>> moronic asses across Usenet.
>>>
>>> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
>>> formulas used:
>>>
>>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
>>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
>>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>>> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>>
>>> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
>>> your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!
>
> Bwahahahaaa! I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard *and* DildoRider (aka
> Mathematical Moron and Mathematical Mega-Moron) on the run.
>
> SPNAK!
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <60e48670a9e4b45e3866b80f06eeb93f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #564537 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yeqkesuwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > i didn't post anything about line counts, dildo. You agreed with Tr!pey old bird buggerer's count, DildoRider. And you being stupid ol' you, you just reiterated your retardation by posting about line count... and getting it *wrong*, TrollTard. LOL SPNAK! on the Mathematical Mega-Moron who can't even count. LOL I do note you're strangely silent on the issue of your kooky sinewave subtraction equation... how many days are you going to cry before you start back in spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves, DildoRider? Yeah, it sucks for you that your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicked your retarded ass all the way across Usenet. Again. But you'll get over it, DildoRider. Don't go committing suicide or anything, now. Look at all you've got to live for... your shitty half-a-house that hasn't even broken even after 15 years of ownership, your pasty spotty stick figure AIDS look, your thoroughly broken libtard brain that's *always* 180 degrees out from reality, and many, many more drop-kicks from your FNVWe in the future. LOL Oh... and my .sig and pre-.sig. You'll always have those to look forward to, DildoRider. <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 03:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yerol6yktm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564701 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:50:57 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yeqkesuwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> i didn't post anything about line counts, dildo.
>
> You agreed with Tr!pey old bird buggerer's count, DildoRider.
no i didn't.
> And you
> being stupid ol' you, you just reiterated your retardation by posting
> about line count... and getting it *wrong*, TrollTard. LOL
>
> SPNAK! on the Mathematical Mega-Moron who can't even count. LOL
>
> I do note you're strangely silent on the issue of your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation... how many days are you going to cry before you
> start back in spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves,
> DildoRider?
>
> Yeah, it sucks for you that your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicked
> your retarded ass all the way across Usenet. Again. But you'll get
> over it, DildoRider. Don't go committing suicide or anything, now.
> Look at all you've got to live for... your shitty half-a-house that
> hasn't even broken even after 15 years of ownership, your pasty spotty
> stick figure AIDS look, your thoroughly broken libtard brain that's
> *always* 180 degrees out from reality, and many, many more drop-kicks
> from your FNVWe in the future. LOL
>
> Oh... and my .sig and pre-.sig. You'll always have those to look
> forward to, DildoRider.
>
> <snicker>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 08:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkk0zc.9ltmqt12mi1crN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564746 |
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:50:57 -0400, Fakey Neighborhood Monkey Spnaker > Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > > <news:op.yeqkesuwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > > into the wood chipper again: > > > >> i didn't post anything about line counts, dildo. > > > > You agreed with Tr!pey old bird buggerer's count, DildoRider. > > no i didn't. > I expect Fakey Neighborhood Monkey Spnaker Ersatzus made a mistake when he read the attributions. It's an easy mistake to make, cut him some slack. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 04:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yerqczshtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564750 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:08:03 -0400, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:50:57 -0400, Fakey Neighborhood Monkey Spnaker
>> Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> >
>> > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> > <news:op.yeqkesuwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> > into the wood chipper again:
>> >
>> >> i didn't post anything about line counts, dildo.
>> >
>> > You agreed with Tr!pey old bird buggerer's count, DildoRider.
>>
>> no i didn't.
>>
>
> I expect Fakey Neighborhood Monkey Spnaker Ersatzus made a mistake
> when he read the attributions. It's an easy mistake to make, cut him
> some slack.
>
you're right. he would cut me some slack, Good Christian that he is...
what was i thinking?
http://i.imgur.com/1UOh8Xq.png
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 06:33 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <8735fb9r4ceej7l8r01lpnekj2slc3fte9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #564701 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:50:57 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Yeah, it sucks for you that your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicked >your retarded ass all the way across Usenet. Again. But you'll get >over it, DildoRider. Don't go committing suicide or anything, now. >Look at all you've got to live for... your shitty half-a-house that >hasn't even broken even after 15 years of ownership, your pasty spotty >stick figure AIDS look, your thoroughly broken libtard brain that's >*always* 180 degrees out from reality, and many, many more drop-kicks >from your FNVWe in the future. LOL Don't forget the broken gable on his flat roof that you claimed to have personally seen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 18:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkj08g.f4ysi71ogjd6rN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564504 |
Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote: > Lines: 333 Only half the Number of the Beast, how disappointing. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 11:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.315b357ef1a3b2098cbb1@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #564591 |
In article <1mkj08g.f4ysi71ogjd6rN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 @gmail.com says... > > Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote: > > > > Lines: 333 > > Only half the Number of the Beast, how disappointing. Yeah, but he can do it for years and years, because he's obsessive that way. It's just too bad he destroyed that race ticket to prove he raced his imaginary Bloatus at a track that was closed. Now nobody will ever believe him. I guess he should have researched said dragstrip before he made that claim, so he wouldn't have gotten busted so easily... Watch this =====> j -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 19:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1mkj0yf.1jf1ukiemcuqN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #564594 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> In article <1mkj08g.f4ysi71ogjd6rN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
>
>
> >
> > Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus
> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Lines: 333
> >
> > Only half the Number of the Beast, how disappointing.
> >
>
> Yeah, but he can do it for years and years, because he's obsessive that
> way. It's just too bad he destroyed that race ticket to prove he raced
> his imaginary Bloatus at a track that was closed. Now nobody will ever
> believe him. I guess he should have researched said dragstrip before he
> made that claim, so he wouldn't have gotten busted so easily...
>
>
> Watch this =====> j
~
I put a joosy wurm on it.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 16:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yeqtajtxtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #564594 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:57:36 -0400, Mustaffa Sheboygan
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <1mkj08g.f4ysi71ogjd6rN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
>
>
>>
>> Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Lines: 333
>>
>> Only half the Number of the Beast, how disappointing.
>
> Yeah, but he can do it for years and years, because he's obsessive that
> way. It's just too bad he destroyed that race ticket to prove he raced
> his imaginary Bloatus at a track that was closed. Now nobody will ever
> believe him. I guess he should have researched said dragstrip before he
> made that claim, so he wouldn't have gotten busted so easily...
>
>
> Watch this =====> j
>
how come in the pic that he posted, the seat is clearly stock and in the
stock position... yet he k'lames that he had to have it modified so that a
300 pound oaf could fit in it and fuck over the weight to power ratio. LOL
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 15:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.315b610c47eb518f98cbb3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #564626 |
In article <op.yeqtajtxtm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says... > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 14:57:36 -0400, Mustaffa Sheboygan > <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > > > In article <1mkj08g.f4ysi71ogjd6rN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2 > > @gmail.com says... > > > > > >> > >> Fake Neighbourhood Mnokey Spnaker Ersatzus > >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> (Snickerturd) wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Lines: 333 > >> > >> Only half the Number of the Beast, how disappointing. > > > > Yeah, but he can do it for years and years, because he's obsessive that > > way. It's just too bad he destroyed that race ticket to prove he raced > > his imaginary Bloatus at a track that was closed. Now nobody will ever > > believe him. I guess he should have researched said dragstrip before he > > made that claim, so he wouldn't have gotten busted so easily... > > > > > > Watch this =====> j > > > > how come in the pic that he posted, the seat is clearly stock and in the > stock position... yet he k'lames that he had to have it modified so that a > 300 pound oaf could fit in it and fuck over the weight to power ratio. LOL Because he's a big fat liar? Do you happen to have that pic? -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web