Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References	(2 earlier) <1mkgzkp.16cfbxe812ijkN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <op.yeoo9amvtm21m2@benson.localhost> <8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> <c2f89da4c80497b18975c75bb9065938@dizum.com> <op.yepn9rx2tm21m2@benson.localhost>
Subject	Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason
Message-ID	<b7df84bfd3a191cc6cd69c7b24600dce@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
Newsgroups	alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yepn9rx2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:59 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>> <news:8uf0fbtffk85a9muvbauigbsnfavs6t6v1@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:

>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1 wrote:

>>>>>> [460 lines]

>>> Hmm... my newsreader counted 461.

>> And once again, DildoRider proves he can't count.

> fakey proves that he can't figure out who said what.

It was 461 lines, DildoRider. You've just demonstrated that you can't
even count. LOL

>> I am surprised, though, that *you* got it right, Shiny Tinfoil
>> Spankard. I guess that's why DildoRider is the Mathematical
>> Mega-Moron, whereas you're only a Mathematical Moron. LOL

Gee... I guess I *do* know "who said what", DildoRider, you pathetic
backpedaling Mathematical Mega-Moron who can't even count. LOL

>>> Fakey, you will now crow that you made us count all the
>>> lines of k00kspew by hand, tho you know better.
>>>
>>> Spew: ____________________________

>> Spankard. LOL

>>>> http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv

>> Translation:
>> "I'm melting down so badly after FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass
>> across Usenet again that I'm creating *more* tributes to my Usenet
>> Lord and Master." LOL!

>>> LOL.  I wonder if fakey is a meth addict?
>>> I bet he's as toothless as emmett.

>> Translation:
>> "FNVWe drop-kicked my retarded ass so hard I stand amazed at his
>> ability to copy-n-paste the SPNAK!s I've run away from in the past,
>> thereby proving that I'm a perpetual coward. Here's some fanfic to
>> show how butthurt I am."
>>
>> Bwahahahaaa! Here, Spankard... give your running away another go...
>>
>> Look at the spankard backpedaling and running away at a full sprint
>> from his having yet again proven himself to be a Mathematical Moron.
>> LOL
>>
>> SPNAK! #1:
>> =========================================================
>> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>>
>> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
>> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
>> > Did you see any complex numbers?
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>> Formula"
>>
>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>> >   = A[cos(0Â°)x^ + sin(0Â°)y^] -A[cos(-120Â°)x^ + sin(-120Â°)y^]
>>
>> Euler wrote:
>> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>
>>
>> SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
>> Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
>> which you'll run away.
>> =========================================================
>>
>>
>> SPNAK! #2:
>> =========================================================
>> > Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
>> >
>> > Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
>> > 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
>> > right twice per cycle.
>>
>> Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
>> <http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?
>>
>> > Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
>> > right.  You can't understand any of it.
>>
>> Translation:
>> "I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't
>> understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal>
>> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"
>>
>> SPNAK!
>> =========================================================
>>
>>
>> SPNAK! #3:
>> =========================================================
>> Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are
>> you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below,
>> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>
>> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
>> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
>> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
>> a coward and ran away from.
>>
>> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
>> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
>> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
>> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
>> =====================================================
>> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
>> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
>> components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal
>> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
>> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
>> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
>> =====================================================
>>
>> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
>> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
>> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
>> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
>> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
>> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
>> this topic...
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
>> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
>> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>>
>> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>>
>> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
>> will hopefully understand...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>>
>> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
>> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
>> Blue: Red + Green
>>
>> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
>> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
>> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
>> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>>
>> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
>> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
>> equal zero.
>>
>> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>>
>> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
>> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
>> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
>> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
>> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
>> Red and the Green lines.
>>
>> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
>> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
>> volts.
>>
>> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
>> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
>> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
>> that point on the X axis.
>>
>> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>>
>> But wait! It gets even better!
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>>
>> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
>> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
>> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>>
>> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
>> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>>
>> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
>> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
>> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>>
>> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>
>> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
>> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>>
>> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
>> moronic asses across Usenet.
>>
>> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
>> formulas used:
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>>
>> <snicker>
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
>> your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!

Bwahahahaaa! I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard *and* DildoRider (aka
Mathematical Moron and Mathematical Mega-Moron) on the run.

SPNAK!

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

Thread

Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 16:58 +0100
  Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 06:45 +0100
    Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 20:19 +0100
      Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 21:10 +0100
        Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 08:56 +0100
          Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:11 +0100
            Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 03:46 +0800
              Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:51 +0000
              Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:50 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 05:51 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:47 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:18 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 17:19 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 16:39 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 12:54 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:11 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 01:30 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
                Fakey admits to counting lines in his obsessed way. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 10:32 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 13:05 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:33 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 08:08 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 04:11 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:33 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:50 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 11:57 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 19:04 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 16:16 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 15:03 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 19:52 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-22 17:47 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:57 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:03 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:30 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 03:38 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:28 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-23 13:50 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 10:57 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 06:57 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 02:20 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-24 00:23 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 03:25 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:06 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 19:39 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-24 17:34 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 06:21 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 01:35 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 17:55 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-25 10:03 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:14 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:13 +0100
                CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 13:25 -0400
                Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:03 -0700
                Re: CHECK OUT FAKEY'S COMPLETE MELTDOWN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 06:43 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-25 14:12 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-25 12:09 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-25 19:16 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-24 08:05 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:34 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:11 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:30 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:30 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:40 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-23 06:31 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-23 09:09 -0700
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 07:36 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:12 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 09:25 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:37 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:40 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 08:58 -0600
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 12:53 -0400
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 05:12 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-23 17:09 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 18:08 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 18:57 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-23 07:04 +0000
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:38 +0800
                Re: Clear Air Turbulence is called Clear Air Turbulence for good reason Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:05 +0100

csiph-web