Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560474 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-08 12:38 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 18:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 131 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 12:38 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 12:54 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:59 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 21:33 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:37 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:47 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:14 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 07:30 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 22:51 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 01:55 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:58 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 11:56 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 04:54 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:52 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:34 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:54 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 22:00 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-10 00:05 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:55 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 23:57 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:04 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 22:19 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:01 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 08:11 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 16:29 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 01:54 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:40 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:44 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:02 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 23:08 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:20 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:03 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:03 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 18:05 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:14 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 11:29 -0700
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 02:13 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 18:52 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:29 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:27 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:54 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 16:00 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 17:16 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-15 19:18 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-16 03:30 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:27 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-10 20:35 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 09:53 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:47 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 20:57 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:49 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 22:11 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:24 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 23:10 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:46 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:16 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 09:03 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 00:52 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:48 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 01:12 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 01:22 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:00 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 21:33 -0700
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 06:32 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:00 -0700
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 08:43 +0100
there is no warmal globing per se noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 12:20 -0700
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:29 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:54 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:30 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 17:39 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:46 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-10 20:40 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 18:46 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:56 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 19:01 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:41 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 06:49 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:38 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:58 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:49 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:34 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 01:45 -0500
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:48 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 01:11 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 23:46 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-14 15:53 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:17 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-14 16:27 +0000
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:51 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 12:42 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:54 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 18:09 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 01:42 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 06:14 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 01:26 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 18:39 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 17:45 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 05:27 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 11:39 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 18:16 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:16 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 05:18 -0400
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 17:29 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:53 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:20 +0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:12 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:11 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:26 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 09:54 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:19 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:03 -0500
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:12 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:25 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 23:30 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 03:31 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 23:31 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:43 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 11:33 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:04 +0100
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:45 -0600
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-09 08:22 -0800
Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 18:22 -0700
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nboi76$e24$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #560698 |
Dne 09/03/2016 v 07:30 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus napsal(a): > Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim? > > The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of > the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. > > The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, > 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. > > Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous > phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar > mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the > same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. > He can as well take water thermodynamic tables, pressure over water and vapour density. and match them in formula ro[kg/m^3]=p.M/R/T where M is effective mean molecular mass. The M will go from about 18 for low temperatures to about 1.05 . 18 for 100 deg C -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nboiv3$fh9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #560705 |
Dne 09/03/2016 v 08:12 Poutnik napsal(a): > > and match them in formula ro[kg/m^3]=p.M/R/T > where M is effective mean molecular mass. > The M will go from about 18 for low temperatures > to about 1.05 . 18 for 100 deg C > That follows general rules of Le Chatelier principle, the equilibrium shifts in direction to act in contrary of change of external conditions. Increases partial water pressure cause dimerization and in small amount trimers or other polymers, following water dimer dissociation constant K(T)=(p[H2O])^2/p[(H2O)2] And this effect is stronger than thermal shift of water dipole dissociation constant. -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 23:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <078f4387-5645-46c1-ab18-efd82f5a2a7b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560705 |
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 11:12:34 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 09/03/2016 v 07:30 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > napsal(a): > > Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim? > > > > The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of > > the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. > > > > The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, > > 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. > > > > Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous > > phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar > > mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the > > same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. > > > He can as well take water thermodynamic tables, > pressure over water and vapour density. > > and match them in formula ro[kg/m^3]=p.M/R/T > where M is effective mean molecular mass. > The M will go from about 18 for low temperatures > to about 1.05 . 18 for 100 deg C Gibberish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 03:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <087d9ff7-ea18-4f77-b1cb-ef0b8b7d4b28@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560708 |
Dne středa 9. března 2016 8:30:29 UTC+1 James McGinn napsal(a): > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 11:12:34 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote: > > Dne 09/03/2016 v 07:30 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > > napsal(a): > > > Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim? > > > > > > The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of > > > the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. > > > > > > The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, > > > 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. > > > > > > Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous > > > phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar > > > mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the > > > same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. > > > > > He can as well take water thermodynamic tables, > > pressure over water and vapour density. > > > > and match them in formula ro[kg/m^3]=p.M/R/T > > where M is effective mean molecular mass. > > The M will go from about 18 for low temperatures > > to about 1.05 . 18 for 100 deg C > > Gibberish. For those with lack of basic theoretical skills, definitely gibberish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 23:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3149711fa48cbf3c98cabe@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560698 |
In article <323719d8a0ffc7eeeb81d09b5da2b252@dizum.com>, FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > James McGinn, in > <news:a678955b-7929-400f-a8c0-a00a4ad0827c@googlegroups.com> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 7:41:03 AM UTC-8, pipp...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > James McGinn: > > Whatever the case, your argument is contrived. You are mixing metaphors and being deceptive. > > > > LipperF: > > Like I said, this is the most direct example I can find of published data showing that moist air is less dense than dry air. > > > > James McGinn: > > There is zero data involving the direct measurement of the weight of moist air versus dry air. Yet meteorologists continue to maintain the BELIEF that moist air is lighter than dry air as THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT IN ALL OF METEOROLOGY'S STORM THEORY. > > > > The fact that this fact is casually dismissed by you and by all meteorologists is all anybody needs to conclude that meteorology is not a real science like physics or chemistry. > > > > LipperF: > > Since air is a fluid, it really doesn't make sense to talk about its weight > > > > James McGinn: > > LOL. It's you meteorologists that assert that weight/buoyancy/convections is what powers all storms. So your words sound funny coming from the mouth of a meteorologist. It's like you don't know what you think from one minute to the next. > > > > LipperF: > > So if there are any publications that address your question directly (by reporting a weight rather than a mass or a density) they are not easy to locate: > > http://www.imeko.org/publications/tc3-2002/IMEKO-TC3-2002-038.pdf > > > > James McGinn: > > As you eluded, your reference is worthless. The details of meteorology's convection model of storm theory are IMPOSSIBLE to locate. Meteorologists don't discuss these details. It is strictly a taboo subject--literally. > > > > You have as much chance to get a meteorologist to discuss the mathematical details of convection as you do getting a priest to discuss the details of the inquisition. > > > > LipperF: > > But since the weight of the sample is directly proportional to the density and the mass of the sample, both of which are reported in the reference(s) above, I find the publications to be thoroughly convincing. > > > > James McGinn: > > I find your claim that the sample is directly proportional to density to be absurd--plainly. And I find the fact that you find this convincing to be evidence that you are not a real scientists and, by association, meteorology is not a real science. > > > > LipperF: > > Nonsense. Meteorologists (as well as physicists, chemists, mathematicians, engineers, etc) spend a considerable amount of time and ink talking about how clouds, dust devils, thunderstorms, winter storms, supercell thunderstorms, monsoons, hurricanes, and tornadoes form. The conceptual and numerical models we use to analyze, simulate, and predict these systems are constantly analyzed for inconsistencies and improved when possible. > > > > James McGinn: > > As you just eluded, meteorology is a conversational science. It's not an empirical science. Listening to you is like listening to two clergy discussing a passage in the bible. Meteorologists make observations. They/you don't do experiments. The basic assumptions of their/your most fundamental models are mathematically absurd/inept. So they/you can't actually solve problems. It's all talk and phoney math used to create the illusion that they/you understand what they/you do not. > > > > Before there was global warming there was meteorology. > > Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim? > > The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of > the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. > > The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, > 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. > > Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous > phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar > mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the > same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. > > The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas > the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP. > > Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh: > 18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase > 28.57 g for air > > Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore > air with water in its gaseous phase in it is lighter than dry air. > > Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its > gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant. > > Ergo, your entire basis of argument is invalid, and you'll be > forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account immediately. > > Now, I'm sure you'll blather something like "that only applies if the > polarity of water is constant, it is not", as you've done in the past, > so let's just destroy that kooky little duck-n-weave right now, shall > we? > > The solvent properties of water depend upon the hydrogen bonding of > water. If the polarity of the water molecule varied, the hydrogen bond > length would vary, and therefore the solvent properties of water would > vary. We know it does not change randomly, only from temperature. > > <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/solacid.gif> > > M. H. Abraham and W. E. Acree Jr., The hydrogen bond properties of > water from 273 K to 573 K; equations for the prediction of gas-water > partition coefficients, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 (2012) 7433-7440. > > The solvent properties of water changing with temperature are > explained by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Jim... a more energetic > environment would cause those hydrogen bonds to be separated more > often, thus affecting the solvent properties as a measure of > temperature, *not* as a result of "variable polarity of water", you > kooktard: > > <http://preparatorychemistry.com/Bishop_solubility_temperature.htm> > > Thus, for any given temperature, the solvent properties of water will > not change, Jim, and thus the polarity of the water molecule does not > change, Jim. It is such a bedrock of all chemical processes involving > water that it can be graphed, as shown above. > > Oh look, proof that the polarity of a water molecule does not change > unless *induced* to do so via application of electric charge: > <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/dielectric_constant.html#polar> > > The only way one can force the polarity of water to vary, given that > the polarization of water is, by definition, its electric dipole > moment density, is to apply an electric field to the water, you > kooktard. > > Thus, if you're going to argue that the change in solvent properties > of water as a result of temperature change is a result of change in > polarity of the water molecule (an utter impossibility, but let's > entertain Jim the Moron for a bit), then according to your kooky > theory, water is an electrocaloric fluid! A change in polarity of the > molecule due to temperature would entail a change in the electric > dipole moment density, thus when that purported polarity change > occurred, your kooky theory says that, by necessity due to the Law of > Conservation of Energy, water *must* give off an electric charge! > > And that, Jim, is just silly. As is your kooky conspiracy theory. As > are you, Jim. > > Your theory has been demolished, Jim. It does not reflect reality, it > cannot reflect reality. > > Now you get to backpedaling, Jim. You backpedal just as hard and fast > as you can... your delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted state demands > that you do so. > > <snicker> Fuck, you're smart! Will you have my baby? -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 19:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <aa72310191f959987fa674bfbaeebb8f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560709 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), socked up as
Mustaffa Sheboygan, in
<news:MPG.3149711fa48cbf3c98cabe@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <323719d8a0ffc7eeeb81d09b5da2b252@dizum.com>,
> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says...
>> James McGinn, in
>> <news:a678955b-7929-400f-a8c0-a00a4ad0827c@googlegroups.com> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>> On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 7:41:03 AM UTC-8, pipp...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> James McGinn:
>>> Whatever the case, your argument is contrived. You are mixing metaphors and being deceptive.
>>>
>>> LipperF:
>>> Like I said, this is the most direct example I can find of published data showing that moist air is less dense than dry air.
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> There is zero data involving the direct measurement of the weight of moist air versus dry air. Yet meteorologists continue to maintain the BELIEF that moist air is lighter than dry air as THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT IN ALL OF METEOROLOGY'S STORM THEORY.
>>>
>>> The fact that this fact is casually dismissed by you and by all meteorologists is all anybody needs to conclude that meteorology is not a real science like physics or chemistry.
>>>
>>> LipperF:
>>> Since air is a fluid, it really doesn't make sense to talk about its weight
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> LOL. It's you meteorologists that assert that weight/buoyancy/convections is what powers all storms. So your words sound funny coming from the mouth of a meteorologist. It's like you don't know what you think from one minute to the next.
>>>
>>> LipperF:
>>> So if there are any publications that address your question directly (by reporting a weight rather than a mass or a density) they are not easy to locate:
>>> http://www.imeko.org/publications/tc3-2002/IMEKO-TC3-2002-038.pdf
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> As you eluded, your reference is worthless. The details of meteorology's convection model of storm theory are IMPOSSIBLE to locate. Meteorologists don't discuss these details. It is strictly a taboo subject--literally.
>>>
>>> You have as much chance to get a meteorologist to discuss the mathematical details of convection as you do getting a priest to discuss the details of the inquisition.
>>>
>>> LipperF:
>>> But since the weight of the sample is directly proportional to the density and the mass of the sample, both of which are reported in the reference(s) above, I find the publications to be thoroughly convincing.
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> I find your claim that the sample is directly proportional to density to be absurd--plainly. And I find the fact that you find this convincing to be evidence that you are not a real scientists and, by association, meteorology is not a real science.
>>>
>>> LipperF:
>>> Nonsense. Meteorologists (as well as physicists, chemists, mathematicians, engineers, etc) spend a considerable amount of time and ink talking about how clouds, dust devils, thunderstorms, winter storms, supercell thunderstorms, monsoons, hurricanes, and tornadoes form. The conceptual and numerical models we use to analyze, simulate, and predict these systems are constantly analyzed for inconsistencies and improved when possible.
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> As you just eluded, meteorology is a conversational science. It's not an empirical science. Listening to you is like listening to two clergy discussing a passage in the bible. Meteorologists make observations. They/you don't do experiments. The basic assumptions of their/your most fundamental models are mathematically absurd/inept. So they/you can't actually solve problems. It's all talk and phoney math used to create the illusion that they/you understand what
> they/you do not.
>>>
>>> Before there was global warming there was meteorology.
>> Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim?
>>
>> The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
>> the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.
>>
>> The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,
>> 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP.
>>
>> Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous
>> phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar
>> mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the
>> same volume of 22.414 liters at STP.
>>
>> The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas
>> the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP.
>>
>> Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh:
>> 18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase
>> 28.57 g for air
>>
>> Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore
>> air with water in its gaseous phase in it is lighter than dry air.
>>
>> Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its
>> gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant.
>>
>> Ergo, your entire basis of argument is invalid, and you'll be
>> forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account immediately.
>>
>> Now, I'm sure you'll blather something like "that only applies if the
>> polarity of water is constant, it is not", as you've done in the past,
>> so let's just destroy that kooky little duck-n-weave right now, shall
>> we?
>>
>> The solvent properties of water depend upon the hydrogen bonding of
>> water. If the polarity of the water molecule varied, the hydrogen bond
>> length would vary, and therefore the solvent properties of water would
>> vary. We know it does not change randomly, only from temperature.
>>
>> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/solacid.gif>
>>
>> M. H. Abraham and W. E. Acree Jr., The hydrogen bond properties of
>> water from 273 K to 573 K; equations for the prediction of gas-water
>> partition coefficients, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 (2012) 7433-7440.
>>
>> The solvent properties of water changing with temperature are
>> explained by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Jim... a more energetic
>> environment would cause those hydrogen bonds to be separated more
>> often, thus affecting the solvent properties as a measure of
>> temperature, *not* as a result of "variable polarity of water", you
>> kooktard:
>>
>> <http://preparatorychemistry.com/Bishop_solubility_temperature.htm>
>>
>> Thus, for any given temperature, the solvent properties of water will
>> not change, Jim, and thus the polarity of the water molecule does not
>> change, Jim. It is such a bedrock of all chemical processes involving
>> water that it can be graphed, as shown above.
>>
>> Oh look, proof that the polarity of a water molecule does not change
>> unless *induced* to do so via application of electric charge:
>> <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/dielectric_constant.html#polar>
>>
>> The only way one can force the polarity of water to vary, given that
>> the polarization of water is, by definition, its electric dipole
>> moment density, is to apply an electric field to the water, you
>> kooktard.
>>
>> Thus, if you're going to argue that the change in solvent properties
>> of water as a result of temperature change is a result of change in
>> polarity of the water molecule (an utter impossibility, but let's
>> entertain Jim the Moron for a bit), then according to your kooky
>> theory, water is an electrocaloric fluid! A change in polarity of the
>> molecule due to temperature would entail a change in the electric
>> dipole moment density, thus when that purported polarity change
>> occurred, your kooky theory says that, by necessity due to the Law of
>> Conservation of Energy, water *must* give off an electric charge!
>>
>> And that, Jim, is just silly. As is your kooky conspiracy theory. As
>> are you, Jim.
>>
>> Your theory has been demolished, Jim. It does not reflect reality, it
>> cannot reflect reality.
>>
>> Now you get to backpedaling, Jim. You backpedal just as hard and fast
>> as you can... your delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted state demands
>> that you do so.
>>
>> <snicker>
>
> Fuck, you're smart! Will you have my baby?
Ah, hell. Chimpy ate up his entire stash of Oxycodone, Neurontin,
Vicodin, Norco, Xanax, N2O, Marijuana, Amphetamine, Ecstasy,
Hydrocodone, Alprazolam and Percocet, wore out his morbidly obese
boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves, and now he's
fagging the place up again.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 11:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.314a1a65d51143a998cad0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #560864 |
In article <aa72310191f959987fa674bfbaeebb8f@dizum.com>, FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx says... > Ah, hell. Chimpy ate up his entire stash of Oxycodone, Neurontin, > Vicodin, Norco, Xanax, N2O, Marijuana, Amphetamine, Ecstasy, > Hydrocodone, Alprazolam and Percocet, wore out his morbidly obese > boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves, and now he's > fagging the place up again. > Dumbass lists the same few drugs by many different names to stretch the truth beyond its breaking limit. Tell me, you disingenuous prick, what's the difference between Norco, Vicodin, and hydrocodone? They're all the same thing with different names. What's the difference between oxycodone and Percocet? How about the difference between Alprazolam and Xanax? So far, you've listed three drugs, only two of which I actually take, and used seven different names. You've also listed marijuana, amphetamine, and Ecstasy... none of which I take, and N2O, which is the gas in a can of whipped cream, and Neurontin, which doesn't get you high. So your list of 12 drugs that you claim I take, actually translates to two... unless you want to count the Neurontin to help you make whatever point you think you're making. Have you ever attempted to have an honest conversation with anyone in your whole pathetic life? -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 05:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <e7b4078ae39e10d85476e2b4ffcd585c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560880 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), socked up as
Mustaffa Sheboygan, in
<news:MPG.314a1a65d51143a998cad0@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <aa72310191f959987fa674bfbaeebb8f@dizum.com>,
> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says...
>> Ah, hell. Chimpy ate up his entire stash of Oxycodone, Neurontin,
>> Vicodin, Norco, Xanax, N2O, Marijuana, Amphetamine, Ecstasy,
>> Hydrocodone, Alprazolam and Percocet, wore out his morbidly obese
>> boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves, and now he's
>> fagging the place up again.
> Dumbass lists the same few drugs by many different names to stretch the
> truth beyond its breaking limit.
I note that Chimpy doesn't deny the part about the morbidly obese
boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves. Chimpy the gay
junkie would much rather be known as gay than a junkie. LOL
> Tell me, you disingenuous prick, what's the difference between Norco,
> Vicodin, and hydrocodone? They're all the same thing with different
> names.
Only a prescription drug-abusing faggot would know that, Chimpy. LOL
Remember, those are all the drugs *you* have described abusing, as
outlined in my .sig. I'll see if I can find your description of that
drug that loosens up your sphincter so your morbidly obese boyfriends
in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves don't get stuck.
<snicker>
> What's the difference between oxycodone and Percocet?
>
> How about the difference between Alprazolam and Xanax?
>
> So far, you've listed three drugs, only two of which I actually take,
> and used seven different names. You've also listed marijuana,
> amphetamine, and Ecstasy... none of which I take, and N2O, which is the
> gas in a can of whipped cream, and Neurontin, which doesn't get you
> high. So your list of 12 drugs that you claim I take, actually
> translates to two... unless you want to count the Neurontin to help you
> make whatever point you think you're making. Have you ever attempted to
> have an honest conversation with anyone in your whole pathetic life?
Translation:
"I'm a bigger junkie than you, so I *win*, for fuck sake!"
Pathetic. Next the gay queer gay fag will k'lame he's won because he
can accurately identify the various strains of fromage fermenting in
the crotchal regions of his morbidly obese boyfriends in pink spandex
and lubed-up boxing gloves.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:45 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <WeOdnUjFp4eVqn3LnZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #560474 |
Two guys who know their meteorology and their climatology, from my institution. ISU professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences Bill Gutowski - Global Climate Change 101 > https://isualumblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/global-climate-change-101/ ISU professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences Eugene S. Takle (ISU) | Outreach Presentations > http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/outreach.html -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 08:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <nbpilq$vug$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #560746 |
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:> > ISU professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences > Bill Gutowski - Global Climate Change 101 > > https://isualumblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/global-climate-change-101/ > > ISU professor of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences > Eugene S. Takle (ISU) | Outreach Presentations >> http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/faculty/takle/outreach.html > > These Two guys who know their meteorology > and their climatology, from my institution. > hanson wrote: ..."your **institution**, not institute, Sam"?... hmmm.... So are you three guys, together, in the same mental ward? Are you 3 sorry mental patient there for Green Hysteria & pathological FUD mastering? What's Takle reaching out for? ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4e6dd46-91a1-4838-9235-5782402e8454@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560474 |
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 12:39:11 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 7:41:03 AM UTC-8, pipp...@gmail.com wrote: > > James McGinn: > Whatever the case, your argument is contrived. You are mixing metaphors and being deceptive. > > LipperF: > Like I said, this is the most direct example I can find of published data showing that moist air is less dense than dry air. > > James McGinn: > There is zero data involving the direct measurement of the weight of moist air versus dry air. Yet meteorologists continue to maintain the BELIEF that moist air is lighter than dry air as THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT IN ALL OF METEOROLOGY'S STORM THEORY. > > The fact that this fact is casually dismissed by you and by all meteorologists is all anybody needs to conclude that meteorology is not a real science like physics or chemistry. > > LipperF: > Since air is a fluid, it really doesn't make sense to talk about its weight > > James McGinn: > LOL. It's you meteorologists that assert that weight/buoyancy/convections is what powers all storms. So your words sound funny coming from the mouth of a meteorologist. It's like you don't know what you think from one minute to the next. > > LipperF: > So if there are any publications that address your question directly (by reporting a weight rather than a mass or a density) they are not easy to locate: > http://www.imeko.org/publications/tc3-2002/IMEKO-TC3-2002-038.pdf > > James McGinn: > As you eluded, your reference is worthless. The details of meteorology's convection model of storm theory are IMPOSSIBLE to locate. Meteorologists don't discuss these details. It is strictly a taboo subject--literally. > > You have as much chance to get a meteorologist to discuss the mathematical details of convection as you do getting a priest to discuss the details of the inquisition. > > LipperF: > But since the weight of the sample is directly proportional to the density and the mass of the sample, both of which are reported in the reference(s) above, I find the publications to be thoroughly convincing. > > James McGinn: > I find your claim that the sample is directly proportional to density to be absurd--plainly. And I find the fact that you find this convincing to be evidence that you are not a real scientists and, by association, meteorology is not a real science. > > LipperF: > Nonsense. Meteorologists (as well as physicists, chemists, mathematicians, engineers, etc) spend a considerable amount of time and ink talking about how clouds, dust devils, thunderstorms, winter storms, supercell thunderstorms, monsoons, hurricanes, and tornadoes form. The conceptual and numerical models we use to analyze, simulate, and predict these systems are constantly analyzed for inconsistencies and improved when possible. > > James McGinn: > As you just eluded, meteorology is a conversational science. It's not an empirical science. Listening to you is like listening to two clergy discussing a passage in the bible. Meteorologists make observations. They/you don't do experiments. The basic assumptions of their/your most fundamental models are mathematically absurd/inept. So they/you can't actually solve problems. It's all talk and phoney math used to create the illusion that they/you understand what they/you do not. > > Before there was global warming there was meteorology.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web