Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562149 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-13 13:42 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-12 09:42 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 161 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 13:42 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-13 16:58 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:14 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-13 20:59 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:06 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:29 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 17:37 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 04:34 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 21:24 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:43 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:12 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 07:07 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 00:37 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 16:24 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 09:32 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-14 12:55 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 19:17 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-14 21:15 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 05:27 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 00:52 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 16:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 17:43 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 05:34 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 11:37 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 17:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:12 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:19 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:06 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 05:32 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 14:16 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 02:08 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:14 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:24 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:44 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:50 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 03:05 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:53 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:51 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 20:31 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:46 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 04:52 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:52 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:56 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:46 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:21 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:12 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:31 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:19 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:45 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 09:36 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 16:34 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 09:26 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:09 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 09:35 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:02 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:17 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:01 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:09 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:46 +0100
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-21 15:38 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 12:57 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:22 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:29 -0400
oinky declareth noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:39 -0700
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:41 -0600
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 05:16 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 21:24 +0000
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 16:20 +0800
Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:56 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:48 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-28 13:23 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-28 15:57 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-18 14:11 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 16:14 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:04 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 06:38 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-18 22:48 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:18 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 06:27 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 21:46 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:07 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 00:39 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 12:51 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 01:03 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:05 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:22 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 10:55 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:02 -0400
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:17 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-01 01:04 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 18:16 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 11:16 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-03-31 12:35 -0500
HOH noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:02 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:36 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:41 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:40 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 19:23 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 12:25 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 21:20 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:04 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 07:14 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:34 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:27 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:47 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:56 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 21:14 +0000
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 05:37 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 15:23 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:25 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:36 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:39 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:46 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:34 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:52 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 17:11 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:09 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 01:12 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 17:16 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:24 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 09:02 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:05 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 17:19 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 04:46 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:18 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-16 23:26 -0500
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 06:43 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:00 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:09 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:35 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:24 +0100
HOH vs OCO noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:52 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 22:57 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:41 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:24 +0800
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:25 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:17 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 22:51 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:56 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 10:00 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 06:58 +0100
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 14:09 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 08:19 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 01:22 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 17:39 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:11 -0700
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:36 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-28 13:22 -0600
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 06:54 +0200
Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 09:42 -0700
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 16:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f5b61dd377a203dd3302bd2bd1dc958d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #562525 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yecntec8tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:27:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
>>
>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
>> non-stop.
>>
>> <snicker>
> "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
> blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
> http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
>
> -
>
> FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
> <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
>
> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>
> Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
> *moron*?
>
> "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
>
> it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
> real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
>
> http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
> "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
> voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
> other:"
> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
>
> http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
>
> on page 2:
>
> ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
> opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
> of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
>
> *COUGH*
> SPNAK!!
>
> -
>
> i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
> art if you ask nicely.
> see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
>
> -
>
> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>
> - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
> /*
> HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
>
> http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
>
> place those files in a directory and save this file as
> snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
>
> compiles with:
>
> gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
>
> run with:
>
> ./a.out
>
> enjoy the LULZ ;)
>
> */
> #include <fprecision.h>
> #include <iostream.h>
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main(){
>
> //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
> //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
>
> float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
> float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
> float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
> ridiculous sinewave mess
> float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
> snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
> float_precision PI;
> PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
>
> // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
> while(sum < snickerPrediction){
>
> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
> +
> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>
> // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
> snickerTurds
> if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
> cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
> }
> t = t+STEP;
> }
> /*
>
> Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
> "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
> reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
> constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
> volts?"
>
> Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
> never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
> That's how stupid you are.
>
> Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
>
> Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
> notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
> summed.
>
> the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
> figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
> still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
> k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
>
> */
> cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
> t <<endl;
> }
> - end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
>
> -
>
> Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
> "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
> rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
> <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
>
> -
>
> Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
> <snicker>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>
> on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
> is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
> can go straight to hell*
>
> *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
>
> -
>
> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
>
> http://cafepress.com/kooktown
>
> http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
>
> -
>
> If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
> containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
> yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
> to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
> information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
>
> if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
> downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
> http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
>
> -
>
> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
> The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
> it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
> or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
> presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
> Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
> before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
> many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
> opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
>
> -
>
> Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
>
> $ perl fakeyBot.pl
> FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
> look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
> bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
> You> Robert Michael Wolfe
> FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
> boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
> Robert. <snicker>
> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
> FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
> Robert> gay sex, mostly...
> FakeyBot> Fag!
>
> (just as useful as the original!)
>
> -
>
> snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
> friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
> <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
> "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
> largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
> the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
> using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
> figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
> while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
> process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
> service. It's not rocket science.
>
> _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
> I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
> get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
> distinct impression was that the "anonymity
> research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
> trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
> kiddie pr0n network.)
>
> That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
> Onymous was just icing on the cake."
>
> -
>
> Golden Killfile, June 2005
> KOTM, November 2006
> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
> AUK Mascot, September 2007
I rest my case. LOL
The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
many months. 150 IQ? LOL
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 17:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yedynbaftm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #562606 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yecntec8tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:27:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
>>>
>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
>>> non-stop.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
>> blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
>> http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
>>
>> -
>>
>> FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
>> <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
>>
>> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>>>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>>>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in
>>>> time:
>>>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>>
>> Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
>> *moron*?
>>
>> "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
>>
>> it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
>> real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
>>
>> http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
>> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
>> "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot†wires, we must
>> subtract
>> voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
>> other:"
>> http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
>>
>> http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
>>
>> on page 2:
>>
>> ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
>> opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
>> of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
>>
>> *COUGH*
>> SPNAK!!
>>
>> -
>>
>> i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in
>> ASCII
>> art if you ask nicely.
>> see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
>>
>> -
>>
>> snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
>>
>> - begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
>> /*
>> HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
>>
>> http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
>>
>> place those files in a directory and save this file as
>> snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
>>
>> compiles with:
>>
>> gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
>>
>> run with:
>>
>> ./a.out
>>
>> enjoy the LULZ ;)
>>
>> */
>> #include <fprecision.h>
>> #include <iostream.h>
>>
>> using namespace std;
>>
>> int main(){
>>
>> //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
>> //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
>>
>> float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
>> float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
>> float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
>> ridiculous sinewave mess
>> float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
>> snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
>> float_precision PI;
>> PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
>>
>> // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand
>> why
>> while(sum < snickerPrediction){
>>
>> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
>> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>> +(float_precision(20)*
>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>> +
>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>>
>> // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
>> snickerTurds
>> if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
>> cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
>> }
>> t = t+STEP;
>> }
>> /*
>>
>> Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
>> "Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
>> reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
>> constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
>> volts?"
>>
>> Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your
>> sinewaves
>> never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
>> That's how stupid you are.
>>
>> Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
>> "I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
>>
>> Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations
>> and
>> notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
>> summed.
>>
>> the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
>> figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
>> still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
>> k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
>>
>> */
>> cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time
>> t=" <<
>> t <<endl;
>> }
>> - end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
>>
>> -
>>
>> Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
>> "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
>> rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
>> <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
>>
>> -
>>
>> Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
>> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> Fag. LOL
>> Idiot. LOL
>> Moron. LOL
>> Tranny. LOL
>> Libtard. LOL
>> Crackhead. LOL
>> GableTard. LOL
>> DildoRider. LOL
>> Bad Musician. LOL
>> Stick Figure. LOL
>> Terrible Liar. LOL
>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
>> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
>>
>> on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
>> is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
>> can go straight to hell*
>>
>> *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
>>
>> -
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
>>
>> http://cafepress.com/kooktown
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
>>
>> -
>>
>> If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From:
>> headers
>> containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
>> yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
>> to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
>> information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
>>
>> if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
>> downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always
>> try:
>> http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
>>
>> -
>>
>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
>> The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority
>> — as
>> it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of
>> subjects
>> or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
>> presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
>> Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their
>> homework
>> before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
>> many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
>> opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
>>
>> -
>>
>> Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
>>
>> $ perl fakeyBot.pl
>> FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk
>> you,
>> look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal
>> harrassing
>> bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
>> You> Robert Michael Wolfe
>> FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16
>> steel-toed
>> boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
>> Robert. <snicker>
>> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
>> FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
>> Robert> gay sex, mostly...
>> FakeyBot> Fag!
>>
>> (just as useful as the original!)
>>
>> -
>>
>> snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
>> friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
>> <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
>> "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
>> largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
>> the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users
>> were
>> using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then
>> we
>> figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
>> while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
>> process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
>> service. It's not rocket science.
>>
>> _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum
>> how
>> I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
>> get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
>> distinct impression was that the "anonymity
>> research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
>> trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
>> kiddie pr0n network.)
>>
>> That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
>> Onymous was just icing on the cake."
>>
>> -
>>
>> Golden Killfile, June 2005
>> KOTM, November 2006
>> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
>> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
>> Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
>> Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
>> Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
>> Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
>> Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
>> Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
>> AUK Mascot, September 2007
>
> I rest my case. LOL
>
> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
> and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
> many months. 150 IQ? LOL
oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 05:34 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <49b0b7587a2fb1776f4ba0fc49ea10d1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #562704 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yedynbaftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker? >>>> >>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat >>>> non-stop. >>>> >>>> <snicker> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating> >> I rest my case. LOL >> >> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency >> and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these >> many months. 150 IQ? LOL > oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25! That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave subtraction equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as: 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage was derived from. 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference between any two phases of 3-phase AC. 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third phase. 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between voltage and apparent power. And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 11:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yefcdisitm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #562769 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yedynbaftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
>>>>>
>>>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
>>>>> non-stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>
> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
>
>>> I rest my case. LOL
>>>
>>> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency
>>> and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
>>> many months. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>> oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
>
> That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation
i don't see any subtraction, k0ok:
http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png
also:
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
> was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
> you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
> should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as:
>
> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
> voltage was derived from.
>
> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>
> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>
> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>
> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>
> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
> between voltage and apparent power.
>
> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 17:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <16769081c5701bd1ed6b69084aeed838@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #562832 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yefcdisitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yedynbaftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker? >>>>>> >>>>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat >>>>>> non-stop. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating> >>>> I rest my case. LOL >>>> >>>> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different frequency >>>> and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these >>>> many months. 150 IQ? LOL >>> oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25! >> That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation > i don't see any subtraction, k0ok: > > http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png > http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave subtraction equation, switches the minus signs to plus signs like the moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees. Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get: 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again: 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL In actuality, the correct answer is: 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees >From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a mathematical moron. LOL SPNAK! > also: Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put on your hip waders. <snicker> > // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: > <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com> > sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision( > sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( > sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( > sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)* > float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + > (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) > + > (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))); > > is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot? Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL >> was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did >> you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it >> should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as: >> >> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS >> voltage was derived from. >> >> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases >> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. >> >> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference >> between any two phases of 3-phase AC. >> >> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* >> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from >> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 >> degrees phase from the remaining third phase. >> >> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of >> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. >> >> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a >> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, >> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you >> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you >> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and >> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 >> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference >> between voltage and apparent power. >> >> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 15:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yefmazzztm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #562845 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:05 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yefcdisitm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:34:45 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.yedynbaftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:52:06 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
>>>>>>> non-stop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snicker>
>
>>> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>
>
>>>>> I rest my case. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different
>>>>> frequency
>>>>> and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, DildoRider. Lo, these
>>>>> many months. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>>>> oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!
>
>>> That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation
>
>> i don't see any subtraction, k0ok:
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
>> http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png
>
> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation
you mean the one that has been used since the discovery of electricity to
compute a voltage difference?
that one?
> , switches the minus signs to plus signs like the
i found it to be a more accurate model of the reality of 2 inverted sine
waves that are present on the phase legs of 120/240 residential
electricity service.
i'm sorry that you were taught contractor "shortcuts" that bypass any true
knowledge of what you are applying the math to.
> moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that
> he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler
> sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
vector summation doesn't plot a graph for me to look at.
> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.
the fuck are you talking about now?
> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get:
> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees
what does that have to do with you denying that the phases of sine waves
on the legs of 120/240 service are inverted and k0okily klaming that to
determine a potential you use addition?
>
> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
according to you you can in sist on adding amplitude vectors of differing
frequency waveforms and get the wrong answer.
>
> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again:
> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees
do you always do incorrect math? o, wait...
>
> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>
> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
>
> In actuality, the correct answer is:
> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees
thanks for clearing that up for yourself.
>
>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a
> mathematical moron. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
>> also:
>
> Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti
> Code
i bet there's a reason that all code looks like spaghetti to you.
> and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put
> on your hip waders.
>
> <snicker>
>
>> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
>> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>> +(float_precision(20)*
>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>> +
>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>>
>> is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?
>
> Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out
> that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
i didn't need to. i figured out the correct answer, unlike you.
>
>>> was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
>>> you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
>>> should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as:
>>>
>>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>>> voltage was derived from.
>>>
>>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
>>> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>>
>>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
>>> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>>>
>>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>>
>>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>>
>>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>>
>>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <e3f97b0a90e438684747bbe8dc03db29@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #562909 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yefmazzztm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:05 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat >>>>>>>> non-stop. >>>> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating> >>>>>> I rest my case. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different >>>>>> frequency and amplitude appears to continue to elude you, >>>>>> DildoRider. Lo, these many months. 150 IQ? LOL >>>>> oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25! >>>> That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did >>>> you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it >>>> should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as: >>> i don't see any subtraction, k0ok: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png >>> http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png >> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation > you mean the one that has been used since the discovery of electricity to > compute a voltage difference? > that one? No, the Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use since 1748 by scientists and engineers, whereas your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for three months by only one thoroughly confused moron. LOL >> , switches the minus signs to plus signs like the > i found it to be a more accurate model of the reality of 2 inverted sine > waves that are present on the phase legs of 120/240 residential > electricity service. "a more accurate model of the reality" LOL That from the moron who gets his stoooopid ass regularly drop-kicked by reality. LOL > i'm sorry that you were taught contractor "shortcuts" that bypass any true > knowledge of what you are applying the math to. "contractor shortcuts" LOL You mean shortcuts such as using the correct equation, you moron? LOL >> moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that >> he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler >> sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL >> >> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass, >> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL > vector summation doesn't plot a graph for me to look at. Still can't figure out vector summation, I see. 150 IQ? LOL >> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of >> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of >> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees. > the fuck are you talking about now? I'm talking about your inability to apply vector summation to even the simplest of examples, two lines of different vector and slope. Once you master that, *then* you can move on to calculating the combined vector and slope of lines that have constantly changing vectors and slopes such as sinewaves. Moron. LOL I'm also talking about the fact that your kooky subtraction equation is wrong. Moron. LOL >> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get: >> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees >> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees > what does that have to do with you denying that the phases of sine waves > on the legs of 120/240 service are inverted and k0okily klaming that to > determine a potential you use addition? We've moved on from split-phase midpoint-neutral to 3-phase AC, DildoRider. You had your stooopid ass kicked hard enough on split-phase midpoint-neutral, so you started spamming bad 3-phase sinewaves, remember? Are you confused, DildoRider? Do you need to take a moment to clear your head of the crack smoke, Cracky McCrackHead? <snicker> >> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can >> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. > according to you you can in sist on adding amplitude vectors of differing > frequency waveforms and get the wrong answer. Wrong. The Euler sinewave summation equation can sum any number of sinewaves of any frequency and amplitude, as the multiple references I've provided prove. That you're *still* to stupid to grasp how to properly sum sinewaves, even after being *given* the correct equation to use, stands as testament to your being Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL >> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again: >> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees >> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees > do you always do incorrect math? o, wait... Bwahahaaa! DildoRider k'lames that completely correct math is "incorrect"... likely because he's a mathematical moron. LOL >> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can >> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation. >> >> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL >> >> In actuality, the correct answer is: >> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees >> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees > thanks for clearing that up for yourself. Don't forget that in so clearing it up, I not only proved that vector summation is the correct mathematical procedure to use, but I also proved your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, and I proved you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a >>> mathematical moron. LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> also: >> Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti >> Code > i bet there's a reason that all code looks like spaghetti to you. Because a talentless mathematical moron wrote it. LOL >> and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put >> on your hip waders. >> >> <snicker> >>> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID: >>> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com> >>> sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision( >>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) >>> +(float_precision(20)* >>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) + >>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) >>> + >>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))); >>> >>> is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot? >> Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out >> that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL > i didn't need to. i figured out the correct answer, unlike you. No, you used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to irrefutably prove yourself a mathematical moron. LOL 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage was derived from. 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference between any two phases of 3-phase AC. 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third phase. 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between voltage and apparent power. And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 16:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3d4becada9775e1b82b5f4e5bf9abda1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #562845 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yeghznswtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > do you find that when you square a sine wave Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, DildoRider. LOL > that all of the negative values disappear and then when you > take the mean For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time sinusoids at 60 Hz. > of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS value? Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and can thus be graphed. <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron and Thoroughly Confused KookTard. <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 13:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.yeha47wptm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #563097 |
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yeghznswtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> do you find that when you square a sine wave
>
> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word,
> DildoRider. LOL
well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to
compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave.
maybe you should graph the mean of a sine wave and tell us it's a sine
wave.
>
>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you
>> take the mean
>
> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time
> sinusoids at 60 Hz.
display purposes? people use RMS to determine whether their circuit will
melt or not when AC voltage is applied. they don't do it for "show",
fakey.
>
>> of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS
>> value?
>
> Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate
> the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC,
RMS is a value, you twit. it's a number. it's not a sine function.
RMS for a triangle (or any shape) wave is computed exactly the same and
it's result is going to be a number.
> and can thus be graphed.
unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of
3-phase which you can't manage to show us?
you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that
summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame.
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave.
you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL
you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal.
> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
looks like someone stole the other sine graph and changed the designation
of "half-cycle", which is correct, to "one cycle", which is profoundly
incorrect.
do you always seek knowledge from the profoundly incorrect?
>
> SPNAK! on Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron and Thoroughly
> Confused KookTard.
>
> <snicker>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 05:32 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <r28meb5d06vlpgi5619kmehjdb1uk4p66o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563130 |
"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > > <news:op.yeghznswtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > > into the wood chipper again: > > > >> do you find that when you square a sine wave > > > > Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, > > DildoRider. LOL > > well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to > compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. > maybe you should graph the mean of a sine wave and tell us it's a sine > wave. > > > > >> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you > >> take the mean > > > > For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time > > sinusoids at 60 Hz. Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. > display purposes? people use RMS to determine whether their circuit will > melt or not when AC voltage is applied. they don't do it for "show", > fakey. > > > > >> of that wave you get a straight horizontal line representing the RMS > >> value? > > > > Wrong. Representing the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate > > the same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, > > RMS is a value, you twit. it's a number. it's not a sine function. > > RMS for a triangle (or any shape) wave is computed exactly the same and > it's result is going to be a number. > > > and can thus be graphed. > > unlike when you are asked to graph the "summation" of two of the legs of > 3-phase which you can't manage to show us? But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... Fakey? > you showed us a graph, but you left out your equation "proving" that > summing sine waves gives a voltage difference, as you klame. > > > <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif> > > someone has computed RMS and then applied it to a sine wave. > > you k'lamed that you had "derived" RMS. LOL > > you don't even know how to compute RMS for any arbitrary AC signal. > > > <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png> > > looks like someone stole the other sine graph and changed the designation > of "half-cycle", which is correct, to "one cycle", which is profoundly > incorrect. Oops!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c61638ed5d1fa871b9496114e97a59e3@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563210 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:r28meb5d06vlpgi5619kmehjdb1uk4p66o@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1: >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> do you find that when you square a sine wave >>> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, >>> DildoRider. LOL >> well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to >> compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. > Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is > a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron. <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL SPNAK! Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? <snicker> >>>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you >>>> take the mean >>> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time >>> sinusoids at 60 Hz. > Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL > But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 > sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with > components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. > > I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... > > Fakey? You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that, or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 14:16 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <ac5nebd8h7ela6i5j87ebn9g6ci8bkjlog@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563286 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1: > > >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >>>> do you find that when you square a sine wave > > >>> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, > >>> DildoRider. LOL > > >> well, except that then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to > >> compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. > > > Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is > > a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. > > Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's > a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron. > > <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> > > Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not evidence of anything. Especially since you are a lying bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine. Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and tell us they are the same. Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what DIFFERENCE means, right? Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then compare that! Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad. > > SPNAK! > > Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? > > <snicker> > > >>>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you > >>>> take the mean > > >>> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time > >>> sinusoids at 60 Hz. > > > Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. > > Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can > follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL Reading isn't your strong suit, is it. > > But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 > > sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. > > MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing > lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook. You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want to retract it now, feel free. > > So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with > > components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. > > > > I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... > > > > Fakey? > > You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that, > or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because > you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real > time. LOL Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired of having to stand while you type your silly posts? Isn't the solution becoming obvious yet? -- "When you superimpose two sine waves of different frequencies, you get components at the sum and difference of the two frequencies. This can be shown by using a *sum* *rule* from trigonometry."˜ --Fakey googles shit he can't understand or verify
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7e6cef657cd9ed165fd5aafe7ec79db5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563301 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:ac5nebd8h7ela6i5j87ebn9g6ci8bkjlog@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1: >>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>> do you find that when you square a sine wave >>>>> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, >>>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>> well, except that Translation: "wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating." LOL! >>>> then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to >>>> compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. >>> Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is >>> a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. >> Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's >> a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron. >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> >> >> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL > That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not > evidence of anything. Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > Especially since you are a lying > bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine. Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL > Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and > tell us they are the same. I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL > Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what > DIFFERENCE means, right? It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL <http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png> Bwahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves yet again that he's taken the Mathematical Moron spot from DildoRider, kicking DildoRider up to Mathematical Mega-Moron. <snicker> > Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then > compare that! > Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know > what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad. Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*. LOL Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing to do with sinewaves? Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact, the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too? <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL SPNAK! >> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? >> >> <snicker> <crickets> LOL! >>>>>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you >>>>>> take the mean >>>>> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time >>>>> sinusoids at 60 Hz. >>> Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. >> Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can >> follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL > Reading isn't your strong suit, is it. Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL >>> But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 >>> sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. >> MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing >> lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you > kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook. You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it the first time... Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive the humiliation of being such a fucking moron. <snicker> > You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want > to retract it now, feel free. Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron. <snicker> >>> So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with >>> components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. >>> >>> I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... >>> >>> Fakey? >> You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that, >> or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because >> you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real >> time. LOL > Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired > of having to stand while you type your silly posts? Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron. > Isn't the solution becoming obvious yet? The solution is for you to stop being such a fucking moron, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. LOL Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 02:08 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <6ifoebt7h3khgjpmokkbmk37uljh25mift@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563404 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > > Fakey wrote: > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1: > > >>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:19:12 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >>>>>> do you find that when you square a sine wave > > >>>>> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, > >>>>> DildoRider. LOL > > >>>> well, except that > > Translation: > "wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating." > LOL! > > >>>> then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to > >>>> compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. > > >>> Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is > >>> a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. > > >> Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's > >> a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron. > >> > >> <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> > >> > >> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL > > > That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not > > evidence of anything. > > Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that > you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL Why are you such an idiot? "Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL. > > Especially since you are a lying > > bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine. > > Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL > > > Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and > > tell us they are the same. > > I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd > said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both > sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL If they are both sinewaves, they must be the same. Sinusoids don't come in a variety of different shapes, fucktard. A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything else is not a sinusoid. Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical properties of sinusoids. You, of course, don't know anything about basic maths, so do continue blathering your silliness. > > Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what > > DIFFERENCE means, right? > > It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly > red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more > stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL > > <http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png> I'll give you credit for obedience to your master, fakey. But why did you put the y axis on the right and then graph it for negative x? And why don't you display the sin and sin^2 functions? In any case, the difference between sin and sin^2 is clearly significant. So thanks again for proving yourself wrong. > > Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then > > compare that! > > Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know > > what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad. > > Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*. > LOL I already know what sines look like. Do your own homework. > Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing > to do with sinewaves? No, i didn't say anything like that. You made that up. > Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact, > the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents What equation? You mean, some equation that you don't understand how to use, and that you never posted? > the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too? > > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> > > Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> > <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> > See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier > transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in > the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL You don't understand anything on that page. It doesn't say a sine is a FT of a circle, or even imply that. You are jumping to conclusions because of your complete ignorance of fourier transforms. I've pointed this out to you several times. You are impervious to clues, so muddle along, sonshine. "a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."... Bwahahahahaaaa!!!!!!!1!!! Good gawd, you're dense. > >>>>>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you > >>>>>> take the mean > > >>>>> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time > >>>>> sinusoids at 60 Hz. > > >>> Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. > > >> Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can > >> follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL > > > Reading isn't your strong suit, is it. > > Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL Is that the best argument you can come up with? Sheesh. What a maroon. > >>> But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 > >>> sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. > > >> MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing > >> lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > > > Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you > > kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook. > > You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure > you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it > the first time... > > Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and > prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a > time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive > the humiliation of being such a fucking moron. Everything in your sig is either disembly, or shit you don't understand. MID away, i can't wait to be embarrassed. > > You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want > > to retract it now, feel free. > > Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made > a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and > difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're > a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron. You said it, tardlet. Now you are expecting me to keep track of the mindless blither-blather you spew all over usenet? If you can't remember what you said, it's your problem and no one else's. It doesn't stop anyone from taking you to task over it. Sux to be you, dunnit? > >>> So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with > >>> components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. > >>> > >>> I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... > >>> > >>> Fakey? > > >> You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that, > >> or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because > >> you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real > >> time. LOL > > > Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired > > of having to stand while you type your silly posts? > > Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane > Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying > backpedaling insane mathematical moron. So you are distancing yourself from what you said. I can't blame you for wanting to "forget" what you said, kooktard. You obviously can't defend it. Are you still afraid to tell us the electronegativity of oxygen? -- "The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector summation of sinusoids. Moron." --Phakster offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi Maths
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 05:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <546fc3827c0f7ba9cd2ca2fe1c8bae33@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563459 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in <news:6ifoebt7h3khgjpmokkbmk37uljh25mift@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in >>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>>>>> do you find that when you square a sine wave >>>>>>> Which creates what, DildoRider? A sine.... go on, complete that word, >>>>>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>>>> well, except that >> Translation: >> "wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating." >> LOL! >>>>>> then when you THEN take the mean of a sine wave to >>>>>> compute your final RMS result the result is undeniably not a sine wave. >>>>> Fakey's trying to coax you into claiming a sin^2 function is >>>>> a sinusoid. It isn't, but fakey can't understand the diff. >>>> Bwaaaahhaaaaahaa! Yet again Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he's >>>> a bleatfarting blither-blathering moron. >>>> >>>> <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> >>>> >>>> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL >>> That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not >>> evidence of anything. >> Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that >> you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > Why are you such an idiot? > > "Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL. <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL >>> Especially since you are a lying >>> bleating kookfart who thinks the RMS of a sine is a sine. >> Awww, the butthurt kook is bleating fanfic and lying again. LOL >>> Do the math, moron. Graph sin(x) and sin^2(x) together and >>> tell us they are the same. >> I didn't say they were the same, that's merely you conflating that I'd >> said they were the same because you're a lying moron. They're both >> sinewaves, which makes you a *wrong* moron. LOL > If they are both sinewaves, they must be the same. Only to morons. LOL > Sinusoids don't come in a variety of different shapes, fucktard. Bwahahaaaa! Moron. <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> "If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"." SPNAK! <http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png> Bwahahaaa! Shiny Tinfoil Brain proves yet again that he's taken the Mathematical Moron spot from DildoRider, kicking DildoRider up to Mathematical Mega-Moron. <snicker> > A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything > else is not a sinusoid. > Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. > Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical > properties of sinusoids. Bwahahahaaa! Moron. > You, of course, don't know anything about basic maths, so do > continue blathering your silliness. You're projecting, Mathematical Moron. LOL >>> Graph the difference between them. Uhmm, you do know what >>> DIFFERENCE means, right? >> It means you're a moron. It also means you'll get foot-stompingly >> red-facedly pissed and blather out more fanfic, more lies, more >> stupidity, and more proof that you're a fucking moron. LOL >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/I5XeT7V.png> > I'll give you credit for obedience to your master, fakey. Translation: "Wuuull... ok, I'm wrong, I'm a mathematical moron. I have no fucking clue what I'm blither-blathering about. I can't even graph sin*x or sin^2*x... but I'm butthurt so I'll keep blither-blathering." Moron. LOL > But why did you put the y axis on the right and then graph > it for negative x? And why don't you display the sin and > sin^2 functions? Translation: "Why didn't you fully kick my stoooopid ass?" <http://i.imgur.com/833nTXg.png> Moron. LOL > In any case, the difference between sin and sin^2 is clearly > significant. So thanks again for proving yourself wrong. Those two *sinusoids* sure look like *sinusoids*. Moron. LOL >>> Better yet, do the fourier transforms of each of them, then >>> compare that! >>> Oh, wait -- you can't do that, because you don't even know >>> what a fourier transform is. Too bad, so sad. >> Says the mathematical moron who can't even properly graph *anything*. >> LOL > I already know what sines look like. Do your own homework. You apparently do not. You claim the two sinusoids of sin*x and sin^2*x are not sinusoids. Moron. LOL And that doesn't address the fact that you're a mathematical moron who can't properly graph *anything*. LOL >> Aren't you the moron who k'lamed that the Fourier equation had nothing >> to do with sinewaves? > No, i didn't say anything like that. You made that up. Liar. Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). SPNAK! on the butthurt backpedaling blither-blathering bleatfarting moronic kooktard who's been reduced to lying as he backpedals, blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves he's a moronic kooktard. LOL >> Then when it was revealed to you that, in fact, >> the equation is known as the Euler-Fourier Equation, and it represents > What equation? You mean, some equation that you don't > understand how to use, and that you never posted? It's been posted many times now, by me, by LunkHead, by Bill Jillians... that you're too fucking stupid to understand it is no one's fault but your own, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL >> the transform of a circle to a sinewave, you denied that, too? >> >> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> >> >> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> >> <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> >> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier >> transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in >> the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL > You don't understand anything on that page. It doesn't say > a sine is a FT of a circle, or even imply that. You are > jumping to conclusions because of your complete ignorance of > fourier transforms. Awww, the kooktard catches himself in his previous lie so he can bleat out his moronity the same as he did last time. <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> "The Fourier Transform takes a specific viewpoint: What if any signal could be filtered into a bunch of circular paths?" "The Fourier Transform is about circular paths (not 1-d sinusoids) and Euler's formula is a clever way to generate one:" "If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"." SPNAK! on Shiny Tinfoil Brain, who yet again backpedals, blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves himself to be Usenet's Mathematical Moron. LOL Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > I've pointed this out to you several times. You are > impervious to clues, so muddle along, sonshine. Translation: "I've been wrong several times. I persist in being wrong. I'm a mathematical moron. I wish I could be right just once." LOL! > "a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."... > Bwahahahahaaaa!!!!!!!1!!! > > Good gawd, you're dense. Look at the backpedaling blither-blathering moron prove he's Usenet's Mathematical Moron! LOL! Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL >>>>>>>> that all of the negative values disappear and then when you >>>>>>>> take the mean >>>>>>> For display purposes only, because humans can't comprehend real-time >>>>>>> sinusoids at 60 Hz. >>>>> Only the stupid ones can't comprehend 60 hz. >>>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain admits he gets go jacked up on crack that he can >>>> follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real time. LOL >>> Reading isn't your strong suit, is it. >> Sanity isn't your strong suit, is it. LOL > Is that the best argument you can come up with? > Sheesh. What a maroon. See above, Mathematical Moron... then get to backpedaling, bleatfarting, blither-blathering and proving yet again that you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron. LOL >>>>> But... but... Fakey told us before that when you add 2 >>>>> sines, you also generate sum and difference frequencies. >>>> MID? No? Awwww, Shiny Tinfoil Brain is reduced to yet again spewing >>>> lies... why are you so butthurt, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL >>> Show me the MIDs where i made the kooky claims that you >>> kookily claim i made in your kooky .sig, kook. >> You really want to embarrass yourself with all that again? You sure >> you want to go through that again? You were pretty embarrassed by it >> the first time... >> >> Ok... I'll update your .sig with the MIDs, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, and >> prove you're a backpedaling lying kook. I'll do it one entry at a >> time, to extend the butthurt you get out of it as you have to relive >> the humiliation of being such a fucking moron. > Everything in your sig is either disembly, or shit you don't > understand. MID away, i can't wait to be embarrassed. Awwww, the shut-in spankard is so pathetic that the only attention he can get is getting his stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet. LOL >>> You made the statement. It's false, of course. If you want >>> to retract it now, feel free. >> Awww, look at the kook backpedal. You made a k'lame of my having made >> a statement "that when you add 2 sines, you also generate sum and >> difference frequencies." (your words). Provide the MID or admit you're >> a lying backpedaling insane mathematical moron. > You said it, tardlet. MID? No? Do you think lying as you backpedal and prove that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron is a good way of "winning, for fuck sake", Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > Now you are expecting me to keep > track of the mindless blither-blather you spew all over > usenet? If you can't remember what you said, it's your > problem and no one else's. It doesn't stop anyone from > taking you to task over it. Awww, look at the kook backpedal away from his lie. You've just destroyed the last tattered shreds of what little credibility you had left, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. You've proven you're a backpedaling lying piece of shit who can't be believed about anything... most especially because you're a fucking moron who doesn't understand much of anything. SPNAK! > Sux to be you, dunnit? And now he's projecting. LOL >>>>> So, if you add 2 60hz sines, you should also end up with >>>>> components at 0 hz (dc) and 120 hz. >>>>> >>>>> I didn't see any DC or 120 hz in fakey's sine plots... >>>>> >>>>> Fakey? >>>> You'll be getting right on providing the MID where I ever said that, >>>> or admit you're a butthurt spankard spewing utter nonsense because >>>> you're so jacked up on crack you can follow a 60 Hz sinewave in real >>>> time. LOL >>> Awww, poor fakey gets ass-booted again. Don't you get tired >>> of having to stand while you type your silly posts? >> Your merely k'laming it doesn't make it so, Lying Backpedaling Insane >> Mathematical Moron. No MID? Oh, you've just proven yourself a lying >> backpedaling insane mathematical moron. > So you are distancing yourself from what you said. > > I can't blame you for wanting to "forget" what you said, > kooktard. You obviously can't defend it. Your k'laming me to be distancing myself from what you k'lame me to have said in no way proves my having said it, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. In light of your utter inability to provide any proof, combined with your having caught yourself in several lies above, you'll be required to provide proof of your contentions or it's a lie from a backpedaling blither-blathering bleatfarting moronic kooktard in the throes of a massive meltdown because you've proven yourself to be Usenet's Mathematical Moron. <snicker> Why are you *so* *stupid* and *butthurt*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > Are you still afraid to tell us the electronegativity of > oxygen? Are you still too stupid to understand the answer that was given, proving you're a moron who is incapable of understanding the answer given, hence your bleating continually for a dumbed-down answer you *can* understand, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > -- > "The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector > summation of sinusoids. Moron." > --Phakster offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi > Maths <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> "The Fourier Transform takes a specific viewpoint: What if any signal could be filtered into a bunch of circular paths?" "The Fourier Transform is about circular paths (not 1-d sinusoids) and Euler's formula is a clever way to generate one:" "If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"." SPNAK! on Shiny Tinfoil Brain, who yet again backpedals, blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves himself to be Usenet's Mathematical Moron. LOL Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 17:14 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <t35qeb5o1at5k8i77neeau3te6b8ffssne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563578 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in > > > Fakey wrote: > >> wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating. LOL! > >>>> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL > > >>> That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not > >>> evidence of anything. > > >> Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that > >> you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL > > > Why are you such an idiot? > > > > "Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL. > > <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> > > Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL 457 lines of blather, and the closest you can come to anything factual is "Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*." LOL. > > A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything > > else is not a sinusoid. > > Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. > > Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical > > properties of sinusoids. > > Bwahahahaaa! Moron. What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ? What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ? They must be the same, right fakazoid? After all, you are the master at deriving things from themselves, no? What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ? What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ? They must be the same, right fakazoid? After all, you computed the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey? -- "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle." --Fakey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 18:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <adaf6ce9b2d471d722ac1261d7b6d6c7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #563602 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:t35qeb5o1at5k8i77neeau3te6b8ffssne@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>>>>> well, except that >>>> Translation: >>>> "wuuuulll... ok, I'm wrong, but I'm butthurt so I'll keep bleating." >>>> LOL! > LOL! I know, right? DildoRider backpedaled and admitted he's Robert Michael Wolfe, Usenet's Mathematical Mega-Moron. Did... did you *not* want to shoot DildoRider in the foot again, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL! >>>>>> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL >>>>> That it "sure looks like a *sinusoid*" to you is not >>>>> evidence of anything. >>>> Except that it's a sinusoid. Why are you so stupid and butthurt that >>>> you're denying reality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL >>> Why are you such an idiot? >>> >>> "Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon. LOL. >> <http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png> >> >> Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL >> >> Why are you so stupid and butthurt that you're denying reality, Shiny >> Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL! And the Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron finally admits defeat. Reality has drop-kicked Shiny Tinfoil Spankard across Usenet. Again. <snicker> >>> A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything >>> else is not a sinusoid. >>> Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. >>> Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical >>> properties of sinusoids. >> Bwahahahaaa! Moron. > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ? > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ? > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL! And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL! And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL SPNAK! > After all, you are the master at deriving things from > themselves, no? > > What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ? > What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ? > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? > > After all, you computed the integral over one period of > [sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey? Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes he did. LOL! SPNAK! Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > -- > "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle." > --Fakey <https://youtu.be/pgzc4aU_HeY?t=110> "The reason that we have these degree designators is because these represent fractions of a full circle, and in fact the sine waves are a manifestation of circular motion, that's why the sine function is sometimes called a circular function." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif> Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> ========================================================= <http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/> See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL <http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf> 2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform> "Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* *transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle periodic functions." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function> You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms> "In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers." Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't it? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms> "Relation with complex exponentials: The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's Formula" Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas. SPNAK! ========================================================= Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you are. Spankard. Moron. LOL SPNAK! Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 02:44 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O |
| Message-ID | <48pteb1ilb3bfc2vf9q6qfqbp8tcjv460k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563655 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > > Fakey wrote: > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > >>> A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything > >>> else is not a sinusoid. > >>> Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. > >>> Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical > >>> properties of sinusoids. > > >> Bwahahahaaa! Moron. > > > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ? > > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ? > > > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? > > Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL! Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right? ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron, mathematical moron? After all your crowing about the higher maths you have mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!? What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to define what + and - mean too? Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait -- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let alone derivatives.) After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your cherry-red ass into next week. > And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard > simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out > how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL! Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need pictures because you can't understand math. Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"? Who was that again?... ?? > And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic > enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL > > SPNAK! > > > After all, you are the master at deriving things from > > themselves, no? > > > > What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ? > > What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ? > > > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? > > > > After all, you computed the integral over one period of > > [sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey? > > Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his > goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes > he did. LOL! Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL! Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are? Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook. > Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet. H,ii? Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon. -- "But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave." --Fakey lectures on trig identities
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-20 11:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O |
| Message-ID | <MPG.315890c37a656a5698cb7d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #563886 |
In article <48pteb1ilb3bfc2vf9q6qfqbp8tcjv460k@4ax.com>, bender@the.future says... > > Fakey wrote: > > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > > > > Fakey wrote: > > > > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > > >>> A sine is a sinusoid. A cosine is a sinusoid. Everything > > >>> else is not a sinusoid. > > >>> Sin^2 and cos^2 are not sinusoids. > > >>> Their shapes are different, and they lack the mathematical > > >>> properties of sinusoids. > > > > >> Bwahahahaaa! Moron. > > > > > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin(x)] ? > > > What's the derivitive d/dx [sin^2(x)] ? > > > > > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? > > > > Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron didn't define 'd'. LOL! > > Fakezoido... say it's not so! You're jesting, right? > ROFL!!! What did you just say about Mathematical Moron, > mathematical moron? > > After all your crowing about the higher maths you have > mastered, are you really so mathematically ignorant that you > don't know what a "derivative" is, and that you don't > understand the universal mathematic notation "d/dx" ?!? > > What next, do you want me to define sin(x)? Do i have to > define what + and - mean too? > > Clue, Ersatziabelle: Google "derivative". How do you > express the derivative of f(x) with respect to x? (Oh, wait > -- you don't express it, because you can't grasp RMS, let > alone derivatives.) > > After google-scouring, come back & blather somekinda gross > misunderstanding of derivatives, so we can re-spank your > cherry-red ass into next week. > > > And he's begging his Usenet Lord and Master to do that hard > > simple-math for him because he's far too retarded to ever figure out > > how to use the desmos.com graphing calculator. LOL! > > Heheh... you HAVE to graph everything, fakey, because you > have no clue how to do simple phasor arithmetic. You need > pictures because you can't understand math. > > Didn't someone just trot out the old saw, "When you only > have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"? > Who was that again?... ?? > > > And he's backpedaling and goalpost-moving because he was moronic > > enough to deny that sin*x and sin^2*x are both sinewaves. LOL > > > > SPNAK! > > > > > After all, you are the master at deriving things from > > > themselves, no? > > > > > > What's the integral over one period of [sin(x)]dx ? > > > What's the integral over one period of [sin^2(x)]dx ? > > > > > > They must be the same, right fakazoid? > > > > > > After all, you computed the integral over one period of > > > [sin^2(x)]dx when you explained RMS, right? fakey? > > > > Did the Mathematical Moron forget to define 'd' before he started his > > goalpost-moving backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering? Yes, yes > > he did. LOL! > > Bwahahahaha! "forget to define 'd'"....... LOL! > Is your face radiating some red-body emission too? Or are > you too stupid to realize how humiliatingly stupid you are? > > Much as i'd like to take credit for spanking you, you're a > self-spanker in the classic mold of the usenet kook. > > > Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > > Yeah, really stupid, fakester... and proud enough of that to > go around broadcasting that ignorance all across usenet. > H,ii? > > Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon. If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious. Poor Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego... -- Mustaffa Sheboygan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 03:05 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Fakey proclaims he's a proudly ignorant mathematical maroon Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O |
| Message-ID | <u1tteb1a8nqi979qkkrjlbclm51ib3gq87@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #563889 |
Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <48pteb1ilb3bfc2vf9q6qfqbp8tcjv460k@4ax.com>, > bender@the.future says... > > > Sheesh. What a maffemagickal looney-maroon. > > If we still had ko0k awards, the outcome would be obvious. Poor > Fakey... a prisoner of his own very trollable ego... In this case, honest to Bob, no trolling was requred. Fakey blundered into it on his own.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web