Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #47560

Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yefmazzztm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:05 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>>>>>> Did you know Pinocchio made a horrible motivational speaker?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I, however, don't suffer that problem. I motivate my kooks to bleat
>>>>>>>> non-stop.

>>>> <snip DildoRider's hundreds of lines of pathetic bleating>

>>>>>> I rest my case. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The necessity of vector summation for sinusoids of different  
>>>>>> frequency and amplitude appears to continue to elude you,
>>>>>> DildoRider. Lo, these many months. 150 IQ? LOL

>>>>> oh, so THAT's how you got the WRONG answer of 2550.25!

>>>> That was an estimate to determine whether your kooky sinewave
>>>> subtraction equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't. Not only did
>>>> you fuck up your equation, your sinewave was 180 degrees from where it
>>>> should have been. Then you went on to blather such stupidity as:

>>> i don't see any subtraction, k0ok:
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/KhXbITQ.png
>>> http://i.imgur.com/R3ufJDo.png

>> Bwahahahaa! DildoRider the Mathematical Moron uses his kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation

> you mean the one that has been used since the discovery of electricity to  
> compute a voltage difference?
> that one?

No, the Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use since 1748
by scientists and engineers, whereas your kooky sinewave subtraction
equation has been in use for three months by only one thoroughly
confused moron. LOL

>> , switches the minus signs to plus signs like the

> i found it to be a more accurate model of the reality of 2 inverted sine  
> waves that are present on the phase legs of 120/240 residential  
> electricity service.

"a more accurate model of the reality" LOL

That from the moron who gets his stoooopid ass regularly drop-kicked
by reality. LOL

> i'm sorry that you were taught contractor "shortcuts" that bypass any true  
> knowledge of what you are applying the math to.

"contractor shortcuts" LOL

You mean shortcuts such as using the correct equation, you moron? LOL

>> moron that he is (again... he's tried this before, signifying that
>> he's clue repellant), and thinks he's talking about the proper Euler
>> sinewave summation equation. 150 IQ? LOL
>>
>> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
>> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL

> vector summation doesn't plot a graph for me to look at.

Still can't figure out vector summation, I see. 150 IQ? LOL

>> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
>> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
>> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.

> the fuck are you talking about now?

I'm talking about your inability to apply vector summation to even the
simplest of examples, two lines of different vector and slope. Once
you master that, *then* you can move on to calculating the combined
vector and slope of lines that have constantly changing vectors and
slopes such as sinewaves. Moron. LOL

I'm also talking about the fact that your kooky subtraction equation
is wrong. Moron. LOL

>> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get:
>> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
>> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees

> what does that have to do with you denying that the phases of sine waves  
> on the legs of 120/240 service are inverted and k0okily klaming that to  
> determine a potential you use addition?

We've moved on from split-phase midpoint-neutral to 3-phase AC,
DildoRider. You had your stooopid ass kicked hard enough on
split-phase midpoint-neutral, so you started spamming bad 3-phase
sinewaves, remember?

Are you confused, DildoRider? Do you need to take a moment to clear
your head of the crack smoke, Cracky McCrackHead?

<snicker>

>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.

> according to you you can in sist on adding amplitude vectors of differing  
> frequency waveforms and get the wrong answer.

Wrong. The Euler sinewave summation equation can sum any number of
sinewaves of any frequency and amplitude, as the multiple references
I've provided prove. That you're *still* to stupid to grasp how to
properly sum sinewaves, even after being *given* the correct equation
to use, stands as testament to your being Robert Michael Wolfe the
Mathematical Moron. LOL

>> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again:
>> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
>> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees

> do you always do incorrect math?  o, wait...

Bwahahaaa! DildoRider k'lames that completely correct math is
"incorrect"... likely because he's a mathematical moron. LOL

>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>>
>> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
>>
>> In actuality, the correct answer is:
>> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
>> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees

> thanks for clearing that up for yourself.

Don't forget that in so clearing it up, I not only proved that vector
summation is the correct mathematical procedure to use, but I also
proved your kooky sinewave subtraction equation is wrong, and I proved
you're a mathematical moron. LOL

>>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that DildoRider is a
>>> mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK!

>>> also:

>> Awww, shit! That silly faggot's gonna start spewing Man-Goo, Spaghetti
>> Code

> i bet there's a reason that all code looks like spaghetti to you.

Because a talentless mathematical moron wrote it. LOL

>> and Bad Sinewaves again! Everybody get out your umbrellas and put
>> on your hip waders.
>>
>> <snicker>

>>> // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
>>> <db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
>>>      sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
>>> sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>> (float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
>>> sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>> (float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
>>> sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
>>> +(float_precision(20)*
>>> float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
>>> (float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
>>> +
>>> (float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
>>>
>>> is it possible that your bird brain needs a reboot?

>> Is it possible you're a mathematical moron? Why can't you figure out
>> that simple Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL

> i didn't need to.  i figured out the correct answer, unlike you.

No, you used your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to irrefutably
prove yourself a mathematical moron. LOL

1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.

2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.

3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.

4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.

5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.

6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.

And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: PSI: Reassessing H2O Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100

csiph-web