Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #555607 > unrolled thread

Hey, DildoRider...

Started byFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
First post2016-02-22 21:05 +0100
Last post2016-02-27 12:22 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 21 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 21:05 +0100
    Re: Hey, DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 13:03 +0800
      Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 21:47 -0800
      Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 08:25 +0100
        Re: Hey, DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:31 -0700
        Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:05 +0100
          Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:49 +0100
            Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 19:35 +0100
              Re: Hey, DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 12:00 -0700
        Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 20:38 -0800
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 23:45 -0500
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 20:49 -0800
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-24 12:03 -0600
              Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 10:12 -0800
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:01 +0100
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 15:21 +0800
              Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 23:31 -0800
                Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-24 12:16 -0600
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 03:29 -0500
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:08 +0100
              Fakey spills his inner thoughts. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:22 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#555607 — Hey, DildoRider...

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-22 21:05 +0100
SubjectHey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<5b46ecbcfe15a88157fde2c2c67d21bf@dizum.com>
<http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>

A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
service.

Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3

Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
Graph #2 (blue): 120.208 volt L2-N RMS
Graph #3: (green): 120.208 volt L3-N RMS
Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
Graph #5: (black): 208.207 volt L2-L3 RMS
Graph #6: (red): 208.207 volt L3-L1 RMS

The 170 volt peak hot legs are the inputs, which result in the 120.208
volt RMS L-N first-resultants as graphed, which result in the 208.207
volt RMS L-L second-resultants as graphed.

SPNAK!

You can't get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to do that, can
you? It just creates a straight line at 150.283974501 volts, which is
*wrong*, because you're a mathematical *moron*.

Bwahahahaaa!

DildoRider can't figure out that Euler sinewave summation equation to
save his pathetic life, but he makes up for it by spamming bad
sinewave after bad sinewave.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that superposition
was the same as wave interference; that wave interference works the
same for standing or traveling waves; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt
RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron
continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

LunkHead is back to backpedaling about "zOMG! Anthroopeermirfock
Gloobaal Waormyng! DDUUUURRRHHH!" and getting his stoooopid ass kicked
over it because he can't seem to wrap his puny little brain around the
Laws of Thermodynamics, nor around reality.

And I'm the *only* one who got the equation to graph properly.

<dances a jig>

Ah, it's good to be the king. Maybe next time you'll think twice about
tangling with somebody smarter than you. Morons. LOL

<snicker, gloat, snicker, gloat, snicker, gloat... snicker>

SPNAK!

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Mathematical Moron. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#555748

FromBite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future>
Date2016-02-23 13:03 +0800
Message-ID<ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com>
In reply to#555607
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
> 
> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
> service.
> 
> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3

But that's not what you graphed.

> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS

That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.

> Graph #2 (blue): 120.208 volt L2-N RMS

120v peak.

> Graph #3: (green): 120.208 volt L3-N RMS

120v peak.

> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

208v peak.

> Graph #5: (black): 208.207 volt L2-L3 RMS

208v peak.

> Graph #6: (red): 208.207 volt L3-L1 RMS

208v peak.

Try again, and again & again.

SPNAK!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555760

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-22 21:47 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.313592317d8e8e8e98c86c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#555748
In article <ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com>, 
bender@the.future says...


> 
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> > <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
> > 
> > A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
> > service.
> > 
> > Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
> > Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
> > Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
> 
> But that's not what you graphed.
> 
> > Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
> 
> That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
> 
> > Graph #2 (blue): 120.208 volt L2-N RMS
> 
> 120v peak.
> 
> > Graph #3: (green): 120.208 volt L3-N RMS
> 
> 120v peak.
> 
> > Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
> 
> 208v peak.
> 
> > Graph #5: (black): 208.207 volt L2-L3 RMS
> 
> 208v peak.
> 
> > Graph #6: (red): 208.207 volt L3-L1 RMS
> 
> 208v peak.
> 
> Try again, and again & again.
> 
> SPNAK!

He dances real good...       *burp*

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555794

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-23 08:25 +0100
Message-ID<9790d42e0ad26e71884beda9114c3c1f@dizum.com>
In reply to#555748
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in 
<news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump head 
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
>> 
>> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
>> service.
>> 
>> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
>> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
>> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3

> But that's not what you graphed.

That's exactly what I graphed.

>> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS

> That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.

No, it's not. You're just a moron.

>> Graph #2 (blue): 120.208 volt L2-N RMS

> 120v peak.

Wrong.

>> Graph #3: (green): 120.208 volt L3-N RMS

> 120v peak.

Wrong.

>> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

> 208v peak.

Wrong.

>> Graph #5: (black): 208.207 volt L2-L3 RMS

> 208v peak.

Wrong.

>> Graph #6: (red): 208.207 volt L3-L1 RMS

> 208v peak.
> 
> Try again, and again & again.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of 
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is 
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given 
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross 
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the 
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for 
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two 
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase 
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron continues to 
demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

> SPNAK!

Moron.

SPNAK!

I've already properly graphed the 170 volt peak of each hot leg, 
graphed along with the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first-resultants and the 
208.207 volt RMS L-L second-resultants, coincidentally 
color-coordinated to show the resultant phase shift due to 
superposition, completely in agreement with the phasor diagram:

<http://www.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/wyedelta.gif>
<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

Input #1, Graph #1 (red): 170v peak, hot leg #1, 0 degree phase
Input #2, Graph #2 (green): 170v peak, hot leg #2, 120 degree phase
Input #3, Graph #3 (purple): 170v peak, hot leg #3, 240 degree phase

1st Resultant #1, Graph #4 (red): 120.208 volt RMS L1-N
1st Resultant #2, Graph #5 (green): 120.208 volt RMS L2-N
1st Resultant #3, Graph #6: (purple): 120.208 volt RMS L3-N
2nd Resultant #1, Graph #7: (red): 208.207 volt RMS L1-L2
2nd Resultant #2, Graph #8: (green): 208.207 volt RMS L2-L3
2nd Resultant #3, Graph #9: (purple): 208.207 volt RMS L3-L1

The 170 volt peak hot legs are the inputs, which result in the 120.208 
volt RMS L-N first-resultants as graphed, which result in the 208.207 
volt RMS L-L second-resultants as graphed.

The voltage of the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first-resultant is Peak 
Voltage / SQRT(2):
170 / 120.208 = 1.41421
170 / SQRT(2) = 120.208
SQRT(2) = 1.41421

The voltage of the 208.207 volt RMS L-L second-resultant is SQRT(3) * 
First Resultant:
208.207 / 120.208 = 1.73205
120.208 * SQRT(3) = 208.20636
SQRT(3) = 1.73205

SPNAK!

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so 
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the 
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius 
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the 
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent 
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the 
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you 
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = 
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is 
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original 
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't 
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend 
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's 
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant 
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral 
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry 
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an 
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor 
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general 
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of 
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is 
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was 
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative 
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects 
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is 
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive 
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the 
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby 
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, 
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon 
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there 
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in 
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of 
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could 
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, 
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature 
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and 
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody 
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow 
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the 
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed 
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven 
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of 
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral 
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how 
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that 
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared 
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate 
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a 
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second 
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same 
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that 
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three 
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a 
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's 
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that 
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555798

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-23 01:31 -0700
Message-ID<876ocb5bob49l6r4pi1msv7kgkvbatelv3@4ax.com>
In reply to#555794
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:25:48 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Euler equation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#555908

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-23 19:05 +0100
Message-ID<a1381ca6d3e17f377f40495068f4f647@dizum.com>
In reply to#555794
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:430pcbdp6pvnd2jk5dp2knqninb9alo58p@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Froups desnecked, Coward.

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> 
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in 
>> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump head 
>> first into the wood chipper again:

>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
>>>> 
>>>> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
>>>> service.
>>>> 
>>>> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
>>>> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
>>>> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3

>>> But that's not what you graphed.

>> That's exactly what I graphed.

>>>> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS

>>> That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.

>> No, it's not. You're just a moron.

> Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v
> ticks?
> Are you a dufus or something?

Yeah, folks, he really is *that* fucking stupid. LOL!

>>>> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

>>> 208v peak.

>> Wrong.

> Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
> +/-200v and 210v ticks?

Moron can't read the label on the sinewave that says "208.207". LOL!

> Are you a dufus or something?
> 
> Do know how to read the tick marks?

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron continues to
demonstrate his inability to read a graph. He's more clueless than
even Chimpy when it comes to electrics.

> Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak

I didn't plot the peak, there was no need. I showed a 170 volt peak
L-N input, which the equations translated to a 120.208 volt RMS L-N,
then to a 208.207 volt RMS L-L. You're just a moron.

> -- 
> "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
>   --Fakey

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>

Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to 
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, 
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as 
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier 
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, 
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* 
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval 
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle 
periodic functions."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of 
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."

Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't 
it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's 
Formula"

Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS 
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.

<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

SPNAK!
=========================================================

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.

Spankard. Moron. LOL

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556138

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-24 06:49 +0100
Message-ID<c2fc75e2d3fb572bd8f93977e920a3d8@dizum.com>
In reply to#555908
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:269pcb5v1tvu2q8i21ppnar42d0u2rm78s@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Froups desnecked, Coward.

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>> <news:430pcbdp6pvnd2jk5dp2knqninb9alo58p@4ax.com> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>

>>>>>> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

>>>>> 208v peak.

>>>> Wrong.

>>> Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
>>> +/-200v and 210v ticks?

>> Moron can't read the label on the sinewave that says "208.207". LOL!

> Exactly.  That's the PEAK voltage.  Not the RMS!
> Hello?  Anyone home???

So your idea of "winning" isn't "be smarter, faster, better", it's
"get your stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet then bleat
'victolly!' because someone paid attention to you". Got it.

You sad sorry stupid sack of shit.

<snicker>

>>> Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak

>> I didn't plot the peak, there was no need. I showed a 170 volt peak
>> L-N input, which the equations translated to a 120.208 volt RMS L-N,
>> then to a 208.207 volt RMS L-L. You're just a moron.

> ROFL!  Can you really be that clueless?

See? You're a moron. It's ok, morons like you are too moronic to keep
yourselves from acting like morons. We understand. But don't think
that will stop me from drop-kicking your moronic ass across Usenet.

<snicker>

> Do you know what "peak" means?

It's apparent that you don't, at least not in this context.

> It means the highest part of the function.

Moron. "Peak voltage" is used to differentiate between the crest
voltage and RMS voltage. Shall I use "crest", or will you start
bleating about the tops of hills?

> Just like a mountain peak is the highest
> place on the mountain.  Just like the peak of your head is
> that pointy thing on top.  Get it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor>
"Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current
or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In
other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a
waveform."

"The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared
(giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the
average power)."

<http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/worksheets/peak-average-and-rms-measurements/>
"We may express quantities of AC voltage and current in terms of peak,
peak-to-peak, average, or RMS."

SPNAK! on the moron who yet again demonstrates he doesn't know much of
anything.

> Sheesh.
> 
> Fakey, do you know that the PEAK of the sine function is 1 ?
> And that its RMS value is 0.707 ?

You mean the maximum amplitude of the sine function is 1, and the
maximum amplitude of its RMS of its maximum amplitude is its maximum
amplitude multiplied by 1/SQRT(2)?

<http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/algtrig/att7/graphvocab.htm>

Do you even know what RMS means? Not the dictionary definition, its
implications in using it and *why* it's maximum amplitude divided by
SQRT(2). If you did, you'd be laughing at DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation and his even kookier k'lame that he's somehow
deriving 120 volts from a 240 volt feed (on the *primary* side of his
magical transformer that can violate Watt's Law, no less), because
what he's describing is a half-wave rectified sinewave to arrive at
120 volts from 240 volts. Thus his kooky equation *cannot* work, it's
mathematically contradictory. He's mathematically *proven* his kooky
equation doesn't work, he's just too stoooopid to realize it.

> Now look at what you graphed.  The highest point of the big
> wave (i'm using words you might understand) is 208v.
> That means its peak value is 208v.
> That means its RMS value is 208v/sqrt(2), or 147v.

No, you're just a moron who doesn't understand much. Thanks for
pointing that out. Again. I see you have no shame in labeling yourself
a moron.

> You totally dont know how to express a 208v RMS sine wave.
> 
> You do it like this:
> 294v * sin(something) --> 294v peak = 208v RMS

That doesn't look anything like a sinewave, moron. That looks like a
moron proving he's a moron. LOL

I graphed the 170 volt *peak* voltage and its 120.208 volt RMS voltage
sinewaves, Moron.

SPNAK!

> Now, be a good little spankee, and do all your graphs all
> over again.  Then come back here for your next lesson.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of 
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is 
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given 
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross 
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the 
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for 
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two 
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase 
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron continues to 
demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

Aren't you the moron who's already demonstrated his inability to 
distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you blathered that the 
graph I'd posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS?

Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
<MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
"You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."

Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the 
difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting 
147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.

SPNAK!

> -- 
> "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
> moron. LOL"
>   --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames 120.208 volts is a peak voltage and not an 
RMS voltage. LOL!

SPNAK! on the moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556256

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-24 19:35 +0100
Message-ID<634d4fc9ba3c64963ce9685a1f67fd1e@dizum.com>
In reply to#556138
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:1kjqcb95f7n2tm2d50kastom0v79ae2hve@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Froups desnecked, Coward.

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>> <news:269pcb5v1tvu2q8i21ppnar42d0u2rm78s@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:
>> 
>> Froups desnecked, Coward.

>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>>>> <news:430pcbdp6pvnd2jk5dp2knqninb9alo58p@4ax.com> did
>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>

>>>>>>>> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

>>>>>>> 208v peak.

>>>>>> Wrong.

>>>>> Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
>>>>> +/-200v and 210v ticks?

>>>> Moron can't read the label on the sinewave that says "208.207". LOL!

>>> Exactly.  That's the PEAK voltage.  Not the RMS!
>>> Hello?  Anyone home???

>> So your idea of "winning" isn't "be smarter, faster, better", it's
>> "get your stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet then bleat
>> 'victolly!' because someone paid attention to you". Got it.
>> 
>> You sad sorry stupid sack of shit.

> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor>
"Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current
or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In
other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a
waveform."

"The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared
(giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the
average power)."

<http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/worksheets/peak-average-and-rms-measurements/>
"We may express quantities of AC voltage and current in terms of peak,
peak-to-peak, average, or RMS."

SPNAK! on the moron who yet again demonstrates he doesn't know much of
anything.

You're the moron who's already demonstrated his inability to
distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you blathered that the
graph I posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
<MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
"You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."

Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the
difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting
147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.

SPNAK!

>>>>> Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak

>>>> I didn't plot the peak, there was no need. I showed a 170 volt peak
>>>> L-N input, which the equations translated to a 120.208 volt RMS L-N,
>>>> then to a 208.207 volt RMS L-L. You're just a moron.

>>> ROFL!  Can you really be that clueless?

>> See? You're a moron. It's ok, morons like you are too moronic to keep

> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.

Says the moron as he projects about his having lost. LOL

>>> Do you know what "peak" means?

>> It's apparent that you don't, at least not in this context.

> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.

I've got the moron repeat-bleating because he lost. LOL

>>> It means the highest part of the function.

>> Moron. "Peak voltage" is used to differentiate between the crest
>> voltage and RMS voltage. Shall I use "crest", or will you start
>> bleating about the tops of hills?

> If "crest" is a word you understand, go ahead and use it.
> You sure don't know what "peak" means.

Sure I do. You've demonstrated that you don't. You lose, Shiny Tinfoil
Brain.

>>> Just like a mountain peak is the highest
>>> place on the mountain.  Just like the peak of your head is
>>> that pointy thing on top.  Get it?

>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor>
>> "Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current
>> or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In
>> other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a
>> waveform."
>> 
>> "The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared
>> (giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the
>> average power)."

> That's great.  It shows you are wrong.
> Peak and RMS are indeed different things.
> But i told you that.

No, you didn't. You're the moron who's already demonstrated his
inability to distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you
blathered that the graph I posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
<MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
"You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."

Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the
difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting
147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.

SPNAK!

>> SPNAK! on the moron who yet again demonstrates he doesn't know much of
>> anything.

<crickets> LOL

You lose, Shiny Tinfoil Brain.

>>> Sheesh.
>>> 
>>> Fakey, do you know that the PEAK of the sine function is 1 ?
>>> And that its RMS value is 0.707 ?

>> You mean the maximum amplitude of the sine function is 1,

> Yes.

>> and the maximum amplitude of its RMS of its maximum amplitude
>> is its maximum amplitude multiplied by 1/SQRT(2)?

> That's getting closer, but your comprehension is lacking.
> 
> "Amplitude" of the RMS doesn't vary with time,

Moron thinks the RMS voltage of a sinewave is constant! Bwahahahaa!

You'll be getting right on graphing this DC "RMS" of an AC waveform,
Shiny TinFoil Brain.

> so it has no min or max.  It's a single, fixed value for any periodic
> function.

See? Shiny Tinfoil Brain just reiterated that he stoooopidly thinks
the RMS voltage of an AC waveform is DC! What a moron! LOL

> v(RMS) = v(peak) / sqrt(2) for all time, for a sinusoid.
> 
> See, you take sin(wt), square it giving sin^2(wt), then use
> some simple calculus (which you can't do) to find the mean
> (that means average, fakey) of that (in v^2, amps^2 or
> whatever), which is 0.5, then take the square root. I know
> you won't understand, so froth away: ________________

Nicely Google-raped, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. Now get right on explaining
why you think (fsvo 'think') the RMS voltage of an AC waveform is DC.

SPNAK!

>> Do you even know what RMS means?

> Glad you asked.  It's a measure of the ability of the
> voltage to do work. ie, it's proportional to the power
> expended.  That's why RMS is also called "effective voltage"
> (or current).

That's the literal definition, not the mathematical one... so you
still don't know why RMS is used on an AC waveform. Likely because
you're a moron.

SPNAK!

> Note that P(out) = V(rms) * I(rms) * cos (theta),
> where theta is the phase ange between voltage & current.
> 
> You won't understand this, of course, so bleat on.

I understand that you spent all night raping Google so you wouldn't
look as stupid as you really are... but that didn't work. You lose,
Shiny Tinfoil Brain.

<snicker>

>> Not the dictionary definition, its implications in using it
>> and *why* it's maximum amplitude divided by SQRT(2).

> Only for a sinusoid.

Which is what we're discussing. Do try to stay on topic. I know it's
difficult for a moron like you, but give it your best shot. LOL

>>   If you did, you'd be laughing at DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation and his even kookier k'lame that he's somehow

> Why?  Your dogwhistle clearly understands what you don't.

The moron k'lames he's half-rectifying 120 volts from 240 volts on the
*primary* of a substation transformer to feed a 120/208 volt
electrical system, that 240 v != 240 v, and that one has to subtract
vectors to arrive at a correct result. What the fuck is it, in your
estimation, that he "understands"?

But then, you're the moron who k'lamed that 4,444,525,800 = 1. LOL

Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
========================================================
> I realize you don't understand the difference between
> frequency and period.  Whatever you think the number means
> is wrong.

You're projecting because you're a moron who doesn't know the
difference between frequency and period. And I'll prove that
contention below. Try not to cry too much. LOL

The period of a sinusoid is the amount of *time* it takes for a
sinusoid to repeat itself. If you are summing the sinusoids, then this
happens the first time that a whole number of each tributary sinusoid
ends at the same time axis, and at the same phase angle as when each
tributary sinusoid started.

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the period was measured in Hz, and
that the resultant would be 4.4 GHz? Yeah... yeah you are.

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the "frequency of the composite sum
is 1 hz."? Yeah... yeah, you are.

Aren't you the *moron* who doesn't understand that the period is the
inverse of the frequency? Yeah... yeah you are.

So you're the *moron* who believes that 4,444,525,800 = 4,400,000,000
= 1.

SPNAK!
========================================================

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; what cross correlation
is; that superposition is the same as wave interference; that wave
interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; that RMS
and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; that 170 volt peak,
120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; that
4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; and the moron continues to demonstrate
his inability to read a graph.

> But please, continue pretending you are winning.

Oh, I am winning. Because I'm right. And you're wrong, because you're
a moron. So you're losing.

<snicker>

>>> Now look at what you graphed.  The highest point of the big
>>> wave (i'm using words you might understand) is 208v.
>>> That means its peak value is 208v.
>>> That means its RMS value is 208v/sqrt(2), or 147v.

>> No, you're just a moron who doesn't understand much. Thanks for
>> pointing that out. Again. I see you have no shame in labeling yourself
>> a moron.

> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.

I note you're still unable to differentiate between peak-to-peak
voltage, peak voltage and RMS voltage... in fact, up above you said
RMS voltage is DC! Likely because you're a moron. That's why you've
lost, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. LOL

>>> You totally dont know how to express a 208v RMS sine wave.
>>> 
>>> You do it like this:
>>> 294v * sin(something) --> 294v peak = 208v RMS

>> That doesn't look anything like a sinewave, moron. That looks like a
>> moron proving he's a moron. LOL

> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.

Says the moron, proving he's a moron. LOL

>> I graphed the 170 volt *peak* voltage and its 120.208 volt RMS voltage
>> sinewaves, Moron.

> No you didn't.  You don't get the concept of "peak", and you
> can't read your own simple-minded graphs.

Yeah, I did. The equations all use the 170 volt peak voltage as the
input.

Of course, you're the moron who's demonstrated that you don't know the
difference between peak voltage, peak-to-peak voltage and RMS voltage.
Likely because you're a moron. LOL

>>> Now, be a good little spankee, and do all your graphs all
>>> over again.  Then come back here for your next lesson.

> Try again, fakey.

Why? I've already done it correctly. You can't.

>> Aren't you the moron who's already demonstrated his inability to 
>> distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you blathered that the 
>> graph I'd posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS?

> Vallor recognized that you graphed 85v RMS, too.  Seems
> everyone is smarter than you.  What a surprise.

Wrong. I graphed the 170 volt peak L-N voltage waveform and its
120.208 volt RMS L-N waveform, from which the 208.207 volt RMS L-L
voltage waveform was graphed. You're just a moron who can't
differentiate between peak voltage, peak-to-peak voltage and RMS
voltage, because you're a moron. LOL

> Try explaining something simple, like the difference between
> i and j.

Now the moron is bragging that he's memorized the alphabet all the way
up to 'j'. LOL!

> -- 
> "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
> moron. LOL"
>   --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames 120.208 volts is a peak voltage and not an 
RMS voltage. LOL!

Of course, Shiny Tinfoil Brain also k'lames RMS voltage of an AC
waveform is DC. He's stoooopid.

SPNAK! on the moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556262

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-24 12:00 -0700
Message-ID<mcvrcbtk53smq0s1uhf36u9dm1vtvdab2l@4ax.com>
In reply to#556256
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:35:32 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Non-response noted.  You lose, fakey.
>
>I've got the moron repeat-bleating because he lost. LOL


Say the attention whore who posts *crickets* every 5 lines.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556113 — Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-23 20:38 -0800
SubjectFakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<MPG.3136d3b6c3cb761898c88e@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#555794
In article <pp5pcbhgp9dc84uqvmcd38v27d9n3ou0hq@4ax.com>, 
bender@the.future says...


> 
> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:00:49 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
> > 
> > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> > >>
> > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
> > >> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> > >> first into the wood chipper again:
> > >>
> > >> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> > >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye electrical
> > >> >> service.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
> > >> >> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
> > >> >> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
> > >>
> > >> > But that's not what you graphed.
> > >>
> > >> That's exactly what I graphed.
> > >>
> > >> >> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
> > >>
> > >> > That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
> > >>
> > >> No, it's not. You're just a moron.
> > >
> > > Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v
> > > ticks?
> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> > 
> > LOL
> > 
> > >
> > >> >> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
> > >>
> > >> > 208v peak.
> > >>
> > >> Wrong.
> > >
> > > Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
> > > +/-200v and 210v ticks?
> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> > >
> > > Do know how to read the tick marks?
> > 
> > "WHO PUT THESE TICK MARKS ON MY GRAPH!!!???"
> > 
> > >
> > > Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak
> > >
> > 
> > hmm... 208 * sqrt(2)?
> > 
> > WHOOPS fakey fucked up, but now he's backpedaling in another thread.
> > 
> > i wonder if he'll ever convince anybody that he has a working  
> > understanding of any of the bullshit that he google dives for all day.   
> > <--- NOTE: not a question.
> 
> I don't think there are more than half a dozen people who
> even care.  But fakey is a surprisingly obliging kook.
> Narcissism, megalomania, paranoia, all the klassic
> koooksigns.
> 
> I never paid much attention to the threads about him before.
> I only knew he was a blowhard.  Do you think he's a shut-in
> who has no life outside the net?

I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a 
chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his 
perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally 
superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to 
have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't 
let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to 
invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality 
disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if 
he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an 
overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey 
Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior... 
something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday 
he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.

That's it in a "nut" shell...

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556114 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-02-23 23:45 -0500
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<op.ydbl5hp4tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#556113
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:38:54 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1  
<Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:

> In article <pp5pcbhgp9dc84uqvmcd38v27d9n3ou0hq@4ax.com>,
> bender@the.future says...
>
>
>>
>> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:00:49 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> > >>
>> > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>> > >> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump  
>> head
>> > >> first into the wood chipper again:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> > >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye  
>> electrical
>> > >> >> service.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
>> > >> >> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
>> > >> >> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
>> > >>
>> > >> > But that's not what you graphed.
>> > >>
>> > >> That's exactly what I graphed.
>> > >>
>> > >> >> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
>> > >>
>> > >> > That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
>> > >>
>> > >> No, it's not. You're just a moron.
>> > >
>> > > Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v
>> > > ticks?
>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
>> >
>> > LOL
>> >
>> > >
>> > >> >> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
>> > >>
>> > >> > 208v peak.
>> > >>
>> > >> Wrong.
>> > >
>> > > Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
>> > > +/-200v and 210v ticks?
>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
>> > >
>> > > Do know how to read the tick marks?
>> >
>> > "WHO PUT THESE TICK MARKS ON MY GRAPH!!!???"
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak
>> > >
>> >
>> > hmm... 208 * sqrt(2)?
>> >
>> > WHOOPS fakey fucked up, but now he's backpedaling in another thread.
>> >
>> > i wonder if he'll ever convince anybody that he has a working
>> > understanding of any of the bullshit that he google dives for all day.
>> > <--- NOTE: not a question.
>>
>> I don't think there are more than half a dozen people who
>> even care.  But fakey is a surprisingly obliging kook.
>> Narcissism, megalomania, paranoia, all the klassic
>> koooksigns.
>>
>> I never paid much attention to the threads about him before.
>> I only knew he was a blowhard.  Do you think he's a shut-in
>> who has no life outside the net?
>
> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a
> chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to
> have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't
> let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to
> invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality
> disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if
> he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an
> overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey
> Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior...
> something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday
> he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
>
> That's it in a "nut" shell...
>

there was that time his dad took all of his games away:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKBxOR4uuiA

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556116 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-23 20:49 -0800
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<MPG.3136d6395dc00fc98c896@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#556114
In article <op.ydbl5hp4tm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...


> 
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:38:54 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1
> <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> 
> > In article <pp5pcbhgp9dc84uqvmcd38v27d9n3ou0hq@4ax.com>,
> > bender@the.future says...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
> >> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
> >> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:00:49 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> >> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >> > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
> >> > >> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump
> >> head
> >> > >> first into the wood chipper again:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >> > >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye
> >> electrical
> >> > >> >> service.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1
> >> > >> >> Input #2: 170 volt peak, hot leg #2
> >> > >> >> Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > But that's not what you graphed.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> That's exactly what I graphed.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> No, it's not. You're just a moron.
> >> > >
> >> > > Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v
> >> > > ticks?
> >> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> >> >
> >> > LOL
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >> >> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > 208v peak.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Wrong.
> >> > >
> >> > > Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
> >> > > +/-200v and 210v ticks?
> >> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> >> > >
> >> > > Do know how to read the tick marks?
> >> >
> >> > "WHO PUT THESE TICK MARKS ON MY GRAPH!!!???"
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > hmm... 208 * sqrt(2)?
> >> >
> >> > WHOOPS fakey fucked up, but now he's backpedaling in another thread.
> >> >
> >> > i wonder if he'll ever convince anybody that he has a working
> >> > understanding of any of the bullshit that he google dives for all day.
> >> > <--- NOTE: not a question.
> >>
> >> I don't think there are more than half a dozen people who
> >> even care.  But fakey is a surprisingly obliging kook.
> >> Narcissism, megalomania, paranoia, all the klassic
> >> koooksigns.
> >>
> >> I never paid much attention to the threads about him before.
> >> I only knew he was a blowhard.  Do you think he's a shut-in
> >> who has no life outside the net?
> >
> > I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a
> > chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
> > perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
> > superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to
> > have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't
> > let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to
> > invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality
> > disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if
> > he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an
> > overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey
> > Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior...
> > something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday
> > he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
> >
> > That's it in a "nut" shell...
> >
> 
> there was that time his dad took all of his games away:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKBxOR4uuiA

Then there was that time... in Band Camp... when he had his way with a 
piccolo.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556237 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-24 12:03 -0600
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<aumdnbaLOev8bVDLnZ2dnUU7-Ye88_jq@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#556114
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:45:07 -0500, \"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living
at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:38:54 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1
> <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> 
>> In article <pp5pcbhgp9dc84uqvmcd38v27d9n3ou0hq@4ax.com>,
>> bender@the.future says...
>>
>>
>>
>>> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
>>> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton
>>> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:00:49 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>>> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>> > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>>> > >> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump
>>> head
>>> > >> first into the wood chipper again:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>>> > >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye
>>> electrical
>>> > >> >> service.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1 Input #2: 170 volt peak,
>>> > >> >> hot leg #2 Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > But that's not what you graphed.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> That's exactly what I graphed.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> >> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> No, it's not. You're just a moron.
>>> > >
>>> > > Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v ticks?
>>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
>>> >
>>> > LOL
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >> >> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > 208v peak.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Wrong.
>>> > >
>>> > > Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the +/-200v
>>> > > and 210v ticks?
>>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
>>> > >
>>> > > Do know how to read the tick marks?
>>> >
>>> > "WHO PUT THESE TICK MARKS ON MY GRAPH!!!???"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > hmm... 208 * sqrt(2)?
>>> >
>>> > WHOOPS fakey fucked up, but now he's backpedaling in another thread.
>>> >
>>> > i wonder if he'll ever convince anybody that he has a working
>>> > understanding of any of the bullshit that he google dives for all
>>> > day.
>>> > <--- NOTE: not a question.
>>>
>>> I don't think there are more than half a dozen people who even care. 
>>> But fakey is a surprisingly obliging kook. Narcissism, megalomania,
>>> paranoia, all the klassic koooksigns.
>>>
>>> I never paid much attention to the threads about him before.
>>> I only knew he was a blowhard.  Do you think he's a shut-in who has no
>>> life outside the net?
>>
>> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and
>> a chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
>> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
>> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has
>> to have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego
>> won't let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets
>> to invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his
>> personality disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix
>> something if he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict
>> parents, and an overbearing father who expected perfection from him at
>> all times.  Fakey Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from
>> Fakey Junior... something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad,
>> but someday he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad
>> way.
>>
>> That's it in a "nut" shell...
>>
>>
> there was that time his dad took all of his games away:
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKBxOR4uuiA

Hilarious!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556244 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-24 10:12 -0800
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<MPG.31379283fb67125398c8a6@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#556237
In article <aumdnbaLOev8bVDLnZ2dnUU7-Ye88_jq@scnresearch.com>, 
pandora@peak.org says...


> 
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:45:07 -0500, \"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living
> at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as
> 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:38:54 -0500, Checkmate, DoW #1
> > <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> > 
> >> In article <pp5pcbhgp9dc84uqvmcd38v27d9n3ou0hq@4ax.com>,
> >> bender@the.future says...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
> >>> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton
> >>> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:00:49 -0500, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> >>> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >>> > > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
> >>> > >> <news:ropncbl1m7meefmlflomjdosejio4c4t8m@4ax.com> did thusly jump
> >>> head
> >>> > >> first into the wood chipper again:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> >>> > >> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> >> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> A properly graphed example of 120/208 volt 3-phase wye
> >>> electrical
> >>> > >> >> service.
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> Input #1: 170 volt peak, hot leg #1 Input #2: 170 volt peak,
> >>> > >> >> hot leg #2 Input #3: 170 volt peak, hot leg #3
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > But that's not what you graphed.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> That's exactly what I graphed.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> >> Graph #1 (red): 120.208 volt L1-N RMS
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > That's 120v peak.  Not RMS.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> No, it's not. You're just a moron.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Then why does the little red sine wave peak at the +/-120v ticks?
> >>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> >>> >
> >>> > LOL
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > >> >> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > 208v peak.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Wrong.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the +/-200v
> >>> > > and 210v ticks?
> >>> > > Are you a dufus or something?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Do know how to read the tick marks?
> >>> >
> >>> > "WHO PUT THESE TICK MARKS ON MY GRAPH!!!???"
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > hmm... 208 * sqrt(2)?
> >>> >
> >>> > WHOOPS fakey fucked up, but now he's backpedaling in another thread.
> >>> >
> >>> > i wonder if he'll ever convince anybody that he has a working
> >>> > understanding of any of the bullshit that he google dives for all
> >>> > day.
> >>> > <--- NOTE: not a question.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think there are more than half a dozen people who even care. 
> >>> But fakey is a surprisingly obliging kook. Narcissism, megalomania,
> >>> paranoia, all the klassic koooksigns.
> >>>
> >>> I never paid much attention to the threads about him before.
> >>> I only knew he was a blowhard.  Do you think he's a shut-in who has no
> >>> life outside the net?
> >>
> >> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and
> >> a chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
> >> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
> >> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has
> >> to have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego
> >> won't let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets
> >> to invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his
> >> personality disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix
> >> something if he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict
> >> parents, and an overbearing father who expected perfection from him at
> >> all times.  Fakey Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from
> >> Fakey Junior... something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad,
> >> but someday he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad
> >> way.
> >>
> >> That's it in a "nut" shell...
> >>
> >>
> > there was that time his dad took all of his games away:
> > 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKBxOR4uuiA
> 
> Hilarious!

I know!  There's nothing like a good meltdown from a self-absorbed 
little brat!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556143 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-24 07:01 +0100
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<13c698d86da905d0ce321edde9476f7a@dizum.com>
In reply to#556113
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.3136d3b6c3cb761898c88e@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:

> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a 
> chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his 
> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally 
> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to 
> have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't 
> let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to 
> invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality 
> disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if 
> he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an 
> overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey 
> Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior... 
> something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday 
> he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
> 
> That's it in a "nut" shell...

Translation:
"For the second time... BBBBBLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAAATTTTTT!!!"

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.

<snicker>

-- 

FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."

In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>

In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>

Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>

Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>

Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet

Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"

Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"

MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."

Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."

MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"

Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."

MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."

Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"

MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."

MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."

MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."

MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."

MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"

MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."

MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."

MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."

MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL

MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL

MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL

Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================

What a FAG!

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!

<snicker>

/\                  Properly known as Bill
  \    /\      The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
   \  /  \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
    \/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.

databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.

Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556154 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

FromBite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future>
Date2016-02-24 15:21 +0800
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<pfmqcb57216sth43cernvj4ve0mvtsulu4@4ax.com>
In reply to#556143
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
> <news:MPG.3136d3b6c3cb761898c88e@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
> head first into the wood chipper again:
> 
> > I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a 
> > chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his 
> > perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally 
> > superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to 
> > have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't 
> > let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to 
> > invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality 
> > disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if 
> > he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an 
> > overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey 
> > Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior... 
> > something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday 
> > he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
> > 
> > That's it in a "nut" shell...
> 
> Translation:
> "For the second time... BBBBBLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAAATTTTTT!!!"
> 
> Melt, Chimpy, melt.
> Froth, Chimpy, froth.
> Dance, Chimpy, dance!
> Muahahaha, etc.
> 
> <snicker>

Is that the best you can do?

-- 
"The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
moron. LOL"
  --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556156 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-23 23:31 -0800
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<MPG.3136fc47ae3b9b7a98c89f@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#556154
In article <pfmqcb57216sth43cernvj4ve0mvtsulu4@4ax.com>, 
bender@the.future says...


> 
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> > 
> > Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
> > Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
> > <news:MPG.3136d3b6c3cb761898c88e@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
> > head first into the wood chipper again:
> > 
> > > I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a 
> > > chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his 
> > > perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally 
> > > superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to 
> > > have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't 
> > > let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to 
> > > invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality 
> > > disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if 
> > > he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an 
> > > overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey 
> > > Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior... 
> > > something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday 
> > > he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
> > > 
> > > That's it in a "nut" shell...
> > 
> > Translation:
> > "For the second time... BBBBBLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAAATTTTTT!!!"
> > 
> > Melt, Chimpy, melt.
> > Froth, Chimpy, froth.
> > Dance, Chimpy, dance!
> > Muahahaha, etc.
> > 
> > <snicker>
> 
> Is that the best you can do?

Fakey's deliberate nonresponse is his tacit admission that my diagnosis 
of his mental aberrations is correct.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#556249 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

Frompandora <pandora@peak.org>
Date2016-02-24 12:16 -0600
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<aumdnbCLOevoblDLnZ2dnUU7-Ye88_jq@scnresearch.com>
In reply to#556156
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:31:56 -0800, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> In article <pfmqcb57216sth43cernvj4ve0mvtsulu4@4ax.com>,
> bender@the.future says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> > 
>> > Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
>> > Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
>> > <news:MPG.3136d3b6c3cb761898c88e@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
>> > head first into the wood chipper again:
>> > 
>> > > I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac,
>> > > and a chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to
>> > > "defeat" his perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels
>> > > is mentally superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial
>> > > way.  Always has to have the last word, never admits he's wrong
>> > > because his giant ego won't let him.  Socially dysfunctional in
>> > > real life.  On Usenet he gets to invent the life he wishes he had,
>> > > but never will, due to his personality disorder(s) that he refuses
>> > > to acknowledge... he can't fix something if he refuses to admit
>> > > it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an overbearing
>> > > father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey Senior
>> > > didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior...
>> > > something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday
>> > > he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.
>> > > 
>> > > That's it in a "nut" shell...
>> > 
>> > Translation:
>> > "For the second time... BBBBBLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEAAAAATTTTTT!!!"
>> > 
>> > Melt, Chimpy, melt.
>> > Froth, Chimpy, froth.
>> > Dance, Chimpy, dance!
>> > Muahahaha, etc.
>> > 
>> > <snicker>
>> 
>> Is that the best you can do?
> 
> Fakey's deliberate nonresponse is his tacit admission that my diagnosis
> of his mental aberrations is correct.

Indeed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#557158 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-27 03:29 -0500
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<narmp0$cue$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#556113
On 23/02/2016 11:38 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a
> chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to
> have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't
> let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to
> invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality
> disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if
> he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an
> overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey
> Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior...
> something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday
> he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.

I've got a Bobo trophy waiting here with his name already engraved on 
the base, just waiting for the day when that happens so it can be duly 
awarded to him...

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#557298 — Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-27 20:08 +0100
SubjectRe: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider...
Message-ID<aba2ffebd3df94702fee78603adb8899@dizum.com>
In reply to#557158
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:narmp0$cue$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 23/02/2016 11:38 PM, Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman
> (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate
> The PickleTickler) wrote:

>> I've profiled him before.  Definitely a narcissistic megalomaniac, and a
>> chronic liar.  Also not above using dishonest means to "defeat" his
>> perceived enemies, which includes anyone that he feels is mentally
>> superior to him and has slighted him in some trivial way.  Always has to
>> have the last word, never admits he's wrong because his giant ego won't
>> let him.  Socially dysfunctional in real life.  On Usenet he gets to
>> invent the life he wishes he had, but never will, due to his personality
>> disorder(s) that he refuses to acknowledge... he can't fix something if
>> he refuses to admit it's broken.  He had overly strict parents, and an
>> overbearing father who expected perfection from him at all times.  Fakey
>> Senior didn't tolerate anything but perfection from Fakey Junior...
>> something that Junior had a hard time delivering.  Sad, but someday
>> he'll really snap, and make the evening news in a very bad way.

Translation:
"My Usenet Lord and Master kicked my ass! He kicked my ass good! Look
at my tears! I haven't stopped crying for years! My poor fragile
little psyche is in tatters, my spirit is broken, and I can barely
drag my pathetic ass out of bed to see what new spankage I've received
from him each morning. I've developed ulcers... stress gives you anal
ulcers, right? Eh, that might be from my morbidly obese boyfriends in
pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves. But anyway, WWWHHHHAAAAAA!!"

<snicker>

> I've got a Bobo trophy waiting here with his name already engraved on 
> the base, just waiting for the day when that happens so it can be duly 
> awarded to him...

Translation:
"I remain hunched over my keyboard, obsessively Google-raping for the
real-life identity of my Usenet Lord and Master because he's so
thoroughly kicked my ass. And when I find him... oh ho ho, when I find
him, I'm gonna give him one of my 'awards from a kook'! That'll show
him!" LOL

Spankard.

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web