Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #47045

Re: Hey, DildoRider...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:269pcb5v1tvu2q8i21ppnar42d0u2rm78s@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Froups desnecked, Coward.

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
>> <news:430pcbdp6pvnd2jk5dp2knqninb9alo58p@4ax.com> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/hVUxMNj.png>

>>>>>> Graph #4: (purple): 208.207 volt L1-L2 RMS

>>>>> 208v peak.

>>>> Wrong.

>>> Then why does the big purple sine wave peak between the
>>> +/-200v and 210v ticks?

>> Moron can't read the label on the sinewave that says "208.207". LOL!

> Exactly.  That's the PEAK voltage.  Not the RMS!
> Hello?  Anyone home???

So your idea of "winning" isn't "be smarter, faster, better", it's
"get your stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet then bleat
'victolly!' because someone paid attention to you". Got it.

You sad sorry stupid sack of shit.

<snicker>

>>> Hint:  208v RMS = 294v peak

>> I didn't plot the peak, there was no need. I showed a 170 volt peak
>> L-N input, which the equations translated to a 120.208 volt RMS L-N,
>> then to a 208.207 volt RMS L-L. You're just a moron.

> ROFL!  Can you really be that clueless?

See? You're a moron. It's ok, morons like you are too moronic to keep
yourselves from acting like morons. We understand. But don't think
that will stop me from drop-kicking your moronic ass across Usenet.

<snicker>

> Do you know what "peak" means?

It's apparent that you don't, at least not in this context.

> It means the highest part of the function.

Moron. "Peak voltage" is used to differentiate between the crest
voltage and RMS voltage. Shall I use "crest", or will you start
bleating about the tops of hills?

> Just like a mountain peak is the highest
> place on the mountain.  Just like the peak of your head is
> that pointy thing on top.  Get it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor>
"Crest factor is a measure of a waveform, such as alternating current
or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In
other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a
waveform."

"The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared
(giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the
average power)."

<http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/worksheets/peak-average-and-rms-measurements/>
"We may express quantities of AC voltage and current in terms of peak,
peak-to-peak, average, or RMS."

SPNAK! on the moron who yet again demonstrates he doesn't know much of
anything.

> Sheesh.
> 
> Fakey, do you know that the PEAK of the sine function is 1 ?
> And that its RMS value is 0.707 ?

You mean the maximum amplitude of the sine function is 1, and the
maximum amplitude of its RMS of its maximum amplitude is its maximum
amplitude multiplied by 1/SQRT(2)?

<http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/algtrig/att7/graphvocab.htm>

Do you even know what RMS means? Not the dictionary definition, its
implications in using it and *why* it's maximum amplitude divided by
SQRT(2). If you did, you'd be laughing at DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation and his even kookier k'lame that he's somehow
deriving 120 volts from a 240 volt feed (on the *primary* side of his
magical transformer that can violate Watt's Law, no less), because
what he's describing is a half-wave rectified sinewave to arrive at
120 volts from 240 volts. Thus his kooky equation *cannot* work, it's
mathematically contradictory. He's mathematically *proven* his kooky
equation doesn't work, he's just too stoooopid to realize it.

> Now look at what you graphed.  The highest point of the big
> wave (i'm using words you might understand) is 208v.
> That means its peak value is 208v.
> That means its RMS value is 208v/sqrt(2), or 147v.

No, you're just a moron who doesn't understand much. Thanks for
pointing that out. Again. I see you have no shame in labeling yourself
a moron.

> You totally dont know how to express a 208v RMS sine wave.
> 
> You do it like this:
> 294v * sin(something) --> 294v peak = 208v RMS

That doesn't look anything like a sinewave, moron. That looks like a
moron proving he's a moron. LOL

I graphed the 170 volt *peak* voltage and its 120.208 volt RMS voltage
sinewaves, Moron.

SPNAK!

> Now, be a good little spankee, and do all your graphs all
> over again.  Then come back here for your next lesson.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of 
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is 
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given 
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross 
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the 
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for 
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two 
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase 
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron continues to 
demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

Aren't you the moron who's already demonstrated his inability to 
distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you blathered that the 
graph I'd posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS?

Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
<MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
"You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."

Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the 
difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting 
147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.

SPNAK!

> -- 
> "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
> moron. LOL"
>   --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames 120.208 volts is a peak voltage and not an 
RMS voltage. LOL!

SPNAK! on the moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 21:05 +0100
  Re: Hey, DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 13:03 +0800
    Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 21:47 -0800
    Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 08:25 +0100
      Re: Hey, DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:31 -0700
      Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:05 +0100
        Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:49 +0100
          Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 19:35 +0100
            Re: Hey, DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 12:00 -0700
      Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 20:38 -0800
        Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 23:45 -0500
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 20:49 -0800
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-24 12:03 -0600
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 10:12 -0800
        Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:01 +0100
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 15:21 +0800
            Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 23:31 -0800
              Re: Fakey Diagnosed   Re: Hey, DildoRider... pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-24 12:16 -0600
        Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider... kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 03:29 -0500
          Re: Fakey Diagnosed Re: Hey, DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:08 +0100
            Fakey spills his inner thoughts. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:22 -0700

csiph-web