Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550411 > unrolled thread

Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
First post2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Last post2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
Articles 20 on this page of 97 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
                                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
                                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
                                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
                                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
                                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
                                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
                                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
                                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
                                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
                                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
                                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
                        Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
                          Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
                            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
                              Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
                                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
                                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
                                      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
                                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
                Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
                    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
                  Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
            Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
      Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
    Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

#551922

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Message-ID<269c06acaf3a88b9e2f94919dbd4306c@dizum.com>
In reply to#551735
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
<news:MPG.3123d6634367160098c600@news.altopia.com> spermburped:

> In article <348kbblrjff0t67mimkdqq0t8o116h0qlc@4ax.com>, 
> Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing
> Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist
> High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic
> Hepatitis-Stricken Pissbum (aka Tony Ray Rawlings, aka
> Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58, Lamplighter Trailer Park,
> Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> says...

>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler) spermburped:

>>> WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
>>> That sweet Swedish poontang was supposed to be *mine*! She was stolen
>>> away and banged so hard she got pregnant *twice* at the same time, by
>>> a crazy guy who can't hold a job! How is that guy better than me?! All
>>> I do is suck a dozen dicks a day. That's better than being crazy and
>>> unemployable, right?! Now I'm going to die alone. Except for my
>>> morbidly obese boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.
>>> WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

>> His own words folks.

> He must be trying to quit.

Chimpy's so traumatized he's experiencing psychological dissociation.
Now he's talking about himself in the third person point of view. Must
be all that bung-abuse he takes from his morbidly obese boyfriends in
pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.

Whatever happened to Donna, Chimpy? She rejected you as too gay, too,
huh.

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.

<snicker>

-- 

FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."

In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>

In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>

In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>

In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>

Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>

Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>

Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet

Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"

Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"

MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."

Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."

MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"

Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."

MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."

Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"

MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."

MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."

MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."

MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."

MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"

MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."

MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."

MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."

MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL

MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL

MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL

Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================

What a FAG!

Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!

<snicker>

/\                  Properly known as Bill
  \    /\      The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
   \  /  \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
    \/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.

Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.

databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.

Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551997

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Message-ID<n5cmbbtle9nqtibl3pmpit1rsmpnrftkv4@4ax.com>
In reply to#551922
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:27:04 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> obese boyfriends in
>pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.


Damn fakey, get some sleep.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551787

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Message-ID<ihjkbb53fnn7a01clggptdb26q6kbl886q@4ax.com>
In reply to#551690
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:23:36 -0700, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>All
>>I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.
>
>His own words folks.

Cowardly, trailer park trash, hillbilly, Urine Vagrant, Skeeter
post-edits out material and thus creates a big lie.

Reinsert the esteemed FNVWe's original material:

Translation:
"WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
That sweet Swedish poontang was supposed to be *mine*! She was stolen
away and banged so hard she got pregnant *twice* at the same time, by
a crazy guy who can't hold a job! How is that guy better than me?! All
I do is suck a dozen dicks a day. That's better than being crazy and
unemployable, right?! Now I'm going to die alone. Except for my
morbidly obese boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!"

You see, Urine Vagrant, how you lie?



-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551792

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Message-ID<8ekkbb9vboj5ujkec6q59m370i3951jb0s@4ax.com>
In reply to#551787
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:42:20 -0500, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq."
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

> All
>I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.

His own words folks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551797

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3123f9f4d369892898c60e@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551787
In article <ihjkbb53fnn7a01clggptdb26q6kbl886q@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> Reinsert the esteemed FNVWe
> 



-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551928

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Message-ID<op.yclowwzvtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#551787
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:42:20 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.  
<greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:23:36 -0700, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>  
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue,  9 Feb 2016 17:14:20 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> All
>>> I do is suck a dozen dicks a day.
>>
>> His own words folks.
>
> Cowardly, trailer park trash, hillbilly, Urine Vagrant, Skeeter
> post-edits out material and thus creates a big lie.
>
> Reinsert the esteemed FNVWe's original material:
>
> Translation:
> "WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
> That sweet Swedish poontang was supposed to be *mine*! She was stolen
> away and banged so hard she got pregnant *twice* at the same time, by
> a crazy guy who can't hold a job! How is that guy better than me?! All
> I do is suck a dozen dicks a day. That's better than being crazy and
> unemployable, right?! Now I'm going to die alone. Except for my
> morbidly obese boyfriends in pink spandex and lubed-up boxing gloves.
> WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!"
>
> You see, Urine Vagrant, how you lie?
>

fakey sure sounds extra k0oky when you take his words out of context like  
you just did.

-- 

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.

"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551689

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Message-ID<528kbbhlbi2rcu0pac6ogej7ivslqb0tmb@4ax.com>
In reply to#551669
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:57:15 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

>In article <n9cifl$15u2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
>says...
>
>
>> 
>> On 08/02/2016 1:34 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>> > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> >>
>> >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
>> >> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> >>>
>> >
>> > kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
>> > with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
>> >
>> > i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
>> > asked him about my porch roof gables?
>> 
>> Oh, probably around half-past never.
>> 
>> I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
>> out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
>> Mistress again. No doubt he'll k'lame I'm "running away" or some such 
>> BS, then whine, then start pining for me pathetically by randomly 
>> starting new threads full of copy-pasted climate change denial screeds.
>> 
>> Ko0ks are so predictable. *snicker*
>
>That's what he's doing in an effort to get my attention now... posting 
>15-year-old Knoxy posts he found at the bottom of the Google dumpster. 
>Like I give a fuck.  LOL!  He's played out, and not creative enough to 
>revive his ko0k kareer.  LOL, etc...
>
>Spin, Fakey, SPIN!


I tried to tell him, you can shoot me with the same bullet twice. Get
new ammo or run along.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551692

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Message-ID<k78kbb93o7nlobg51qjl1ruc2tu6i43hb4@4ax.com>
In reply to#551689
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:22:56 -0700, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

>On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:57:15 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
><Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>
>>In article <n9cifl$15u2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
>>says...
>>
>>
>>> 
>>> On 08/02/2016 1:34 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
>>> Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
>>> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:49:08 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>> >>
>>> >> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
>>> >> <news:ad4c0f6621da930303bf0644d36093fb@dizum.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> > kooky is responding to his own foamy poasts now since everybody's had it
>>> > with his screedy diatribes and mostly ignores his flailing.
>>> >
>>> > i wonder when he's going to get around to answering that question that i
>>> > asked him about my porch roof gables?
>>> 
>>> Oh, probably around half-past never.
>>> 
>>> I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
>>> out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
>>> Mistress again. No doubt he'll k'lame I'm "running away" or some such 
>>> BS, then whine, then start pining for me pathetically by randomly 
>>> starting new threads full of copy-pasted climate change denial screeds.
>>> 
>>> Ko0ks are so predictable. *snicker*
>>
>>That's what he's doing in an effort to get my attention now... posting 
>>15-year-old Knoxy posts he found at the bottom of the Google dumpster. 
>>Like I give a fuck.  LOL!  He's played out, and not creative enough to 
>>revive his ko0k kareer.  LOL, etc...
>>
>>Spin, Fakey, SPIN!
>
>
>I tried to tell him, you can shoot me with the same bullet twice. Get
>new ammo or run along.


That's supposed to be can't...but it ought to keep faketard busy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551786

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake>
Date2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Message-ID<b7jkbbttv6se8dua950s2rc3kpove65b53@4ax.com>
In reply to#551563
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 06:27:40 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:

<...>

>I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
>out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
>Mistress again. 

<...>

Kensi offers to be the FNVWe's kinky mistress. OMG! What a slut!



-- 
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my erudite opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the ignorant or
the thin-skinned."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551796

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.3123f9bbab3bf56f98c60d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551786
In article <b7jkbbttv6se8dua950s2rc3kpove65b53@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_master.fake says...


> 
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 06:27:40 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
> >I think I've got him panting hard enough and now it's time to freeze him 
> >out until he starts *begging* for attention from his Usenet Lady and 
> >Mistress again. 
> 
> <...>
> 
> Kensi offers to be the FNVWe's kinky mistress. OMG! What a slut!

She's trying to take YOUR job?

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551277

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Message-ID<op.ycixeoe1tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#551185
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:41:16 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>  
wrote:

> On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus  
> wrote:
>
>>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html
>>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.
>>
>> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
>> LOL
>
> You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at  
> reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced.
>
> *snicker*
>
> I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is,  
> after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days  
> doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying  
> about your job) can be expected to cope with.
>
> *snicker*
>
> Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian  
> curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the  
> integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter,  
> for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut  
> surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and  
> thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size). But the  
> former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere. In particular, the  
> Gaussian curvature depends on r.
>
> Now do you understand?
>
>> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!>
>
> No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon.
>
> *snicker*
>

did he drop out in order to marry his high-school sweetheart and live  
happily ever after?

-- 

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.

"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551305

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.312278e6791f5dc998c5c4@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#551277
In article <op.ycixeoe1tm21m2@benson.localhost>, root@127.0.0.1 says...


> 
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:41:16 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 08/02/2016 12:26 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html
> >>> Gaussian curvature: one over the radius squared.
> >>
> >> Nowhere on that web page does it say that, you bootfucked spankard.
> >> LOL
> >
> > You don't have to keep demonstrating your hopeless incompetence at
> > reading comprehension. We're all thoroughly convinced.
> >
> > *snicker*
> >
> > I'll help the poor struggling koOk a little now, though -- this math is,
> > after all, well beyond what a highschool dropout who now spends his days
> > doing blue-collar labor on fixer-uppers (if, that is, you're not lying
> > about your job) can be expected to cope with.
> >
> > *snicker*
> >
> > Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand, the Gaussian
> > curvature, which is defined at each point of a smooth manifold, and the
> > integral of that curvature over the manifold, on the other. The latter,
> > for closed and bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut
> > surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, and
> > thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless of curvature or size). But the
> > former is 1/r^2 at every point on that sphere. In particular, the
> > Gaussian curvature depends on r.
> >
> > Now do you understand?
> >
> >> No, you're just a l<SMACKAK00K!>
> >
> > No, *you're* just a high school dropout. And a lOon.
> >
> > *snicker*
> >
> 
> did he drop out in order to marry his high-school sweetheart and live
> happily ever after?

Was his high school sweetheart's name Butch?

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#551004

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Message-ID<iv7dbb9bhb67ib8simgsihkkmt2cqfsu6e@4ax.com>
In reply to#550989
On Sun,  7 Feb 2016 00:39:04 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Do you really think you're fooling anyone, Lunkhead?


He says as he stares into the mirror.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550849

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Message-ID<ijdbbbpihfm5jlt3evgogmfdl40p4qj7pn@4ax.com>
In reply to#550836
On Sat,  6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
><news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
>the wood chipper again:
>
>Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
>========================================================
>========================================================
>> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  
>
>Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
>coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
>apparently.
>
>And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
>on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
>
>Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
>anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
>it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
>between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
>f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
>getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
>mouth!
>
>Oh, here's Kensi:
><http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
>
>She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
>I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
>
>Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
>thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
>
><https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
>
>You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
>say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
>"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
>kinky. LOL
>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
>
>> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
>> any good telescopes lately?
>
>Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
>capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
>
><snicker>
>========================================================
>========================================================
>
>I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
>time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
>work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
>which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
>lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
>because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
>assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
>jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
>dude.
>
><snicker>
>
>> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus wrote:
>
>>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school
>
>> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or 
>> something?
>
>Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
>teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
>temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
>cloud, they must all be high. LOL
>
>>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>>> atmospheric window
>
>> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
>
>Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
>atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
>
>Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
>range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
>micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
>~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
>window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
>constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
>
>Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
>atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
>to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
>present. Moron. LOL
>
>So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
>would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
>from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
>window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
>skewing the results.
>
>But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
>do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
>NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
>
>--------------------------
>
>Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
>causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
>
>"The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
>energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>
>To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>
><http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>=================================================================
>"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>
>For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>of that total back into space.
>
>{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>=================================================================
>
>To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>facilities proving it's cooling:
>
>=================================================================
><http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>*decrease*.
>
>Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>
><http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>cooling has set in... since 1998.
>
><http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>
>Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
><http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>
>Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>archived it):
><http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>
>"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>
><http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>"We have been building models and there are now robust
>contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>physical model says it has to be warming."
>
>===============================================================
>Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
><http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>
>"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>out of the bag.
>
>You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>===============================================================
>
>You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, 
>you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>
>SPNAK!
>
>>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
>
>>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
>>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
>>> hurricanes. LOL
>>> 
>>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>> 
>>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
>>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
>>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
>>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
>>> halfwits believe in. LOL
>
>> *noisy crickets*
>
>Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL
>
>>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
>>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
>>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
>>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)
>
>>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
>>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.
>
>And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
>who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
>*cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
>goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
>bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
>fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
>straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
>away with his tail tucked. LOL
>
><Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
>---------------------------------
>> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link 
>> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did 
>> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really 
>> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase 
>> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than 
>> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go 
>> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as 
>> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without 
>> any truth to it whatsoever.
>> 
>> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the 
>> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of 
>> three great circles:
>
>IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL
>
>> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as 
>> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the 
>> sphere,
>
>So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
>by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
>introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
>Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
>geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
>"advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
>conflating glass with clouds? LOL
>
>> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.
>
>You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.
>
>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
>
>You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL
>
>> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
>
>Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
>Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
>backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
>
>You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
>and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
>due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
>Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
>
>You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
>LOL
>
>Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
>space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
>therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
>area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
>space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
>roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
>geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
>principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
>isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
>it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
>metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
>between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
>described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
>
>But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
>introductory college course-level geometry goof.
>
><snicker>
>
>> divided by its surface area.
>
>Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
>of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
>when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL
>
>Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
>shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
>space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
>akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
>surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
>eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
>curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL
>
>He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
>Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
>describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
>positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
>general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
>require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
>total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
>angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
>an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
>lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
>astrophysicist.
>
><snicker>
>
>> If the triangle's area is 
>> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is 
>> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established 
>> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = 
>> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just 
>> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum 
>> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
>> 
>> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* 
>> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the 
>> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that 
>> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can 
>> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed 
>> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a 
>> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same 
>> area will do likewise.
>> 
>> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized 
>> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to 
>> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly 
>> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my 
>> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you 
>> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
>---------------------------------
><Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
>
>Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
>desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
>unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
>kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
>anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
>than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
>thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
>window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
>*coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
>the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
>proved.
>
>SPNAK!
>
>> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
>reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
>Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
>they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.
>
><snicker>



Damn!   Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550852

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.311f67dc5b3284df98c57d@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#550849
In article <ijdbbbpihfm5jlt3evgogmfdl40p4qj7pn@4ax.com>, 
skeet@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Sat,  6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >
> >Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
> ><news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
> >the wood chipper again:
> >
> >Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
> >========================================================
> >========================================================
> >> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  
> >
> >Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
> >coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
> >apparently.
> >
> >And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
> >on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
> >
> >Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
> >anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
> >it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
> >between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
> >f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
> >getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
> >mouth!
> >
> >Oh, here's Kensi:
> ><http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
> >
> >She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
> >I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
> >
> >Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
> >thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
> >
> ><https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
> >
> >You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
> >say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
> >"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
> >kinky. LOL
> >
> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> >
> >> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> >> any good telescopes lately?
> >
> >Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
> >capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
> >
> ><snicker>
> >========================================================
> >========================================================
> >
> >I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
> >time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
> >work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
> >which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
> >lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
> >because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
> >assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
> >jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
> >dude.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> >> Emeritus wrote:
> >
> >>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
> >
> >>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school
> >
> >> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or 
> >> something?
> >
> >Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
> >teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
> >temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
> >cloud, they must all be high. LOL
> >
> >>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
> >>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
> >>> atmospheric window
> >
> >> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
> >
> >Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
> >atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
> >
> >Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
> >range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
> >micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
> >~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
> >window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
> >constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
> >
> >Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
> >atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
> >to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
> >present. Moron. LOL
> >
> >So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
> >would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
> >from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
> >window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
> >skewing the results.
> >
> >But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
> >do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
> >NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
> >
> >--------------------------
> >
> >Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
> >180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
> >causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
> >
> >"The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
> >energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
> >convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
> >An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
> >through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
> >response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
> >_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
> >leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
> >
> >To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
> >
> ><http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
> >=================================================================
> >"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
> >James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
> >"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
> >molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
> >
> >For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
> >absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
> >the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
> >of that total back into space.
> >
> >{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
> >wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
> >=================================================================
> >
> >To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
> >from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
> >facilities proving it's cooling:
> >
> >=================================================================
> ><http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
> >The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
> >*decrease*.
> >
> >Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
> >The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
> >*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
> >
> ><http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
> ><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
> >Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
> >orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
> >cooling has set in... since 1998.
> >
> ><http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
> >Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
> >
> >Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
> >*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
> >years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
> ><http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
> >
> >Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
> >Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
> >years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
> >archived it):
> ><http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
> >Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
> >temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
> >
> >"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
> >is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
> >
> ><http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
> >"We have been building models and there are now robust
> >contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
> >Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
> >physical model says it has to be warming."
> >
> >===============================================================
> >Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
> ><http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
> >
> >"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
> >warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
> >relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
> >scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
> >out of the bag.
> >
> >You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
> >ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
> >===============================================================
> >
> >You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
> >can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*, 
> >you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
> >window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
> >your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
> >do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
> >your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
> >and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
> >
> >SPNAK!
> >
> >>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
> >
> >>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
> >>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
> >>> hurricanes. LOL
> >>> 
> >>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
> >>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
> >>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
> >>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
> >>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
> >>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
> >>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
> >>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
> >>> 
> >>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
> >>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
> >>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
> >>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
> >>> halfwits believe in. LOL
> >
> >> *noisy crickets*
> >
> >Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL
> >
> >>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
> >>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
> >>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
> >>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)
> >
> >>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
> >>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.
> >
> >And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
> >who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
> >*cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
> >goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
> >bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
> >fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
> >straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
> >away with his tail tucked. LOL
> >
> ><Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
> >---------------------------------
> >> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link 
> >> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did 
> >> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really 
> >> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase 
> >> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than 
> >> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go 
> >> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as 
> >> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without 
> >> any truth to it whatsoever.
> >> 
> >> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the 
> >> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of 
> >> three great circles:
> >
> >IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL
> >
> >> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as 
> >> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the 
> >> sphere,
> >
> >So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
> >by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
> >introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
> >Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
> >geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
> >"advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
> >conflating glass with clouds? LOL
> >
> >> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.
> >
> >You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.
> >
> >> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
> >
> >You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL
> >
> >> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
> >
> >Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
> >Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
> >backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
> >
> >You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
> >and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
> >due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
> >Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
> >
> >You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
> >LOL
> >
> >Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
> >space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
> >therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
> >area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
> >space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
> >roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
> >geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
> >principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
> >isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
> >it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
> >metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
> >between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
> >described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
> >
> >But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
> >introductory college course-level geometry goof.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> divided by its surface area.
> >
> >Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
> >of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
> >when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL
> >
> >Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
> >shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
> >space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
> >akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
> >surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
> >eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
> >curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL
> >
> >He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
> >Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
> >describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
> >positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
> >general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
> >require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
> >total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
> >angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
> >an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
> >lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
> >astrophysicist.
> >
> ><snicker>
> >
> >> If the triangle's area is 
> >> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is 
> >> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established 
> >> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = 
> >> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just 
> >> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum 
> >> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
> >> 
> >> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* 
> >> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the 
> >> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that 
> >> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can 
> >> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed 
> >> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a 
> >> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same 
> >> area will do likewise.
> >> 
> >> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized 
> >> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to 
> >> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly 
> >> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my 
> >> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you 
> >> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
> >---------------------------------
> ><Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
> >
> >Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
> >desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
> >unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
> >kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
> >anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
> >than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
> >thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
> >window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
> >*coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
> >the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
> >proved.
> >
> >SPNAK!
> >
> >> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
> >
> >You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
> >reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
> >Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
> >they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.
> >
> ><snicker>
> 
> 
> 
> Damn!   Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start.

That was quite the screed.  He's obviously majorly butthurt over Kensi 
kicking his stupid ass to the curb, and being more intelligent than him.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, and new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550854

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Message-ID<n94hfv$bqv$2@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#550852
x-no-archive: yes

On 2/6/2016 2:16 AM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <ijdbbbpihfm5jlt3evgogmfdl40p4qj7pn@4ax.com>,
> skeet@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
>>
>> On Sat,  6 Feb 2016 07:38:10 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
>>> <news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
>>> the wood chipper again:
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
>>> ========================================================
>>> ========================================================
>>>> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
>>>
>>> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
>>> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
>>> apparently.
>>>
>>> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
>>> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
>>>
>>> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
>>> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
>>> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
>>> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
>>> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
>>> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
>>> mouth!
>>>
>>> Oh, here's Kensi:
>>> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
>>>
>>> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
>>> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
>>>
>>> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
>>> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
>>>
>>> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
>>>
>>> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
>>> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
>>> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
>>> kinky. LOL
>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
>>>
>>>> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
>>>> any good telescopes lately?
>>>
>>> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
>>> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>> ========================================================
>>> ========================================================
>>>
>>> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
>>> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
>>> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
>>> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
>>> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
>>> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
>>> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
>>> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
>>> dude.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>>> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
>>>
>>>>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school
>>>
>>>> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or
>>>> something?
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
>>> teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
>>> temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
>>> cloud, they must all be high. LOL
>>>
>>>>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>>>>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>>>>> atmospheric window
>>>
>>>> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
>>>
>>> Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
>>> atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
>>>
>>> Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
>>> range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
>>> micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
>>> ~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
>>> window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
>>> constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
>>>
>>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
>>> atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
>>> to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
>>> present. Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
>>> would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
>> >from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
>>> window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
>>> skewing the results.
>>>
>>> But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
>>> do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
>>> NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>>
>>> Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>>> 180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
>>> causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
>>>
>>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>>> =================================================================
>>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>>
>>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>>> of that total back into space.
>>>
>>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>>> =================================================================
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>> >from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>>> facilities proving it's cooling:
>>>
>>> =================================================================
>>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>>> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>>> *decrease*.
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>>> *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>>>
>>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>>>
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>>> archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>>
>>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>>> is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>>>
>>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>>> "We have been building models and there are now robust
>>> contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>>> Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>>> physical model says it has to be warming."
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>>> relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>>> scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>>> out of the bag.
>>>
>>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>>> can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
>>> you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>>> window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>>> your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>>> do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>>> your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>>> and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>>>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
>>>
>>>>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
>>>>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
>>>>> hurricanes. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> "The total and UV solar radiation -  A hurricane's maximum potential
>>>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>>>>
>>>>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
>>>>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
>>>>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
>>>>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
>>>>> halfwits believe in. LOL
>>>
>>>> *noisy crickets*
>>>
>>> Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL
>>>
>>>>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
>>>>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
>>>>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
>>>>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)
>>>
>>>>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
>>>>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.
>>>
>>> And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
>>> who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
>>> *cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
>>> goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
>>> bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
>>> fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
>>> straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
>>> away with his tail tucked. LOL
>>>
>>> <Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link
>>>> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did
>>>> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really
>>>> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase
>>>> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than
>>>> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go
>>>> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as
>>>> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without
>>>> any truth to it whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the
>>>> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of
>>>> three great circles:
>>>
>>> IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL
>>>
>>>> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as
>>>> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the
>>>> sphere,
>>>
>>> So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
>>> by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
>>> introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
>>> Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
>>> geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
>>> "advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
>>> conflating glass with clouds? LOL
>>>
>>>> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.
>>>
>>> You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.
>>>
>>>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
>>>
>>> You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL
>>>
>>>> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
>>>
>>> Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
>>> Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
>>> backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
>>>
>>> You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
>>> and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
>>> due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
>>> Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
>>>
>>> You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
>>> space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
>>> therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
>>> area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
>>> space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
>>> roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
>>> geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
>>> principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
>>> isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
>>> it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
>>> metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
>>> between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
>>> described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
>>>
>>> But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
>>> introductory college course-level geometry goof.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>>> divided by its surface area.
>>>
>>> Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
>>> of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
>>> when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL
>>>
>>> Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
>>> shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
>>> space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
>>> akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
>>> surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
>>> eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
>>> curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL
>>>
>>> He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
>>> Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
>>> describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
>>> positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
>>> general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
>>> require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
>>> total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
>>> angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
>>> an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
>>> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
>>> astrophysicist.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>>> If the triangle's area is
>>>> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is
>>>> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established
>>>> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi =
>>>> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just
>>>> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum
>>>> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
>>>>
>>>> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any*
>>>> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the
>>>> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that
>>>> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can
>>>> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed
>>>> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a
>>>> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same
>>>> area will do likewise.
>>>>
>>>> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized
>>>> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to
>>>> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly
>>>> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my
>>>> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you
>>>> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> <Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
>>>
>>> Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
>>> desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
>>> unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
>>> kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
>>> anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
>>> than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
>>> thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
>>> window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
>>> *coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
>>> the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
>>> proved.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>>> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>
>>> You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
>>> reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
>>> Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
>>> they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>
>>
>>
>> Damn!   Fakey proves himself yet again, a foam frother from the start.
>
> That was quite the screed.  He's obviously majorly butthurt over Kensi
> kicking his stupid ass to the curb, and being more intelligent than him.


You mean Paul is kicking his own ass?  The allegation is that Paul is 
Fakey is Kensi.  I don't know if that was ever conclusively proved.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550858

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Message-ID<n94ir2$1j2a$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#550854
On 06/02/2016 5:20 AM, Janithor wrote:

> You mean Paul is kicking his own ass?  The allegation is that Paul is
> Fakey is Kensi.  I don't know if that was ever conclusively proved.

That allegation came from some of the wackiest lunatics ever to 
gravitate towards auk, and is based on such "evidence" and methods as 
assuming that if two people ever used the same IP address at separate 
times then they were the same person (ever heard of open wifi, VPN 
exits, NAT, and the like?) and then chaining together *dozens* of such 
occurrences, so if I ever used an IP that was used by someone who ever 
used an IP that was used by someone who ever used an IP that was used by 
... etc. ... someone, then I was the same person as whoever was at the 
other end of the chain.

Other leaps they've made include "if anyone is from Pembroke, Canada 
then they're Paul" (Wiki says the population there is around 15,000, or 
14,999 more than consistent with that particular k'lame) and "if anyone 
has ever so much as traveled there, then they're Paul". And, of course, 
there's the all-purpose "if someone is Paul, and someone else ever takes 
their side on anything, then they're Paul too". I'm fairly sure that if 
you use these sorts of "logic" the planet's population consists solely 
of seven billion clones of Paul, one of whom is *you*.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550860

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Message-ID<lekbbb5g5eu2f62lui8arkif0mko7j5ugg@4ax.com>
In reply to#550858
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 05:44:43 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
wrote:

>On 06/02/2016 5:20 AM, Janithor wrote:
>
>> You mean Paul is kicking his own ass?  The allegation is that Paul is
>> Fakey is Kensi.  I don't know if that was ever conclusively proved.
>
>That allegation came from some of the wackiest lunatics ever to 
>gravitate towards auk, and is based on such "evidence" and methods as 
>assuming that if two people ever used the same IP address at separate 
>times then they were the same person (ever heard of open wifi, VPN 
>exits, NAT, and the like?) and then chaining together *dozens* of such 
>occurrences, so if I ever used an IP that was used by someone who ever 
>used an IP that was used by someone who ever used an IP that was used by 
>... etc. ... someone, then I was the same person as whoever was at the 
>other end of the chain.
>
>Other leaps they've made include "if anyone is from Pembroke, Canada 
>then they're Paul" (Wiki says the population there is around 15,000, or 
>14,999 more than consistent with that particular k'lame) and "if anyone 
>has ever so much as traveled there, then they're Paul". And, of course, 
>there's the all-purpose "if someone is Paul, and someone else ever takes 
>their side on anything, then they're Paul too". I'm fairly sure that if 
>you use these sorts of "logic" the planet's population consists solely 
>of seven billion clones of Paul, one of whom is *you*.
>
>*snicker*


Didn't "Paul" throw Fakey under the bus? yea! He did!

LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550861

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.311f73355eab152098c581@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#550858
In article <n94ir2$1j2a$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On 06/02/2016 5:20 AM, Janithor wrote:
> 
> > You mean Paul is kicking his own ass?  The allegation is that Paul is
> > Fakey is Kensi.  I don't know if that was ever conclusively proved.
> 
> That allegation came from some of the wackiest lunatics ever to 
> gravitate towards auk, and is based on such "evidence" and methods as 
> assuming that if two people ever used the same IP address at separate 
> times then they were the same person (ever heard of open wifi, VPN 
> exits, NAT, and the like?) and then chaining together *dozens* of such 
> occurrences, so if I ever used an IP that was used by someone who ever 
> used an IP that was used by someone who ever used an IP that was used by 
> ... etc. ... someone, then I was the same person as whoever was at the 
> other end of the chain.
> 
> Other leaps they've made include "if anyone is from Pembroke, Canada 
> then they're Paul" (Wiki says the population there is around 15,000, or 
> 14,999 more than consistent with that particular k'lame) and "if anyone 
> has ever so much as traveled there, then they're Paul". And, of course, 
> there's the all-purpose "if someone is Paul, and someone else ever takes 
> their side on anything, then they're Paul too". I'm fairly sure that if 
> you use these sorts of "logic" the planet's population consists solely 
> of seven billion clones of Paul, one of whom is *you*.
> 
> *snicker*

You seem overly concerned with convincing people that you couldn't 
possibly be Paul.  If you aren't, why is that so important to you?

Also, 15,000 people in Pembroke is a pretty small population.  What are 
the odds that someone other than Paul would be posting here from 
Pembroke?  Why did Nads always post around the same time you did, and 
why did she suddenly disappear about the time you realized you were 
teaming up with a complete nut case?  It really doesn't matter if you're 
Paul, does it?

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#550931

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Message-ID<9b33e7b081639991de9bbad0a1cce744@dizum.com>
In reply to#550858
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n94ir2$1j2a$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On 06/02/2016 5:20 AM, Janithor wrote:

>> You mean Paul is kicking his own ass?  The allegation is that Paul is
>> Fakey is Kensi.  I don't know if that was ever conclusively proved.

I'd have to cut out 9/10ths of my brain to be Paul Derbyshire... he's
a fucking moron.

<snicker>

Now let's watch a spankard backpedal and phooooaaaammm....

> That allegation came from some of the wackiest lunatics ever to 
> gravitate towards auk, and is based on such "evidence" and methods as 
> assuming that if two people ever used the same IP address at separate 
> times then they were the same person (ever heard of open wifi, VPN 
> exits, NAT, and the like?) and then chaining together *dozens* of such 
> occurrences, so if I ever used an IP that was used by someone who ever 
> used an IP that was used by someone who ever used an IP that was used by 
> ... etc. ... someone, then I was the same person as whoever was at the 
> other end of the chain.
> 
> Other leaps they've made include "if anyone is from Pembroke, Canada 
> then they're Paul" (Wiki says the population there is around 15,000, or 
> 14,999 more than consistent with that particular k'lame) and "if anyone 
> has ever so much as traveled there, then they're Paul". And, of course, 
> there's the all-purpose "if someone is Paul, and someone else ever takes 
> their side on anything, then they're Paul too". I'm fairly sure that if 
> you use these sorts of "logic" the planet's population consists solely 
> of seven billion clones of Paul, one of whom is *you*.
> 
> *snicker*

Nicely bleated, LunkHead... are you butthurt because I've proven you
*wrong* on everything you've been blathering, caught you making a
simple geometry error that you continue to defend because you're too
stupid to understand the equation you raped from Wikipedia (which also
got the equation wrong), forced you to admit you don't understand
simple concepts such as the Riemann curvature tensor and thereby can't
understand general relativity, gravity or space-time, and thereby made
you prove you're no astrophysicist, and *also* proved the entire
Klimate Katastrophe Kook AGW claim is a scam and a lie, using
peer-reviewed studies that you cannot refute?

Need a tissue, you teary-eyed bleatfarting spankard?

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web