Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #554189 > unrolled thread

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 10:25 +0100
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:26 -0700
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:14 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:43 -0700
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 16:13 -0500
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:19 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 22:47 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:56 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:30 +0100
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:42 +0100
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:45 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:04 -0800
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:17 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:04 +0000
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 18:15 +0100
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:27 -0700
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 19:02 +0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 07:15 +0100
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:32 +0800
                  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:05 +0100
                    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:27 -0700
                      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:45 +0800
                        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
                          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:16 +0800
                            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
                            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:41 -0700
                              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 20:07 +0000
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:29 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:21 -0500
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:09 +0000
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:14 -0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 12:07 +0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#554871

Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid
> says...
> 
> 
> > > <MUSHROOM CLOUD>
> > 
> > Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all followed
> > from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals necessary.
>  
> 
> Now you've done it!  You "ran away"!  The Fakeytard will claim victolly,
> because you "ran away" and he never gave up.  That's how you win on 
> Usenet... right or wrong, you never quit arguing.  Come on, Paul... whip
> out that Checkmate Hammer of Thor, and throttle heeem!

rofl

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe       <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
        
My pet rock Gordon wants out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554948

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
>> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
>> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.

> You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
> than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
> different frequencies.

You stupid fuck, no it wouldn't.

> For instance, a frequency of 2 Hz and a frequency of 3 Hz will have 
> periods of 1/2 and 1/3 second respectively. According to your ko0ky 
> math, the resultant has a period of 1/lcm(2,3) = 1/6 second, which is 
> obvious bullshit. (In fact the period of the resultant is 1/gcd, not 
> 1/lcm, and in this case that's 1.)

Moron can't do word problems. LOL

Did I say to take the LCM of the periods of the tributaries, or the
LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries, you moronic halfwit?

> Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
> you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. So just because
> Ko0kHead says so, the period of the resultant is shorter than any of the 
> constituents' periods! Bwahahaha!

Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. You can't do simple
geometry problems, you've fucked up your stupid k'lame that you're an
astrophysicist because what astrophysicist wouldn't know that the
Riemann curvature tensor concept is the central mathematical tool in
the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and
the curvature of space-time is described by the geodesic deviation
equation, or that space-time isn't primarily positive Gaussian
curvature because massive objects such as planets, stars and black
holes would ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature
positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*, and
now we find that you're *such* a moron you can't even do a simple word
math problem.

SPNAK!

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#554953

On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:15:41 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
>> than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
>> different frequencies.
>
>You stupid fuck, no it wouldn't.


Yes it would.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555226

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
> <news:na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
> wood chipper again:
> 
> > On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> > Emeritus wrote:
> 
> >> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
> >> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
> >> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.
> 
> > You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
> > than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
> > different frequencies.
> 
> You stupid fuck, no it wouldn't.

Omg... fakey swallowed the whole hook.  For a sentient
being, that would hurt like hell.

Reel 'im in, kensi!  Careful he doesn't tip over the boat
when he jumps in.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555402

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:a36jcb5b50l7d8va5flnhte470sgvjkklh@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
>> <news:na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
>> wood chipper again:

>>> On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus wrote:

>>>> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
>>>> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
>>>> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.

>>> You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
>>> than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
>>> different frequencies.

>> You stupid fuck, no it wouldn't.
>> 
>> Moron can't do word problems. LOL
>> 
>> Did I say to take the LCM of the periods of the tributaries, or the
>> LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries, you moronic halfwit?

> Omg... fakey swallowed the whole hook.  For a sentient
> being, that would hurt like hell.
> 
> Reel 'im in, kensi!  Careful he doesn't tip over the boat
> when he jumps in.

Stoooopid sticking up for stoooopid. I'll soon have *all* my kooks
bleating out their butthurt. LOL

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*), that superposition
was the same as wave interference, that wave interference works the
same for standing or traveling waves, nor that 170 volt peak, 120.208
volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L.

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the period was measured in Hz, and 
that the resultant would be 4.4 GHz? Yeah... yeah you are.

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the "frequency of the composite sum 
is 1 hz."? Yeah... yeah, you are.

Aren't you the *moron* who doesn't understand that the period is the 
inverse of the frequency? Yeah... yeah you are.

So you're the *moron* who believes that 4,400,000,000 = 1.

SPNAK!

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555418

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
<FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Stoooopid

<yawn>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555539

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:laelcb9mqoj20lju41nr8k7nrtfa2eghic@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Stoooopid

> <yawn>

SPNAK! on Stoooopid.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that superposition
was the same as wave interference; that wave interference works the
same for standing or traveling waves; that 170 volt peak, 120.208
volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the
moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555544

>Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>

Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555554

Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> 
> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
> 
> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.

Hey!  I want a faglame first!
Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.

-- 
"...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
  --Fakey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555562

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:45:53 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:

>Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> 
>> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
>> 
>> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.
>
>Hey!  I want a faglame first!
>Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.


Let us join forces and demand he meet our demands or we will demand it
again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555573

Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:45:53 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> <bender@the.future> wrote:
> 
> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> 
> >> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
> >> 
> >> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.
> >
> >Hey!  I want a faglame first!
> >Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.
> 
> 
> Let us join forces and demand he meet our demands or we will demand it
> again.

Fakey, we demand you faglame me first, then Skeeter, or we
will fourier transform your ass into a 4-d quivering sobbing
blob of imaginary jello.

And dangle it from the gable of a triangle wave to whimper
in the wind.

-- 
"...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
  --Fakey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555577

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote:

> Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:45:53 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> > <bender@the.future> wrote:
> > 
> > >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 
> > >> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
> > >> 
> > >> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.
> > >
> > >Hey!  I want a faglame first!
> > >Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.
> > 
> > 
> > Let us join forces and demand he meet our demands or we will demand it
> > again.
> 
> Fakey, we demand you faglame me first, then Skeeter, or we
> will fourier transform your ass into a 4-d quivering sobbing
> blob of imaginary jello.
> 
> And dangle it from the gable of a triangle wave to whimper
> in the wind.

You could emblazon it on a banner and tow it behind a drone.

-- Tr!pe

-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2  aka  Tr!pe    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555585

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:16:02 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:

>Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:45:53 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>> <bender@the.future> wrote:
>> 
>> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
>> >> 
>> >> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.
>> >
>> >Hey!  I want a faglame first!
>> >Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.
>> 
>> 
>> Let us join forces and demand he meet our demands or we will demand it
>> again.
>
>Fakey, we demand you faglame me first, then Skeeter, or we
>will fourier transform your ass into a 4-d quivering sobbing
>blob of imaginary jello.
>
>And dangle it from the gable of a triangle wave to whimper
>in the wind.


We've already done that, what else ya got?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555601

Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 03:16:02 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> <bender@the.future> wrote:
> 
> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:45:53 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
> >> <bender@the.future> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 
> >> >> >Shiny Tinfoil Br<SMACK>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Yea Yea, nobody cares about that shit, now about that fag lame.
> >> >
> >> >Hey!  I want a faglame first!
> >> >Fakey loves me more than you!  Neener, neener.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Let us join forces and demand he meet our demands or we will demand it
> >> again.
> >
> >Fakey, we demand you faglame me first, then Skeeter, or we
> >will fourier transform your ass into a 4-d quivering sobbing
> >blob of imaginary jello.
> >
> >And dangle it from the gable of a triangle wave to whimper
> >in the wind.
> 
> 
> We've already done that, what else ya got?
>

We'll shout it from the pulpit of the church where he is a deacon.

--  Tr!pe
        
-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555071

On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:45:59 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>  
wrote:

> On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus  
> wrote:
>
>> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
>> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
>> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.
>
> You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter*  
> than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with  
> different frequencies.
>
> For instance, a frequency of 2 Hz and a frequency of 3 Hz will have  
> periods of 1/2 and 1/3 second respectively. According to your ko0ky  
> math, the resultant has a period of 1/lcm(2,3) = 1/6 second, which is  
> obvious bullshit. (In fact the period of the resultant is 1/gcd, not  
> 1/lcm, and in this case that's 1.)
>
> Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
> you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. So just because
> Ko0kHead says so, the period of the resultant is shorter than any of the  
> constituents' periods! Bwahahaha!

he's re-writing physics books with magical math again?

>
>> all six of the tributary sinewaves go to zero each
>> second, giving a beat frequency of 60 Hz.
>
> WTF did you get 60 Hz from a period of 1 second?!?!?! They teach you  
> that at some Konservative Kreationist KoOkSkOoL or something?

never mind that beat frequencies have nothing to do with superimposed  
waves summing to 0.  beat frequencies happen if you play/combine a 60Hz  
tone and a 61Hz tone simultaneously, for instance.  that would produce a  
"beat" every second.  the "beats" in kooky's sinewave stew would be at all  
sorts of different intervals determined by the interactions between every  
frequency.

>
>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD>
>
> Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all followed  
> from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals necessary.
>

this has been the best meltdown of his yet and i can tell that he's only  
getting started.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL


on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

-

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555101

On 20/02/2016 3:29 PM, "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 
Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 
Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote:

>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD>
>>
>> Gotta nuke the rest or I'll die laughing at this retard. It all
>> followed from ludicrously flawed premises anyway; no further rebuttals
>> necessary.
>
> this has been the best meltdown of his yet and i can tell that he's only
> getting started.

His screedometer needle is already in the 4000-5000 lines per day range 
and steadily creeping upward, and he's "only getting started"?! Yikes.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555117

"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

[...]

> > WTF did you get 60 Hz from a period of 1 second?!?!?! They teach you
> > that at some Konservative Kreationist KoOkSkOoL or something?
> 
> never mind that beat frequencies have nothing to do with superimposed
> waves summing to 0.  beat frequencies happen if you play/combine a 60Hz
> tone and a 61Hz tone simultaneously, for instance.  that would produce a
> "beat" every second.  the "beats" in kooky's sinewave stew would be at all
> sorts of different intervals determined by the interactions between every
> frequency.
>

Maybe he can tell us something about heterodynes, sidebands, IFs 
and the use of the BFO.
        
-- 
^Ï^.    Sn!pe, DoW #2    <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2, Fuckhead #3 
AUK Ministry of Circle Jerks, Aug. 2015 (award now deprecated)
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555153

In article <1mixut8.ylsgw91ayn7x0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...


> 
> "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > WTF did you get 60 Hz from a period of 1 second?!?!?! They teach you
> > > that at some Konservative Kreationist KoOkSkOoL or something?
> > 
> > never mind that beat frequencies have nothing to do with superimposed
> > waves summing to 0.  beat frequencies happen if you play/combine a 60Hz
> > tone and a 61Hz tone simultaneously, for instance.  that would produce a
> > "beat" every second.  the "beats" in kooky's sinewave stew would be at all
> > sorts of different intervals determined by the interactions between every
> > frequency.
> >
> 
> Maybe he can tell us something about heterodynes, sidebands, IFs 
> and the use of the BFO.
>         

The beat frequency oscillator?  I built a shortwave receiver when I was 
in Junior High, and it had one of those.

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#555181

"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <1mixut8.ylsgw91ayn7x0N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > "Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
> > (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
> > 15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > WTF did you get 60 Hz from a period of 1 second?!?!?! They teach you
> > > > that at some Konservative Kreationist KoOkSkOoL or something?
> > > 
> > > never mind that beat frequencies have nothing to do with superimposed
> > > waves summing to 0.  beat frequencies happen if you play/combine a 60Hz
> > > tone and a 61Hz tone simultaneously, for instance.  that would produce a
> > > "beat" every second.  the "beats" in kooky's sinewave stew would be at all
> > > sorts of different intervals determined by the interactions between every
> > > frequency.
> > >
> > 
> > Maybe he can tell us something about heterodynes, sidebands, IFs 
> > and the use of the BFO.

That would be too entertaining.

I wonder if fakey knows the difference between i and j?

> >         
> 
> The beat frequency oscillator?  I built a shortwave receiver when I was 
> in Junior High, and it had one of those.

Fakey don't need no steenkin BFO.  He can get sum n diff
frequencies just by adding them with an euler phazer
infinite fooly'all series.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web