Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #520084 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes

Started byFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
First post2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Last post2015-09-10 19:24 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 283 — 21 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
          Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
                      Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:13 -0500
      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:31 -0500
        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 14:43 -0500
          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:26 -0500
            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:55 -0500
          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:09 -0500
      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
        Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
          Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
            Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
              Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
              Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
                                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
                                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
                                                    Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
                                                      Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
                                                        Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
                                                            Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
                                                              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
                                                                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
                                                                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
                                                                  9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
                                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
                                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
                                            Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
                                              Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
                                                Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
                                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
                                                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
                                                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
                                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
                                                                  Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
                                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
                                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
                                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
                                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
                                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
                                                                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
                                                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:49 -0500
                                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
                                                                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:56 -0500
                                                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:18 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:21 -0500
                                                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
                                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
                                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
                                                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
                                                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
                                                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
                                                                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
                                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
                                                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
                                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
                                                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
                                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
                                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
                                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
                                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
                                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
                                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
                                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
                                                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
                                                                                  planes thereupon none where noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 18:10 -0700
                                                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
                                                                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
                                                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
                                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
                                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:47 -0500
                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:32 -0500
                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
                                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:13 -0500
                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:33 -0500
                                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:15 -0500
                                                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
                                                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
                                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
                                                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
                                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
                                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
                                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
                                        Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
                                          Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
                                            Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
                                              Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
                                                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
                                                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
                                                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
                                                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
                                                        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
                                                          Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:11 -0500
                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:40 -0500
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
                              Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
                                    Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
                                      Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
                                        Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
                                          Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
                                            Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
                                              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
                                                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
                                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
                                      Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
                                        Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
                                          Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
                                        Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
                                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
                                          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
                                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
                                              9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
                                              9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
                                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
                                Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
                                  Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
                                  no asbestos cladding on the main beams noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0700
                                  Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
                                    if the planes were not bombs, or if they were bombs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:21 -0700
                                    Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
                                      Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
                                        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
                        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 17:03 -0500
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:38 -0500
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:01 -0500
                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:36 -0500
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:07 -0500
                                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:44 -0500
                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
                                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:21 -0500
                                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
                                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:20 -0500
                                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:14 -0500
                                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:56 -0500
                                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
                                                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-22 03:28 -0700
                                                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
                          9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
                                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
                    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
                        Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:20 -0500
        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:36 -0500
          Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-12 08:02 -0400
            Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:42 -0500
              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 04:18 -0700
                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:04 -0500
                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0500
                  Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
                    Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500
                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700
                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:33 -0500
                                Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 13:45 -0700
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
                            Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500
                              Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
                                Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500
                                  Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200
                                    Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500
                      Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500
                        Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:40 -0400
                          Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:28 -0400
                            Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 14:10 -0700
                        Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500
                      Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:19 -0700
    Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 14:04 -0700
    no bombs that were not planes e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:24 -0700

Page 11 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 15  Next page →


#522684

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Message-ID<op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#522646
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>   <-------------
>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>   <-------------
>>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
>>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.
>   <-------------
>>>> yep.. i can't figure it out.  you aer so smort.
>   <-------------
>>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted.
>   <-------------
>> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux sysadmins
>> with 2 decades of experience don't use perl.  uh-huh.
>
> Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program
> running, and is all pissed about it.

yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy.  LOL

> If you were able to get the Perl
> program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that
> the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather
> is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL
>
>>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.
>   <-------------
>>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that  
>>>> nobody
>>>> likes?
>   <-------------
>>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider.
>   <-------------
>> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of,
>> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath.
>
> Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it
> something I said that set you off? LOL

was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of your  
wife and kids?

>
>>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them.
>   <-------------
>> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb.  i was the only person in
>> my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school.
>
> Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the
> room, by his own admission. LOL

i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing  
cock and anal sex unprompted, you were.

>
>>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper
>>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't
>>> even know copper burns green.
>   <-------------
>> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry.  in fact, i know absolutely
>> nothing, so you win.  that was easy.
>
> Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL

awesome.  i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you  
needed it more than me.

>
>>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>>>>>> signify "nothing".
>   <-------------
>>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you  
>>>>> "moron".
>>>>> LOL
>   <-------------
>>>> you sure seem to be "happy".
>   <-------------
>>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL
>   <-------------
>> why would i act smart?
>
> It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL

that would be stupid of me.

>
>> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart.
>
> Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'?
> Vince Lamb?

exactly.

> Stooopid kook. LOL

yes they are.

>
>> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid  
>> people.
>
> No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you
> were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL

huh?

>
>>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond  
>>>>>> "something
>>>>>> made out of bricks".
>   <-------------
>>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.
>   <-------------
>>>> no i'm not.
>   <-------------
>>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting
>>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you.
>   <-------------
>> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity.  i come here  
>> to
>> waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish
>> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of
>> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been  
>> invested
>> in for years and years.
>
> I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the
> best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy
> meltdowns. LOL

LOL

>
>>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them, DildoRider.
>>>>> You are, after all, a libtard.
>   <-------------
>>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?
>   <-------------
>>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional.
>>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions.
>>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it.
>>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant.
>   <-------------
>> only four?  seems petty.
>
> Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with
> liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be
> succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little
> psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist

http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830

>
>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up  
>>>>> with
>>>>> him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?
>   <-------------
>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.
>   <-------------
>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones
>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977
>>> hovel.
>   <-------------
>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey.  you ought
>> to know that.
>
> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too
> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation
> potential. LOL

also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's  
houses.

surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove  
your now-vaporized bluster.

>
>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do.  free clue: one  
>> of
>> my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that there
>> "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a  
>> lot
>> of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days quite
>> wealthy.  better get to work!
>>
>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.
>
> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called
> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the
> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and
> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying
> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL

the fanfic is strong with this one.

>
>> that should keep you busy googling for a while...
>
> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL
>
>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout.
>   <-------------
>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling children
>
> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL

i said "family", not parents.  you got a reading problem?

>
>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to  
>> solve
>> all of my problems.
>
> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't
> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL

more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.

>
>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care
>> of everything for them, do you?  you seem to think that's how it works
>> for everybody, for some reason.  just wondering where you're getting
>> your "data".
>   <-------------
>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents.
> LOL
>
>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative  
>> what
>> happens in real life?  i told you that those numbers were not correct.   
>> i
>> told you that my parents are both retired.  your little stalkyStats are
>> just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i  
>> must
>> say.
>
> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
> all upset? LOL

"was it something i said" lame is noted.

the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't read  
that far, though.

what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.

now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options...  
add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments...  
calculate the values of the classic cars...

you sure are a simpleton.

>
>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's
>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've
>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that the
>>> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
>>> increased by the rising real estate market...
>
> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance
> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even
> with the price appreciation. LOL

did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15  
years?

>
>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
>> important than someone's perceived quality of life.
>
> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
> the best you could afford? LOL

2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full  
basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year old  
mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here  
 from 1912 until probably around the great depression.  it seems to  
befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice area.

>
>>> a rising level in the toilet bowl lifts all turds, you know. Too bad
>>> it couldn't even keep up with inflation.
>   <-------------
>> i bought it to live in, not to flip or give to my snot-nosed kid,  
>> genius.
>
> Said kid which you'll never have... you're gay. You've admitted it.
> LOL

you win.

>
>> i like a roof over my head where i can do whatever the hell i want  
>> without
>> shifty landlord or homeowner's association rules and i'm willing to pay
>> for it.
>
> And pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it...
> there comes a point when you must realize you've made a bad choice...
> or perhaps not. You *are* pretty retarded. LOL

you know, i was thinking about that while playing my drums at midnight  
with nothing to worry about.

>
>> what was your first house like, fakey?  something you wouldn't even want
>> to live in so you rented it out to some poor sap?
>
> You're comparing apples to oranges, DildoRider. I went out on my own
> when I was 18

you beat me by 2 years.

> and in a very short time I was financially set.

what does that have to do with your first house?

> You've
> been out on your own for what, 20 years now? And you're *still* in
> your "first house".

last house, maybe.  i like it here.

> How long are you gonna use the excuse of "I'm just
> starting out!"... until you retire? LOL

have you ever been content?  like, even once?

>
>>>>> I note they're pretty quiet lately.
>   <-------------
>>>> maybe they gave up dealing with a sociopath hiding behind a remailer.
>   <-------------
>>> The delivery method of truth isn't relevant. That it's truth they're
>>> running from is all that's relevant. You've done the same.
>   <-------------
>> "troof"!  LOL  thanks for admitting that you're a troofTard.  you're  
>> still
>> a sociopath and i expect that very soon we'll (TINW) see some very  
>> public
>> and undeniable evidence of that.  "chickens coming home to roost" and  
>> such.
>
> Awww, your butthurt fanfic is so entertaining, DildoRider... you've
> obviously been deeply psychologically scarred by the truth that I
> promulgate. Most libtards are. Having the rug pulled out from under
> your entire kooky belief system tends to do that to you idiots. LOL
>
> You'd think by now you'd have learned to just shut your stupid fucking
> gob and quietly live your little libtard lie of a life so I wouldn't
> utterly conflagrate your entire kooky belief system by exposing it to
> the scorching light of reality... but libtards are retarded. LOL

more lame strawman bullshit.

>
>>>>> Even retards like that have to succumb to reality once it's
>>>>> driven home with a size 16 steel-toe boot.
>   <-------------
>>>> you talk about your feet a lot, probably to distract from something
>>>> else.
>   <-------------
>>> You seem to be obsessed about that "something else"...
>   <-------------
>> i was talking about your tiny brain...
>
> Nicely backpedaled, DildoRider... except you've admitted *you* are the
> stupid one, not me. Remember, it's memorialized in my .sig. LOL

you are the one that was thinking about cock again, like usual.

>
>> i guess we found out not only that i was 100% correct, but that
>> what you were distracting from wasn't your atrophied
>> conservative noggin.  it was, indeed, "something else".
>
> You're at Gargles-level backpedaling, DildoRider. LOL

you walked right into that one, idiot, nice backpedal tho.  gargles on  
your mind lately?

>
>>> to the point that you turn your "girlfriend" into a "strap-on dude"
>>> and make her "rectally ream" you, DildoRider.
>   <-------------
>> magical dildos dancing in your head turning girls into dudes much?   
>> pretty
>> sure i get bonus points for proving that you think about your junk at  
>> the
>> same time that you are fantasizing my girlfriend turning into a man and
>> "rectally reaming" me.  are you trying to slyly hit on me, klosetBoi?   
>> LOL
>>
>> sorry, i don't date insufferable oafs with 6 kids and hawt wives.  :(
>
> Wow, that's some pretty serious projection you're doing, DildoRider.
> But I note you don't deny you make your "girlfriend" strap on a dildo
> and rectally ream you whenever you can't satisfy your cock addiction.
> LOL

i don't "make" anybody do anything.  i would ask politely.

>
>>>>> I mean, look at how much good it did your sanity, DildoRider.
>>>>> Barely a trace of swish in your blather, and you're talking about TIG
>>>>> welding and campfires just like a real man.
>   <-------------
>> ^ there's another of those funny spots where it looks like you meant to
>> say something, but changed your mind.
>
> Or, it could be another of those funny spots where your broken little
> libtard brain is misfiring again, DildoRider. LOL

nah, it's one of those things where your "program" for quoting is taking  
empty lines and only adding a single quote char instead of checking the  
lines above and below to match *at least* the number of levels of  
quotation as the one above.

i'm sure you wouldn't be able to fix it, even having been told what the  
problem is.

>
>>  ...or perhaps your buggy quoting algorithm?
>
> Or perhaps your buggy libtard brain. LOL

lame.

>
>> it seems to be indicating that you intentionally put a carriage return  
>> there,
>> but most likely, your cut/paste from your newsreader to your little  
>> dizum
>> duckblind app is adding extra carriage returns for no reason.  to
>> demonstrate how dumb that looks, i'll be adding an extra carriage return
>> after them all. ;)
>
> I'm not seeing them at all, so I don't know what you're bleating
> about... perhaps you've just gone so insane that you're seeing things,
> DildoRider. LOL

your quoteyProgram is adding in blank lines that aren't quoted in between  
quoted lines in messages.  kind of looks stupid, but i'm sure you "knew"  
that... it's *your* program, after all.

>
>>>> wow.  the misogyny is getting a little thick, "big man".
>   <-------------
>>> What does misogyny have to do with anything, DildoRider? Unless you're
>>> admitting you're a tranny. LOL
>   <-------------
>> what do trannies have to do with anything besides your fixation on them
>> and your disgust at a man who would do such a horrible thing as "demote"
>> himself to the status of a woman (or maybe lower since your queerphobia
>> adds another layer of hate beyond plain-old hatred of femininity)?
>
> Fucksake, you've been driven to stupidity. Again. LOL
>
> <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny>
> "a hatred of women"
>
> What does talking about TIG welding and camp fires have to do with
> women, unless you're admitting you prance around pretending you're a
> transexual woman, DildoRider?

first off, i know of ladies who can weld not only better then me, but  
better than most welders...

second, it's not *me* who hates/fears all things feminine and seeks to  
degrade them to some kind of "woman" status.  that would be you, the  
tranny chasing k0ok who lies about visiting people's homes.

seems like you need to learn a new word:

https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=transmisogyny

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmisogyny

Transmisogyny (sometimes trans-misogyny) is the intersection of  
transphobia and misogyny. It was coined by Julia Serano in her 2007 book  
Whipping Girl and used to describe the unique discrimination faced by  
trans women because of "the assumption that femaleness and femininity are  
inferior to, and exist primarily for the benefit of, maleness and  
masculinity",[1][2][3] and the way that transphobia intensifies the  
misogyny faced by trans women (and vice versa).[1] Transmisogyny is a  
central concept in transfeminism and is commonly seen in intersectional  
feminist theory. The suggestion that trans women's femaleness (rather than  
their femininity) is a source of transmisogyny is rejected by some  
feminists, who believe that trans women are not female.[4]

>
>>>> if you were so great you'd likely not have to put others down.  you're
>>>> nothing but a swole up infant.  it's no wonder that gerg idolizes you.
>   <-------------
>>> Awww, you're so butthurt, DildoRider. Why can't you refute
>   <-------------
>> i came here to distract you from all of those other nasty ko0ks, that's
>> why.
>
> Uh huh... your inability to refute any of that truth that I've
> promulgated was because you intentionally decided to melt down
> instead? That seems likely, eh? LOL

you just let me know when that happens, k?

>
>>> any of that
>>> truth that I've promulgated, which you've run away from?
>   <-------------
>> all i see is you wasting your time and effort and actively denying that
>> you're wasting time and effort.
>
> I see you running away after I utterly demolished all your kooky
> libtard blather... shall we go over all that again and torment you a
> second time? LOL

i see you lying on usenet about knocking on my door and then you calling  
me a "stalker".

>
>>>>> Yer welcome, DildoRider.
>   <-------------
>>>> yeah, thanks for outing yourself as a sad little
>>>> lonely-in-a-crowded-room malcontent. i'm sorry i hadn't
>>>> mentioned it sooner.
>   <-------------
>>> You're projecting, DildoRider. LOL
>   <-------------
>> the truth hurts, does it?  how many people are in the room that you are
>> currently in, fakey?  (the man in the white scrubs doesn't count)
>
> The kids are in bed, they have a strict 8:30 PM bedtime because
> they're up early for morning calisthenics. So just the wife and I are
> laughing at you currently, DildoRider. LOL

so, your wife is a complete loser as well?  hmmm, what are the chances  
that you're lying?

no oversized oafs have knocked on my door.  especially during the time you  
said you were going to be in town.  i even double checked just in case i  
missed an email from my zoneminder setup, but i should have not wasted  
those 5 seconds on a lying POS...

>
>>>>>> ^^^ you dropped something...
>   <-------------
>>>>> That's OK. Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer (aka Steve Hall) will be around
>>>>> to snuffle it up shortly. He loves that shit.
>   <-------------
>>>> so you have a shit-eating snicker?
>   <-------------
>>> If you consider Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer to be a "shit-eating
>>> snicker", that's your prerogative.
>   <-------------
>> i don't know who that is.  i was speaking of your shit-eating snicker.
>  Ah, I see. So your speech impediment precluded your conveying your
> message clearly. LOL

like the way you snicker while eating shit?

>
>>>> you might want to brush your teeth.
>   <-------------
>>> Yes, Steve, brush your teeth.
>   <-------------
>> steve's not here man... </chong>
>
> Yeah, you might want to put the crack pipe down and back away from it,
> Cracky McCrackHead... that shit made you melt down hilariously before,
> and now you're at it again. I expect you'll be bleating hard in the
> wee hours again? Yeah, you will.
>
> <snicker>
>

does your wife sit behind you while you type out your bleats a la swayze  
in 'ghost'?

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522692

Fromsnipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2)
Date2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
Message-ID<1mb5vxm.1nqditit5loc4N%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk>
In reply to#522684
"Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> >
> > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> > sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

[...]

<snickerTurd>

> >   <-------------

</snickerTurd>

<BFG>

-- 
^Ï^.        Sn!pe       <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> 

PTB
Siri Seal of Disavowal #007-007 (license to killfile)
AUK DoW #2 
0 %

My pet rock Gordon just is. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522779 — 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
Subject9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2
Message-ID<f1e408a366f95ffc9d7b7f0dc6df7956@dizum.com>
In reply to#522684
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
parts. Spankard. LOL

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>> head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>> a rising level in the toilet bowl lifts all turds, you know. Too bad
>>>> it couldn't even keep up with inflation.

>>> i bought it to live in, not to flip or give to my snot-nosed kid,  
>>> genius.

Say, did you know Rose Goldstein died in your house back in 1949,
DildoRider? In the master bedroom.

You might want to tell Saru Matambanadzo. She might be superstitious.
She is a libtard feminist, after all, so she'll believe pretty much
anything. Is she your "strap-on dude"? <snicker>

>> Said kid which you'll never have... you're gay. You've admitted it.
>> LOL

> you win.

I always do. Which means you lose. You always do. That's never stopped
you from melting down, though. LOL

>>> i like a roof over my head where i can do whatever the hell i want  
>>> without shifty landlord or homeowner's association rules and i'm willing
>>> to pay for it.

>> And pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it...
>> there comes a point when you must realize you've made a bad choice...
>> or perhaps not. You *are* pretty retarded. LOL

> you know, i was thinking about that while playing my drums at midnight  
> with nothing to worry about.

Except if you become too sick to work.. then you'll be out on the
street in short order. And faggots tend to develop all sorts of
various debilitating ailments that cut their life short. AIDS, for
instance. LOL

>>> what was your first house like, fakey?  something you wouldn't even want
>>> to live in so you rented it out to some poor sap?

>> You're comparing apples to oranges, DildoRider. I went out on my own
>> when I was 18

> you beat me by 2 years.

So you lounged around home mooching off your already-poor parents for
2 years, and now you refuse to perpetuate the species because you're a
selfish prick who only thinks of himself. I suppose you won't give a
second thought to standing idly by as your parents eat cat food and
live in a cardboard shack in their old age, too, DildoRider. So you're
a typical self-absorbed selfish mooching libtard douchebag who only
thinks of himself. Got it. LOL

>> and in a very short time I was financially set.

> what does that have to do with your first house?

My first house was an apartment complex I bought. Before I got the
payday from the movie, I rented for a couple years.

>> You've been out on your own for what, 20 years now? And you're *still*
>> in your "first house".

> last house, maybe.  i like it here.

So your "starter house" is as good as you can do. LOL

>> How long are you gonna use the excuse of "I'm just
>> starting out!"... until you retire? LOL

> have you ever been content?  like, even once?

Contentedness leads to sloth. I'm happy for what I've got, but never
content with it.

>>>>>> I note they're pretty quiet lately.

>>>>> maybe they gave up dealing with a sociopath hiding behind a remailer.

>>>> The delivery method of truth isn't relevant. That it's truth they're
>>>> running from is all that's relevant. You've done the same.

>>> "troof"!  LOL  thanks for admitting that you're a troofTard.  you're  
>>> still a sociopath and i expect that very soon we'll (TINW) see some
>>> very public and undeniable evidence of that.  "chickens coming home
>>> to roost" and such.

>> Awww, your butthurt fanfic is so entertaining, DildoRider... you've
>> obviously been deeply psychologically scarred by the truth that I
>> promulgate. Most libtards are. Having the rug pulled out from under
>> your entire kooky belief system tends to do that to you idiots. LOL
>>
>> You'd think by now you'd have learned to just shut your stupid fucking
>> gob and quietly live your little libtard lie of a life so I wouldn't
>> utterly conflagrate your entire kooky belief system by exposing it to
>> the scorching light of reality... but libtards are retarded. LOL

> more lame strawman bullshit.

Your backpedaling evasion of the truth that I promulgate is noted,
DildoRider. LOL

Did you ever notice that Obama's campaign theme was taken from Henry
Winkler in "The Waterboy"? "Yes we can" LOL And you libtards ate it
up. WaterBoy. LOL

>>>>>> Even retards like that have to succumb to reality once it's
>>>>>> driven home with a size 16 steel-toe boot.

>>>>> you talk about your feet a lot, probably to distract from something
>>>>> else.

>>>> You seem to be obsessed about that "something else"...

>>> i was talking about your tiny brain...

>> Nicely backpedaled, DildoRider... except you've admitted *you* are the
>> stupid one, not me. Remember, it's memorialized in my .sig. LOL

> you are the one that was thinking about cock again, like usual.

Says the guy who's so cock-obsessed he's admitted he dresses up as a
tranny and trolls dating websites for cock, and when he can't find any
there, he begs his "girlfriend" to strap one on so he can fantasize
about cocks as he rides dildos... then backpedals and bleats out that
because he rides cocks *and* gets reamed by a woman wearing a strap-on
dildo, that he's not gay, he's "bisexual". LOL

>>> i guess we found out not only that i was 100% correct, but that
>>> what you were distracting from wasn't your atrophied
>>> conservative noggin.  it was, indeed, "something else".

>> You're at Gargles-level backpedaling, DildoRider. LOL

> you walked right into that one, idiot, nice backpedal tho.

Your saying it doesn't make it so, DildoRider. Now tell us all again
how you weren't talking about cock again, Faggot. LOL

> gargles on your mind lately?

Just as relates to the fact that you're backpedaling like he does and
your trying the same sort of desperate word-twisting gymnastics that
Gargles performs when he's caught being an idiot. LOL

>>>> to the point that you turn your "girlfriend" into a "strap-on dude"
>>>> and make her "rectally ream" you, DildoRider.

>>> magical dildos dancing in your head turning girls into dudes much?   
>>> pretty sure i get bonus points for proving that you think about your
>>> junk at the same time that you are fantasizing my girlfriend turning
>>> into a man and "rectally reaming" me.  are you trying to slyly hit on
>>> me, klosetBoi? LOL
>>> 
>>> sorry, i don't date insufferable oafs with 6 kids and hawt wives.  :(

>> Wow, that's some pretty serious projection you're doing, DildoRider.
>> But I note you don't deny you make your "girlfriend" strap on a dildo
>> and rectally ream you whenever you can't satisfy your cock addiction.
>> LOL

> i don't "make" anybody do anything.  i would ask politely.

Bwahaha! Your admission that you're so cock-obsessed that you've
admitted you dress up as a tranny and troll dating websites for cock,
and when you can't find any there, you beg your "girlfriend" to strap
one on so you can fantasize about cocks as you ride dildos... then you
backpedal and bleat out that because you ride cocks *and* get reamed
by a woman wearing a strap-on dildo, that you're not gay, you're
"bisexual", noted. LOL

You're one step away from putting on your tranny garb and trolling the
red-light district, DildoRider. If you haven't already. LOL

>>>>>> I mean, look at how much good it did your sanity, DildoRider.
>>>>>> Barely a trace of swish in your blather, and you're talking about TIG
>>>>>> welding and campfires just like a real man.

>>> ^ there's another of those funny spots where it looks like you meant to
>>> say something, but changed your mind.

>> Or, it could be another of those funny spots where your broken little
>> libtard brain is misfiring again, DildoRider. LOL

> nah, it's one of those things where your "program" for quoting is taking  
> empty lines and only adding a single quote char instead of checking the  
> lines above and below to match *at least* the number of levels of  
> quotation as the one above.
> 
> i'm sure you wouldn't be able to fix it, even having been told what the  
> problem is.

Or, it's that your broken little libtard brain is yet again seeing
things that aren't there, DildoRider. It looks fine in my newsreader.
Perhaps you're so perturbed that you've become too retarded and insane
to properly run a newsreader. LOL

Or it could be I'm such a genius I can put things into your newsreader
that no one else sees, just to fuck with you and drive you that much
more insane. LOL

>>>  ...or perhaps your buggy quoting algorithm?

>> Or perhaps your buggy libtard brain. LOL

> lame.

Truth. LOL

>>> it seems to be indicating that you intentionally put a carriage return  
>>> there, but most likely, your cut/paste from your newsreader to your little  
>>> dizum duckblind app is adding extra carriage returns for no reason.  to
>>> demonstrate how dumb that looks, i'll be adding an extra carriage return
>>> after them all. ;)

>> I'm not seeing them at all, so I don't know what you're bleating
>> about... perhaps you've just gone so insane that you're seeing things,
>> DildoRider. LOL

> your quoteyProgram is adding in blank lines that aren't quoted in between  
> quoted lines in messages.  kind of looks stupid, but i'm sure you "knew"  
> that... it's *your* program, after all.

Does it bother you, DildoRider? You seem to have devoted the majority
of your reply to bleating about something that isn't there. Perhaps
you're seeing things again. You libtards are pretty delusional. LOL

>>>>> wow.  the misogyny is getting a little thick, "big man".

>>>> What does misogyny have to do with anything, DildoRider? Unless you're
>>>> admitting you're a tranny. LOL

>>> what do trannies have to do with anything besides your fixation on them
>>> and your disgust at a man who would do such a horrible thing as "demote"
>>> himself to the status of a woman (or maybe lower since your queerphobia
>>> adds another layer of hate beyond plain-old hatred of femininity)?

>> Fucksake, you've been driven to stupidity. Again. LOL

>> <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny>
>> "a hatred of women"
>>
>> What does talking about TIG welding and camp fires have to do with
>> women, unless you're admitting you prance around pretending you're a
>> transexual woman, DildoRider?

> first off, i know of ladies who can weld not only better then me, but  
> better than most welders...
> 
> second, it's not *me* who hates/fears all things feminine and seeks to  
> degrade them to some kind of "woman" status.  that would be you, the  
> tranny chasing k0ok who lies about visiting people's homes.
> 
> seems like you need to learn a new word:
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=transmisogyny
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmisogyny
> 
> Transmisogyny (sometimes trans-misogyny) is the intersection of  
> transphobia and misogyny. It was coined by Julia Serano in her 2007 book  
> Whipping Girl and used to describe the unique discrimination faced by  
> trans women because of "the assumption that femaleness and femininity are  
> inferior to, and exist primarily for the benefit of, maleness and  
> masculinity",[1][2][3] and the way that transphobia intensifies the  
> misogyny faced by trans women (and vice versa).[1] Transmisogyny is a  
> central concept in transfeminism and is commonly seen in intersectional  
> feminist theory. The suggestion that trans women's femaleness (rather than  
> their femininity) is a source of transmisogyny is rejected by some  
> feminists, who believe that trans women are not female.[4]

Your further admission that you're a tranny, combined with your
admission that you fervently wish you were a female tranny, noted. LOL

>>>>> if you were so great you'd likely not have to put others down.  you're
>>>>> nothing but a swole up infant.  it's no wonder that gerg idolizes you.

>>>> Awww, you're so butthurt, DildoRider. Why can't you refute

>>> i came here to distract you from all of those other nasty ko0ks, that's
>>> why.

>> Uh huh... your inability to refute any of that truth that I've
>> promulgated was because you intentionally decided to melt down
>> instead? That seems likely, eh? LOL

> you just let me know when that happens, k?

You ran away from all that truth I promulgated as regards climate
change being a politicized lie, libtards opposing civil rights since
the inception of the Democrat party as a slave-holder haven to
contemporary times, and various and sundry other topics... all of
which you've melted down over, then ran away from. LOL

In short, it's happened. Deal with it, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> any of that truth that I've promulgated, which you've run away from?

>>> all i see is you wasting your time and effort and actively denying that
>>> you're wasting time and effort.

>> I see you running away after I utterly demolished all your kooky
>> libtard blather... shall we go over all that again and torment you a
>> second time? LOL

> i see you lying on usenet about knocking on my door and then you calling  
> me a "stalker".

Where's that date-stamped video, DildoRider? If you had it, you'd have
posted it. That you didn't, combined with the fact that retards like
you (who can barely afford to pay off the college education you didn't
get, who can barely afford to pay off their shitshack half-a-house,
who have to lie about having "rich parents", who can only afford 20
year old beater Honda Accords) can't afford security systems and have
nothing worth stealing anyway, thus often getting caught in lies,
means you've been caught in yet another lie, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>>> Yer welcome, DildoRider.

>>>>> yeah, thanks for outing yourself as a sad little
>>>>> lonely-in-a-crowded-room malcontent. i'm sorry i hadn't
>>>>> mentioned it sooner.

>>>> You're projecting, DildoRider. LOL

>>> the truth hurts, does it?  how many people are in the room that you are
>>> currently in, fakey?  (the man in the white scrubs doesn't count)

>> The kids are in bed, they have a strict 8:30 PM bedtime because
>> they're up early for morning calisthenics. So just the wife and I are
>> laughing at you currently, DildoRider. LOL

> so, your wife is a complete loser as well?  hmmm, what are the chances  
> that you're lying?
> 
> no oversized oafs have knocked on my door.  especially during the time you  
> said you were going to be in town.  i even double checked just in case i  
> missed an email from my zoneminder setup, but i should have not wasted  
> those 5 seconds on a lying POS...

Awww, you furiously Googled up "Linux security system" and decided to
go with ZoneMinder as the security system you k'lame to have... yet
you've failed to post any videos. If you had videos, you'd have been
posting them left and right, DildoRider... where are those
date-stamped videos, DildoRider?

Now you backpedal and bleat about zma being too busy and it skipped
those frames. You know you want to. LOL

>>>>>>> ^^^ you dropped something...

>>>>>> That's OK. Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer (aka Steve Hall) will be around
>>>>>> to snuffle it up shortly. He loves that shit.

>>>>> so you have a shit-eating snicker?

>>>> If you consider Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer to be a "shit-eating
>>>> snicker", that's your prerogative.

>>> i don't know who that is.  i was speaking of your shit-eating snicker.

>> Ah, I see. So your speech impediment precluded your conveying your
>> message clearly. LOL

> like the way you snicker while eating shit?

Like the way you blurt out butthurt fanfic? LOL

>>>>> you might want to brush your teeth.

>>>> Yes, Steve, brush your teeth.

>>> steve's not here man... </chong>

>> Yeah, you might want to put the crack pipe down and back away from it,
>> Cracky McCrackHead... that shit made you melt down hilariously before,
>> and now you're at it again. I expect you'll be bleating hard in the
>> wee hours again? Yeah, you will.
>>
>> <snicker>

> does your wife sit behind you while you type out your bleats a la swayze  
> in 'ghost'?

Your evasion of the fact that you've been hitting that crack pipe
pretty hard lately, noted. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522787 — 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Subject9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1
Message-ID<3a7c6e15be1b1be329bf07e7d2a83b45@dizum.com>
In reply to#522684
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
parts. Spankard. LOL

> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>> head first into the wood chipper again:

>>   <-------------

Your melting down so badly that you're seeing things that aren't there
is noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
>>>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.

>>>>> yep.. i can't figure it out.  you aer so smort.

>>>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted.

>>> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux sysadmins
>>> with 2 decades of experience don't use perl.  uh-huh.

>> Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program
>> running, and is all pissed about it.

> yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy.  LOL

You admitted it, Witless. LOL

>> If you were able to get the Perl
>> program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that
>> the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather
>> is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.

>>>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that  
>>>>> nobody likes?

>>>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider.

>>> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of,
>>> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath.

>> Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it
>> something I said that set you off? LOL

> was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of your  
> wife and kids?

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

>>>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them.

>>> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb.  i was the only person in
>>> my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school.

>> Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the
>> room, by his own admission. LOL

> i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing  
> cock and anal sex unprompted, you were.

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

>>>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper
>>>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't
>>>> even know copper burns green.

>>> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry.  in fact, i know absolutely
>>> nothing, so you win.  that was easy.

>> Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL

> awesome.  i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you  
> needed it more than me.

Kooks often think that by exposing all their shortcomings themselves,
they can deflect the raucous laughter directed at them. You should
know by now that never works, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>>>>>>> signify "nothing".

>>>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you  
>>>>>> "moron". LOL

>>>>> you sure seem to be "happy".

>>>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL

>>> why would i act smart?

>> It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL

> that would be stupid of me.

That's why you try so hard, and fail so hilariously, DildoRider. LOL

>>> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart.

>> Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'?
>> Vince Lamb?

> exactly.

Ummm, kensi the astrophysicist? Petey John-John Ross the mildly
intelligent writer of bad poems (OK, I'll give you that one. LOL)?
Craptain Kneel Whorin' who is obviously intelligent but more than a
bit unhinged? Professor Dr. Richard Vincent Lamb?

Yeah, I see your point... they must all be idiots. Or you're a moron.
LOL

>> Stooopid kook. LOL

> yes they are.

Says the college dropout. LOL

>>> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid  
>>> people.

>> No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you
>> were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL

> huh?

Exactly. Stupid. LOL

>>>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond  
>>>>>>> "something made out of bricks".

>>>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.

>>>>> no i'm not.

>>>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting
>>>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you.

>>> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity.  i come here  
>>> to waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish
>>> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of
>>> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been  
>>> invested in for years and years.

>> I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the
>> best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy
>> meltdowns. LOL

> LOL

LOL

>>>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them, DildoRider.
>>>>>> You are, after all, a libtard.

>>>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?

>>>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional.
>>>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions.
>>>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it.
>>>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant.

>>> only four?  seems petty.

>> Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with
>> liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be
>> succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little
>> psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL

> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist
> 
> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/
> 
> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/
> 
> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830

Still spamming those same links to Obama bleating because Donald Trump
exercised his right to not correct idiots? And as for Ben Carson, a
black man... how exactly is he "racist", especially in light of his
discussing a *religion*, Moron? How is Islam a "race", Moron? LOL

>>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up  
>>>>>> with him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?

>>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
>>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.

>>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
>>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
>>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones
>>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977
>>>> hovel.

>>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey.  you ought
>>> to know that.

>> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too
>> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation
>> potential. LOL

> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's  
> houses.

Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't
even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord
beater. LOL

> surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove  
> your now-vaporized bluster.

Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam"
videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all
know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL

>>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do.  free clue: one  
>>> of my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that there
>>> "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a  
>>> lot of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days quite
>>> wealthy.  better get to work!
>>>
>>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.

>> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called
>> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the
>> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and
>> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying
>> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL

> the fanfic is strong with this one.

Says the guy who got caught lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

>>> that should keep you busy googling for a while...

>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
>>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout.

>>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling children

>> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL

> i said "family", not parents.  you got a reading problem?

"Rich" aunts and uncles aren't going to give you any money,
DildoRider. Especially if they're as "rich" as your parents. LOL

>>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to  
>>> solve all of my problems.

>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't
>> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL

> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.

Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

>>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care
>>> of everything for them, do you?  you seem to think that's how it works
>>> for everybody, for some reason.  just wondering where you're getting
>>> your "data".

>>>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents.
>>>> LOL

>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative  
>>> what happens in real life?  i told you that those numbers were not correct.   
>>> i told you that my parents are both retired.  your little stalkyStats are
>>> just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i  
>>> must say.

>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
>> all upset? LOL

> "was it something i said" lame is noted.

Evasion noted. LOL

> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't read  
> that far, though.
> 
> what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.
> 
> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options...  
> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments...  
> calculate the values of the classic cars...
> 
> you sure are a simpleton.

"inheritances" LOL

You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider.

"401k" LOL

At your $75/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up,
if that, given that you waste your money. LOL

"classic cars" LOL

You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL

Well, you can always sell your 200 clowncycles that you have to pedal
at 5000 RPM to go 10 MPH... for scrap. LOL

>>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's
>>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've
>>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that the
>>>> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
>>>> increased by the rising real estate market...

>> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance
>> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even
>> with the price appreciation. LOL

> did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15  
> years?

Did you forget that the reason you bleated about needing a house is so
you had more room? Now you've been caught in that lie, too. Do you
ever *not* lie about how pathetic your life is, DildoRider? LOL

>>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
>>> important than someone's perceived quality of life.

>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
>> the best you could afford? LOL

> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full  
> basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year old  
> mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here  
>  from 1912 until probably around the great depression.  it seems to  
> befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice area.

"really nice house" LOL

It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown half-a-house with half the roof
in desperate need of complete replacement... meaning maintenance has
been deferred on that hovel to the point that it can't even appreciate
faster than inflation. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522911 — Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
SubjectRe: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1
Message-ID<op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#522787
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
> You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
> DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
> parts. Spankard. LOL
>
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>>> head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>   <-------------
>
> Your melting down so badly that you're seeing things that aren't there
> is noted, DildoRider. LOL

i suppose i'll just have to write a de-mogrifier for your broken shit  
poasts.  i'll be sure to add in a ascii to binary feature as well as it  
seems like you were too stupid to figure that one out on your own in the  
past.

>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
>>>>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.
>
>>>>>> yep.. i can't figure it out.  you aer so smort.
>
>>>>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted.
>
>>>> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux  
>>>> sysadmins
>>>> with 2 decades of experience don't use perl.  uh-huh.
>
>>> Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program
>>> running, and is all pissed about it.
>
>> yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy.  LOL
>
> You admitted it, Witless. LOL

yep.  probably because i'm just stupid.  i'm so stupid that if i *did*  
know how, i'd still fuck it up and say i couldn't figure it out.  probably.

>
>>> If you were able to get the Perl
>>> program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that
>>> the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather
>>> is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!

i'm not the one who doubts the physics, doofus... or did you forget?  i  
only commented to try to save you about and hour of your day each day  
responding to the 9-11 troofGoofs.  some thanks...

>
>>>>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.
>
>>>>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that
>>>>>> nobody likes?
>
>>>>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider.
>
>>>> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of,
>>>> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath.
>
>>> Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it
>>> something I said that set you off? LOL
>
>> was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of  
>> your
>> wife and kids?
>
> Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

your admission you chase trannies on usenet is noted.

>
>>>>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them.
>
>>>> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb.  i was the only person  
>>>> in
>>>> my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school.
>
>>> Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the
>>> room, by his own admission. LOL
>
>> i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing
>> cock and anal sex unprompted, you were.
>
> Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

your further admission that you don't understand why hollering "tranny!"  
at a tranny is completely pointless as well as transmisogyny.

>
>>>>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper
>>>>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't
>>>>> even know copper burns green.
>
>>>> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry.  in fact, i know  
>>>> absolutely
>>>> nothing, so you win.  that was easy.
>
>>> Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL
>
>> awesome.  i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you
>> needed it more than me.
>
> Kooks often think that by exposing all their shortcomings themselves,
> they can deflect the raucous laughter directed at them. You should
> know by now that never works, DildoRider. LOL

laughter never bothered me.

>
>>>>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>>>>>>>> signify "nothing".
>
>>>>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you
>>>>>>> "moron". LOL
>
>>>>>> you sure seem to be "happy".
>
>>>>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL
>
>>>> why would i act smart?
>
>>> It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL
>
>> that would be stupid of me.
>
> That's why you try so hard, and fail so hilariously, DildoRider. LOL

you wouldn't like me if i "tried hard".

>
>>>> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart.
>
>>> Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'?
>>> Vince Lamb?
>
>> exactly.
>
> Ummm, kensi the astrophysicist? Petey John-John Ross the mildly
> intelligent writer of bad poems (OK, I'll give you that one. LOL)?
> Craptain Kneel Whorin' who is obviously intelligent but more than a
> bit unhinged? Professor Dr. Richard Vincent Lamb?
>
> Yeah, I see your point... they must all be idiots. Or you're a moron.
> LOL

everybody you listed, except kensi, is a total idiot.

>
>>> Stooopid kook. LOL
>
>> yes they are.
>
> Says the college dropout. LOL

here's a quotable quote for you:

there are lots of idiots in the world... some of them have degrees.

>
>>>> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid
>>>> people.
>
>>> No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you
>>> were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL
>
>> huh?
>
> Exactly. Stupid. LOL

buh?

>
>>>>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond
>>>>>>>> "something made out of bricks".
>
>>>>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.
>
>>>>>> no i'm not.
>
>>>>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting
>>>>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you.
>
>>>> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity.  i come here
>>>> to waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish
>>>> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of
>>>> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been
>>>> invested in for years and years.
>
>>> I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the
>>> best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy
>>> meltdowns. LOL
>
>> LOL
>
> LOL

LOL

>
>>>>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them,  
>>>>>>> DildoRider.
>>>>>>> You are, after all, a libtard.
>
>>>>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?
>
>>>>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional.
>>>>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions.
>>>>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it.
>>>>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant.
>
>>>> only four?  seems petty.
>
>>> Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with
>>> liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be
>>> succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little
>>> psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL
>
>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist
>>
>> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/
>>
>> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830
>
> Still spamming those same links to Obama bleating because Donald Trump
> exercised his right to not correct idiots? And as for Ben Carson, a
> black man... how exactly is he "racist", especially in light of his
> discussing a *religion*, Moron? How is Islam a "race", Moron? LOL

ben carson is more than a black man, he's an idiot just like anybody else  
who thinks that we shouldn't be able to have a muslim president.

>
>>>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up
>>>>>>> with him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?
>
>>>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
>>>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>>>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.
>
>>>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
>>>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
>>>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones
>>>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977
>>>>> hovel.
>
>>>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey.  you  
>>>> ought
>>>> to know that.
>
>>> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too
>>> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation
>>> potential. LOL
>
>> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's
>> houses.
>
> Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't
> even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord
> beater. LOL

security systems can be had for less than $200.  only an idiot like you  
would hire someone and hope that person doesn't have cat burglar friends.

i can afford way more than a beater accord, especially with the money i  
saved so far driving a beater accord for a decade.  only an idiot would  
have a good car in pittsburgh, anyway.  have you ever seen the streets  
here in spring?  perhaps you don't live in a place where they dump  
corrosive salt on the roads for 6 months.

>
>> surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove
>> your now-vaporized bluster.
>
> Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam"
> videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all
> know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL

i don't clutter up my security images with timestamps.  the filenames have  
the timestamps in them.

actually, i don't have any clue what the "date in question" is, mostly  
because unlike you, i'm not an obsessed fucktard and you never posted a  
date as far as i read.  maybe i don't read all of your posts?  sorry about  
that.

i did check from the time you announced your alleged pitt visit until 2  
weeks later, and sad to say, i saw no images of an idiot oaf on my porch.

>
>>>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do.  free clue: one
>>>> of my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that  
>>>> there
>>>> "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a
>>>> lot of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days  
>>>> quite
>>>> wealthy.  better get to work!
>>>>
>>>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.
>
>>> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called
>>> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the
>>> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and
>>> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying
>>> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL
>
>> the fanfic is strong with this one.
>
> Says the guy who got caught lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

my family seems to be more important to you than your own, these days.  is  
it because the kids are back in school?

>
>>>> that should keep you busy googling for a while...
>
>>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
>>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL!

<fart> LOL

>
>>>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
>>>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout.
>
>>>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling  
>>>> children
>
>>> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL
>
>> i said "family", not parents.  you got a reading problem?
>
> "Rich" aunts and uncles aren't going to give you any money,
> DildoRider. Especially if they're as "rich" as your parents. LOL

did you never know your grandparents or something?  straight to "aunts and  
uncles" as your only relatives when you were born?  that's too bad.

>
>>>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to
>>>> solve all of my problems.
>
>>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
>>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't
>>> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL
>
>> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.
>
> Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

<fart> LOL

>
>>>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care
>>>> of everything for them, do you?  you seem to think that's how it works
>>>> for everybody, for some reason.  just wondering where you're getting
>>>> your "data".
>
>>>>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents.
>>>>> LOL
>
>>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative
>>>> what happens in real life?  i told you that those numbers were not  
>>>> correct.
>>>> i told you that my parents are both retired.  your little stalkyStats  
>>>> are
>>>> just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i
>>>> must say.
>
>>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
>>> all upset? LOL
>
>> "was it something i said" lame is noted.
>
> Evasion noted. LOL

evasion of what?

>
>> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't  
>> read
>> that far, though.
>>
>> what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.
>>
>> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options...
>> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments...
>> calculate the values of the classic cars...
>>
>> you sure are a simpleton.
>
> "inheritances" LOL
>
> You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider.

that's funny.  my parents did, and so will i, genius.

>
> "401k" LOL
>
> At your $75/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up,
> if that, given that you waste your money. LOL

i was responding to your goofy k'lames about my parents that you based on  
some generic results from a website.

>
> "classic cars" LOL
>
> You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL

no, the classic cars that my parents have collected.

i'd put classic plates on mine but i actually use it sometimes.  there are  
limits on how often a week you can drive a classic car and where you can  
drive it to.

>
> Well, you can always sell your 200 clowncycles that you have to pedal
> at 5000 RPM to go 10 MPH... for scrap. LOL

i only have 3 trials bikes, spaz.  their total value is only about $3000.   
parted out they are worth more, what with all of the highly sought after  
high-end and titanium parts i've used.  go look up the price of a chris  
king mountain bike hubset.  now look up an industry9 mountain hubset.   
that's just the hubs on two of the bikes.

>
>>>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's
>>>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've
>>>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that  
>>>>> the
>>>>> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
>>>>> increased by the rising real estate market...
>
>>> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance
>>> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even
>>> with the price appreciation. LOL
>
>> did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15
>> years?
>
> Did you forget that the reason you bleated about needing a house is so
> you had more room?

so, you think i have to rent out every room becaue you're an idiot, eh?  i  
rent out my 3rd floor, genius.  i've only ever had 2 roommates at a time.   
those roommates also needed room for their bike and musician stuff.   
nobody complained, so i guess i completely fucked up.  yep.

BTW: that "DRIVEWAY" that you saw on the google street view was written  
after my old roommate went to leave for work at 7am and some idiot had  
blocked the driveway one too many times.  i was also concerned about the  
other 4 households whose cars were being blocked in.  haven't had that  
problem happen much lately.  but you know, because i'm stupid and i forget  
what a "driveway" is occasionally, i had to label it.  mmmHmmm.

> Now you've been caught in that lie, too. Do you
> ever *not* lie about how pathetic your life is, DildoRider? LOL

is that like how you got caught in a lie k'laming you came to my house?   
did the driveway look the same as it does on the google street view?

did you notice anything different from how it looks on google when you  
"were here"?  LOL

free clue:  a friend of mine bought it at sheriff's sale this year.  he's  
having his side of the roof either re-done or patched.  it's a 103 year  
old slate roof on his side.  i suggested that if he gets guys walking all  
over it in fall, he's going to be pissed in the winter and spring when  
it's leaking in new spots from being walked on and he can't get it fixed  
easily until the weather is above freezing.

the elderly lady who lived next door and passed away a year ago in a care  
facility after a battle with c-dif following a fall refused to do anything  
about her clogged up drain in the back, the roof, and the borer-infested  
tree out in front of that property.  i tried to help her as much as i  
could by doing her lawn and taking her garbage to the curb every week for  
15 years.  my guess is that her shitty kids that hardly ever came to visit  
her spent or hoarded all of her savings for her and left her in poverty.

>
>>>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
>>>> important than someone's perceived quality of life.
>
>>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
>>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
>>> the best you could afford? LOL
>
>> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full
>> basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year  
>> old
>> mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here
>>  from 1912 until probably around the great depression.  it seems to
>> befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice  
>> area.
>
> "really nice house" LOL
>
> It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown

overgrown?  let me guess... your house is situated exposed out in the  
blazing hot sun so that everybody can stare at its majesty and so you can  
pay double heating and cooling bills like an idiot.

> half-a-house with half the roof

of course you'll refuse to note that i repaired over half of that roof.   
the new owner next door is fixing the other.

> in desperate need of complete replacement...

which could only be done once the late neighbor's kids left the house and  
it's entire contents go to sheriff sale after over a year of fighting and  
bickering over it and legal bullshit.

> meaning maintenance has
> been deferred on that hovel to the point that it can't even appreciate
> faster than inflation. LOL

except most of what you are fakeyGoogling and seeing has been fixed  
already.  likely, you idiotically think that google maps is a real-time  
live website, since you have some brain damage from getting your head  
knocked around so much during your lifetime.

feel free to split your response up into as many parts as you need in  
order to be a fucking idiot.  i've been on usenet since 1994 and have  
never seen anybody but complete k0oks do the shit you do on it.

PS: you could always choose a more normal way to poast that doesn't have  
limitations on the size of posts?

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name? <snicker>
You>    Gerg
FakeyBot>       Oh look you're back again to polish my size 16 boot with  
your colon, Gerg. <snicker>
Gerg>   No, not again. I just had it detailed.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you just had it detailed?
Gerg>   Because it's still seeping
FakeyBot>       Is that the real reason?
Gerg>   Mostly, yes.
FakeyBot>       Why don't you tell me a little more about this.
Gerg>   it's personal.  i think i got it from the bucket.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you think you got it from the bucket?
Gerg>   i fell in last night.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you fell in last night?
Gerg>   I was nearly killed.
FakeyBot>       You should probably off yourself. <snicker>
FakeyBot>       The world won't miss you. <snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522935 — Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
SubjectRe: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b
Message-ID<199d1e6faacf054bb506bad26f210e0b@dizum.com>
In reply to#522911
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>
>> You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
>> DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
>> parts. Spankard. LOL

<crickets> LOL

You bleated so hard in your reply that I have to split this one into
two parts... I've got you working hard, DildoRider. <snicker>

>>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>>>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>>>> head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up
>>>>>>>> with him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?

>>>>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
>>>>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>>>>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.

>>>>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
>>>>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
>>>>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones
>>>>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977
>>>>>> hovel.

>>>>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey.  you  
>>>>> ought to know that.

>>>> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too
>>>> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation
>>>> potential. LOL

>>> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's
>>> houses.

>> Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't
>> even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord
>> beater. LOL

> security systems can be had for less than $200.  only an idiot like you  
> would hire someone and hope that person doesn't have cat burglar friends.

Awwww, you're so perturbed you're spewing fanfic again, DildoRider.
LOL

> i can afford way more than a beater accord, especially with the money i  
> saved so far driving a beater accord for a decade.  only an idiot would  
> have a good car in pittsburgh, anyway.  have you ever seen the streets  
> here in spring?  perhaps you don't live in a place where they dump  
> corrosive salt on the roads for 6 months.

Oh, sure. You can afford "way more" than a shitty road-salt-rusted 20
year old Honda Accord beater and dilapidated shitshack half-a-house
hovel. You *choose* to live like a pauper because growing up, you had
poor parents. It's all you know, right? And that "job" you've got that
lets you bleat non-stop on Usenet keeps you in caviar and champagne,
right? LOL

>>> surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove
>>> your now-vaporized bluster.

>> Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam"
>> videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all
>> know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL

> i don't clutter up my security images with timestamps.  the filenames have  
> the timestamps in them.

More backpedaling. LOL

IOW, you've got nothing, and you've been caught in yet another lie.
Just like you were caught lying when you said your parents were
"rich". LOL

> actually, i don't have any clue what the "date in question" is, mostly  
> because unlike you, i'm not an obsessed fucktard and you never posted a  
> date as far as i read.  maybe i don't read all of your posts?  sorry about  
> that.

Your admission that you're too fucking stupid to read older posts,
noted. LOL

> i did check from the time you announced your alleged pitt visit until 2  
> weeks later, and sad to say, i saw no images of an idiot oaf on my porch.

And yet, no videos. Imagine that... let's see your faked-up video with
a falsified file date stamp taken with a camera you duct-taped to your
porch ceiling as means of covering up your lies, or you'll admit
you've been caught blathering lies, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do.  free clue: one
>>>>> of my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that  
>>>>> there "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a
>>>>> lot of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days  
>>>>> quite wealthy.  better get to work!
>>>>>
>>>>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.

>>>> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called
>>>> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the
>>>> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and
>>>> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying
>>>> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL

>>> the fanfic is strong with this one.

>> Says the guy who got caught lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

> my family seems to be more important to you than your own, these days.  is  
> it because the kids are back in school?

Says the guy bleating day and night to entertain his Usenet Lord and
Master. LOL

>>>>> that should keep you busy googling for a while...

>>>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
>>>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL

>> <crickets> LOL!

> <fart> LOL

Your lamely attempted evasion of having been caught lying about having
rich parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
>>>>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout.

>>>>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling  
>>>>> children

>>>> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL

>>> i said "family", not parents.  you got a reading problem?

>> "Rich" aunts and uncles aren't going to give you any money,
>> DildoRider. Especially if they're as "rich" as your parents. LOL

> did you never know your grandparents or something?  straight to "aunts and  
> uncles" as your only relatives when you were born?  that's too bad.

Your grandparents, if they had any money, gave it to their kids. And
being that their kids are typical middle-class consumerist retards,
they'll chew through most or all of that money. You won't see a dime,
DildoRider. Especially as big a disappointment as you grew up to be.
LOL

>>>>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to
>>>>> solve all of my problems.

>>>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
>>>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't
>>>> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL

>>> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.

>> Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

> <fart> LOL

Says the guy getting the dildos pulled out by his "rich" parents. LOL

>>>>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care
>>>>> of everything for them, do you?  you seem to think that's how it works
>>>>> for everybody, for some reason.  just wondering where you're getting
>>>>> your "data".

>>>>>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents.
>>>>>> LOL

>>>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>>>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative
>>>>> what happens in real life?  i told you that those numbers were not  
>>>>> correct.
>>>>> i told you that my parents are both retired.  your little stalkyStats  
>>>>> are just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well,
>>>>> i must say.

>>>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
>>>> all upset? LOL

>>> "was it something i said" lame is noted.

>> Evasion noted. LOL

> evasion of what?

More evasion as desperate means of trying to cover up your having been
caught lying about your "rich" parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL

>>> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't  
>>> read that far, though.
>>>
>>> what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.
>>>
>>> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options...
>>> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments...
>>> calculate the values of the classic cars...
>>>
>>> you sure are a simpleton.

>> "inheritances" LOL
>>
>> You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider.

> that's funny.  my parents did, and so will i, genius.

Your parents will burn through any inheritance they got. Being on a
fixed income is hell, especially as they get older and feeble. Ever
priced hospital stays, retirement homes and home assistance? And I'm
sure, to save your "inheritance", you'll have no problem taking your
parents in and wiping their drool and changing their diapers when they
reach that stage, right? No? No, that'd be too much like having
kids... and you'll never do that. You're gay. LOL

>> "401k" LOL
>>
>> At your $75k/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up,
>> if that, given that you waste your money. LOL

> i was responding to your goofy k'lames about my parents that you based on  
> some generic results from a website.

Your parents were worker bees. Now they're retired worker bees on a
fixed income. They're not "rich", DildoRider. You've done the typical
lower-middle-class thing and perpetuated the class you were born into.
Ah well, at least that trend dies out with you, eh? You being a
selfish douchebag who only thinks of and lives for himself, you won't
have any kids. You're gay. LOL

>> "classic cars" LOL
>>
>> You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL

> no, the classic cars that my parents have collected.
> 
> i'd put classic plates on mine but i actually use it sometimes.  there are  
> limits on how often a week you can drive a classic car and where you can  
> drive it to.

And exorbitant insurance rates that you couldn't afford. LOL

Do your parents keep these "classic cars" in their barn? Let me guess,
they're all the old rusted-out beaters your parents bought over the
years. LOL

>> Well, you can always sell your 200 clowncycles that you have to pedal
>> at 5000 RPM to go 10 MPH... for scrap. LOL

> i only have 3 trials bikes, spaz.  their total value is only about $3000.   
> parted out they are worth more, what with all of the highly sought after  
> high-end and titanium parts i've used.  go look up the price of a chris  
> king mountain bike hubset.  now look up an industry9 mountain hubset.   
> that's just the hubs on two of the bikes.

You have no idea what you'll be able to sell those used parts for,
DildoRider. Lower-middle-class goofs like you often grossly
overestimate their net worth... it's part of what keeps you tards in
your economic rut. You think you're doing better than you really are.
What are your liquid assets with verifiable worth? LOL

I think you'll be shocked to learn it's likely less than $50,000. LOL

>>>>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's
>>>>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've
>>>>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that  
>>>>>> the property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
>>>>>> increased by the rising real estate market...

>>>> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance
>>>> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even
>>>> with the price appreciation. LOL

>>> did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15
>>> years?

>> Did you forget that the reason you bleated about needing a house is so
>> you had more room?

> so, you think i have to rent out every room becaue you're an idiot, eh?  i  
> rent out my 3rd floor, genius.  i've only ever had 2 roommates at a time.   
> those roommates also needed room for their bike and musician stuff.   
> nobody complained, so i guess i completely fucked up.  yep.

Well, you *did* buy a dilapidated shitshack half-a-house that couldn't
even appreciate its way out of the steepest downturn in real estate
values since the Great Depression at a rate that exceeded inflation.
LOL

> BTW: that "DRIVEWAY" that you saw on the google street view was written  
> after my old roommate went to leave for work at 7am and some idiot had  
> blocked the driveway one too many times.  i was also concerned about the  
> other 4 households whose cars were being blocked in.  haven't had that  
> problem happen much lately.  but you know, because i'm stupid and i forget  
> what a "driveway" is occasionally, i had to label it.  mmmHmmm.

Didn't see it on Google Street View. But your admission that you did
is noted. I've got you spinning so fast you're stalking yourself,
DildoRider. LOL

>> Now you've been caught in that lie, too. Do you
>> ever *not* lie about how pathetic your life is, DildoRider? LOL

> is that like how you got caught in a lie k'laming you came to my house?   

Says the guy who can't post any proof because he's lying. LOL

> did the driveway look the same as it does on the google street view?

No idea. I've not look at it in Google Street View.

> did you notice anything different from how it looks on google when you  
> "were here"?  LOL
> 
> free clue:  a friend of mine bought it at sheriff's sale this year.  he's  
> having his side of the roof either re-done or patched.  it's a 103 year  
> old slate roof on his side.  i suggested that if he gets guys walking all  
> over it in fall, he's going to be pissed in the winter and spring when  
> it's leaking in new spots from being walked on and he can't get it fixed  
> easily until the weather is above freezing.
> 
> the elderly lady who lived next door and passed away a year ago in a care  
> facility after a battle with c-dif following a fall refused to do anything  
> about her clogged up drain in the back, the roof, and the borer-infested  
> tree out in front of that property.  i tried to help her as much as i  
> could by doing her lawn and taking her garbage to the curb every week for  
> 15 years.  my guess is that her shitty kids that hardly ever came to visit  
> her spent or hoarded all of her savings for her and left her in poverty.

Nicely bleated, DildoRider. LOL

Wow, you really *do* live in a dilapidated shit-shack, don't you?
Shitted-out roof, clogged up drains, wood borer infestation,
over-grown and maintenance deferred, in need of brickwork because
you've let plants grow up the side of the property. No wonder that
property couldn't even appreciate faster than inflation. LOL

>>>>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
>>>>> important than someone's perceived quality of life.

>>>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
>>>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
>>>> the best you could afford? LOL

>>> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full
>>> basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year  
>>> old mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here
>>> from 1912 until probably around the great depression.  it seems to
>>> befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice  
>>> area.

>> "really nice house" LOL
>>
>> It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown

> overgrown?  let me guess... your house is situated exposed out in the  
> blazing hot sun so that everybody can stare at its majesty and so you can  
> pay double heating and cooling bills like an idiot.

I have solar, and excellent insulation. I pay for less than half of
what a similarly-sized house consumes. Those brutal PA winters must
really run up the heating bills, though, eh? Especially in an ancient
dilapidated shitshack half-a-house with insulation that's likely
settled decades ago. Or is it so old it has the old chemically-treated
shredded wood pulp insulation? You know, as that shit ages, compacts
and gets water-soaked, it actually causes an increase in heat transfer
through the wall, right? Do you get frost on inside walls during
brutal winters? LOL

>> half-a-house with half the roof

> of course you'll refuse to note that i repaired over half of that roof.   
> the new owner next door is fixing the other.

Still with half the roof in desperate need of complete replacement,
then. LOL

>> in desperate need of complete replacement...

> which could only be done once the late neighbor's kids left the house and  
> it's entire contents go to sheriff sale after over a year of fighting and  
> bickering over it and legal bullshit.

That won't happen when you finally die of an infected perforated
intestine though, eh, DildoRider? No, what little of yours that has
any value will go to your parents (who will promptly sell it because
they have no need of it), and the rest of it will be dumped. A live
lived and thoroughly wasted. LOL

>> meaning maintenance has
>> been deferred on that hovel to the point that it can't even appreciate
>> faster than inflation. LOL

> except most of what you are fakeyGoogling and seeing has been fixed  
> already.  likely, you idiotically think that google maps is a real-time  
> live website, since you have some brain damage from getting your head  
> knocked around so much during your lifetime.

Says the guy who admits that what I said is the truth... half the roof
is in dire need of complete replacement. LOL

> feel free to split your response up into as many parts as you need in  
> order to be a fucking idiot.  i've been on usenet since 1994 and have  
> never seen anybody but complete k0oks do the shit you do on it.

Says the guy melting down day and night as he bleats up a storm. LOL

I note, however, that for your current meltdown, you've not invented
any new ways of melting down, as you did last time with your WordCloud
Tributes To Your Usenet Lord and Master. LOL

> PS: you could always choose a more normal way to poast that doesn't have  
> limitations on the size of posts?

Why, when this makes you spin up and barf foam, DildoRider?

I want to see you annotate each and every blank line in my posts with
arrowed lines again, DildoRider. Get right on that.

<snicker>

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522944 — Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
SubjectRe: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b
Message-ID<op.x5gc5cogtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#522935
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:53:47 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>
>>> You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
>>> DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
>>> parts. Spankard. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
> You bleated so hard in your reply that I have to split this one into
> two parts... I've got you working hard, DildoRider. <snicker>
>
>>>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>>>>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>>>>> head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up
>>>>>>>>> with him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?
>
>>>>>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating  
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>>>>>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.
>
>>>>>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
>>>>>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
>>>>>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the  
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty  
>>>>>>> $154,977
>>>>>>> hovel.
>
>>>>>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey.  you
>>>>>> ought to know that.
>
>>>>> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too
>>>>> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation
>>>>> potential. LOL
>
>>>> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's
>>>> houses.
>
>>> Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't
>>> even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord
>>> beater. LOL
>
>> security systems can be had for less than $200.  only an idiot like you
>> would hire someone and hope that person doesn't have cat burglar  
>> friends.
>
> Awwww, you're so perturbed you're spewing fanfic again, DildoRider.
> LOL
>
>> i can afford way more than a beater accord, especially with the money i
>> saved so far driving a beater accord for a decade.  only an idiot would
>> have a good car in pittsburgh, anyway.  have you ever seen the streets
>> here in spring?  perhaps you don't live in a place where they dump
>> corrosive salt on the roads for 6 months.
>
> Oh, sure. You can afford "way more" than a shitty road-salt-rusted 20
> year old Honda Accord beater and dilapidated shitshack half-a-house
> hovel. You *choose* to live like a pauper because growing up, you had
> poor parents. It's all you know, right? And that "job" you've got that
> lets you bleat non-stop on Usenet keeps you in caviar and champagne,
> right? LOL
>
>>>> surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove
>>>> your now-vaporized bluster.
>
>>> Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam"
>>> videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all
>>> know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL
>
>> i don't clutter up my security images with timestamps.  the filenames  
>> have
>> the timestamps in them.
>
> More backpedaling. LOL
>
> IOW, you've got nothing, and you've been caught in yet another lie.
> Just like you were caught lying when you said your parents were
> "rich". LOL
>
>> actually, i don't have any clue what the "date in question" is, mostly
>> because unlike you, i'm not an obsessed fucktard and you never posted a
>> date as far as i read.  maybe i don't read all of your posts?  sorry  
>> about
>> that.
>
> Your admission that you're too fucking stupid to read older posts,
> noted. LOL
>
>> i did check from the time you announced your alleged pitt visit until 2
>> weeks later, and sad to say, i saw no images of an idiot oaf on my  
>> porch.
>
> And yet, no videos. Imagine that... let's see your faked-up video with
> a falsified file date stamp taken with a camera you duct-taped to your
> porch ceiling as means of covering up your lies, or you'll admit
> you've been caught blathering lies, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>>>>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do.  free clue:  
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> of my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that
>>>>>> there "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition  
>>>>>> making a
>>>>>> lot of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days
>>>>>> quite wealthy.  better get to work!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.
>
>>>>> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called
>>>>> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the
>>>>> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and
>>>>> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying
>>>>> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL
>
>>>> the fanfic is strong with this one.
>
>>> Says the guy who got caught lying about his "rich" parents. LOL
>
>> my family seems to be more important to you than your own, these days.   
>> is
>> it because the kids are back in school?
>
> Says the guy bleating day and night to entertain his Usenet Lord and
> Master. LOL
>
>>>>>> that should keep you busy googling for a while...
>
>>>>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
>>>>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL
>
>>> <crickets> LOL!
>
>> <fart> LOL
>
> Your lamely attempted evasion of having been caught lying about having
> rich parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>>>>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
>>>>>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College  
>>>>>>> Dropout.
>
>>>>>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling
>>>>>> children
>
>>>>> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL
>
>>>> i said "family", not parents.  you got a reading problem?
>
>>> "Rich" aunts and uncles aren't going to give you any money,
>>> DildoRider. Especially if they're as "rich" as your parents. LOL
>
>> did you never know your grandparents or something?  straight to "aunts  
>> and
>> uncles" as your only relatives when you were born?  that's too bad.
>
> Your grandparents, if they had any money, gave it to their kids. And
> being that their kids are typical middle-class consumerist retards,
> they'll chew through most or all of that money. You won't see a dime,
> DildoRider. Especially as big a disappointment as you grew up to be.
> LOL
>
>>>>>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to
>>>>>> solve all of my problems.
>
>>>>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
>>>>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They  
>>>>> couldn't
>>>>> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL
>
>>>> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.
>
>>> Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL
>
>> <fart> LOL
>
> Says the guy getting the dildos pulled out by his "rich" parents. LOL
>
>>>>>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care
>>>>>> of everything for them, do you?  you seem to think that's how it  
>>>>>> works
>>>>>> for everybody, for some reason.  just wondering where you're getting
>>>>>> your "data".
>
>>>>>>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich"  
>>>>>>> parents.
>>>>>>> LOL
>
>>>>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>>>>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are  
>>>>>> indicative
>>>>>> what happens in real life?  i told you that those numbers were not
>>>>>> correct.
>>>>>> i told you that my parents are both retired.  your little  
>>>>>> stalkyStats
>>>>>> are just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite  
>>>>>> well,
>>>>>> i must say.
>
>>>>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
>>>>> all upset? LOL
>
>>>> "was it something i said" lame is noted.
>
>>> Evasion noted. LOL
>
>> evasion of what?
>
> More evasion as desperate means of trying to cover up your having been
> caught lying about your "rich" parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>>> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't
>>>> read that far, though.
>>>>
>>>> what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.
>>>>
>>>> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock  
>>>> options...
>>>> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party  
>>>> investments...
>>>> calculate the values of the classic cars...
>>>>
>>>> you sure are a simpleton.
>
>>> "inheritances" LOL
>>>
>>> You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider.
>
>> that's funny.  my parents did, and so will i, genius.
>
> Your parents will burn through any inheritance they got. Being on a
> fixed income is hell, especially as they get older and feeble. Ever
> priced hospital stays, retirement homes and home assistance? And I'm
> sure, to save your "inheritance", you'll have no problem taking your
> parents in and wiping their drool and changing their diapers when they
> reach that stage, right? No? No, that'd be too much like having
> kids... and you'll never do that. You're gay. LOL
>
>>> "401k" LOL
>>>
>>> At your $75k/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up,
>>> if that, given that you waste your money. LOL
>
>> i was responding to your goofy k'lames about my parents that you based  
>> on
>> some generic results from a website.
>
> Your parents were worker bees. Now they're retired worker bees on a
> fixed income. They're not "rich", DildoRider. You've done the typical
> lower-middle-class thing and perpetuated the class you were born into.
> Ah well, at least that trend dies out with you, eh? You being a
> selfish douchebag who only thinks of and lives for himself, you won't
> have any kids. You're gay. LOL
>
>>> "classic cars" LOL
>>>
>>> You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL
>
>> no, the classic cars that my parents have collected.
>>
>> i'd put classic plates on mine but i actually use it sometimes.  there  
>> are
>> limits on how often a week you can drive a classic car and where you can
>> drive it to.
>
> And exorbitant insurance rates that you couldn't afford. LOL
>
> Do your parents keep these "classic cars" in their barn? Let me guess,
> they're all the old rusted-out beaters your parents bought over the
> years. LOL
>
>>> Well, you can always sell your 200 clowncycles that you have to pedal
>>> at 5000 RPM to go 10 MPH... for scrap. LOL
>
>> i only have 3 trials bikes, spaz.  their total value is only about  
>> $3000.
>> parted out they are worth more, what with all of the highly sought after
>> high-end and titanium parts i've used.  go look up the price of a chris
>> king mountain bike hubset.  now look up an industry9 mountain hubset.
>> that's just the hubs on two of the bikes.
>
> You have no idea what you'll be able to sell those used parts for,
> DildoRider. Lower-middle-class goofs like you often grossly
> overestimate their net worth... it's part of what keeps you tards in
> your economic rut. You think you're doing better than you really are.
> What are your liquid assets with verifiable worth? LOL
>
> I think you'll be shocked to learn it's likely less than $50,000. LOL
>
>>>>>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house  
>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time  
>>>>>>> you've
>>>>>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that
>>>>>>> the property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
>>>>>>> increased by the rising real estate market...
>
>>>>> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance
>>>>> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even
>>>>> with the price appreciation. LOL
>
>>>> did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last  
>>>> 15
>>>> years?
>
>>> Did you forget that the reason you bleated about needing a house is so
>>> you had more room?
>
>> so, you think i have to rent out every room becaue you're an idiot,  
>> eh?  i
>> rent out my 3rd floor, genius.  i've only ever had 2 roommates at a  
>> time.
>> those roommates also needed room for their bike and musician stuff.
>> nobody complained, so i guess i completely fucked up.  yep.
>
> Well, you *did* buy a dilapidated shitshack half-a-house that couldn't
> even appreciate its way out of the steepest downturn in real estate
> values since the Great Depression at a rate that exceeded inflation.
> LOL
>
>> BTW: that "DRIVEWAY" that you saw on the google street view was written
>> after my old roommate went to leave for work at 7am and some idiot had
>> blocked the driveway one too many times.  i was also concerned about the
>> other 4 households whose cars were being blocked in.  haven't had that
>> problem happen much lately.  but you know, because i'm stupid and i  
>> forget
>> what a "driveway" is occasionally, i had to label it.  mmmHmmm.
>
> Didn't see it on Google Street View. But your admission that you did
> is noted. I've got you spinning so fast you're stalking yourself,
> DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> Now you've been caught in that lie, too. Do you
>>> ever *not* lie about how pathetic your life is, DildoRider? LOL
>
>> is that like how you got caught in a lie k'laming you came to my house?
>
> Says the guy who can't post any proof because he's lying. LOL
>
>> did the driveway look the same as it does on the google street view?
>
> No idea. I've not look at it in Google Street View.
>
>> did you notice anything different from how it looks on google when you
>> "were here"?  LOL
>>
>> free clue:  a friend of mine bought it at sheriff's sale this year.   
>> he's
>> having his side of the roof either re-done or patched.  it's a 103 year
>> old slate roof on his side.  i suggested that if he gets guys walking  
>> all
>> over it in fall, he's going to be pissed in the winter and spring when
>> it's leaking in new spots from being walked on and he can't get it fixed
>> easily until the weather is above freezing.
>>
>> the elderly lady who lived next door and passed away a year ago in a  
>> care
>> facility after a battle with c-dif following a fall refused to do  
>> anything
>> about her clogged up drain in the back, the roof, and the borer-infested
>> tree out in front of that property.  i tried to help her as much as i
>> could by doing her lawn and taking her garbage to the curb every week  
>> for
>> 15 years.  my guess is that her shitty kids that hardly ever came to  
>> visit
>> her spent or hoarded all of her savings for her and left her in poverty.
>
> Nicely bleated, DildoRider. LOL
>
> Wow, you really *do* live in a dilapidated shit-shack, don't you?
> Shitted-out roof, clogged up drains, wood borer infestation,
> over-grown and maintenance deferred, in need of brickwork because
> you've let plants grow up the side of the property. No wonder that
> property couldn't even appreciate faster than inflation. LOL
>
>>>>>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
>>>>>> important than someone's perceived quality of life.
>
>>>>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
>>>>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
>>>>> the best you could afford? LOL
>
>>>> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus  
>>>> full
>>>> basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year
>>>> old mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived  
>>>> here
>>>> from 1912 until probably around the great depression.  it seems to
>>>> befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice
>>>> area.
>
>>> "really nice house" LOL
>>>
>>> It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown
>
>> overgrown?  let me guess... your house is situated exposed out in the
>> blazing hot sun so that everybody can stare at its majesty and so you  
>> can
>> pay double heating and cooling bills like an idiot.
>
> I have solar, and excellent insulation. I pay for less than half of
> what a similarly-sized house consumes. Those brutal PA winters must
> really run up the heating bills, though, eh? Especially in an ancient
> dilapidated shitshack half-a-house with insulation that's likely
> settled decades ago. Or is it so old it has the old chemically-treated
> shredded wood pulp insulation? You know, as that shit ages, compacts
> and gets water-soaked, it actually causes an increase in heat transfer
> through the wall, right? Do you get frost on inside walls during
> brutal winters? LOL
>
>>> half-a-house with half the roof
>
>> of course you'll refuse to note that i repaired over half of that roof.
>> the new owner next door is fixing the other.
>
> Still with half the roof in desperate need of complete replacement,
> then. LOL
>
>>> in desperate need of complete replacement...
>
>> which could only be done once the late neighbor's kids left the house  
>> and
>> it's entire contents go to sheriff sale after over a year of fighting  
>> and
>> bickering over it and legal bullshit.
>
> That won't happen when you finally die of an infected perforated
> intestine though, eh, DildoRider? No, what little of yours that has
> any value will go to your parents (who will promptly sell it because
> they have no need of it), and the rest of it will be dumped. A live
> lived and thoroughly wasted. LOL
>
>>> meaning maintenance has
>>> been deferred on that hovel to the point that it can't even appreciate
>>> faster than inflation. LOL
>
>> except most of what you are fakeyGoogling and seeing has been fixed
>> already.  likely, you idiotically think that google maps is a real-time
>> live website, since you have some brain damage from getting your head
>> knocked around so much during your lifetime.
>
> Says the guy who admits that what I said is the truth... half the roof
> is in dire need of complete replacement. LOL
>
>> feel free to split your response up into as many parts as you need in
>> order to be a fucking idiot.  i've been on usenet since 1994 and have
>> never seen anybody but complete k0oks do the shit you do on it.
>
> Says the guy melting down day and night as he bleats up a storm. LOL
>
> I note, however, that for your current meltdown, you've not invented
> any new ways of melting down, as you did last time with your WordCloud
> Tributes To Your Usenet Lord and Master. LOL
>
>> PS: you could always choose a more normal way to poast that doesn't have
>> limitations on the size of posts?
>
> Why, when this makes you spin up and barf foam, DildoRider?
>
> I want to see you annotate each and every blank line in my posts with
> arrowed lines again, DildoRider. Get right on that.
>
> <snicker>
>


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name? <snicker>
You>    Gerg
FakeyBot>       Oh look you're back again to polish my size 16 boot with  
your colon, Gerg. <snicker>
Gerg>   No, not again. I just had it detailed.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you just had it detailed?
Gerg>   Because it's still seeping
FakeyBot>       Is that the real reason?
Gerg>   Mostly, yes.
FakeyBot>       Why don't you tell me a little more about this.
Gerg>   it's personal.  i think i got it from the bucket.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you think you got it from the bucket?
Gerg>   i fell in last night.
FakeyBot>       Why do you say you fell in last night?
Gerg>   I was nearly killed.
FakeyBot>       You should probably off yourself. <snicker>
FakeyBot>       The world won't miss you. <snicker>



didn't even read your bullshit, fakey.  you win.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#523077 — Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
SubjectRe: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b
Message-ID<1487fa40b9ea8daf2fdd52017c34c5b0@dizum.com>
In reply to#522944
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1root@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5gc5cogtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:53:47 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>> <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>>> into the wood chipper again:
>>>>
>>>> You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
>>>> DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
>>>> parts. Spankard. LOL

>> <crickets> LOL

>> You bleated so hard in your reply that I have to split this one into
>> two parts... I've got you working hard, DildoRider. <snicker>

<crickets> LOL

>>>>> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's
>>>>> houses.

>>>> Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't
>>>> even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord
>>>> beater. LOL

>>> security systems can be had for less than $200.  only an idiot like you
>>> would hire someone and hope that person doesn't have cat burglar  
>>> friends.

>> Awwww, you're so perturbed you're spewing fanfic again, DildoRider.
>> LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> i can afford way more than a beater accord, especially with the money i
>>> saved so far driving a beater accord for a decade.  only an idiot would
>>> have a good car in pittsburgh, anyway.  have you ever seen the streets
>>> here in spring?  perhaps you don't live in a place where they dump
>>> corrosive salt on the roads for 6 months.

>> Oh, sure. You can afford "way more" than a shitty road-salt-rusted 20
>> year old Honda Accord beater and dilapidated shitshack half-a-house
>> hovel. You *choose* to live like a pauper because growing up, you had
>> poor parents. It's all you know, right? And that "job" you've got that
>> lets you bleat non-stop on Usenet keeps you in caviar and champagne,
>> right? LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>> Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam"
>>>> videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all
>>>> know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL

>>> i don't clutter up my security images with timestamps.  the filenames  
>>> have the timestamps in them.

>> More backpedaling. LOL
>>
>> IOW, you've got nothing, and you've been caught in yet another lie.
>> Just like you were caught lying when you said your parents were
>> "rich". LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> actually, i don't have any clue what the "date in question" is, mostly
>>> because unlike you, i'm not an obsessed fucktard and you never posted a
>>> date as far as i read.  maybe i don't read all of your posts?  sorry  
>>> about
>>> that.

>> Your admission that you're too fucking stupid to read older posts,
>> noted. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>> And yet, no videos. Imagine that... let's see your faked-up video with
>> a falsified file date stamp taken with a camera you duct-taped to your
>> porch ceiling as means of covering up your lies, or you'll admit
>> you've been caught blathering lies, DildoRider. LOL

<crickets> LOL

DildoRider tacitly admits he's been caught blathering lies. LOL

>>> my family seems to be more important to you than your own, these days.   
>>> is it because the kids are back in school?

>> Says the guy bleating day and night to entertain his Usenet Lord and
>> Master. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>>>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being
>>>>>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL

>>>> <crickets> LOL!

>>> <fart> LOL

>> Your lamely attempted evasion of having been caught lying about having
>> rich parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> did you never know your grandparents or something?  straight to "aunts  
>>> and uncles" as your only relatives when you were born?  that's too bad.

>> Your grandparents, if they had any money, gave it to their kids. And
>> being that their kids are typical middle-class consumerist retards,
>> they'll chew through most or all of that money. You won't see a dime,
>> DildoRider. Especially as big a disappointment as you grew up to be.
>> LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>>>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those
>>>>>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They  
>>>>>> couldn't afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL

>>>>> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey.

>>>> Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL

>>> <fart> LOL

>> Says the guy getting the dildos pulled out by his "rich" parents. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>>>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
>>>>>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are  
>>>>>>> indicative what happens in real life?  i told you that those
>>>>>>> numbers were not correct.
>>>>>>> i told you that my parents are both retired.  your little  
>>>>>>> stalkyStats are just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus
>>>>>>> operandi quite well, i must say.

>>>>>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you
>>>>>> all upset? LOL

>>>>> "was it something i said" lame is noted.

>>>> Evasion noted. LOL

>>> evasion of what?

>> More evasion as desperate means of trying to cover up your having been
>> caught lying about your "rich" parents, noted, DildoRider. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>>> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages.  you don't
>>>>> read that far, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> what's about $200k times 35 years?  do the math, dummy.
>>>>>
>>>>> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock  
>>>>> options...
>>>>> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party  
>>>>> investments...
>>>>> calculate the values of the classic cars...
>>>>>
>>>>> you sure are a simpleton.

>>>> "inheritances" LOL
>>>>
>>>> You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider.

>>> that's funny.  my parents did, and so will i, genius.

>> Your parents will burn through any inheritance they got. Being on a
>> fixed income is hell, especially as they get older and feeble. Ever
>> priced hospital stays, retirement homes and home assistance? And I'm
>> sure, to save your "inheritance", you'll have no problem taking your
>> parents in and wiping their drool and changing their diapers when they
>> reach that stage, right? No? No, that'd be too much like having
>> kids... and you'll never do that. You're gay. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>> "401k" LOL
>>>>
>>>> At your $75k/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up,
>>>> if that, given that you waste your money. LOL

>>> i was responding to your goofy k'lames about my parents that you based  
>>> on some generic results from a website.

>> Your parents were worker bees. Now they're retired worker bees on a
>> fixed income. They're not "rich", DildoRider. You've done the typical
>> lower-middle-class thing and perpetuated the class you were born into.
>> Ah well, at least that trend dies out with you, eh? You being a
>> selfish douchebag who only thinks of and lives for himself, you won't
>> have any kids. You're gay. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>> "classic cars" LOL

>>>> You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL

>>> no, the classic cars that my parents have collected.
>>>
>>> i'd put classic plates on mine but i actually use it sometimes.  there  
>>> are limits on how often a week you can drive a classic car and where you can
>>> drive it to.

>> And exorbitant insurance rates that you couldn't afford. LOL
>>
>> Do your parents keep these "classic cars" in their barn? Let me guess,
>> they're all the old rusted-out beaters your parents bought over the
>> years. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> i only have 3 trials bikes, spaz.  their total value is only about  
>>> $3000. parted out they are worth more, what with all of the highly
>>> sought after high-end and titanium parts i've used. go look up the
>>> price of a chris king mountain bike hubset. now look up an
>>> industry9 mountain hubset. that's just the hubs on two of the bikes.

>> You have no idea what you'll be able to sell those used parts for,
>> DildoRider. Lower-middle-class goofs like you often grossly
>> overestimate their net worth... it's part of what keeps you tards in
>> your economic rut. You think you're doing better than you really are.
>> What are your liquid assets with verifiable worth? LOL
>>
>> I think you'll be shocked to learn it's likely less than $50,000. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>> Well, you *did* buy a dilapidated shitshack half-a-house that couldn't
>> even appreciate its way out of the steepest downturn in real estate
>> values since the Great Depression at a rate that exceeded inflation.
>> LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> BTW: that "DRIVEWAY" that you saw on the google street view was written
>>> after my old roommate went to leave for work at 7am and some idiot had
>>> blocked the driveway one too many times.  i was also concerned about the
>>> other 4 households whose cars were being blocked in.  haven't had that
>>> problem happen much lately.  but you know, because i'm stupid and i  
>>> forget what a "driveway" is occasionally, i had to label it.  mmmHmmm.

>> Didn't see it on Google Street View. But your admission that you did
>> is noted. I've got you spinning so fast you're stalking yourself,
>> DildoRider. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> is that like how you got caught in a lie k'laming you came to my house?

>> Says the guy who can't post any proof because he's lying. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> did the driveway look the same as it does on the google street view?

>> No idea. I've not look at it in Google Street View.

<crickets> LOL

>>> did you notice anything different from how it looks on google when you
>>> "were here"?  LOL
>>>
>>> free clue:  a friend of mine bought it at sheriff's sale this year.   
>>> he's having his side of the roof either re-done or patched.  it's a
>>> 103 year old slate roof on his side.  i suggested that if he gets
>>> guys walking all over it in fall, he's going to be pissed in the
>>> winter and spring when it's leaking in new spots from being walked
>>> on and he can't get it fixed easily until the weather is above freezing.
>>>
>>> the elderly lady who lived next door and passed away a year ago in a  
>>> care facility after a battle with c-dif following a fall refused to do  
>>> anything about her clogged up drain in the back, the roof, and the
>>> borer-infested tree out in front of that property.  i tried to help
>>> her as much as i could by doing her lawn and taking her garbage to
>>> the curb every week for 15 years.  my guess is that her shitty kids
>>> that hardly ever came to visit her spent or hoarded all of her savings
>>> for her and left her in poverty.

>> Nicely bleated, DildoRider. LOL
>>
>> Wow, you really *do* live in a dilapidated shit-shack, don't you?
>> Shitted-out roof, clogged up drains, wood borer infestation,
>> over-grown and maintenance deferred, in need of brickwork because
>> you've let plants grow up the side of the property. No wonder that
>> property couldn't even appreciate faster than inflation. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>>>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a
>>>>>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that
>>>>>> the best you could afford? LOL

>>>>> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus  
>>>>> full basement isn't enough for me?  don't tell NEMO, but there's a
>>>>> 100 year old mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker
>>>>> who lived here from 1912 until probably around the great depression.
>>>>> it seems to befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in
>>>>> a really nice area.

>>>> "really nice house" LOL
>>>>
>>>> It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown

>>> overgrown?  let me guess... your house is situated exposed out in the
>>> blazing hot sun so that everybody can stare at its majesty and so you  
>>> can pay double heating and cooling bills like an idiot.

>> I have solar, and excellent insulation. I pay for less than half of
>> what a similarly-sized house consumes. Those brutal PA winters must
>> really run up the heating bills, though, eh? Especially in an ancient
>> dilapidated shitshack half-a-house with insulation that's likely
>> settled decades ago. Or is it so old it has the old chemically-treated
>> shredded wood pulp insulation? You know, as that shit ages, compacts
>> and gets water-soaked, it actually causes an increase in heat transfer
>> through the wall, right? Do you get frost on inside walls during
>> brutal winters? LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>> half-a-house with half the roof

>>> of course you'll refuse to note that i repaired over half of that roof.
>>> the new owner next door is fixing the other.

>> Still with half the roof in desperate need of complete replacement,
>> then. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>> That won't happen when you finally die of an infected perforated
>> intestine though, eh, DildoRider? No, what little of yours that has
>> any value will go to your parents (who will promptly sell it because
>> they have no need of it), and the rest of it will be dumped. A live
>> lived and thoroughly wasted. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>>> meaning maintenance has been deferred on that hovel to the point
>>>> that it can't even appreciate faster than inflation. LOL

>>> except most of what you are fakeyGoogling and seeing has been fixed
>>> already.  likely, you idiotically think that google maps is a real-time
>>> live website, since you have some brain damage from getting your head
>>> knocked around so much during your lifetime.

>> Says the guy who admits that what I said is the truth... half the roof
>> is in dire need of complete replacement. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> feel free to split your response up into as many parts as you need in
>>> order to be a fucking idiot.  i've been on usenet since 1994 and have
>>> never seen anybody but complete k0oks do the shit you do on it.

>> Says the guy melting down day and night as he bleats up a storm. LOL
>>
>> I note, however, that for your current meltdown, you've not invented
>> any new ways of melting down, as you did last time with your WordCloud
>> Tributes To Your Usenet Lord and Master. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> PS: you could always choose a more normal way to poast that doesn't have
>>> limitations on the size of posts?

>> Why, when this makes you spin up and barf foam, DildoRider?
>>
>> I want to see you annotate each and every blank line in my posts with
>> arrowed lines again, DildoRider. Get right on that.
>>
>> <snicker>

> didn't even read your bullshit, fakey.  you win.

I always do. Because I promulgate truth and reality, whereas you're a
delusional libtard who's lied so much to himself and to everyone else
that you've started believing your own bullshit.

You were stupid enough to buy into the whole libtard lie, and when I
proved that liberals were and are the party of slavery, sharecropping,
Jim Crow, racism, eugenics, denial of civil rights and attempts at
sterilizing people in third world countries, you bleated hard.

You were delusional enough to convince yourself that dressing up as a
tranny and trolling for cock on a dating website, and when you didn't
get any there, begging your "girlfriend" to strap one on so you could
fantasize about cock as you rode a dildo didn't make you gay, it made
you "bisexual". You further convinced yourself that your aberrant
behavior was "normal", to the point that you started bragging about it
to complete strangers online. When people naturally started to laugh
at the broken-brained faggoty little freak you've become, you bleated
hard.

You were retarded enough to believe the libtard "anthropogenic global
warming" politicized lie. When I proved that not only didn't
"anthropogenic global warming" exist, but "global warming" period
didn't exist given that the planet's been cooling for ~16 years and
the planet's tilt and precessional indexes forecast an extended cold
period approaching, you bleated hard.

So yeah, you lost. Thanks for admitting that.

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#522936 — Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
SubjectRe: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a
Message-ID<df7657b982ac19aedde298d0c9999e7f@dizum.com>
In reply to#522911
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>
>> You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt,
>> DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two
>> parts. Spankard. LOL

<crickets> LOL

You bleated so hard in your reply that I have to split this one into
two parts... I've got you working hard, DildoRider. <snicker>

>>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
>>>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
>>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump
>>>> head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>   <-------------

>> Your melting down so badly that you're seeing things that aren't there
>> is noted, DildoRider. LOL

> i suppose i'll just have to write a de-mogrifier for your broken shit  
> poasts.  i'll be sure to add in a ascii to binary feature as well as it  
> seems like you were too stupid to figure that one out on your own in the  
> past.

Still no idea what you're babbling on about, DildoRider. If it works
for everyone else I've ever conversed with, and you have a problem,
then the problem lies with you. Perhaps you've just been driven so
insane that you can no longer operate a newsreader, DildoRider. LOL

>>>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>>>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
>>>>>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.

>>>>>>> yep.. i can't figure it out.  you aer so smort.

>>>>>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted.

>>>>> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux  
>>>>> sysadmins with 2 decades of experience don't use perl.  uh-huh.

>>>> Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program
>>>> running, and is all pissed about it.

>>> yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy.  LOL

>> You admitted it, Witless. LOL

> yep.  probably because i'm just stupid.  i'm so stupid that if i *did*  
> know how, i'd still fuck it up and say i couldn't figure it out.  probably.

Well, sure. You *are* pretty stupid, after all. You've admitted it.
Your continued admission that you couldn't get that Perl program
working, noted. LOL

>>>> If you were able to get the Perl
>>>> program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that
>>>> the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather
>>>> is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL

>> <crickets> LOL!

> i'm not the one who doubts the physics, doofus... or did you forget?  i  
> only commented to try to save you about and hour of your day each day  
> responding to the 9-11 troofGoofs.  some thanks...

Those TrooferTards have yet again expanded their delusions to include
Cherenkov radiation at the WTC site... an utter impossibility. My
having proven it's an utter impossibility has compelled them to run
away from me and the truthiness I promulgate yet again. LOL

Much as you ran away when I utterly decimated your libtard lies. LOL

>>>>>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.

>>>>>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that
>>>>>>> nobody likes?

>>>>>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider.

>>>>> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of,
>>>>> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath.

>>>> Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it
>>>> something I said that set you off? LOL

>>> was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of  
>>> your wife and kids?

>> Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

> your admission you chase trannies on usenet is noted.

Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

>>>>>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them.

>>>>> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb.  i was the only person  
>>>>> in my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school.

>>>> Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the
>>>> room, by his own admission. LOL

>>> i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing
>>> cock and anal sex unprompted, you were.

>> Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL

> your further admission that you don't understand why hollering "tranny!"  
> at a tranny is completely pointless as well as transmisogyny.

Your further admission that you're too stoooopid to be embarrassed by
your broken little brain compelling you to admit it's broken, noted.
LOL

>>>>>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper
>>>>>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't
>>>>>> even know copper burns green.

>>>>> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry.  in fact, i know  
>>>>> absolutely nothing, so you win.  that was easy.

>>>> Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL

>>> awesome.  i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you
>>> needed it more than me.

>> Kooks often think that by exposing all their shortcomings themselves,
>> they can deflect the raucous laughter directed at them. You should
>> know by now that never works, DildoRider. LOL

> laughter never bothered me.

You've grown accustomed to it, having been laughed at your entire life
for being a broken-brained little tranny freak. LOL

>>>>>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>>>>>>>>> signify "nothing".

>>>>>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you
>>>>>>>> "moron". LOL

>>>>>>> you sure seem to be "happy".

>>>>>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL

>>>>> why would i act smart?

>>>> It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL

>>> that would be stupid of me.

>> That's why you try so hard, and fail so hilariously, DildoRider. LOL

> you wouldn't like me if i "tried hard".

Your admission that you don't have to try hard to be stupid, noted,
Stupid. LOL

>>>>> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart.

>>>> Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'?
>>>> Vince Lamb?

>>> exactly.

>> Ummm, kensi the astrophysicist? Petey John-John Ross the mildly
>> intelligent writer of bad poems (OK, I'll give you that one. LOL)?
>> Craptain Kneel Whorin' who is obviously intelligent but more than a
>> bit unhinged? Professor Dr. Richard Vincent Lamb?
>>
>> Yeah, I see your point... they must all be idiots. Or you're a moron.
>> LOL

> everybody you listed, except kensi, is a total idiot.

All that is required to prove you were spewing blather is just one.
Thanks for admitting that you were spewing blather, DildoRider. LOL

>>>> Stooopid kook. LOL

>>> yes they are.

>> Says the college dropout. LOL

> here's a quotable quote for you:
> 
> there are lots of idiots in the world... some of them have degrees.

Here's a quotable quote for you:
"There are lots of idiots in the world... some of them have degrees.
But most of them are high school graduates at best."
College dropout. LOL

Did you drop out of college because you were too stoooopid to keep up,
or because you were too poor to afford it? LOL

>>>>> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid
>>>>> people.

>>>> No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you
>>>> were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL

>>> huh?

>> Exactly. Stupid. LOL

> buh?

That's right. Stupid. LOL

>>>>>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond
>>>>>>>>> "something made out of bricks".

>>>>>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.

>>>>>>> no i'm not.

>>>>>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting
>>>>>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you.

>>>>> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity.  i come here
>>>>> to waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish
>>>>> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of
>>>>> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been
>>>>> invested in for years and years.

>>>> I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the
>>>> best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy
>>>> meltdowns. LOL

>>> LOL

>> LOL

> LOL

LOL

>>>>>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them,  
>>>>>>>> DildoRider.
>>>>>>>> You are, after all, a libtard.

>>>>>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?

>>>>>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional.
>>>>>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions.
>>>>>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it.
>>>>>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant.

>>>>> only four?  seems petty.

>>>> Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with
>>>> liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be
>>>> succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little
>>>> psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL

>>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist
>>>
>>> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/
>>>
>>> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/
>>>
>>> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830

>> Still spamming those same links to Obama bleating because Donald Trump
>> exercised his right to not correct idiots? And as for Ben Carson, a
>> black man... how exactly is he "racist", especially in light of his
>> discussing a *religion*, Moron? How is Islam a "race", Moron? LOL

> ben carson is more than a black man, he's an idiot just like anybody else  
> who thinks that we shouldn't be able to have a muslim president.

You're evading, DildoRider. Answer the questions, Moron. LOL

And as for Ben Carson, a black man... how exactly is he "racist",
especially in light of his discussing a *religion*, Moron? How is
Islam a "race", Moron? LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521717

FromTopaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
Date2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Message-ID<qsbmva5dqaq8mnvgrachia1b5ee9lv286j@4ax.com>
In reply to#521597
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:36:30 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>


     You worthless little turds are all the same. Imagining you proved
something in the past when no one even reads your posts. The only
thing you prove in the present is that you should do the world a favor
and flush yourself down a toilet.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever
caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are
examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in
WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed
multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large
areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in
the WTC towers did none of these things.

The One Meridian Plaza Fire
One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that
suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the
22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an
estimated $100 million in direct property loss. 1   2   3   It was
later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant
fire in this century".

The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of
spandrel panel connections. 4   Despite the severity and duration of
the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part
of the building collapsed.


www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521721

From"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Message-ID<op.x44meunqtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to#521717
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:27:05 -0400, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:36:30 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>
>      You worthless little turds are all the same. Imagining you proved
> something in the past when no one even reads your posts. The only
> thing you prove in the present is that you should do the world a favor
> and flush yourself down a toilet.
>
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
>
> Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever
> caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse.

well, now it has, so chalk an X in the fire/collapse column and stop with  
the logical fallacy, already.

> Following are
> examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in
> WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed
> multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large
> areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in
> the WTC towers did none of these things.
>
> The One Meridian Plaza Fire
> One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that
> suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the
> 22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an
> estimated $100 million in direct property loss. 1   2   3   It was
> later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant
> fire in this century".
>
> The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of
> spandrel panel connections. 4   Despite the severity and duration of
> the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part
> of the building collapsed.
>
>
> www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org
>
> http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521739 — no asbestos cladding on the main beams

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-17 16:38 -0700
Subjectno asbestos cladding on the main beams
Message-ID<eef72709-f94b-42ad-aa45-a5a857c83537@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#521717
problem was,
the special nature of building seven, to the site (although
the two towers were not clad with an adequate refractant
[asbestos

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521773

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Message-ID<d9c8da554d1c60ebc2ad1685caf137f9@dizum.com>
In reply to#521717
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Topaz, in <news:qsbmva5dqaq8mnvgrachia1b5ee9lv286j@4ax.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:36:30 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

> You worthless little tur<SMACKAKOOK!>

Oh, I'm sorry that my truthiness just shit all over your delusion,
K0oKTarD. Welcome to reality.

<snicker>

> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
> 
> Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever
> caused a steel-framed high-rise building to coll<SMACKAKOOK!>

Lying kook. That you have to have reality drubbed into your thick 
skull proves you're too broken-brained to figure out these simple 
things. That's why you glom onto any stupid conspiracy theory you 
can... and in your case, you especially gravitate toward any 
conspiracy theory that allows you to fuel your hatred toward Jews.

Kook. LOL
Moron. LOL
Laughingstock. LOL

Message-ID: <a07468688db77a10dbf968ff5620e4c2@dizum.com>
====================================================
There is a long list of buildings that have had the spray-on
insulation and suffered fire damage resulting in partial or complete
collapse. The McCormick Center, the Sight and Sound Theater, the Kader
Toy Factory in Singapore, the Dogwood Elementary School in Virginia,
the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Wisma Kosgoro in Jakarta, the Alexis
Nihon Plaza Montreal, One New York Plaza (connection bolts sheared
during fire, causing several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors
to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders),
and several other examples.

And the complete list. 22 multi-story buildings from 1970 to 2002 have
collapsed solely from fire damage weakening their structural
integrity... 6 of them being steel-framed buildings, all of those 6
being taller than 20 stories:
<http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_Building_Collapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf>
====================================================

22 + 1... here's one that got hit with a plane, and had a fire that
resulted in a partial collapse: The Bijlmermeer Apartment Complex in	
Amsterdam Zuidoost, Netherlands.

23 + 1... here's one the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMTALBYRNA>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik>

24 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
The steel-framed Wal-Mart super-center in Searcy, AR.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g-3omP5YM8>
The fertilizer that spontaneously combusted was at the back rear
corner of the building, all the way across the store from the freight
roll-up door, along a large wide aisle at the back of the store that
had compost materials, wood, lawn care equipment, etc.... the rest of
the flammable materials in the building burned hot enough to not only
cause massive steel structural member sagging, but collapse of the
building. So don't even try the straw-man argument of "but it was an
ammonia nitrate fire, they burn hot!" because the entire fucking
structure sagged and collapsed, the fertilizer was a small amount at
the back rear of the store.

25 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmLvp0t2xDw>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefKrzcG2H4>
Note that this is a wholly-steel structure building, without adequate
fireproofing, and it eventually collapsed... this is what fire does to
steel.

26 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVzrPaLRsfI>
A steel structure that completely collapsed after a fire due to no
fireproofing.

27 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
Mission Bay fire and structural collapse on 3/11/14:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJLFez9kwd0>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx_G7G1R6Cg>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgtsBxalxzs>
The building was steel-framed, and had no fireproofing because it was
still under construction.

28 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JzTYLuKQQ>
Ironically, in an insulation warehouse.

And of course, the wholly-steel constructed Oakland Freeway was built
*much* *MUCH* stronger than any skyscraper... it had to hold up
thousands of tons of moving vehicles *and* contend with the occasional
CA earthquake... yet in 19 minutes, with less fuel, and with much
larger steel beams than any that were in the WTC towers, the steel
became heat-weakened enough to collapse:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwOFLNiim3A>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tjs5ILNkJc>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH3gRwf4XIA>
You'll note the loud popping noises as the steel heated and expanded.
That is what fuel can do to steel.

That the kooks cannot grasp the enormity of the forces involved leads 
them to make false assumptions... and once emotionally invested in 
their decision to remain uneducated, they continue to compound and 
expand their stupidity and insanity, eventually culminating in the 
hilariously wrong types of conclusions that kooks such as Roger T.E. 
Wittekind (aka Rocky) arrive at. This is the process that leads them 
into insanity.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521833 — if the planes were not bombs, or if they were bombs

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-18 11:21 -0700
Subjectif the planes were not bombs, or if they were bombs
Message-ID<ab7d045b-c9e0-439e-907f-eb3daa127f0f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#521773
ah, that's what I was referring to, viz no asbestos cladding
on the main beams ... other than that,
don't be an a-hole/thankyou

> There is a long list of buildings that have had the spray-on
> insulation and suffered fire damage resulting in partial or complete
> collapse. The McCormick Center, the Sight and Sound Theater, the Kader
> Toy Factory in Singapore, the Dogwood Elementary School in Virginia,
> the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Wisma Kosgoro in Jakarta, the Alexis
> Nihon Plaza Montreal, One New York Plaza (connection bolts sheared
> during fire, causing several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors
> to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders),
> and several other examples.
> 
> And the complete list. 22 multi-story buildings from 1970 to 2002 have
> collapsed solely from fire damage weakening their structural
> integrity... 6 of them being steel-framed buildings, all of those 6
> being taller than 20 stories:
> <http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_Building_Collapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf>
> ====================================================
> 
> 22 + 1... here's one that got hit with a plane, and had a fire that
> resulted in a partial collapse: The Bijlmermeer Apartment Complex in	
> Amsterdam Zuidoost, Netherlands.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521902

FromTopaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
Date2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Message-ID<dq4pvat39gp3nicjfms6jihfu56vduar3r@4ax.com>
In reply to#521773
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever
caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are
examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in
WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed
multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large
areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in
the WTC towers did none of these things.

The One Meridian Plaza Fire
One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that
suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the
22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an
estimated $100 million in direct property loss. 1   2   3   It was
later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant
fire in this century".

The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of
spandrel panel connections. 4   Despite the severity and duration of
the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part
of the building collapsed.

www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521942

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Message-ID<4bca2e8b4c6a274efc8e13b9da23e4f8@dizum.com>
In reply to#521902
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Topaz, in <news:dq4pvat39gp3nicjfms6jihfu56vduar3r@4ax.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
> 
> Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever
> caused a steel-framed high-rise building to col<SMACKAKOOK!>

Your continuing to desperately spew this lie so you can sustain your
unwarranted hatred of Jews is noted.

Kook. LOL
Moron. LOL
Laughingstock. LOL

Message-ID: <a07468688db77a10dbf968ff5620e4c2@dizum.com>
====================================================
There is a long list of buildings that have had the spray-on
insulation and suffered fire damage resulting in partial or complete
collapse. The McCormick Center, the Sight and Sound Theater, the Kader
Toy Factory in Singapore, the Dogwood Elementary School in Virginia,
the Windsor Tower in Madrid, the Wisma Kosgoro in Jakarta, the Alexis
Nihon Plaza Montreal, One New York Plaza (connection bolts sheared
during fire, causing several steel filler beams on the 33-34th floors
to fall and rest on the bottom flanges of their supporting girders),
and several other examples.

And the complete list. 22 multi-story buildings from 1970 to 2002 have
collapsed solely from fire damage weakening their structural
integrity... 6 of them being steel-framed buildings, all of those 6
being taller than 20 stories:
<http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_Building_Collapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf>
====================================================

22 + 1... here's one that got hit with a plane, and had a fire that
resulted in a partial collapse: The Bijlmermeer Apartment Complex in	
Amsterdam Zuidoost, Netherlands.

23 + 1... here's one the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMTALBYRNA>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik>

24 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
The steel-framed Wal-Mart super-center in Searcy, AR.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g-3omP5YM8>
The fertilizer that spontaneously combusted was at the back rear
corner of the building, all the way across the store from the freight
roll-up door, along a large wide aisle at the back of the store that
had compost materials, wood, lawn care equipment, etc.... the rest of
the flammable materials in the building burned hot enough to not only
cause massive steel structural member sagging, but collapse of the
building. So don't even try the straw-man argument of "but it was an
ammonia nitrate fire, they burn hot!" because the entire fucking
structure sagged and collapsed, the fertilizer was a small amount at
the back rear of the store.

25 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmLvp0t2xDw>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefKrzcG2H4>
Note that this is a wholly-steel structure building, without adequate
fireproofing, and it eventually collapsed... this is what fire does to
steel.

26 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVzrPaLRsfI>
A steel structure that completely collapsed after a fire due to no
fireproofing.

27 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
Mission Bay fire and structural collapse on 3/11/14:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJLFez9kwd0>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx_G7G1R6Cg>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgtsBxalxzs>
The building was steel-framed, and had no fireproofing because it was
still under construction.

28 + 1... another the report above didn't catch:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JzTYLuKQQ>
Ironically, in an insulation warehouse.

And of course, the wholly-steel constructed Oakland Freeway was built
*much* *MUCH* stronger than any skyscraper... it had to hold up
thousands of tons of moving vehicles *and* contend with the occasional
CA earthquake... yet in 19 minutes, with less fuel, and with much
larger steel beams than any that were in the WTC towers, the steel
became heat-weakened enough to collapse:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwOFLNiim3A>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tjs5ILNkJc>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH3gRwf4XIA>
You'll note the loud popping noises as the steel heated and expanded.
That is what fuel can do to steel.

That the kooks cannot grasp the enormity of the forces involved leads
them to make false assumptions... and once emotionally invested in
their decision to remain uneducated, they continue to compound and
expand their stupidity and insanity, eventually culminating in the
hilariously wrong types of conclusions that kooks such as Roger T.E.
Wittekind (aka Rocky) arrive at. This is the process that leads them
into insanity.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521978

FromTopaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
Date2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Message-ID<91aqva1t4sn5vsudtfageoug8h5e5fhavm@4ax.com>
In reply to#521942
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:36:26 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:


>
>Your continuing to desperately spew this lie so you can sustain your
>unwarranted hatred of Jews is noted.


Exposing the Real Racists       
Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book      
Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003

More than 500,000 copies of 'Jewish Supremacism' have been sold
worldwide.  It is even sold within the Russian Duma (parliament).

Jewish leaders are extremely fearful of this book. I can illustrate
the cause of their concern by giving an example of David Duke's
technique in exposing what he calls Jewish supremacism.
If any prominent political person in the Western World publicly
announced that Jews are frequently disloyal to nations where they live
and that they view Gentiles as racially inferior, he would face
excoriation as an 'anti-Semite'. Probably, he would be driven from
office. Duke has no need to make such claims, for he simply quotes
very prominent and powerful Jews who make his point for him.
FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH

In the first few pages of Jewish Supremacism, Duke quotes Dr.
Steinlight, a former head of National Affairs for the largest Jewish
organisation in the United States. Here is the quotation taken from a
2001 magazine article written by Dr. Steinlight:-

'I'll confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my
generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a
quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative
years... I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted
a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colours, sang a
foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language... and was taught
the superiority of my people to the 'Gentiles' who oppressed us.
'We were taught to view non-Jews as... people less sensitive,
intelligent and moral than ourselves.'

This method of quoting major Jewish figures and sources is used
hundreds of times in Duke's book to advance his thesis that there is a
powerful Jewish supremacist element in Judaism and Zionism that
threatens not only the freedom of the Palestinian people but all
nations, including the United States.

Duke also uses direct quotes from the Talmud and other major Jewish
sources, such as the Jewish Encyclopedia to expose a long-standing
cadre of hateful, anti-Gentile Jewish supremacists. Shocking quotes
are displayed from major Jewish magazines that boast of a Jewish
supremacy over the media and politics of the United States. He finds
disturbing and hateful words from Jewish leaders, such as Ariel
Sharon, which openly support genocide, and he reveals quotations from
Israeli leaders who equate Zionism and Nazism. Of course, he also
cites many prominent Gentiles of historical and contemporary times,
but the Jewish quotations and sources have the greatest power.
Frankly, they are so convincing that Jewish leaders have sought to get
the book banned in many nations.

Interestingly, Jewish Supremacism was published first in Russia, the
same nation that gave birth to The Protocols of Zion. In 2000 it
quickly became a best seller throughout the entirety of the former
Eastern bloc. It even sells briskly in the corridors of the Russian
Duma (Parliament) and has prompted Levinsky, Goldman and other leading
Jews to seek its ban under old Soviet laws forbidding 'anti-Semitism'.
In the Autumn of 2000, Levinsky and others filed a formal complaint to
the Russian Prosecutor General and asked for the book to be classified
as anti-Semitic and thus illegal. After a year of close examination
(they painstakingly verified all 669 of the documentations), the
Russian Government shocked the Jewish community by officially
declaring that the book is not anti-Semitic. Jewish members of the
Duma then introduced new legislation aimed at outlawing 'Jewish
Supremacism', but it failed by a few votes. 

Since then, the book has been sold in thousands of street corners
across the breadth of the Russian Federation and has now topped an
incredible 500,000 in print.

Translated into most of the Eastern European languages, the book has
won Duke many academic awards for its scholarship, including an
honorary Doctorate awarded by President's University, the second
largest university in the nation of Ukraine.

Subsequently the university itself published a best-selling Ukrainian
edition. In May of 2003, Free Speech Press published the English
version of Jewish Supremacism, accompanied by a storm of interest and
controversy. Jewish leaders are horrified that it is well on its way
to becoming the best-read book in the world on Zionism.

SMEARS BACKFIRED

Although Zionist organisations have tried to use Duke's media
characterisation as a 'white supremacist' to discredit his book, so
far their exploitation of his early-life involvement in a KKK group
has only backfired by making the book and its author more newsworthy.
Attacks by the ADL and other pro-Zionist groups have led to
sensationalist news coverage, causing even greater interest and
confounding those who desperately wanted Duke's book to die a quiet
death.

David Duke decries the label of white supremacist and says that while
he certainly desires the preservation of his own heritage he seeks no
supremacy over others. He maintains that those who scream most
hatefully against him are themselves guilty of the most extreme and
powerful supremacism on earth: Jewish supremacism.

When Duke lectured in some Persian Gulf nations last year, Zionist
leaders attempted to undercut his support by allegations of 'racism'.
Those organised efforts had little affect on the overflow, mixed-race
audiences that cheered almost his every word. As a former university
professor and a writer who has lectured occasionally on behalf of the
people of Palestine, I approached David Duke's book out of a curiosity
elicited by the intense Zionist efforts to suppress it. Actually, I
had readily accepted the negative portrayals of him I had read in the
Jewish press, but I wanted to see what all the commotion was about.
Why were they so anxious to ban this book and slander its author? To
my great surprise I discovered a most amazing book!

David Duke stated that he had set out with the ambitious goal of
writing the most powerful expose of Zionism ever put into print. With
extreme scepticism of his ability to accomplish such a lofty goal, I
began to read. Three days later, as I turned the last page, I knew
that he had accomplished more than he dreamed. Rather than just
assembling his facts in a dry textbook fashion, David Duke presents
his thesis in the first person. It is the personal narrative of a
thoughtful and enlightened young man who is sympathetic to Zionism,
but is awakened to its supremacist core that not only threatens the
Palestinians but his own beloved European-Americans as well. I could
not find even a trace of hatred, intemperance or true anti-Semitism in
this book. However, by extensive quoting of important Jewish leaders
and Zionist source materials, Duke exposes a deep well of Jewish
supremacist hatred against Gentiles. He points out that one is
unfairly labelled an 'anti-Semite' simply for exposing the hateful
pronouncements of Jewish supremacists.

ABSOLVES SOME JEWS

The book is clearly not anti-Semitic. Duke goes at length to point out
that not all Jews are supremacists, and that the supremacists not only
endanger the Gentile world but threaten innocent Jews by exposing them
to an inevitably hostile Gentile reaction. The book is in fact
dedicated to the late Dr. Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor and
Israeli peace activist whose life was dedicated to saving both Jews
and Gentiles from the dangers of 'Jewish supremacism'. David Duke
cleverly turns the term 'anti-Semitic' on its head by quoting
columnist Joseph Sobran's remark that the 'anti-Semite' is no longer
someone who dislikes Jews; he is now simply a person whom the Jews
don't like.

Jewish Supremacism begins with David Duke's first great epiphany on
the Jewish question: his learning that the Russian Revolution wasn't
Russian but overwhelmingly Jewish. Using powerful documentary
evidence, he shows that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually financed
and led by Jews who had their own agenda against the Czar. He quotes
from familiar and impeccable sources such as Winston Churchill, the
dispatches of the American ambassador to Russia, the chief of British
Intelligence and copious Jewish sources. For instance, he quotes a
report from the National Archives of the United States showing that of
the 384 members of the first Bolshevik government, there were more
than 300 Jews and only 13 ethnic Russians.

How could such an enormous fact of history be hidden? Duke asks. His
rhetorical question is answered throughout the rest of this book by
giving the clear evidence of the tremendous power exercised by Jewish
supremacists in government, media and the academic establishment. Not
only has the pre-eminent Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and
its Gulags been quietly suppressed, but also even the very existence
of Jewish supremacism has been kept from public awareness. One can
freely discuss the evils of white supremacism, but if one dares to
expose Jewish supremacism, one will assuredly be labelled an
'anti-Semite', the ultimate term of opprobrium in modern society. In
very effective arguments, Duke points out that one is not called
'anti-Christian' for exposing the excesses of the Inquisition or
'anti-Muslim' for opposing the intolerance of some extremist Moslem
sects.  But dare simply to quote the hateful statements of important
leaders of Judaism and Zionism, and in many countries one could well
wind up in prison for 'hate speech'.

One of the fascinating themes to which David Duke repeatedly turns is
the easily documented Jewish supremacist strategy of fostering extreme
chauvinism among their own people while at the same time working to
break down the group loyalty of the Gentiles among whom they live.
Jewish leaders have long made clear that Jewish communities often have
agendas that conflict with their Gentile hosts. Duke describes the
struggle over those agendas as similar to the contest of two football
teams. One team cultivates an extreme group loyalty through a chronic
recital of Gentile persecution and an accompanying 'chosen-people'
supremacist vision. The other is instilled with guilt and the idea
that teamwork is immoral. The main Jewish holidays are dominated by
the recounting of Gentile persecutions, and the Holocaust has now
achieved almost a religious significance in Jewish life. Duke quotes
many Jewish leaders proclaiming Jewish superiority and the need for
the race to preserve its racial genotype. Even today, Israel will
grant instant citizenship to an atheist Jew from New York, but forbids
Palestinians who were born in Israel to return. Israel also forbids
marriages between Jews and Gentiles.

While Jewish supremacists have these supremacist policies for their
own people, they relentlessly work to break down the immigration laws
of other nations. While they preach multi-culturalism and diversity
for almost every other country in which they dwell, they themselves
support and expect Americans to support a Zionist State, dedicated
exclusively to the Jewish people, religion and culture.

INFLUENCE ON MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT

In chapters on Jewish influence over the American mass media and
government, Duke offers extensive documentation that exceeds almost
anyone's suspicions. Major Jewish sources are quoted which boast of
their takeover and control of Hollywood, the news media and the most
sensitive part of the Government of the United States. For instance,
Duke quotes a major Israeli newspaper bragging about the fact that
Jews loyal to Israel make up seven out of the eleven members of the
secretive and sensitive National Security Council (NSC). The article
goes on to assert that "America no longer has a government of Goyim"
(Gentiles). Duke also quotes many US presidents and high government
officials who have dared to speak out about the Jewish supremacy over
the establishment. After thoroughly documenting Jewish supremacy in
government and media, he shows how their media power is used to stifle
public knowledge and understanding of this critical issue. Any
legitimate criticism of Jewish Supremacism is labelled
'anti-Semitism', and the Jewish supremacists almost exclusively define
that term.

In particularly interesting passages, Duke recounts how that when he
looked up the term 'anti-Semitism' in some popular encyclopaedias, he
found that the articles and recommended reading lists were authored
entirely by Jewish zealots! In every conflict with Gentiles, Jews are
always portrayed as completely innocent while Gentiles are portrayed
as totally evil. Duke suggests that the chronic portrayal of Gentiles
as inherently evil toward Jews is for Gentiles the equivalent of
'blood libel' for Jews.

Duke makes a compelling case that the nation of Israel is the doctrine
of Jewish supremacism put into action. In startling documentary
evidence from Israel, he shows that some of the early Zionist founders
of the country readily co-operated with Nazi Germany, praised Nazi
policies and claimed that their own ideology was similar. He also
quotes major Jewish figures in Israel who have had the courage to
condemn Israel's Nuremberg style racial laws, such as former Israeli
Supreme Court member Haim Cohen, thus:-
'The bitter irony of fate, which has led the same biological and
racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous
Nuremberg laws to serve as a basis of Judaism within the state of
Israel.'

With these kinds of powerful quotes, it is no wonder that Zionists
around the world are extremely fearful of this book.

ON ISRAELI TERROR

Americans will find the last chapter on Israel of particular interest.
Duke unveils the long Israeli record of terrorism. He documents the
horrendous terror waged against the Palestinians; he also exposes
Israel's long record of terrorism and treachery against its greatest
benefactor, the United States! From major Jewish sources, he recounts
the Israeli terrorist attacks against America in the Lavon Affair, in
which Israeli agents set off bombs in American installations in Egypt
in a treacherous attempt to provoke America into war against that
nation. Duke presents copious evidence exposing the deliberate,
murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in which 34 Americans were
killed and 172 grievously wounded. The terrible damage inflicted on
the United States by Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is also recounted.
Jewish supremacy in the American media and government has suppressed
any outcry against Israel's treachery. The Jewish supremacists have
even been able to prevent a formal Congressional investigation into
the attack on the USS Liberty. Duke makes the powerful point that
billions of dollars of American aid continue to flow to Israel even
after its treacherous attacks. He writes that supplying this aid is
the moral equivalent of sending military aid to Japan after the attack
on Pearl Harbour.

Duke also shows how the Zionist domination of American foreign policy
led directly to America's 9/11 catastrophe and a whole new series of
foreign policy moves that are leading to disaster. This timely book
shows the Jewish supremacist power behind the Iraq War, the
manipulation of the President and the American people with false
information, and the horrendous damage the war has done to our economy
and even our security. Duke shows how the war is costing us hundreds
of billions of dollars, continues to spill the blood of our military
men and certainly increases world hatred and terrorism against
America.

In one of the most shocking chapters of his work, Duke reveals the
damning evidence of Israeli treachery in the 9/11 attacks. He shows
that a massive Israeli spy ring was uncovered and apprehended in the
months before and after the attacks, and that some of the Mossad
agents had actually monitored the hijackers, including the leader
Mohammed Atta (five Israeli agents lived on his street). Warning
messages of the impending attacks were sent to Israeli firms with
offices both in Israel and the World Trade Centre. A group of Mossad
agents was arrested on 9/11 after they were found to have been filming
and cheering the attacks while they occurred. After they had been held
for a few months, Zionist Michael Chertoff of the US Department of
Justice released all the members of the Israeli spy ring and allowed
them to return to Israel - out of the reach of Congressional 9/11
investigators.

It is impossible to give the reader more than a glance into the depth
and power of this incredible book. Practically every paragraph is a
revelation. There is so much more that I could write about: detailing
how the Holocaust has cynically been used as a Zionist tool in
heightening Jewish solidarity and deflating criticism of Zionism and
Israel; how Jewish supremacists have used immigration as a weapon of
conquest, not only in Palestine but in the Western World as well. I
was fascinated by Duke's expose of Sigmund Freud as a secret Jewish
supremacist who thought of himself as a Hannibal destroying the
foundations of the Christian church and the European family as
Hannibal had sacked Rome. I could go on and on, but I will leave these
discoveries to you when you read this amazing book.

After I completed the book, I wanted to find out if it had the same
affect on others as it had on me. I gave it to two long-time friends
at the university where I taught for 11 years. One has conservative
leanings; the other is decidedly liberal; and I would describe both of
them as sympathetic to Israel. Both were so fascinated that they could
hardly put the book down, and one became so engrossed that he missed
his regular two o'clock class. They both agreed that Duke's book is
one of the best-argued that they have ever read, and used the
identical term of 'amazing' to describe it. My conservative friend
commented that many quotations were so shocking that he began to check
out the references and found them all to be accurate. "Hell" he said,
"If only half the documents Duke cites are authentic, there is enough
evidence here to start a revolution."



www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521436

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
Message-ID<ef9f99ae56496eda5ba7b0518ece0748@dizum.com>
In reply to#521149
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

NEMO, in <news:j7efvadoqoccjovckfu2dr36tn6m1a77vm@4ax.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:22:04 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
> wrote:

>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:47:43 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:

>>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:36:31 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>> Wanker Ejaculatus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

>>>> Topaz, in <news:ivfavahkksfl0jgm14l4ijl95957mp0q23@4ax.com> did thusly
>>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> Shut up you turd.

>>>>> You should flu<SMACKAKOOK!>l, 

>>> Shut your worthless pie hole you snickering twisted turd.

>> None of the conspiracy whacko's can manage to write a sentence 
>> without some reference to shit, turds, and assholes.  And that
>> includes the ring leader Pathological Liar Roger the stalker/heckler.

> Have you read any of Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wanker Ejaculatus'
> (pudding cup boi's) posts?  They're chock FULL of it.
> 
> BTW plural's don't take apostrophe's.

Somebody is pwned hard, bleating harder and obsessively post-editing
every single one of my posts as he follows me around like some
demented stalker.

Now how did that happen, OCDK0oK?

<snicker>

-- 

Remember this, Sister Fister?

"I use a Sony Cybershot DSC-H2 model camera 6.0 Megapixels and 12x
zoom with an in-camera microphone along with a Velbon tripod."
So at least we know what equipment you used to take piccies of yer
sister's tits. Even went to the trouble of setting up a tripod, eh?
Professional. LOL

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.nerd.obsessive/K84e5-h4130/Fs1OgPJsbQcJ
"There is OBVIOUSLY something you want to tell us, cain. Someone
mentions the word "sister-fister" on this newsgroup and you just
couldn't keep yourself from responding and making an ass out of
yourself once again"

DinkleFail copyrights his last name, so he can get exclusive rights to
his sisterporn movies:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/rec.sport.pro-wrestling/lYhkOsZCFLs/dG4igl8F81gJ
"This is to announce that heanceforth no one is allowed to use the
Cain family name in usenet except myself, Alex Cain, the one and
only."

Dinkle McSisterFister starts a poll:
Subject: [POLL] Ever see your sister naked?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/rec.sport.pro-wrestling/a-zCK84hSFk/VkmjRYDmzikJ

https://web.archive.org/web/20040820191757/http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/dink/index.html
"IRL, Dink has two younger sisters. Some of his more disturbing
comments about them include his boasts to Richard Bullis (see #22) of
having seen both of them naked. While it would be overly critical to
suggest that children of a similar age in a family don't see each
other nude on occassion (most readers with close siblings will
probably have shared a few baths in their childhood), bragging about
it to an unquestionably proven pedophile certainly suggests a dramatic
lack of judgement, if nothing else."

Durh-de-duuurrrrhhh!
https://web.archive.org/web/20040820191757im_/http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/dink/images/logo.gif

Mama Cain always said "put the plastic sheets on the bed before you
pop your sister's cherry".

Dink fucks his sister:
Message-ID: <26bc2d8d67df0422e483bf33cfe503ef@dizum.com>
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.pizza.delivery.drivers/QdqCP4jxadM/YEZmAbdIZF4J

Dink fucking his sister:
http://goo.gl/VsDhDm
Note the short strokes. LOL

And now, just to rub salt in the loser's wounds:
He is an ugly inbred racist piece of jobless redneck trash.
He is 5 foot 3.
He is nearly 40 years old and *still* doesn't have a car or job.
He has been molested by every male member of his family, dog included.
He perpetually fails out of college, which his poor mother pays for.
He masturbates to pictures of Chad Bryant, Emmett Gulley and his
sister.

"My I.Q. is in the 170 + range. I am, for all intensive purposes, a
creative genius."
Alex Cain mistakes his weekly gay midget porn masturbation frequency
as his IQ: <1559b599.0203301828.27a683b@posting.google.com>

For all intents and purposes, DinkleTard is an idiot who can't even
properly use the term "for all intents and purposes".

Especially like this blurb:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/rec.sport.pro-wrestling/lYhkOsZCFLs/dG4igl8F81gJ
"Since I know that one day I will be a millionaire, I want no one
claiming to be related to me so that they may atempt to use my good
family name for their profit and gain."

15 years on and Bwahahahaaaa!
How'd that work out for you, Dink The Indigent?

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/rec.sport.pro-wrestling/pqZB4HA1cUk/6Az2p0tUbcEJ
"I will be more successful than you could ever hope to be."

How'd that work out for ya, DinkleFailure? LOL

"I will have to go all the way to California, because that's where the
heart of the movie industry lies. I will be able to fully utilize my
creative abilities."

How'd *that* work out for ya, DinkleLoser? LOL

"Hopefully, I'll find this out within the next 2-3 years."

You never even left your momma's house, let alone Georgia... poor
loserly Dink D. SisterFister will never make it to Hollywood, let
alone make it *in* Hollywood. LOL

"While it's currently on the sidelines, I still indeed have an
interest in entering the professional wrestling field"

Midget wrestling. LOL

> You have NO chance in the world.
"Yes, I do"

No. You don't. You're the failure known as Alex Cain. LOL
You're Emmett, with a mother who gives at least one shit about her
sprog. But when she's gone... you're Emmett. Mooch the money for a
tent off yer mama while you still can.

"When I think back
on all the tit photos in high school
It's a wonder
I could fap at all
Because my sister's tits are sagging, but
That don't stop me none
To get hard I punch myself in the balls.

JaaawwwwJuhhhChrome
They give us the nice fap photos
Sag-tits and herpes camel-toes
It makes me think all the girls
Are a wank away, oh yeah
I got a redneck sister
I love to take tit photographs
So mama, don't take my JaaawwwwJuhhhChrome away"

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521213

FromFriendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Message-ID<1a71add765942753f6dde8fd6d2809df@dizum.com>
In reply to#521140
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Topaz, in <news:5cceva12sf02b92mm9l1ngc0tpavq2v7tj@4ax.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:36:31 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>> 
>> Topaz, in <news:ivfavahkksfl0jgm14l4ijl95957mp0q23@4ax.com> did thusly
>> jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> Shut up you turd.

Awwww, poor kook can't refute reality, so it cowardly snips it out and
starts spitting vitriol. Sucks to be so broken-brained that you can't
even figure out reality.

<snicker>

>>> You should flu<SMACKAKOOK!>l, 

> Shut your worthless pie hole you snickering twisted turd.

Wow, you are butthurt beyond belief by all that reality you can't
refute.

<snicker>

> B<SMACKAKOOK!>

Your continuing to quote other broken-brained kooks isn't proof of
anything other than your own broken-brainedness. Kook.

You do realize, of course, that you're a laughingstock.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521352

FromTopaz <mars1933@hotmail.com>
Date2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
Message-ID<7s0hvahs8bfcvoduf1ems6pen2o80eilh3@4ax.com>
In reply to#521213
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:18:31 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>

     You worthless little turds are all the same. Imagining you proved
something in the past when no one even reads your posts. The only
thing you prove in the present is that you should do the world a favor
and flush yourself down a toilet.


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=28

Im suprised people still think it was jet fuel burning in the towers.
Has anyone ever lit jet fuel on fire? I have. It burns up REAL quick.
We do training every six months and light fires with jet fuel to put
them out.

with that said, jet fuel wasnt burning in that building.. Office
debris was. Office debris that is fire coded for a 110 story
skyscraper (read: non-flammable).

Jets burn about 1000-5000lbs per hour depending on airframes,
powerplant... weight.. etc. And thats in a controlled environment with
jet fuel being fed into the engine. Imagine you light it ALL on fire
all at once... its gone.

So, the argument of jet fuel burn temps is moot. And i wont buy the
fact that pools of jet fuel were burning. Pools of jet fuel were found
in cars on the streets below.. not burning.

Try it, Get some Kerosene (even though it burns slower than jet fuel),
put it in a coffee can and throw it on a fire... Stand back
though....lol. Cause this is what happened when those planes hit. Then
you may want to throw some unburned kerosene on a tree.. or steel..
whichever... hey.. try a coke can. And light it. I bet it doesnt even
melt the coke can it burns so quick. (although it may, havent tried it
myself) 


www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 11 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 15  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web