Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #632768 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-10 03:18 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-05-10 19:37 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 on this page of 21 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 03:18 -0700
2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 04:07 -0700
HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 04:33 -0700
Re: HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 22:28 -0700
Re: HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 18:30 -0400
So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 15:30 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 17:27 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-11 17:35 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 20:54 -0400
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 20:50 -0400
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 21:43 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 22:04 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 21:55 -0700
HVAC et.al only laugh their balls off on each reply from APe shit ArchiePoo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-12 23:35 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 00:47 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 01:16 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 01:54 -0700
Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-13 07:39 -0700
Re: 2please do not talk to the failure of physics-- APe shit Archie Poo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-10 06:08 -0700
Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 10:36 -0700
Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 19:37 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-10 19:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oevq66$5fh$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #632822 |
Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> writes: >On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:18:46 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >> Sci.physics is a open forum, meaning, kooks can come and waste your time. >> Please do not talk, ever to these kooks, these failures of physics. We >> cannot kick them out, they have a privilege of being a kook of physics, >> but if you talk to them, they hang around longer and they attract other >> kooks. >I guess I've been talking to you too much. >> >[] >> >> They failed phsyics, so why are they here? Some people are so so very looney, >Are you saying you passed Physics? Really? >You are so loony sometimes. This is a classic example of projection, where someone blames others for his own faults. It apparently bugs Archie subconsciously that he doesn't do very well in physics or is considered a kook, and projection causes him to accuse others of failure or being a kook. As you mentioned in another thread, McGinn does that as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web