Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #632843

Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards
Date 2017-05-10 19:37 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <oevq66$5fh$3@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <08e601b4-f578-4ddf-bb13-bfcfc6f03a48@googlegroups.com> <c68a74aa-bbeb-4a52-9516-d5d5d289c942@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> writes:

>On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:18:46 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Sci.physics is a open forum, meaning, kooks can come and waste your time.
>> Please do not talk, ever to these kooks, these failures of physics. We
>> cannot kick them out, they have a privilege of being a kook of physics,
>> but if you talk to them, they hang around longer and they attract other
>> kooks. 

>I guess I've been talking to you too much.
>> 
>[]
>> 
>> They failed phsyics, so why are they here? Some people are so so very looney, 

>Are you saying you passed Physics? Really?
>You are so loony sometimes.

This is a classic example of projection, where someone blames others for his
own faults. It apparently bugs Archie subconsciously that he doesn't do very
well in physics or is considered a kook, and projection causes him to accuse
others of failure or being a kook.

As you mentioned in another thread, McGinn does that as well.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 03:18 -0700
  2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 04:07 -0700
    HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 04:33 -0700
      Re: HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 22:28 -0700
        Re: HVAC, buddy of mine-- need you do an experiment//2please do not benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 18:30 -0400
        So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 15:30 -0700
          Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 17:27 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-11 17:35 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 20:54 -0400
          Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 20:50 -0400
          Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 21:43 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 22:04 -0700
          Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 21:55 -0700
            HVAC et.al  only laugh their balls off on each reply from APe shit ArchiePoo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-12 23:35 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 00:47 -0700
          Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 01:16 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 01:54 -0700
            Re: So did Roy Spencer get the Greenhouse Effect Experiment correct, or is it bogus "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-13 07:39 -0700
    Re: 2please do not talk to the failure of physics-- APe shit Archie Poo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-10 06:08 -0700
  Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 10:36 -0700
    Re: 2please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, Odd, McGinn (Robots treated in separate thread) but you need to shower afterwards moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-10 19:37 +0000

csiph-web