Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #621455 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-04 07:17 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-17 04:01 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 255 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 07:17 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-04 17:12 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 19:33 +0100
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-04 20:45 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 12:31 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-04 19:40 +0100
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-04 18:23 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 04:40 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-07 04:56 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 07:14 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 05:53 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-07 16:26 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:44 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-04 12:53 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 17:09 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 06:59 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 05:59 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 08:24 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 11:57 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:01 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-07 16:31 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-08 06:11 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 09:39 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-07 17:56 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 11:59 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 10:28 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 12:49 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 13:09 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-08 03:19 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 05:47 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 06:53 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 09:50 -0600
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-08 17:17 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-08 11:45 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 14:20 -0600
subjectum editen arbyz14u@gmail.com - 2017-03-08 12:34 -0800
or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 19:32 -0800
or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 06:14 -0800
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 15:26 +0100
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:29 -0600
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:18 -0800
(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:29 -0800
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:32 -0600
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:46 -0800
exemplar grati noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 11:55 -0800
Re: exemplar grati noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 22:00 -0800
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-10 20:57 +0000
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 16:13 -0600
Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:34 -0600
Re: When we zoom in|out too far, it looks random. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-08 19:41 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 13:04 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-11 17:16 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 16:59 -0800
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-11 20:28 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:17 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:59 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-14 13:15 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 15:17 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 17:23 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 16:06 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:02 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 07:05 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:58 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 08:22 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 10:33 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:16 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:23 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 12:10 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 05:14 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 05:55 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 06:18 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 07:22 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 09:35 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:23 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 10:27 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:45 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 11:26 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 09:43 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:00 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 10:13 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:34 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 11:57 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 14:06 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:22 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 14:30 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:41 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 15:13 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 15:17 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:29 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 15:37 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 16:21 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 15:15 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 20:02 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:13 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:54 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 18:57 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 16:20 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:51 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:25 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:17 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 04:11 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 01:58 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 13:00 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 06:29 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:28 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:54 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate folland28@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 09:23 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 10:26 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 11:21 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 11:25 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 11:29 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 13:38 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 12:11 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 14:20 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 15:26 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 17:28 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 22:53 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 23:13 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 18:57 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 19:20 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-18 03:56 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 23:52 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 01:59 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 19:23 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 08:28 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 08:42 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 11:42 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 08:00 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 12:07 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 07:18 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 11:35 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 09:31 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:32 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate hanson <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-31 12:33 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-22 02:24 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 06:18 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 07:13 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-22 18:11 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 07:17 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:32 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 09:34 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-22 14:35 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 08:06 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 08:21 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 10:32 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-22 17:58 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:11 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:02 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:28 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:54 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-22 18:16 -0400
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-22 18:27 -0400
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:17 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-31 17:57 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 21:25 -0400
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-31 18:51 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 04:06 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 06:34 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-04-01 17:45 -0400
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 15:09 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 16:09 -0700
Re: Usenet is all play and no work. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-04-01 19:12 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-22 17:49 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 10:29 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 20:26 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 09:18 -0500
John Sefton won't bow down to experimental evidence. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 06:47 -0700
Arrogance is ugly. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 06:52 -0700
Arrogance is ugly. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 07:19 -0700
Re: Arrogance is ugly. gmbr3359@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 09:27 -0700
Re: Arrogance is ugly. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-18 16:33 +0000
Re: Arrogance is ugly. gmbr3359@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 09:41 -0700
Re: Arrogance is ugly. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Arrogance is ugly. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-18 14:26 -0700
Re: John Sefton won't bow down to experimental evidence. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-18 17:48 -0400
Re: John Sefton won't bow down to experimental evidence. edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 08:29 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-18 04:12 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 23:22 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 23:34 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 23:19 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 10:10 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 22:59 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:13 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:04 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 04:04 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:30 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:49 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 12:57 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 18:34 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 19:06 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 18:29 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:19 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 23:13 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 05:35 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-18 17:14 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 16:10 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-18 20:35 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 05:02 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 05:23 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 05:35 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 05:46 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:30 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:40 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:48 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 07:50 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 08:40 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 00:29 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 00:53 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 04:42 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 20:21 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 07:27 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 07:34 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 08:22 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 08:46 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-21 17:23 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-21 17:16 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-21 17:16 -0400
Re: Order in Nature. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-21 14:32 -0700
Re: The "church steeple" is a campus building. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Princeton's 5 octave carillon ( 35 bells, in a Gothic tower ). Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-23 12:59 -0700
Re: The "church steeple" is a campus building. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-21 19:32 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 18:52 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:25 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 03:53 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 18:19 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 03:51 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 18:35 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 03:47 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 07:42 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 03:43 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 12:04 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 11:00 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 11:06 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:32 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-16 18:26 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 19:16 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 02:20 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 03:40 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 23:25 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-15 09:35 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-14 19:03 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-14 23:23 +0000
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-14 20:52 -0400
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 18:03 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:53 -0700
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 11:18 -0500
Re: Another insanity- That electrons don't radiate moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-17 04:01 +0000
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 16:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9mn9e$33i$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #621963 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >S.Ergio >"if they radiate, they loose energy, so at some point the electron would >just drop off. But it dosent, so it dont. " >Now remember one of the reasons against >LeSage Gravity: if matter continually were >absorbing Gravity, it would heat up. >So, if electrons were continually LOSING >energy to provide energy, but matter is >continually ABSORBING this energy to >provide Inertia and Gravity, I don't see the >problem. I see a solution. Except 1) we already know LeSage gravity doesn't work; and 2) stuff would still heat up. You apparently see Magic energy in LeSage "mundane particles" supplying energy to replace energy radiated by electrons, yet the electrons still radiate causing stuff to heat up/radiate light/radio/ X-rays or whatever. Problem not solved.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 06:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9316a27b-e7a7-4755-8ece-1e98dbb7f0cc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #621963 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:59:44 AM UTC-5, john wrote: > S.Ergio > "if they radiate, they loose energy, so at some point the electron would > just drop off. But it dosent, so it dont. " > > Now remember one of the reasons against > LeSage Gravity: if matter continually were > absorbing Gravity, it would heat up. > > So, if electrons were continually LOSING > energy to provide energy, but matter is > continually ABSORBING this energy to > provide Inertia and Gravity, I don't see the > problem. I see a solution. So you had your chance at abandoning this insane theory, but let it pass by. too bad. I was really hoping you could change your mind. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 09:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d992963a-b140-4150-abdd-ab71f1416776@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #621455 |
On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 7:17:39 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > Electrons may not radiate emr > as they orbit, > but they do radiate. > They are changing direction > rapidly and continuously in Space. > Space is not empty; Space is as full > as full can be. > Space is Infinitely Full: there is and can > be no smallest thing, and everything is made > of something, all the turtles Russian Dolls way > down. > Electrons everywhere give off ripples in > this Infinitely-recurring Space, > and it is this pressure from all matter that > is absorbed by matter and results in Gravity > and Inertia. Electrons indeed radiate. You all know my theory that photons can never change speed,nor bounce.Electrons are the reason. If electrons changed to a low speed it would create this question "what gets them back to c?" O ya Trebert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 17:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o9no7o$v0e$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #621983 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > You all know my theory that will not explain why I became <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> who is a Face Shitter & Criminal Graveyard Vandal, and why > <http://tinyurl.com/Jew-Swine-Glazier-cries> [1] for what is pointed out to Bert in link [1] , who added: > But "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & an IQ of 122", & "I know how everything works" "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 11:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o9msem$1h6o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #621455 |
On 3/4/2017 9:17 AM, john wrote: > Electrons may not radiate emr > as they orbit, > but they do radiate. > They are changing direction > rapidly and continuously in Space. > Space is not empty; Space is as full as full can be. > Space is Infinitely Full: there is and can > be no smallest thing, and everything is made > of something, all the turtles Russian Dolls way > down. > Electrons everywhere give off ripples in > this Infinitely-recurring Space, > and it is this pressure from all matter that > is absorbed by matter and results in Gravity > and Inertia. > if you send an electron beam across some wiggle magnets it generates an intense XRay beam https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/news/2016-06-15-spiraling-light-slac-x-ray-laser-offers-new-glimpses-molecules.aspx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 10:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <24629832-d357-4b53-8bdf-eeef3efe9ba0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #621988 |
The electron is in a bound state precisely BECAUSE it can recover energy from the proton. Energy which it is giving off 24/7, the proton is RECEIVING 24/7. Little bits of electron are always burning out , falling in, and being shot back out in an energized state. You guys. It's like saying, "Water can't evaporate because all the water would be gone, and it's not, so it doesn't."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 12:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o9mvcq$1n71$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #621994 |
On 3/7/2017 12:28 PM, john wrote: > The electron is in a bound state precisely > BECAUSE it can recover energy from > the proton. Energy which it is giving off > 24/7, the proton is RECEIVING 24/7. > Little bits of electron are always burning out , > falling in, and being shot back out in an > energized state. > > You guys. > > It's like saying, "Water can't evaporate because > all the water would be gone, and it's not, > so it doesn't." > the water turns into water vapor at room temperature and the water vapor floats up into the sky, because moist air is lighter than dry air. part of the momentuim of the electron beam (going very fast) is converted into xrays.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 13:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o9n0gl$1pc8$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #621994 |
On 3/7/2017 12:28 PM, john wrote: > The electron is in a bound state precisely > BECAUSE it can recover energy from > the proton. No. Don't GUESS at what "bound state" means. Don't INVENT what "bound state" means. Look it up. > Energy which it is giving off > 24/7, the proton is RECEIVING 24/7. > Little bits of electron are always burning out , > falling in, and being shot back out in an > energized state. > > You guys. > > It's like saying, "Water can't evaporate because > all the water would be gone, and it's not, > so it doesn't." > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 03:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9nt8l$epf$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #621994 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >The electron is in a bound state precisely >BECAUSE it can recover energy from >the proton. Quit making up stupid crap, John. An electron is bound because it doesn't have the energy needed to escape from the nucleus (oversimplified, QM complicates things). >You guys. >It's like saying, "Water can't evaporate because >all the water would be gone, and it's not, >so it doesn't." No, what you are writing is more like "rocks evaporate when left out in the sun on a hot day and later the rock vapor condenses and rocks fall back to the ground, completing the cycle". Only problem is that rocks don't evaporate. And there is no rock vapor in the air to condense back into rocks that fall back to earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 05:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <54340edc-139f-4b97-8ece-a8e7aa7258c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622088 |
MM "QM complicates things" Which is the opposite of the goal of Science.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 06:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <37ad3374-7317-4d18-a024-96f0abdffa28@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622131 |
it's keplerian; see Sommerville e.g
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 09:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o9p98q$1s06$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #622131 |
On 3/8/2017 7:47 AM, john wrote: > MM > "QM complicates things" > > Which is the opposite of the goal of Science. > John, I'm sorry, but you just have some plain wrong ideas of what science is or does. The goal of science is to discover the rules that nature operates by, no matter how complicated they are. It is not the aim of science to make nature simpler than it is. It is not the aim of science to explain nature in a naturally intuitive way. You are trying to get nature to fit inside your own limitations, to conform to what is comfortable to YOU. You are nothing but a blip as far as the universe is concerned. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 17:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o9pebc$nut$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #622131 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"QM complicates things" >Which is the opposite of the goal of Science. Wrong. The goal of science is to figure out how Nature works, and to model it (so we can make things that depend on how nature works). If nature happens to be complex, so be it. We have to deal with that. Why do you believe the goal of science is to make things simple? We don't get to tell nature what to do. Nature tells us what it does and we have to accept that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 11:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e59a36ef-cb6a-482c-84fd-7e625a7168bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622131 |
On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 8:47:24 AM UTC-5, john wrote: > MM > "QM complicates things" > > Which is the opposite of the goal of Science. No. You have to remember Murphy's 5th law: Mother Nature is a Bitch. Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins103652.html Note: "as simple as possible" is not the same as "simple". And do not overlook the ending "but not simpler." Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 14:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o9pp1u$qg3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #622166 |
On 3/8/2017 1:45 PM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 8:47:24 AM UTC-5, john wrote: >> MM >> "QM complicates things" >> >> Which is the opposite of the goal of Science. > > No. You have to remember Murphy's 5th law: > Mother Nature is a Bitch. > > Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. > Albert Einstein > https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins103652.html > > Note: > "as simple as possible" is not the same as "simple". > And do not overlook the ending "but not simpler." > > Ed > I believe there is a sentiment among certain people like John that science is an act of creation with the intent of making life better for people. They look at science as a way to create solutions to problems. So people like John say, it's a problem that everyday people do not understand nature to see how to fix life's problems. Therefore, these people say, it is the job of science to allow people to understand nature to see how to fix life's problems. Unfortunately, this is not the aim of science. The aim of science is to understand how nature works, period. If nature is complicated, then the understanding of it will be complicated, and the problem of everyday people not having the depth or the patience to gain that complicated understanding will go unsolved. This pisses people like John off. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arbyz14u@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 12:34 -0800 |
| Subject | subjectum editen |
| Message-ID | <66cf8017-30a5-43e8-ac2b-fe6e39bdfb2a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622167 |
I'm going to change my name; has to do with octonions, un\fortunately
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-08 19:32 -0800 |
| Subject | or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) |
| Message-ID | <f8583687-0bf0-4be0-8866-b80ed46c9909@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622170 |
well, anyway, welcome to the octonion workgroup!... to begin with, we shall investigate scalar powering, 1.4^(7/5)^1.4^(7/5),, and other 2-digital forms, firstly where parentheses are not required, because it is just sec0ndr00t of t00, to the power of the secondr00t of t00, in a tower
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 06:14 -0800 |
| Subject | or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) |
| Message-ID | <babbfddd-69b8-4572-9b82-49553a6317c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #622220 |
So- excited electrons give off a specific amount of energy when "dropping" back to their ground state. So, excited electrons DO use energy to orbit, but ground state electrons don't. Is that the position of the Odd, et al?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 15:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) |
| Message-ID | <o9ucua$7c4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #622414 |
On 03/10/2017 03:14 PM, john wrote: > So- excited electrons give off a specific > amount of energy when "dropping" > back to their ground state. > So, excited electrons DO use energy > to orbit, but ground state electrons don't. > > Is that the position of the Odd, et al? > I am not aware of Odd's position, but... Electrons do not "use" energy. Electrons in stable ground states, or metastable excited states have energy, that is partly kinetic, partly potential. The energy forms mutually exchange, keeping the sum constant, ( analogically as e.g. satellites on elliptical orbits ), until there is emitted or absorbed a photon, what changes the electron quantum state. ( Not only energy) -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-10 08:29 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: or, maybe, (1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2)^(1/2) |
| Message-ID | <o9ud7i$79p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #622414 |
On 3/10/2017 8:14 AM, john wrote: > So- excited electrons give off a specific > amount of energy when "dropping" > back to their ground state. > So, excited electrons DO use energy > to orbit, but ground state electrons don't. > > Is that the position of the Odd, et al? > No, John. "Using energy to orbit" means consuming a steady stream of energy to move. Electrons in atoms can have different energy levels, just like rocks on different height shelves in your living room will have different amounts of potential energy. Rocks do not consume energy sitting on your shelf. The one sitting on a higher shelf will not consume energy, the one sitting on the lower shelf will not consume energy. But if a rock falls from a higher shelf to a lower shelf, it will now lose the higher amount of potential energy it had by sitting on the higher shelf. The difference between how much potential energy it had before and how much it has now when it lands, that energy goes into the damage it causes on the shelf below. Electrons do not cause damage when they fall from one orbit to another. Instead, the difference between the energy it had before and how much it has now is radiated away in a photon (EM radiation). But just like the rocks on the shelf, there is no energy consumed just sitting in one state or another. Now you may say, but the rocks are sitting and the electrons are moving, and so there is energy consumed in moving where there is no energy consumed in sitting. And my reply is, no, there is no energy consumed in moving. Period, end of story. There are asteroids in space that have been moving for billions of years, and they have zero source of energy to move. They are just rocks. And so my question to you is, WHY do you think there is energy used up just in moving? What do you have in your mind that says, there HAS to be energy used in moving, because..... ? Because WHY? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web