Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #617006 > unrolled thread
| Started by | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-04 15:54 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-02-14 10:41 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 82 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:54 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 15:58 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:19 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:22 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 18:51 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:10 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 16:53 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:01 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 17:20 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 12:04 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:05 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 08:13 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 09:45 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 17:12 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 16:10 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:25 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:52 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:15 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:51 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:41 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 21:48 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 20:52 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 03:51 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 21:33 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-08 16:58 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-08 22:08 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 19:02 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:24 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 00:22 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:50 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 03:17 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-06 23:52 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-07 01:42 +0000
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 11:59 -0600
Re: Van Allen radiation belt benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-02-04 20:22 -0500
Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-04 18:28 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 12:37 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-02-05 20:49 +0000
or, PI < 10/31 in some base_n > 3 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:36 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:07 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 14:33 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:04 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:05 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:51 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:52 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:54 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:55 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:56 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 08:47 -0800
waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 16:02 -0800
Re: waves are wavey noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 19:05 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-05 15:57 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:02 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:20 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 01:21 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 12:14 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 12:28 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-08 13:41 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-09 11:19 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:45 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:47 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:52 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 12:56 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-11 11:36 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 13:10 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-11 16:32 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-12 13:43 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 08:58 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 13:46 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 13:13 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 13:59 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 14:34 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-13 15:55 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 09:57 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 10:06 -0800
Re: Van Allen radiation belt numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 10:41 -0800
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58991955$0$10699$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617286 |
On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>> >>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>> rovers genius? >>>> >>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>> >>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted > troll liar. > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 01:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <77lnmd-4hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617301 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>> >>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>> >>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>> >>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >> troll liar. >> >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with ad admitted troll liar? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <589a3c80$0$57736$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617314 |
On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>> >>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>> >>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>> >>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>> >>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>> troll liar. >>> >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with > ad admitted troll liar? > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 21:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <utrpmd-ui.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617433 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>>> >>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>> >>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>> troll liar. >>>> >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with >> ad admitted troll liar? >> >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. The troll seems desperate for attention. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 20:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <589a79d4$0$57907$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617449 |
On 2/7/2017 4:48 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>>>> >>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>> >>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>>> troll liar. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>> >>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with >>> ad admitted troll liar? >>> >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > The troll seems desperate for attention. > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 03:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i6hqmd-vm2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617486 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/7/2017 4:48 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>>>> troll liar. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>> >>>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with >>>> ad admitted troll liar? >>>> >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> The troll seems desperate for attention. >> >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. The troll desperately seeks attention. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 21:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <44f6cb99-6388-4cec-a193-a13fe4585b4e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #617512 |
waves are reciprocal of secondpower; optical waves > >>>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and > >>>>>>>>>> rovers genius? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. > >>>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted > >>>>>> troll liar. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > >>>> > >>>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with > >>>> ad admitted troll liar? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > >> > >> The troll seems desperate for attention. > >> > >> > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > The troll desperately seeks attention. > > > -- > Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <589b948b$0$43818$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617512 |
On 2/7/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/7/2017 4:48 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>>>>> troll liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>> >>>>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with >>>>> ad admitted troll liar? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>> >>> The troll seems desperate for attention. >>> >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > The troll desperately seeks attention. > > Doncha love this "did not" "did too" display of intellect here by chimp and me?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 22:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dfhsmd-lh9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617623 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/7/2017 10:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/7/2017 4:48 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/6/2017 8:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/6/2017 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >>>>>>>>>>>>> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >>>>>>>>>>>>> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and >>>>>>>>>>>> rovers genius? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's the point chimporoni, they can't get back hence must be hoaxes. >>>>>>>>>>> You've often argued this kind of thing yourself. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Typical troll nonsense and ad hominem. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>>>>>> troll liar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, what would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with >>>>>> ad admitted troll liar? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>> >>>> The troll seems desperate for attention. >>>> >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> The troll desperately seeks attention. >> >> > Doncha love this "did not" "did too" display of intellect here by chimp > and me? QED. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 19:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o7gf33$11ei$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #617030 |
On 2/4/2017 6:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >> The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to use >> radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio >> waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. not inverse to 5th, inverse to 2nd. > > How are the pictures getting back from all of the Mars probes and > rovers genius? > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-08 01:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f5326d47-b4fc-41c3-b2cb-e844a68249e0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #617016 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 7:10:27 PM UTC-5, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote: > The Mars mission may also be fake since it may not be possible to > use radio waves at the distance of 33 millions of miles since radio > waves are dependent on the inverse of the fifth power. What have you been smoking? You have some really strange ideas.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-05 00:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3r7imd-4q4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617006 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: > Is it causing gravity? Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt around them? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-04 20:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <589684ea$0$17444$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617029 |
On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >> Is it causing gravity? > > Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt > around them? Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical significance. You argument is a non-sequitur.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-05 03:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p2iimd-nr5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617045 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>> Is it causing gravity? >> >> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >> around them? > > Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish > experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical > significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. Troll nonsense. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 16:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5898efc7$0$10636$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617060 |
On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Is it causing gravity? >>> >>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >>> around them? >> >> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. > > Troll nonsense. > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 23:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9qenmd-dsl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617250 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> Is it causing gravity? >>>> >>>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >>>> around them? >>> >>> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >>> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >>> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. >> >> Troll nonsense. >> >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 19:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <58991960$0$10699$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617287 |
On 2/6/2017 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> Is it causing gravity? >>>>> >>>>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >>>>> around them? >>>> >>>> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >>>> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >>>> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. >>> >>> Troll nonsense. >>> >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll. > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 01:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f8lnmd-4hm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #617302 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 2/6/2017 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> Is it causing gravity? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >>>>>> around them? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >>>>> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >>>>> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. >>>> >>>> Troll nonsense. >>>> >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll. >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. What would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll liar? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 16:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <589a3c8b$0$57736$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #617315 |
On 2/6/2017 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 2/6/2017 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> Is it causing gravity? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a radiation belt >>>>>>> around them? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >>>>>> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >>>>>> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. >>>>> >>>>> Troll nonsense. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>> >>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted troll. >>> >> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. > > What would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with an admitted > troll liar? > > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 11:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o7ialn$1va4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #617434 |
On 2/7/2017 3:30 PM, benj wrote: > On 2/6/2017 8:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 2/6/2017 6:52 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/4/2017 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/4/2017 7:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> numbernumber1964@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> Is it causing gravity? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did the lead spheres in the Cavendish experiment have a >>>>>>>> radiation belt >>>>>>>> around them? >>>>>>> Sorry Chimp but another kook here has already proved that Cavendish >>>>>>> experiment was invalid with the data well below statistical >>>>>>> significance. You argument is a non-sequitur. >>>>>> >>>>>> Troll nonsense. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >>>> There is no point in attempting to discuss anything with an admitted >>>> troll. >>>> >>> No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. >> >> What would be the point of attempting to discuss anything with an >> admitted >> troll liar? >> >> > No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth. instead of; "No discussion from chimp. just wasted bandwidth." use; NDFCJWB. (conserves bandwidth) so, what was the OP about ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web