Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #595567 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-01 17:06 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-09-11 14:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 355 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 17:06 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-02 01:56 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 21:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 21:48 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 04:44 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-02 13:46 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:47 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-02 07:02 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:08 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-02 11:17 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:53 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:48 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:40 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 10:06 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-02 13:40 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:18 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-02 17:04 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 15:15 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-03 04:13 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 03:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 08:03 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-04 03:14 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 20:39 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 10:03 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-05 13:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 15:34 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 10:30 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 10:28 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 10:23 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 12:23 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:45 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:36 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-05 12:40 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:34 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 08:49 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 09:31 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 09:59 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:34 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:39 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-04 19:30 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 12:34 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 16:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-05 13:23 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 15:47 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-05 16:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-06 09:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-06 11:24 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-07 13:23 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 06:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 07:41 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:29 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 08:59 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 11:02 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 11:03 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 09:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 09:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-07 10:44 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 15:21 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 09:15 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 07:39 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 08:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 10:20 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-08 17:23 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-08 15:11 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 10:16 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 08:22 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 08:38 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 11:55 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-08 11:06 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 14:20 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 16:30 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 14:57 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 07:32 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 17:33 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 16:57 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 20:00 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 18:18 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 22:05 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:15 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:52 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:24 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 23:54 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 08:15 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 23:19 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 09:07 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:31 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 23:59 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 21:48 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-14 05:14 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:50 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 00:53 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:54 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:16 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:00 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:41 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:57 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:48 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 07:00 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-14 12:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 14:35 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:47 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 08:30 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:56 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 08:46 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 06:04 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 06:21 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 06:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 07:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 07:39 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 15:40 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 11:33 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:41 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 09:26 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:09 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 18:19 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 22:07 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:16 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 23:25 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 09:09 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:33 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 09:29 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 09:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 20:18 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 07:24 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:46 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 20:12 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 21:04 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 21:48 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:05 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 09:02 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-08 22:11 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-08 19:55 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 07:35 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 05:46 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-09 13:36 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 08:46 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 06:54 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:33 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 17:45 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 17:05 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 15:24 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-09 22:51 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 16:09 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 06:15 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 07:08 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 18:22 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 23:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-10 14:04 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 06:14 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 20:15 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 18:05 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 16:12 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 18:26 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 16:46 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 20:06 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 03:04 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-12 10:01 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 10:14 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-12 18:03 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 13:24 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-12 11:37 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 11:56 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 11:59 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 15:34 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 18:17 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:30 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 18:43 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:02 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-13 02:13 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-13 02:09 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 23:38 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-13 04:40 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 07:19 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 07:27 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 09:24 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 15:05 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 20:06 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-14 05:15 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 11:59 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:45 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 14:05 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:08 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 15:36 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 14:16 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 07:56 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 06:47 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 20:04 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 07:06 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:22 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-15 12:55 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 06:18 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 08:45 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-15 14:31 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 08:23 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 10:43 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 08:58 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 09:48 -0700
tautochrononology noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 10:03 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:32 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 10:57 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 11:01 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 14:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:15 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 16:01 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 14:07 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 02:25 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 07:00 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 11:58 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:43 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:46 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 10:47 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 09:19 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 22:11 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 21:19 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 23:29 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 09:12 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 19:38 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 09:54 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 10:11 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:50 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 06:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-13 09:10 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 23:12 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 07:12 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 05:51 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 08:32 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 06:36 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 06:44 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-22 20:15 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 15:58 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 06:56 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 07:05 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 09:49 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:25 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 08:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 11:51 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 12:12 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 00:33 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 13:59 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 06:19 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 07:19 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 06:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 08:33 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 13:00 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 06:37 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 07:46 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-20 16:08 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 09:35 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-20 19:39 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:42 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 07:42 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 08:27 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 15:28 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 10:59 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 19:14 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 12:57 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 07:42 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 09:53 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:13 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 17:04 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 18:09 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 19:10 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 15:12 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 08:20 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 08:28 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "Tim BandTech.com" <timgolden@bandtechnology.com> - 2016-09-24 08:57 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:25 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 19:08 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:52 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 23:47 +0000
sh*t *p or p*t *p noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 10:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 02:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 06:25 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 10:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:37 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 08:01 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 14:38 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 01:44 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-29 03:26 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:32 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-29 12:01 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 14:08 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 15:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 17:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 08:00 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-28 23:26 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-29 11:50 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:24 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 19:05 +0000
spins in zpinz noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 16:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:18 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 08:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 15:54 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:41 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 09:44 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:23 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 16:01 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 09:54 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 08:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:18 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 08:42 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:19 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 15:49 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 17:14 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 08:10 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 11:22 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 10:38 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 07:34 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 06:35 -0700
the little sEEds in that guy noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 13:37 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 13:07 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-16 13:20 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-08 09:03 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 12:51 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-07 18:57 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 12:29 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:40 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 13:09 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-07 10:30 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-09-07 10:26 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 13:42 -0500
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 20:11 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 07:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 07:33 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 08:15 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 09:18 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-05 18:11 -0400
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 12:41 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-09-09 22:49 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-10 14:08 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 07:43 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-10 21:09 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 15:48 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 15:56 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-10 23:56 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 06:59 -0700
Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-12 00:31 +0000
Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 14:41 -0700
Page 17 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 08:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nrm3nm$l31$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #597223 |
On 9/16/2016 4:14 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/16/2016 8:12 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 9/16/2016 1:12 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: >>> ========================================= >>> imbecile parrot Bodkin Draper >>> force can be done only !!y push >>> not by pull !! >> >> Who says? >> > Science says. No it doesn't. > Is space made up of ropes and strings that transmit force > by a pull? I don't think so. Disconnected individual particles (gas etc. > aether, etc,) can only PUSH on one another. Bullshit. Where is the string providing the attraction between disconnected particles of opposite electric charge? Hmmmm??? > There is no pull. Ideas like > "suction" are as amateur as "centrifugal force". -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 11:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqunk7$e5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #596375 |
On 9/9/2016 8:54 AM, john wrote: > Odd > I've told you many times what's BS: > point particles (impossible) > suck gravity- no mechanism- impossible > electrons moving w/o losing energy- impossible > light moving w/o losing energy- impossible > universal inflation- impossible > > MANY other things. > > I'm not worried- scientific shit is going > to hit the fan when Juno tries to tell > us that Jupiter has a crust: Levi-S > kicked up Sulphur- where is THAT in you > "gas planet"? > Following up on this, here's the bottom line. You object to certain things because they just don't "feel right". But beyond this, you seem to be completely stymied to explain what's wrong. You then say that they don't feel right, and so there must be some common sense rules that are being broken by them. But then notice that you can't lay your hand on any particular rule that applies, one that you know is true with some confidence. So you don't really have any THINKING rationale for what you say is possible and impossible, only what your gut tells you. As an example of this, you have this mental image that as an object moves, it must be giving off or consuming energy. You don't know WHY you have this image, but you just do. Nor can you point to any physical law or rule that says that objects must lose energy as they move. Only that your mental image is that they do. Nowhere in any of this do you ever consider the possibility that your mental image is just flat wrong. Another example is what you stated just above. The presence of sulfur tells you that Jupiter must have a crust, as though sulfur cannot exist as a gas. Why you have this image in your head, I can't say, but it's flat wrong. Sulfur gas exists even in the sun. So what does this tell you about your mental images of how the world is? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 10:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa1a44e0-d2f7-4f03-b663-aee6c21ba305@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596382 |
> -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Odd, you have way more patience with John than I do. I commend you. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 07:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqua81$1601$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #596329 |
On 9/8/2016 5:41 PM, john wrote: > Michael, > QM is PROUD that it violates all the > rules > John, that is just the silliest bullshit I've heard all week. Where on earth did you get that idea? Or are you just making this up? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 06:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8c6e0a85-2928-4d12-966f-51db0fb24792@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596312 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 5:21:29 PM UTC-4, john wrote: > Ed said > " > So QM spin too small to see but you postulate the electron > is made of a vortex of even tinier particles than the electron > itself. > > Just pick and choose your facts, just like other trolls. " > > QM "spin" is not like macroscopic spin. So you learned something from reading my posts. good. > In fact, it's indescribable! > That kind of "fairy spin" only happens > where you can't see it- according to QM- > and you have to kind of IMAGINE it, > along with a lot of VIRTUAL stuff and > Magic WORMholes. And your magic galaxies inside the electron. You have watched Men In Black too many times. > > In MY model- which is a true model in that > it can be run in 3D- there are actual > pathways that stuff follows, and the > rules of Physics don't change. So tell me again the problem your models solves? > > Ed, you'll just believe any kind of shit for a degree, > just like the other zombies, won't you? That you must stoop to vulgar language shows you don't have the evidence. I've gone through this before. I don't "believe" the current Standard model. I accept it based on the MANY problems it solves. I look at the evidence. You have presented zero evidence for your "true model". That is why I reject it. As a friend of mine like to put it: All theories are wrong, but some are more useful that others. So it is not because I believe you are wrong. It is that you have not shown your model is useful or workable. I reject it because it doesn't explain ANYTHING.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-09 13:37 -0700 |
| Subject | the little sEEds in that guy |
| Message-ID | <24796eec-64d0-4dc5-9a48-413264c76272@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596312 |
the original quantum numbers were all quite keplerian, and they are still teh same, ol' quantumfication of yore; unfortunately, because of the British hegemonY of all things educational, most folks believe that quanta of light are newtonian zero-dimensional rocks, although eL Fig said that lightrocks go faster in a denser medium. stick with Young's two-pinhole moire', and you will ne;er go wrongly with eL Fig, again > QM "spin" is not like macroscopic spin. > In fact, it's indescribable! > That kind of "fairy spin" only happens > where you can't see it- according to QM- > and you have to kind of IMAGINE it, > along with a lot of VIRTUAL stuff and > Magic WORMholes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 13:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c9189d5-3b07-4110-95de-6e1fd5cad225@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596312 |
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 2:21:29 PM UTC-7, john wrote: > Ed said > " > So QM spin too small to see but you postulate the electron > is made of a vortex of even tinier particles than the electron > itself. > > Just pick and choose your facts, just like other trolls. " > > QM "spin" is not like macroscopic spin. > In fact, it's indescribable! > That kind of "fairy spin" only happens > where you can't see it- according to QM- > and you have to kind of IMAGINE it, > along with a lot of VIRTUAL stuff and > Magic WORMholes. > > In MY model- which is a true model in that > it can be run in 3D- there are actual > pathways that stuff follows, and the > rules of Physics don't change. > > Ed, you'll just believe any kind of shit for a degree, > just like the other zombies, won't you? Electron is a spinning particle created by photons or anti-photons for positrons.I haVE knon this for 71 years. I have posted this for 24 years. It is probably my very first theory on the universe.Only thing older is my G=EMC^2 I will post it again (now) TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 13:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nrhk67$kaa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #597198 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: >Only thing older is my (stolen ) G=EMC^2 which say: > "Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism"... on which > I will post again (now) TreBert > > Glazier, does your ** Social Worker** know that you are a Face-Shitter that wants to be mayor? ... ROTFLMAO > Glazier, why do you believe that the voters and the City Council wants to have a criminal Graveyard Vandal, like yourself, at the helm, who is ... > <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier who wrote: "I'll be sitting on Benj Jacoby's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". > hanson wrote: So, Glazier, again, do the right thing, be a Mensch, and recant and apologize for what you said, will ya. > If you don't then it is a given that your self-introduction will follow each one of you posts... in which it says that... > <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> the sanctimonious Full-Swine Glazier who often posts: "god and religion is hocus pocus" and now that Glazier is doing his final twitching he trembles and prays: "Open Mind of God. Best to go with God, and be nice" > hanson wrote: But Glazier you Swine, it is YOU that is NOT nice, and things have not gotten any better because YOU came back after you wrote: > Full Swine & Cretin Glazier wrote: > "Why am I not loved by all?" > "I might leave if things do not get better"..because... > <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier whose G=EMC^2 is short for "Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism", (Zika & or by his genetic ashkeNazi marker) defines Bert, reber Trebert, or Treb as the loud mouth, the misogynic Peeping Tom (lifts & looks under the shirts of girls) the Jewish Jailbird, the Liar, Hatemonger, schizoid mental cripple, Pervert Face- Shitter, criminal Graveyard vandal, Bigot, Racist, War-monger & Communist :B::ert Glazier who introduces himself with/as.... > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > about which .... Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > "Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup." "Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__." "Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!." > "Glazier, your science is far worse than the man's on the street." "Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage." "Glazier, your brain is entangled with a used garbage can." > "reber, take your 'you know it all thinking' to your grave" . "reber, your horseshit gets old. Say hi to Allah for me.: "reber, you don't believe in science." > Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> "Harlow Campbell" succinctly added & wrote: > "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker".... "Bert you are senile, dazed & confused" "Bert, you are Fucked in the head. > "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking moron who ever came down the Mass Pike." "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" > "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human fucking being". "Bert you are an idiot." "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". > "Bert, you should be arrested" "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your van seems to be a center for drug activity in the Wal-Mart parking lot"... .... .... about which.... > Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts. You know nothing about government nor physics. You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: > GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! Saul Levy > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: > I know, you reber are an idiot. Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > benj" Benjamin Franklin Jacoby <nobody@gmail.com> who recently nymshifted to "B Gates" <nobodyxx@gmail>, wrote: > One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is... and promote that shitting into a bucket in a car is an achievement that is a laudable accomplishment... and both being Communists they demand entitlement to goods and services that were created by hardworking people while they themselves drink, party and frolic!... ... still waiting "to be loved by all"... > hanson wrote: So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year old Minnie Mouse van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > "What are they gonna say when Swine Glazier dies? Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans which Glazier, the Full-Swine, announced and posted at the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > (1) On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which Glazier proudly announced & posted... > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier threatened... > (3) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide". <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> after... > (4) The Criminal Swine Glazier rejected to recant, disavow & apologize, and refused to stop his practices & because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel-movement, acceting that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... and that Glazier, also being a Peeping Tom, enjoys lifting & loooking up under the skirts of girls... > hanson wrote: Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your legacy, is because: > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: .... "hanson made me famous".... > hanson wrote So, Glazier you Swine, you should be grateful to me & not wish me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for: > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > which is why the mental cripple <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier> badly needs to be administered to with <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> ... > Now Glazier, you filthy Swine, "you will never be loved by all" but incredibly, Glazier, you do have groupies who love you, and haved become, voluntarily, your personal slaves of you, Faceshitter Glazier, who demonstrate their worship & their devotion to their master Glazier, by lying under & literally shit-eating Glazier's turds: <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> such as: > =1= Sefton "john" <johnsefton288@gmail.com> the delusional vegetarian loud-mouth from Canuckistan's town of Regina is under the influence of his Lysergic- and Solanine contaminated diet and so Sefton lays himself with gusto under Face-shitter Glazier's Sphincter and enjoys eating <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> and Sefton is impressed also with the Hate-mongering of > =2= <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> is Iran's Glazier. The Freak Muslime Mehram Maleki HATES Western culture & the USA, hates Xtians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, even Sunnis. Yet Maldrecki lays himself freely UNDER the Sphincter of Face shitter Jew Glazier who bragged <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> to have _"PFM"_= "Poop For Maleki", which the gay, Iranian Muslime, Maldrecki, consumed until he turned black & posted his <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-Mehram-Selfie> > Then the 88 Year old Glazier announced that "Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses & a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... which so impressed Maldrecki that Maleki showed his devotion and solidarity by going LGBT & had a Sex change operation, whose result she posted in <http://tinyurl.com/Maleki-the-TG-Girl>. > =3= "AA" <double-a3@hush.com> is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__, aka "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic Addict" who struts with his "AmoebA" brain, posted and yearns to be like Glazier, & "AA" doubles as "Anon Yidd. Mouse", <nobody@home.invalid> who does NOT mind that Full-swine Glazier is a Face shitter & a criminal Grave yard vandal, & Glazier who never recanted nor apologized for the overt criminal threats Glazier made.... .... >> > ...aux contraire, "AA", who is __Glazier's "Ass Angel"__, comes to the aid of Full Swine Glazier's criminality, & worse, the Jewish Pig "AA" cum "Anon Yidd Mouse", curses folks that point at Glazier's behavior, which makes Yidd Mouse to be an "AA" example of the lurid "Closeness" which the eminent Jewish Scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal ||R:|| describes in his epic <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT> wherein it says: ||R:|| We Jews have a solidarity & a closeness to ||R:|| fellow Jews like none other in the world. ||R:|| We Jews are always 'as one' when it counts. > ||R:|| It's no secret that we Jews do not respect ||R:|| you gentiles. All of you are our enemies. ||R:|| Our Jewish beliefs are entirely different from yours. ||R:|| Our Talmud/Nedarim/Kol Nidre = "all vows" allows ||R:|| us Jews to lie, subvert and cheat you, the Goyim > =4= Strangely, the Austrian Hitleryouth Halbmutt Wabnigger, <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> sides with Glazier too, but said: ____ "Jews are a residue of failed evolution" _______ > =5= Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>, the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle) is a criminal Child-support dead-beat who greedily sucks turds out of Glazier's sphincter, especially when they are Methamphetamine preloaded as seen when Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>::JR:: wrote: ::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore. I masturbate. I've found that ::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate. ::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to ::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed. ::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin ::JR:: or meth. So I've recently vowed to not masturbate... ::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ... ::JR:: Does that make me smart ? -- I'd rather masturbate. ::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum). ::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want. ::::::: (cuz Relf is apparently interested now, with his "mouth wide ::::::: open", to let Swine Glazier shit into Relf's "kisser") ::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..." > =6= ... and even earlier, ironically, signed up was kike "Bodaisky", <root@localhost.localdomain> who lied and claimed to be "Bo Dai" from China, but was in fact "Fagie Bodaisky", who lives off the tips he gets from being a rest-room attendant in a NY Bath house for gay Jews. > =7= "Andrew Vecsey" posting as <trudi.schwander@gmail.com> is another AshkeNAZI pervert, a twat mimicker, who enjoys spending her time under Glazier's Sphincter like the ones above. Like those pigs s/he does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but s/he objects and groans when that is pointed out & comes runnning to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT> > =8= The Wal-Mart Greeter "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> Mark L. Fergerson is another stupid & despicably filthy pig that enjoys spending his time under Glazier's Sphincter like the 7 ones above. Like those 7 other pigs, the Wal-Mart Greeter Ferkel does NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but says that Glazier's criminal behavior, like Glazier's looking up/under the skirts of girls, is "not abusive" & insists that "Us old-timers gotta stick together." > =9= Israeli Zionist Yehiel Porat <poraty350@gmail.com> is another 80 year old AshkeNAZI pervert, who enjoys spending his time under Glazier's Sphincter like those pigs above who do NOT mind that Jew Glazier is bragging to be a Face shitter and a criminal Grave yard vandal, but object and groans when that is pointed out & come to defend and side with Full-Swine Glazier, just like seen in =3= & <http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT> > > This bizarre perversion is well documented as seen here in: <http://tinyurl.com/magnum-opus-the-rectal-jew> <https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=jewish+coprophilia>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-08 09:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <517d0bc4-24a6-47c2-b7bd-2d1e473d9936@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596227 |
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:21:26 PM UTC-4, john wrote: > Ed said > "The spin of both electron and positron is 1/2. > They both have the same mass rest mass: 0.511MeV > The property where they differ is their charge. > > So again, NO, antimatter is NOT due to something > having opposite " You clipped "spin" from the quote > > Questions for Ed: > 1. There are two jets produced > by an AGN. > Do THEY have: (for 10 points) > a. the same spin > b. no spin > c. opposite spin > 2. Explain your choice (for 90 points) Given the jets are primarily EM radiation, there is no spin to the jets. :) Oops I answered question 2 before question 1. Sorry. Let's see what silly Gotcha you have planned. But of course you know, spin on a macro scale such as a spinning black hole is not the same as the spin property of subatomic particles. So pop quiz back at you: A. What does the 1/2 spin of an electron mean? B. How's the weather? (There's no wrong answer to question B. I just did not want you to feel like you could not answer any questions we ask you, since you seem to have no scientific training.) Enjoy, ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 12:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqpk3e$2ct$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #596183 |
On 9/7/2016 11:33 AM, john wrote: > You just keep coming back for more, Odd. > > And we observe that opposite > electrons have opposite spin, Yes. Note that this does not mean that one is matter and the other is antimatter. I've already described to you what an electron is and what a positron is, and the difference is NOT THE DIRECTION OF THE SPIN. > meaning that opposite galactic arms > are made from matter having opposite > spin, meaning, that's where the > antimatter is. As you repeatedly seem to ignore/forget/wince, you keep focusing on the parts of galactic arms that are well separated from each other, and you do not care to deal with the inconvenient problem that galactic arms all touch the galactic center. If the galactic center is made of matter, then your antimatter arm touches it, and you would necessarily see 1.022 MeV gammas, which you don't. If the galactic center is made of antimatter, then your matter arm touches it and you would necessarily see 1.022 MeV gammas, which you don't. So what you call "cute" has an ugly cancerous liver which you don't want to acknowledge. Plus, your "cute" idea relies on your claim that matter and antimatter repel, when it is an experimental fact that they do exactly the opposite. (Positronium) > > Cute. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 18:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nqpntt$88g$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #596183 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded: >And we observe that opposite >electrons have opposite spin, The two electrons in a particular suborbital, yes. >meaning that opposite galactic arms We're talking about electrons, not galaxies. >are made from matter having opposite >spin, No, it doesn't. > meaning, that's where the >antimatter is. No, it doesn't. Antimatter isn't matter with the opposite spin. Read about positronium, for example. >Cute. In a very retarded way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 12:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqpipe$1vmo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #596182 |
On 9/7/2016 11:30 AM, john wrote: > Odd > An electron looks just like a galactic arm > of 50 billion stars, etc. A galactic arm touches the galactic core which is also filled with stars. So in the atom, what are you saying the electron does? It extends from from more electrons in the middle of the atom? What's the analog of the stars in the case of the electron? What's the electron made of? Can you distinguish the components of an electron like you can distinguish the stars in a galactic arm? > > You see, "Galaxy Model for the Atom" > is what that means. > You still don't get that? > > Okay, it's just the ELECTRONS that > QM has no structure for. > Gotcha. That's right. Some things have no observable structure, and so it'd be silly to insist that they have structure anyway, unless you can provide experimental evidence consistent with them having structure. But you can't, at least so far. Other things, like atoms, do have structure, and QM provides that structure MUCH BETTER THAN YOUR animations do. > > That's like, "I'm sitting on a cloud." > "You can't be sitting on a cloud!" > "Of course not! I'm sitting on a chair..... > (.....on a cloud)" > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 10:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9da00431-2b87-40d5-9e7e-cc12cf8d0094@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596189 |
Odd The galactic rotation curve consists of a straight part and a curved part. Can you explain what that might mean in terms of star movement?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 13:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nqpl52$480$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #596193 |
On 9/7/2016 12:40 PM, john wrote: > Odd > The galactic rotation curve consists > of a straight part and a > curved part. > Can you explain what that might mean in > terms of star movement? > What the fuck are you on about? The measured galactic rotation curves I've seen are plots of velocity vs distance from center. Those curves have a rising part near the center, followed by a plateau. In terms of star movement, what it means is that near the center, the stars have small tangential velocity, which increases as you go out, up to a point. Beyond that point, matter has a the same velocity out to the edge of the galaxy. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67b728cf-f82c-40b5-9094-04f212643013@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596170 |
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 10:42:12 AM UTC-4, john wrote: > You see, Michael, for atoms, > all the spinny stuff is too fast to > see. They are precessing at > 10^16 times per sec. > That is why that part is "theory". But your theory explains NOTHING. If you cannot measure it, what good is it? Present one measurement that might support your theory. Evidence so far is electrons are point-like particles. So what experiment shows the spinning structure you propose? Don't worry we'll wait.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-07 10:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0ed01596-bd3b-4ce2-9d30-694950c3cf9e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #596072 |
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:24:51 PM UTC-4, john wrote: > Ed > I would think that > a real enquiring mind > would address the subject. > You're like > Michael and Odd- you know there > is no real model, just descriptions of > the various effects. > Another Odd wanna be- ohno Yep, you are definitely a JM droid. maybe you are not him, but you pattern your reply in his style. Looks like you are the one lacking the inquiring mind, set on your conviction that you are right, without evidence, without knowledge, without the skills to present your argument. Sorry to spoil your day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-04 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AYCdnc6767uY9lHKnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #595788 |
Damn. Harlo Varlo Arlo Carlo. I'd thought you'd vanished. You missed: "regressing". -- Goat On 09/04/2016 10:49, HVAC wrote: > Michael Moroney > john <johnse...@gmail.com> tarded: > > <snip crap> > > John, I'm telling you, the brown acid or whatever it was you got from > Little Pharma is going to permanently fry your mind, to the point that not > even a good shrink and the best antipsychotics that Big Pharma has to > offer will be able to help you. > ----------- > > Antipsychotics and phychotics. Vortices in the subfractal. Precessing and recessing. > > > > > On the other hand, perhaps it's too late. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-04 16:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <47eb83db-a6ab-4a82-afed-2c2c3ee0fcdb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595810 |
Lofty Goat Damn. Harlo Varlo Arlo Carlo. I'd thought you'd vanished. ----------- Just off on a fishing adventure. You missed: "regressing". -- Goat ---------- Regressing? Was that a topic?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-04 20:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <128295a0-0081-46ab-a0f7-61cb9db7519b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595853 |
HVAC said " Regressing? Was that a topic? " Don't try to shine us, HVAC. You have no idea what a topic is- at least I've never seen you stay on one
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-05 07:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0016e169-6c43-4f2a-aaec-eb754f6703fd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595876 |
john HVAC said " Regressing? Was that a topic? " Don't try to shine us, HVAC. You have no idea what a topic is- at least I've never seen you stay on one --------- Moosecock
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web