Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #583662 > unrolled thread

Gravitational Waves

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:45 -0500
    Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:47 -0500
      Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:51 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 14:55 -0500
        Re: Gravitational Waves benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 16:50 -0400
          Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:38 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:52 -0700
    Re: Gravitational Waves "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:11 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:29 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:45 -0700
          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 06:51 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 15:15 +0000
          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 11:26 -0700
            Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 19:44 +0000
              Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:36 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 02:45 +0000
                  Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 02:26 -0700
                    Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 12:20 +0000
                      Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:06 -0700
                        Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 15:54 +0000
                          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 11:21 -0700
                            Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-15 14:33 +0000
                              Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:35 -0700
                                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-16 01:39 +0000
        Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 13:02 -0700
          Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 14:20 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#583662 — Gravitational Waves

Gravitational Waves
> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves


> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
> articles from the archives of Physic

   Nice Collection of Articles.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#583663

On 6/7/16 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Gravitational Waves
>> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
>
>
>> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
>> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
>> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
>> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
>> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
>> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
>> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
>> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
>> articles from the archives of Physic
>
>   Nice Collection of Articles.
>


   This was one of my favorites

   Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
 > 
http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#583905

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:48:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 6/7/16 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Gravitational Waves
> >> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
> >
> >
> >> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
> >> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
> >> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
> >> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
> >> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
> >> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
> >> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
> >> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
> >> articles from the archives of Physic
> >
> >   Nice Collection of Articles.
> >
> 
> 
>    This was one of my favorites
> 
>    Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
>  > 
> http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

LIGO is a lie. No Nobel Think "cold Fusion"Think shuttles" taken us nowhere,and not safe and replacing the great saturn V.All done by GOPers TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#583908

On 6/8/16 2:51 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> LIGO is a lie.



               ##                                      #
               ##                                      #
               #########################################
               #########################################
               ##                                 ######
               ##                             ##########
                                            ############
                                         ##############
                                       #############
                                    #############
                                ##############
                              #############
                           ##############
                         #############
                      ##############
                  #############                        #
                #############                          #
               #########################################
               #########################################
                                                       #

                       ########
                    ###############
                  ##################
                 #####################
                ####               ####
                ##                   ##
               ##                     ##
               ##                     ##
               ##                    ###
                ##                   ##
                ####               ####
                 #####################
                  ##################
                    ###############
                       ########




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#583919

On 06/08/2016 03:51 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:48:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 6/7/16 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Gravitational Waves
>>>> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
>>>
>>>
>>>> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
>>>> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
>>>> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
>>>> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
>>>> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
>>>> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
>>>> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
>>>> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
>>>> articles from the archives of Physic
>>>
>>>    Nice Collection of Articles.
>>>
>>
>>
>>     This was one of my favorites
>>
>>     Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
>>   >
>> http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> community, and physics-related social issues.
>
> LIGO is a lie. No Nobel Think "cold Fusion"Think shuttles" taken us nowhere,and not safe and replacing the great saturn V.All done by GOPers TreBert
>
Herb, saying LIGO is a lie, is science discussion.
Bringing GOPers into it is not science.

I won't apply the warning this time, but you are treading close to the 
edge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584102

On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 1:50:46 PM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 03:51 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:48:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >> On 6/7/16 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> >>> Gravitational Waves
> >>>> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
> >>>> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
> >>>> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
> >>>> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
> >>>> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
> >>>> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
> >>>> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
> >>>> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
> >>>> articles from the archives of Physic
> >>>
> >>>    Nice Collection of Articles.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>     This was one of my favorites
> >>
> >>     Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
> >>   >
> >> http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> >> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> >> community, and physics-related social issues.
> >
> > LIGO is a lie. No Nobel Think "cold Fusion"Think shuttles" taken us nowhere,and not safe and replacing the great saturn V.All done by GOPers TreBert
> >
> Herb, saying LIGO is a lie, is science discussion.
> Bringing GOPers into it is not science.
> 
> I won't apply the warning this time, but you are treading close to the 
> edge.

GOPersSteal billions and billions.Think Nixon Annenberg,Kissenger,and last but biggest crook Bush.LIGO is a $450,000,000 GOPermoney.maker.O YaOnly a GOPer couldget away with it. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#583906

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:48:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 6/7/16 3:45 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > Gravitational Waves
> >> http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
> >
> >
> >> Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
> >> Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
> >> gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
> >> predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
> >> first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
> >> to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
> >> detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
> >> fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
> >> articles from the archives of Physic
> >
> >   Nice Collection of Articles.
> >
> 
> 
>    This was one of my favorites
> 
>    Viewpoint: The First Sounds of Merging Black Holes -- PDF Version
>  > 
> http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584451

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 11:45:42 PM UTC+3, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Gravitational Waves
> > http://physics.aps.org/gravitational-waves
> 
> 
> > Earlier this year, physicists at the Laser Interferometer
> > Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) reported that they had detected
> > gravitational waves for the first time—a century after Einstein
> > predicted their existence. And on June 7th, researchers announced the
> > first results from LISA Pathfinder, the exploratory mission designed
> > to demonstrate the technological feasibility of future space-based
> > detectors of gravitational waves. Discover more about these
> > fascinating studies and related investigations in this collection of
> > articles from the archives of Physic
> 
>    Nice Collection of Articles.
> 
> -- 
> ============================================

NOMASS ( THE ONLY MASS))!!! - NO REA; PHYSICS 
==============================================
ATB
Y.Porat

>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584453

I actually have to agree with Bert, here.
Big money for completely wrong
Science that
fakes the signal and then
MONTHS LATER
after papers were written
says "just testing".

God's "just testing" THEM right
now, to see how big they make
their LIE.

Look at all the homeless!!
THAT'S how good your "science" is.
Look at all the sick!!
THAT'S how good your "science" is.
Look at all the DEVASTATION!!!
THAT IS HOW GOOD YOUR SCIENCE IS!!!

Your "science" is a reeking, shameful,
sack of lies.

Point particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
Infinite gravitation!!  Ridiculous on its face.
Random electron movement!!  Ridiculous
on its fucken face.
Suck gravity!! Ridiculous on its face.
No underlying structure to subatomic
particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
Universal expansion!!! Ridiculous
on its face.

You should be ashamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584456

John
Point particles!!  Ridiculous on its face. 
Infinite gravitation!!  Ridiculous on its face. 
Random electron movement!!  Ridiculous 
on its fucken face. 
Suck gravity!! Ridiculous on its face. 
No underlying structure to subatomic 
particles!!  Ridiculous on its face. 
Universal expansion!!! Ridiculous 
on its face. 

You should be ashamed 
-----------

John's mad.

But remember John, "Science shaming hurts everyone". Just like fat shaming, kook shaming, homo shaming, etc. 
(I'm SO progressive)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584484

HVAC
You are a liar, sir.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584705

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Look at all the homeless!!
>THAT'S how good your "science" is.
>Look at all the sick!!
>THAT'S how good your "science" is.
>Look at all the DEVASTATION!!!
>THAT IS HOW GOOD YOUR SCIENCE IS!!!

>Your "science" is a reeking, shameful,
>sack of lies.

WTF does science have to do with causing any of these?

Please wipe the foam from your mouth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584735

Michael
Wake the fuck up.

If you say your Science is good,
but all your chemical "fixes" just
keep making matters worse, then
your Science ain't no damn good.

For example, Monsanto put chemical
in Columbia's wells to stop the
mosquitos, and thousands of babies
are born microcephalic. Hey- blame it
on the mosquitos- even though Peru
has those same mosquitos and no such
problem.

Lack of knowledge about how atoms work
equals 100% TOXIC chemicals. Look at
the bottom of EVERY label: MAY CAUSE 
DEATH.

Is Science to blame?

Another example: all the bees are in trouble.
Why? F-en Monsanto trying to kill shit
without killing other shit.

To continue: repression of possible energy
sources OTHER than OIL. You say that's never
happened? You're deluded. And now we
have a world covered in oil and oceans
awash in plastics.

Is Science to blame if they can make
radioactive shit but can't de-activate it?
Wipe the drool from your mouth- oh, I
forgot, you have the attention span
of a gnat.
Not a problem- for me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584748

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Michael
>Wake the fuck up.

>If you say your Science is good,
>but all your chemical "fixes" just
>keep making matters worse, then
>your Science ain't no damn good.

Science, and chemistry is a TOOL.  Tools can be used for good or bad, but
overall usually more good comes from the tools than bad.  Chemistry is
no different.

>For example, Monsanto put chemical
>in Columbia's wells to stop the
>mosquitos, and thousands of babies
>are born microcephalic. Hey- blame it
>on the mosquitos- even though Peru
>has those same mosquitos and no such
>problem.

Oh good grief! You want to blame the effects of Zika on Monsanto?  Monsanto
are hardly angels, but come on! I am sure very good scientists have been
researching this and have a very definite cause-and-effect link between
Zika and microcephaly.

I'm sure you have a reputable source for that (not a kooksite).

>Lack of knowledge about how atoms work
>equals 100% TOXIC chemicals. Look at
>the bottom of EVERY label: MAY CAUSE 
>DEATH.

Lack of knowledge about how atoms work? Are you now claiming that your
Spinny Things will save us all??  Benzene is only a carcinogen because
nobody (but you) knows how benzene molecules are made of Dancing Precessing
Spinny Things? And if only scientists would look at your animations....?

>Is Science to blame?

Toxicity is determined by how those chemicals react with other chemicals
(of the human body).

>Another example: all the bees are in trouble.
>Why? F-en Monsanto trying to kill shit
>without killing other shit.

As an amateur beekeeper I know there is a lot of shit going on with
bees.  Yes, pesticides are part of it but there is a lot else. Tracheal
mites, varroa, colony collapse disorder, other diseases, etc.

>To continue: repression of possible energy
>sources OTHER than OIL. You say that's never
>happened? You're deluded. And now we
>have a world covered in oil and oceans
>awash in plastics.

Around here, solar panels are sprouting up like mushrooms. Part of the
oil company conspiracy, I guess.  But there is a lot that there isn't
much choice other than oil. Yet.  Cars/transportation. Give chemistry time
and they will produce better batteries so we can power our cars from
Canadian Hydropower rather than Saudi oil. We're getting there, slowly.

>Is Science to blame if they can make
>radioactive shit but can't de-activate it?

Some things are easier to do than undo.  These days, radioactive anything
is greatly avoided.

You need to wipe the foam from your mouth again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584775

Michael brainlessed:

>Oh good grief! You want to blame the effects of Zika on >Monsanto?  Monsanto 
>are hardly angels, but come on! I am sure very good >scientists have been 
>researching this and have a very definite 
>cause-and-effect
 >link between Zika and microcephaly. 
There is Zika all over, but the
microcephaly is NOT all over.
USE YOUR BRAIN- you SAY you're a
scientist.
Microcephaly is confined to the
northeastern coast of Brazil, while Zola
is in many countries.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584805

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>There is Zika all over, but the
>microcephaly is NOT all over.

>USE YOUR BRAIN- you SAY you're a
>scientist.
>Microcephaly is confined to the
>northeastern coast of Brazil, while Zola
>is in many countries.

I'd like to hear your explanation how Monsanto poisoning wells in
Colombia caused microcephaly in northeast Brazil.

Let me guess. The mosquitos in Colombia all flew to northeast Brazil,
carrying the poison with them.

Then they flew throughout much of Central and South America, bringing 
that Monsanto poison with them, but not as many did that as flew to
northeast Brazil. And not so many poisoned mosquitos stayed in Colombia, 
either.

That's why I love reading kook posts here.  Kooks can be so creative in
the kookiness they come up with!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584841

Michael
You say the Zika cases are in Columbia?
I thought it was Brazil

The microcephaly is only in one
part of the Zika range, is the point.
I know you and Odd don't stick
to one point, but, you're flaky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584848

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>You say the Zika cases are in Columbia?
>I thought it was Brazil

YOU claimed the microcephaly in Brazil was caused by Monsanto poisoning
the wells in Colombia!

Keep your k00k stories straight!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584862

Michael
-The microcephaly is only in one 
-part of the Zika range, is the point,
where a chemical was put in the
water
Do the math

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584876

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Michael
>-The microcephaly is only in one 
>-part of the Zika range, is the point,
>where a chemical was put in the
>water
>Do the math

You said, in article <eae42e53-03ae-4394-8342-c5c185ec0787@googlegroups.com>
that:

"For example, Monsanto put chemical
in Columbia's wells to stop the
mosquitos, and thousands of babies
are born microcephalic. Hey- blame it
on the mosquitos- even though Peru
has those same mosquitos and no such
problem."

But you also said (and facts support) that the microcephalic babies were
mostly born in northeastern Brazil.

As I said, keep your k00k stories straight.  Or did all the Colombian
mosquitos fly (with their poison) to northeastern Brazil, but none of
them flew to Peru???

It's funny to watch kooks squirm when their stories don't pass muster...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web