Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #584748

Re: Gravitational Waves

Show all headers | View raw

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded:

>Michael
>Wake the fuck up.

>If you say your Science is good,
>but all your chemical "fixes" just
>keep making matters worse, then
>your Science ain't no damn good.

Science, and chemistry is a TOOL.  Tools can be used for good or bad, but
overall usually more good comes from the tools than bad.  Chemistry is
no different.

>For example, Monsanto put chemical
>in Columbia's wells to stop the
>mosquitos, and thousands of babies
>are born microcephalic. Hey- blame it
>on the mosquitos- even though Peru
>has those same mosquitos and no such
>problem.

Oh good grief! You want to blame the effects of Zika on Monsanto?  Monsanto
are hardly angels, but come on! I am sure very good scientists have been
researching this and have a very definite cause-and-effect link between
Zika and microcephaly.

I'm sure you have a reputable source for that (not a kooksite).

>Lack of knowledge about how atoms work
>equals 100% TOXIC chemicals. Look at
>the bottom of EVERY label: MAY CAUSE 
>DEATH.

Lack of knowledge about how atoms work? Are you now claiming that your
Spinny Things will save us all??  Benzene is only a carcinogen because
nobody (but you) knows how benzene molecules are made of Dancing Precessing
Spinny Things? And if only scientists would look at your animations....?

>Is Science to blame?

Toxicity is determined by how those chemicals react with other chemicals
(of the human body).

>Another example: all the bees are in trouble.
>Why? F-en Monsanto trying to kill shit
>without killing other shit.

As an amateur beekeeper I know there is a lot of shit going on with
bees.  Yes, pesticides are part of it but there is a lot else. Tracheal
mites, varroa, colony collapse disorder, other diseases, etc.

>To continue: repression of possible energy
>sources OTHER than OIL. You say that's never
>happened? You're deluded. And now we
>have a world covered in oil and oceans
>awash in plastics.

Around here, solar panels are sprouting up like mushrooms. Part of the
oil company conspiracy, I guess.  But there is a lot that there isn't
much choice other than oil. Yet.  Cars/transportation. Give chemistry time
and they will produce better batteries so we can power our cars from
Canadian Hydropower rather than Saudi oil. We're getting there, slowly.

>Is Science to blame if they can make
>radioactive shit but can't de-activate it?

Some things are easier to do than undo.  These days, radioactive anything
is greatly avoided.

You need to wipe the foam from your mouth again.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:45 -0500
  Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:47 -0500
    Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:51 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 14:55 -0500
      Re: Gravitational Waves benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 16:50 -0400
        Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:38 -0700
    Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:52 -0700
  Re: Gravitational Waves "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:11 -0700
    Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:29 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:45 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 06:51 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 15:15 +0000
        Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 11:26 -0700
          Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 19:44 +0000
            Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:36 -0700
              Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 02:45 +0000
                Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 02:26 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 12:20 +0000
                Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:06 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 15:54 +0000
                Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 11:21 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-15 14:33 +0000
                Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:35 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-16 01:39 +0000
      Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 13:02 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 14:20 -0700

csiph-web