Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #576669 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 26 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 14:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 15:15 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 20:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 16:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-11 22:38 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 03:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 08:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes |
| Message-ID | <fJudnVBvcJC75K3KnZ2dnUU7-anNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >>> >>>>Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings >>>>that >>>>collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove >>>>your >>>>bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >>> >>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building >>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >>> You ran away, instead. > >>You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that >>collapsing >>buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the >>Twin Towers were MRR nuked. > > K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about > the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were > nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can > only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and > RUN AWAY!!!!!! ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't forget this only happens one way: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg ROTFLMAO Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 14:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #576669 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't >forget this only happens one way: K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and RUN AWAY!!!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8-mdnUVqG9owP63KnZ2dnUU7-a3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #576702 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! > >>ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't >>forget this only happens one way: > > K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about > the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were > nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can > only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and > RUN AWAY!!!!!! ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers that a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. UN FCUKING REAL http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 15:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #576706 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >> >>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >>>ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't >>>forget this only happens one way: >> >> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers that >a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. UN >FCUKING REAL http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg RUN AWAY!!!!!! No "mass spectrometry" results. RUN AWAY!!!!!! No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, RUN AWAY!!!!!! No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland because only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of the US. RUN AWAY!!!!!! RUN AWAY!!!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a6OdnTmBMdjknq_KnZ2dnUU7-bnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #576715 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> >>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>> about >>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>> were >>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>> and >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>>>ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>Don't >>>>forget this only happens one way: >>> >>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! > >>ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers >>that >>a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. UN >>FCUKING REAL > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg > > RUN AWAY!!!!!! > > No "mass spectrometry" results. > > RUN AWAY!!!!!! > > No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, > > RUN AWAY!!!!!! > > No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in > the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland because > only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of > the US. > > RUN AWAY!!!!!! > RUN AWAY!!!!!! ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you fell. ROTFLMAO Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion pounds of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the Twin Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #577030 |
On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> >>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>> about >>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>> were >>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>> and >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>> Don't >>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>> >>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers >>> that >>> a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. UN >>> FCUKING REAL >> >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg >> >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >> No "mass spectrometry" results. >> >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, >> >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in >> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland because >> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of >> the US. >> >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> RUN AWAY!!!!!! > > ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you > fell. ROTFLMAO > > Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion pounds > of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the Twin > Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > Keep running. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_u6dnfCPhs8w3a_KnZ2dnUU7-e_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #577034 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me... > On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> >>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>>> Don't >>>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>>> >>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>> about >>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>> were >>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>> and >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers >>>> that >>>> a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. >>>> UN >>>> FCUKING REAL >>> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg >>> >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>> No "mass spectrometry" results. >>> >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, >>> >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in >>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland >>> because >>> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of >>> the US. >>> >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >> ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you >> fell. ROTFLMAO >> >> Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion >> pounds >> of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the >> Twin >> Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Keep running. ROTFLMAO because neither you or Michael has been able to get off the ground after being faced with something that NIST never explained. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Global Collapses do not leave the very bottom of buildings standing but MRR nukes can do that by vaporizing the building above the "Surviving Corners.". <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngtl0k$vtd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #577075 |
On 10/05/2016 21:11, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me... >> On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>>>> Don't >>>>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>>>> >>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>> about >>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>> were >>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>> and >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers >>>>> that >>>>> a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. >>>>> UN >>>>> FCUKING REAL >>>> >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg >>>> >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>> No "mass spectrometry" results. >>>> >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, >>>> >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in >>>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland >>>> because >>>> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of >>>> the US. >>>> >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you >>> fell. ROTFLMAO >>> >>> Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion >>> pounds >>> of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the >>> Twin >>> Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> Keep running. > > ROTFLMAO because neither you or Michael has been able to get off the ground > after being faced with something that NIST never explained. <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Global Collapses do not leave the very bottom of buildings standing but MRR > nukes can do that by vaporizing the building above the "Surviving Corners.". > <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > Wriggle, wriggle, can't you answer the question you were asked. If you believe what you posted, you should have no problem providing evidence. I await one of your usual answers. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1c6dna7sxc82x6_KnZ2dnUU7-SXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #577092 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:ngtl0k$vtd$1@dont-email.me... > On 10/05/2016 21:11, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me... >>> On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the >>>>>>>>> question >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>>>>> Don't >>>>>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin >>>>>> Towers >>>>>> that >>>>>> a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder >>>>>> burns. >>>>>> UN >>>>>> FCUKING REAL >>>>> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg >>>>> >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> No "mass spectrometry" results. >>>>> >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, >>>>> >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made >>>>> in >>>>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland >>>>> because >>>>> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part >>>>> of >>>>> the US. >>>>> >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before >>>> you >>>> fell. ROTFLMAO >>>> >>>> Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion >>>> pounds >>>> of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the >>>> Twin >>>> Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Keep running. >> >> ROTFLMAO because neither you or Michael has been able to get off the >> ground >> after being faced with something that NIST never explained. <G> >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Global Collapses do not leave the very bottom of buildings standing but >> MRR >> nukes can do that by vaporizing the building above the "Surviving >> Corners.". >> <G> >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Wriggle, wriggle, can't you answer the question you were asked. But why should I answer any questions when it is you and plenty of others on this NG who do not have an explanation for the following: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Shooting point blank. A jet fuel collapse does not and can not leave "Surviving Corners" but MRR nukes planted deep underground on one side of a building can and do. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg BTW the seismograph readings have to be thrown out because the lack of S-waves and P-waves from WTC7 are comparable to a jackhammer so something is clearly wrong with them. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngtn44$b0r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #577098 |
On 10/05/2016 23:02, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:ngtl0k$vtd$1@dont-email.me... >> On 10/05/2016 21:11, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me... >>>> On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the >>>>>>>>>> question >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>>>>>> Don't >>>>>>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin >>>>>>> Towers >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder >>>>>>> burns. >>>>>>> UN >>>>>>> FCUKING REAL >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg >>>>>> >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> No "mass spectrometry" results. >>>>>> >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,, >>>>>> >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made >>>>>> in >>>>>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland >>>>>> because >>>>>> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part >>>>>> of >>>>>> the US. >>>>>> >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before >>>>> you >>>>> fell. ROTFLMAO >>>>> >>>>> Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion >>>>> pounds >>>>> of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the >>>>> Twin >>>>> Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes? >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Keep running. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because neither you or Michael has been able to get off the >>> ground >>> after being faced with something that NIST never explained. <G> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Global Collapses do not leave the very bottom of buildings standing but >>> MRR >>> nukes can do that by vaporizing the building above the "Surviving >>> Corners.". >>> <G> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> Wriggle, wriggle, can't you answer the question you were asked. > > But why should I answer any questions Because you made the claims in your post. > when it is you and plenty of others on > this NG who do not have an explanation for the following: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Shooting point blank. A jet fuel collapse does not and can not leave > "Surviving Corners" but MRR nukes planted deep underground on one side of a > building can and do. DUH > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > BTW the seismograph readings have to be thrown out because the lack of > S-waves and P-waves from WTC7 are comparable to a jackhammer so something is > clearly wrong with them. <G> > > Rocky > > Keep wriggling. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 20:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nh04kc$erh$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #577098 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >news:ngtl0k$vtd$1@dont-email.me... >> Wriggle, wriggle, can't you answer the question you were asked. >But why should I answer any questions Thanks for finally admitting defeat, Ko0ktard!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 16:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nh07iq$1c05$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #577267 |
On 5/11/2016 3:27 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:ngtl0k$vtd$1@dont-email.me... > >>> Wriggle, wriggle, can't you answer the question you were asked. > >> But why should I answer any questions > > Thanks for finally admitting defeat, Ko0ktard! > As I said, the hallmark of the kook is to say, "But I don't have to prove anything! You have to convince ME!!" -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2qs5jbhat3k1f7j2j6ksd38ea628feo5j2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #577075 |
On Tue, 10 May 2016 15:11:59 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:ngt1ev$j99$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 10/05/2016 16:50, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us
>>>>>>>> about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they
>>>>>>>> were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that
>>>>>>>> can only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question
>>>>>>>> and RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked.
>>>>>>> Don't forget this only happens one way:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us
>>>>>> about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they
>>>>>> were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can
>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question
>>>>>> and RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers
>>>>> that a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns.
>>>>> UN FCUKING REAL
>>>>
>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>>>>
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> No "mass spectrometry" results.
>>>>
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,,
>>>>
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in
>>>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland
>>>> because only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of
>>>> the US.
>>>>
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you
>>> fell. ROTFLMAO
>>>
>>> Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion
>>> pounds of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the
>>> Twin Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes?
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Keep running.
>
>ROTFLMAO because neither you or Michael has been able to get off the ground
>after being faced with something that NIST never explained. <G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>Global Collapses do not leave the very bottom of buildings standing but MRR
>nukes can do that by vaporizing the building above the "Surviving Corners.".
><G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
Yo, Run Away Roger, when are you going to post the results
regarding the "mass
spectrometry analysis of the dust samples" of the WTC showing "two
items in equal parts that only exist after nuclear detonations"?
You wouldn't want people to think the claims from
veteranstoday.com are all lies, would you? Of course not. Because of
this, you will provide the information I, and others, have been
requesting for months.
Unless veteranstoday.com is a site that only posts lies. If this
is the case, and you wish to acknowledge it, you'll not offer the
results.
I eagerly await the results. But you will run away, as you always
do when faced with the truth.
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oos5jb1tgbs6u620c4smut02irqfdllcpt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #577030 |
On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:50:52 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:ngq9hk$18r$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ngq72m$9m5$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>
>>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us
>>>>>> about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they
>>>>>> were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can
>>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question
>>>>>> and RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>>ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked.
>>>>>Don't forget this only happens one way:
>>>>
>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about
>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were
>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can
>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and
>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because you have the bullet and what it did to the Twin Towers
>>>that
>>>a "Global Collapse" could not do and now you want the gunpowder burns. UN
>>>FCUKING REAL
>>
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>>
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>
>> No "mass spectrometry" results.
>>
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>
>> No seismograph results of what the collapses should produce.,,
>>
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>>
>> No explanation of what "MMR nukes" are. Other than they weren't made in
>> the US. I guess you must believe that they were made in Disneyland because
>> only Disney can add the magic, and you believe Disneyland isn't part of
>> the US.
>>
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>
>ROTFLMAO because you never made it over your very first hurdle before you
>fell. ROTFLMAO
>
>Here, try to jump your first hurdle again. Explain how a gazillion pounds
>of debris fell on the Twin Towers but failed to crush the sides of the Twin
>Towers furthest from deep underground MRR nukes?
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
Hey Run Away Roger.
When are you going to post the results regarding the "mass
spectrometry analysis of the dust samples" of the WTC showing "two
items in equal parts that only exist after nuclear detonations"?
I eagerly await the results, or your additional PROOF that you
run away from the truth.
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-FDC6FD.09014009052016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #576706 |
In article <8-mdnUVqG9owP63KnZ2dnUU7-a3NnZ2d@giganews.com>, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: There are no nuclear weapons. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were spoofs: the Japanese and Americans agreed to cover up of a fleet of invisible bombers dropping incendiaries instead of a nuclear weapon. I saw this on youtube so it must be true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChcBZAEKiKQ -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jr83jbp09bjls0rbenl42hv4fmtfmrj16i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #576669 |
On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!!
>>>>
>>>>>Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings
>>>>>that
>>>>>collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove
>>>>>your
>>>>>bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G>
>>>>
>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building
>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings.
>>>> You ran away, instead.
>>
>>>You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that
>>>collapsing
>>>buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the
>>>Twin Towers were MRR nuked.
>>
>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about
>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were
>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can
>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and
>> RUN AWAY!!!!!!
>
>ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't
>forget this only happens one way:
>http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>ROTFLMAO
Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the mass
spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the
presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made
by nuclear explosions?
You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet
all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger.
Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not
nuked?
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngt1f4$j99$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #576976 |
On 10/05/2016 10:01, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >>>>> >>>>>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings >>>>>> that >>>>>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove >>>>>> your >>>>>> bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>> >>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building >>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >>>>> You ran away, instead. >>> >>>> You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that >>>> collapsing >>>> buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the >>>> Twin Towers were MRR nuked. >>> >>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were >>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >> >> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. Don't >> forget this only happens one way: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> ROTFLMAO > > Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the mass > spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the > presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made > by nuclear explosions? > You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet > all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger. > Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not > nuked? > > > Brave Sir [Roger] ran away > Bravely ran away, away > When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head > He bravely turned his tail and fled > Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about > And gallantly he chickened out > Bravely taking to his feet > He beat a very brave retreat > Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]! > > > "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their > belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." > > Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used > on 9/11/01 in > Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> > He can't explain it, it was probably something he was told (so it must be true). --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MMOdnauQAqGZyq_KnZ2dnUU7-XPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #577035 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:ngt1f4$j99$4@dont-email.me... > On 10/05/2016 10:01, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >> On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove >>>>>>> your >>>>>>> bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a >>>>>> building >>>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >>>>>> You ran away, instead. >>>> >>>>> You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that >>>>> collapsing >>>>> buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when >>>>> the >>>>> Twin Towers were MRR nuked. >>>> >>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>> were >>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>> Don't >>> forget this only happens one way: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> ROTFLMAO >> >> Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the mass >> spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the >> presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made >> by nuclear explosions? >> You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet >> all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger. >> Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not >> nuked? >> >> >> Brave Sir [Roger] ran away >> Bravely ran away, away >> When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head >> He bravely turned his tail and fled >> Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about >> And gallantly he chickened out >> Bravely taking to his feet >> He beat a very brave retreat >> Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]! >> >> >> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their >> belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." >> >> Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used >> on 9/11/01 in >> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> >> > > He can't explain it, it was probably something he was told (so it must be > true). I see t-ANNOY is back at it. Dude, I don't have to do squat because this photo says something else destroyed the Twin Towers besides the rumored "global collapse." http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg The above photo says the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they could crush the "Surviving Corners." <G> And that is all I have to post because posters will have to deal with that hurdle before they can do anything else. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngtl7e$1c3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #577091 |
On 10/05/2016 22:47, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:ngt1f4$j99$4@dont-email.me... >> On 10/05/2016 10:01, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a >>>>>>> building >>>>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >>>>>>> You ran away, instead. >>>>> >>>>>> You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that >>>>>> collapsing >>>>>> buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when >>>>>> the >>>>>> Twin Towers were MRR nuked. >>>>> >>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about >>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>> were >>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can >>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and >>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>> Don't >>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO >>> >>> Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the mass >>> spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the >>> presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made >>> by nuclear explosions? >>> You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet >>> all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger. >>> Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not >>> nuked? >>> >>> >>> Brave Sir [Roger] ran away >>> Bravely ran away, away >>> When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head >>> He bravely turned his tail and fled >>> Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about >>> And gallantly he chickened out >>> Bravely taking to his feet >>> He beat a very brave retreat >>> Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]! >>> >>> >>> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their >>> belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." >>> >>> Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used >>> on 9/11/01 in >>> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> >>> >> >> He can't explain it, it was probably something he was told (so it must be >> true). > > I see t-ANNOY is back at it. > > Dude, I don't have to do squat because this photo says something else > destroyed the Twin Towers besides the rumored "global collapse." > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > The above photo says the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they could > crush the "Surviving Corners." <G> > > And that is all I have to post because posters will have to deal with that > hurdle before they can do anything else. DUH > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > Thank you for confirming that you have no evidence to back up what you posted. To help you I will repost the question asked of you. "When will you show us the results of the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made by nuclear explosions?" --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <b-qdnbuqj5Cuh67KnZ2dnUU7-UPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #577094 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:ngtl7e$1c3$2@dont-email.me... > On 10/05/2016 22:47, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:ngt1f4$j99$4@dont-email.me... >>> On 10/05/2016 10:01, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 May 2016 06:48:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other >>>>>>>>> buildings >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to >>>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>> bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a >>>>>>>> building >>>>>>>> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >>>>>>>> You ran away, instead. >>>>>> >>>>>>> You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that >>>>>>> collapsing >>>>>>> buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left >>>>>>> when >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Twin Towers were MRR nuked. >>>>>> >>>>>> K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us >>>>>> about >>>>>> the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they >>>>>> were >>>>>> nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that >>>>>> can >>>>>> only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question >>>>>> and >>>>>> RUN AWAY!!!!!! >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because you can not prove the Twin Towers were not nuked. >>>>> Don't >>>>> forget this only happens one way: >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO >>>> >>>> Hey, k00k. When will you show us the results of the mass >>>> spectrometry of the WTC dust sample that, according to you, shows the >>>> presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made >>>> by nuclear explosions? >>>> You've been asked for it many times over many, many months. Yet >>>> all you've ever done is live up to your name of Run Away Roger. >>>> Will you answer it now, or continue to admit the WTC was not >>>> nuked? >>>> >>>> >>>> Brave Sir [Roger] ran away >>>> Bravely ran away, away >>>> When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head >>>> He bravely turned his tail and fled >>>> Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about >>>> And gallantly he chickened out >>>> Bravely taking to his feet >>>> He beat a very brave retreat >>>> Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]! >>>> >>>> >>>> "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their >>>> belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with." >>>> >>>> Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used >>>> on 9/11/01 in >>>> Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com> >>>> >>> >>> He can't explain it, it was probably something he was told (so it must >>> be >>> true). >> >> I see t-ANNOY is back at it. >> >> Dude, I don't have to do squat because this photo says something else >> destroyed the Twin Towers besides the rumored "global collapse." >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> The above photo says the Twin Towers had to be vaporized before they >> could >> crush the "Surviving Corners." <G> >> >> And that is all I have to post because posters will have to deal with >> that >> hurdle before they can do anything else. DUH >> >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky >> >> > > Thank you for confirming that you have no evidence to back up what you > posted. ROTFLMAO because you just can't figure out there are some things that talk for themselves and there is absolutly no way a "global collapse" could leave surviving corners and craters where the MRR nukes were detonated. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web