Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #574768 > unrolled thread

Book Claims BJ Is A Kook

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:32 -0700
    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 02:35 -0400
      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 04:22 -0700
        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 05:42 -0700
          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 05:58 -0700
            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:07 -0400
          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:18 -0500
            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 15:20 -0400
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:33 -0700
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 21:20 -0400
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 16:13 -0500
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 21:33 -0400
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 16:14 -0500
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 21:35 -0400
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 06:56 -0500
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 05:07 -0700
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 05:20 -0700
                        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 05:38 -0700
                          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 07:43 -0500
                            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 06:05 -0700
                              Re: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale, AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-04 11:51 -0400
                                Re: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale, AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-04 10:01 -0700
                            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 09:33 -0400
                              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 10:00 -0500
                          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 09:25 -0400
                        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 09:37 -0400
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 09:15 -0400
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 09:41 -0400
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 10:10 -0500
        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 08:14 -0500
          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 06:25 -0700
            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 09:18 -0500
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 07:57 -0700
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:00 -0400
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 11:03 -0500
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:20 -0700
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:39 -0400
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-02 11:08 -0700
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:04 -0400
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:27 -0700
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:43 -0400
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:46 -0700
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 13:37 -0400
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 20:12 -0500
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 18:50 -0700
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 19:23 -0700
                        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 23:20 -0400
                          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-04 01:17 -0500
                            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-03 23:29 -0700
                      Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 23:13 -0400
                    Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-02 19:05 -0700
                Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 20:05 -0500
                  Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-02 19:00 -0700
              Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-02 11:07 -0700
            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 11:55 -0400
          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 11:52 -0400
        Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 11:45 -0400
          Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:18 -0700
            Re: Book Claims BJ Is A Kook benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-02 12:38 -0400

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#575450 — Re: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale, AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks.

On 05/03/2016 03:26 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     Re: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale, AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks.
>
>     It's easy to wind up on the wrong side of the law;
>     all it takes is a nasty divorce, or some such.
>      From there, it's easy to find fault with one's "opponent", the law.
>
>     Americans covet what's not theirs ("it's not fair!"),
>     -- "Microsoft/BillGates/Amazon" exploit the little guy, they say;
>     so they enact numerous laws to "redistribute" income.
>     Hence: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale Kooks.
>
>     At some point, you realize that "your" money isn't really yours.
>     You're a slave.  Hence: AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks.
>
>     An all powerful, all knowing, eternal "God"
>     is indestinguishable from nature itself;
>     it controls us completely, 100% -- we're robots.
>
>     Otherwise, one's "God" is weak, flawed.
>
>     Subconsciously, humanity defines "Life" as:
>
>        That program, running in our heads, to breathe, drink, etc.
>        SemiRandom Replication/Evolution was ignition, following:
>
>          Punishments:  Masculine Blood Lust.  Bad Cop.
>              Rewards:  Feminine Puppy Love.   Good Cop.
>
>
Rolf selling his religion again. We've heard your dogma before, Rolf. 
Just saying it over and over doesn't make it any more true than it was 
to start. Fundies!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575478 — Re: AntiCapitalist/AntiMale, AntiGovernment/AntiFemale Kooks.

"benj" <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
 Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:<snip crap> 
>>
Benj wrote:
> Rolf selling his religion again. 
> We've heard your dogma before, Rolf. 
> Just saying it over and over doesn't make 
> it any more true than it was to start. Fundies!
>
Right!, because this is the religion of  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.>
the "Rectal Vacuumist (Seattle), ::JR:: who wrote:
>
::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore.  I  masturbate. I've found  that
::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate.
::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to
::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed.
::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin
::JR:: or meth.    So I've recently vowed to not masturbate...
::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ...
::JR:: Does that make me smart ? --  I'd rather masturbate.
::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum).
::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want.
::::::: (cuz Relf is apparently interested now, with his "mouth wide
:::::::  open", to let Swine Glazier shit into Relf's "kisser")
::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575159

On 05/03/2016 08:43 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/3/2016 7:38 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>
>> 8:20 AMjohn
>> Speaking of jets, weren't you up in
>> a Chemtrail jet, HVAC?
>> Or were you involved when they were
>> using helicopters?
>> No I'm sure you said you
>> were talking with a CHEMTRAILS pilot!!
>> ---------------
>>
>> John, I'm trying to ignore this belief you and BJ have in chemtrails.
>> It's embarrassing.
>> I mean, isn't the world trade centers being blown up with nukes
>> enough? Or ghosts? Or ESP?
>>
>> If you really want me to utterly destroy you on yet another kooky
>> belief, I will.
>>
>> I'm just trying to save you from yet another newsgroup beating.
>>
>
> I'm struggling to understand the anti-government heebie jeebies that
> John and Ben exhibit. It seems like everytime someone has a thought of
> "That looks weird" or "I didn't think things would behave that way" then
> people like John jump all over it, declaring that the government is up
> to Something Bad, Something Covert. It's like they're hunting for things
> to be spooked about regarding the government. Why? What is it about the
> government that gives people like John the creeps?

Odd has hit the nail on the head. Normal people never doubt what 
government tells them because everybody knows that governments never lie 
to their citizens. They would never tell people that things that might 
kill them are good for them. They would never give someone dangerous 
drugs without their knowledge, They would never expose innocent citizens 
to radiation or spread bacteria around subways. They would never tell 
citizens they are curing them and then do nothing and watch them die for 
"science". And they certainly would never sterilize defectives. They 
would never do ANY of these things. Which is why people who worry that 
they might do it again, are kooks.

Never forget that Odd says that anything you ever hear from an official 
course is beyond question. All that is necessary for happiness is to 
BELIEVE!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575167

On 5/3/2016 8:33 AM, benj wrote:
>> I'm struggling to understand the anti-government heebie jeebies that
>> John and Ben exhibit. It seems like everytime someone has a thought of
>> "That looks weird" or "I didn't think things would behave that way" then
>> people like John jump all over it, declaring that the government is up
>> to Something Bad, Something Covert. It's like they're hunting for things
>> to be spooked about regarding the government. Why? What is it about the
>> government that gives people like John the creeps?
>
> Odd has hit the nail on the head. Normal people never doubt what
> government tells them because everybody knows that governments never lie
> to their citizens.

The government is made up of people. Corporations are also made up of 
people. Families are made up of people.

Lying happens in any accumulation of people. Repeat: ANY accumulation of 
people.

Therefore lying happens in government, happens in corporations, happens 
in families. It is something that is a part of life, and which every 
single human has to be able to operate with.

What is interesting is why some folks have difficulty operating with 
this reality. What is interesting is why some folks find that this is 
only truly evil when it happens from the government.

> They would never tell people that things that might
> kill them are good for them. They would never give someone dangerous
> drugs without their knowledge, They would never expose innocent citizens
> to radiation or spread bacteria around subways. They would never tell
> citizens they are curing them and then do nothing and watch them die for
> "science". And they certainly would never sterilize defectives. They
> would never do ANY of these things. Which is why people who worry that
> they might do it again, are kooks.
>
> Never forget that Odd says that anything you ever hear from an official
> course is beyond question. All that is necessary for happiness is to
> BELIEVE!

Never forget that Ben believes that if anyone is ever found to say 
anything false, then NOTHING that person says is to be trusted ever 
again. Same goes for any aggregation of people.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575156

On 05/03/2016 08:38 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
> 8:20 AMjohn
> Speaking of jets, weren't you up in
> a Chemtrail jet, HVAC?
> Or were you involved when they were
> using helicopters?
> No I'm sure you said you
> were talking with a CHEMTRAILS pilot!!
> ---------------
>
> John, I'm trying to ignore this belief you and BJ have in chemtrails. It's embarrassing. I mean, isn't the world trade centers being blown up with nukes enough? Or ghosts? Or ESP?
>
> If you really want me to utterly destroy you on yet another kooky belief, I will.
>
> I'm just trying to save you from yet another newsgroup beating.
>
HVAC denys lasers, ligntning, cellphones and Barium exist.
He says all the stories are due to college kids playing pranks.

And then he calls everyone else nuts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575161

On 05/03/2016 08:20 AM, john wrote:
> Speaking of jets, weren't you up in
> a Chemtrail jet, HVAC?
> Or were you involved when they were
> using helicopters?
> No I'm sure you said you
> were talking with a CHEMTRAILS pilot!!
>
He'll say he was "misquoted". It's what he ALWAYS says when he gets 
caught in another lie. Tries to change the subject by making a joke of 
it or talking about sex.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575150

On 05/03/2016 08:07 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Odd Bodkin
> - hide quoted text -
> On 5/2/2016 8:35 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 05/02/2016 05:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 5/2/2016 2:20 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> Basically, when it comes to UFOs, if you haven't seen it yourself, it's
>>>> probably bullshit or at least must be assumed to be so as a first
>>>> position.
>>>
>>> Exactly. Which is why some reports do not get scientific investigation.
>>> Because they are assumed (as a first position) to be bullshit.
>>
>> So why can't you understand that assuming that reports are bullshit as a
>> first position isn't the same as using superpowers to KNOW they are
>> bullshit and therefore refuse to even investigate them.
>
> If you assume a report is bullshit as first position, then you are going
> to invariably investigate it anyway? How do you find the time to
> investigate all those bullshit reports?
> ----------
>
> To take BJ's idea to its ad absurdum conclusion, we would be vectoring fighter jets to reports of Santa Claus on a ballistic track over the north pole.
>
> To even suggest that while insulting science such as LIGO, we SHOULD be investigating ghosts and ESP, BJ has shown himself to be 100% anti science.

Wait. The News ALWAYS reports fighter jets vectored to Santa Claus on 
Christmas eve. And HVAC told us all (which means there is no way to 
refute it) that the news and government NEVER lie! Case closed.

Of course given a couple of tiny noise wiggles supposedly coming from 
some invisible black holes that were picked up by giant blocks of glass 
moving less than the diameter of an atom. It's obvious that LIGO needs 
investigation FAR more than someone thinking they saw a ghost! Since 
HVAC has no science education and knows no science, how can he know what 
is and isn't science? So he just makes it all up. That's his world.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575163

On 05/03/2016 07:56 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/2/2016 8:35 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 05/02/2016 05:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 5/2/2016 2:20 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> Basically, when it comes to UFOs, if you haven't seen it yourself, it's
>>>> probably bullshit or at least must be assumed to be so as a first
>>>> position.
>>>
>>> Exactly. Which is why some reports do not get scientific investigation.
>>> Because they are assumed (as a first position) to be bullshit.
>>
>> So why can't you understand that assuming that reports are bullshit as a
>> first position isn't the same as using superpowers to KNOW they are
>> bullshit and therefore refuse to even investigate them.
>
> If you assume a report is bullshit as first position, then you are going
> to invariably investigate it anyway? How do you find the time to
> investigate all those bullshit reports?

How do you find the time to defend and support all the bullshit reports 
that you like? How can one discuss ANY report if nobody bothers to check 
it? Verification is the essence of the science "norms". To simply call 
reports "bullshit" because you think so, or "fact" because some official 
told you it's true isn't science at all. You might as well get a job as 
a publisher or journalist. Oh wait. You already have.

>> The later is
>> obviously anti-science religious kookery.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#575169

On 5/3/2016 8:41 AM, benj wrote:
> How do you find the time to defend and support all the bullshit reports
> that you like? How can one discuss ANY report if nobody bothers to check
> it?

Experimental results are verified by other independent teams of 
scientists, and those are also recorded in the literature.

> Verification is the essence of the science "norms".

Yes, but this doesn't imply that every scientist needs to personally 
verify the published work of everyone else. Science is a communal 
activity, much different than the way you approach things.

> To simply call
> reports "bullshit" because you think so, or "fact" because some official
> told you it's true isn't science at all.

Well, as you say, taking some reports as bullshit as a first position is 
advisable.

> You might as well get a job as
> a publisher or journalist. Oh wait. You already have.

What??




-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574802

On Mon, 2 May 2016 04:22:43 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:

> BJ quacked
> Are UFOs real? YOU BET THEY ARE. I've seen them moving around the sky. 
> I've watched them flying in formation, I've watched them doing moves 
> KNOWN human technology (or "venus" or "swamp gas") can't handle and even 
> better I've watch USAF fighter planes taking pictures of them. So why 
> can the people paying for all this SEE those pictures? HVAC says forget 
> it. Governments never lie so shut up and hand over your money. 
> ------------
> 
> There have been orders of magnitude improvements in holographic technology. Every rational person knows this

Ask him if he believes in Babadook. 

-- 
    "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And 
     have a good laugh when it seeps down on 
     your face."
                            - Bert

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574806

ClutterFreak
- show quoted text -
Ask him if he believes in Babadook
-----------

I actually tried to watch that film. Let's just say that I had a less than enjoyable experience. 

But here's an anthological recommendation from yours truly... Tales Of Halloween. 10 short stories with Halloween as the central theme.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574816

On Mon, 2 May 2016 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:

> ClutterFreak
> - show quoted text -
> Ask him if he believes in Babadook
> -----------
> 
> I actually tried to watch that film. Let's just say that I had a less than enjoyable experience. 
> 
> But here's an anthological recommendation from yours truly... Tales Of Halloween. 10 short stories with Halloween as the central theme.

I haven't seen that one. I think I'll pirate it now
and see it!

The Babadook movie was kind of nice cause it depicted
what goes on inside a woman's head when she's
progressively developing insanity, adversely affecting
her kid and whoever had to depend on her for life (the
dog). She somehow managed to contain her "Babadook"
and keep living. What some lucky ones can achieve.

I think Benj and scores of others who believe in
ghosts and UFO and demon, ... all have some kind of
Babadook in their lives that they have similarly
managed to contain. It is real! But just for them. 
-- 
    "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And 
     have a good laugh when it seeps down on 
     your face."
                            - Bert

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574821

ClutterFreak
- hide quoted text -
On Mon, 2 May 2016 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote: 

> ClutterFreak 
> - show quoted text - 
> Ask him if he believes in Babadook 
> ----------- 
> 
> I actually tried to watch that film. Let's just say that I had a less than enjoyable experience. 
> 
> But here's an anthological recommendation from yours truly... Tales Of Halloween. 10 short stories with Halloween as the central theme. 

I haven't seen that one. I think I'll pirate it now 
and see it! 
-----------

Of course I cannot advocate piracy, but... Is streaming piracy? This is agrey area.

Two really excellent horror films from 2013 are The Cabin In The Woods and the remake of Evil Dead.

They quickly became two of my ask time faves.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574835

On 05/02/2016 10:57 AM, HVAC wrote:
> ClutterFreak
> - hide quoted text -
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:
>
>> ClutterFreak
>> - show quoted text -
>> Ask him if he believes in Babadook
>> -----------
>>
>> I actually tried to watch that film. Let's just say that I had a less than enjoyable experience.
>>
>> But here's an anthological recommendation from yours truly... Tales Of Halloween. 10 short stories with Halloween as the central theme.
>
> I haven't seen that one. I think I'll pirate it now
> and see it!
> -----------
>
> Of course I cannot advocate piracy, but... Is streaming piracy? This is agrey area.
>
> Two really excellent horror films from 2013 are The Cabin In The Woods and the remake of Evil Dead.
>
> They quickly became two of my ask time faves.

Just look at HVAC light up once fantasy starts being discussed. He 
BELIEVES everything he sees on the silver screen is 100% reality.
It's his whole life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574839

On Mon, 2 May 2016 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:

> Of course I cannot advocate piracy, but... Is streaming piracy? This is agrey area.
> 
> Two really excellent horror films from 2013 are The Cabin In The Woods and the remake of Evil Dead.
> 
> They quickly became two of my ask time faves.

I pay high prices for watching pirated movies. 2 hours
of my attention time for each! 

I'll "look" into The Cabin and the Evil Dead. I may
have seen them cause I'm not good at movie titles at
all.
-- 
    "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And 
     have a good laugh when it seeps down on 
     your face."
                            - Bert

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574847

ClutterFreak
On Mon, 2 May 2016 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote: 

> Of course I cannot advocate piracy, but... Is streaming piracy? This is agrey area. 
> 
> Two really excellent horror films from 2013 are The Cabin In The Woods and the remake of Evil Dead. 
> 
> They quickly became two of my ask time faves. 

I pay high prices for watching pirated movies. 2 hours 
of my attention time for each! 

I'll "look" into The Cabin and the Evil Dead. I may 
have seen them cause I'm not good at movie titles at 
all. 
---------------

If you enjoy horror films, you WILL enjoy these two. Trust me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574850

On 05/02/2016 12:20 PM, HVAC wrote:
> ClutterFreak
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:
>
>> Of course I cannot advocate piracy, but... Is streaming piracy? This is agrey area.
>>
>> Two really excellent horror films from 2013 are The Cabin In The Woods and the remake of Evil Dead.
>>
>> They quickly became two of my ask time faves.
>
> I pay high prices for watching pirated movies. 2 hours
> of my attention time for each!
>
> I'll "look" into The Cabin and the Evil Dead. I may
> have seen them cause I'm not good at movie titles at
> all.
> ---------------
>
> If you enjoy horror films, you WILL enjoy these two. Trust me.

HVAC is an EXPERT on fantasy and horror.

Cabin is a mind-blower. Trust me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574900

"ClutterFreak" <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> wrote
 > I pay high prices for being...
Mehram, the filthy Shiite pig 
who begs his Jew-Boss for a gig
and tells him that he needs to spit
while Mehram chews the Jew boy's shit:
>
The servile Moslem Swine "ClutterFreak" 
asked his tormentor Jew Glazier, "g=emc^2" 
for permission to enjoy echoing & to be like 
the Criminal Jew Glazier, saying:
> These days I'm enjoying your deep and rich words
> regarding Hanson as my temporary signature if you
> don't mind. 
>
>   "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And 
>    have a good laugh when it seeps down on 
>    your face."
>                              - Bert
>
which came about because Mehram Maleki, the 
black, hate-filled & -driven  Iranian Muslim Swine 
<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak"
Bio-, Excel-" or <"MathFreak"@FakeAddress.com>
chose to be the personal slave of Faceshitter Jew 
Glazier, "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
& laid himself under & literally shit-eats Glazier's turd:
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
after which Maleki wrote:  " iss aaal goo, biatch :-)".
>
Then Maleki smiles & insists that criminal Graveyard 
Vandalism "is just so poetic that Mehram can't help it" 
to sign off with: 
>
>   "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And 
>    have a good laugh when it seeps down on 
>    your face."
>                              - Bert
>
... which is all what incontinent Mehram is capable 
of doing now, after eating Glazier's turds...about which, 
>
Mehram just wrote:
This is my "Medical Workout, The Secrets to Health 
As Well As A Good Figure" according to a 1930 book 
from Reimann....  which "caused Mehram stress that 
kicked in when he was working" ..."That was my last
day working", Maleki said..."as it is exactly like
multiple sclerosis, and the cure  for this condition 
might then be to introduce AIDS virus in the blood.
Maleki's thalassemia, has a certain gene responsible 
for the flaw in how it makes hemoglobin in Maleki.
Maleki also suffers from Sex-deprivation, menopausal 
hormon-driven insanity & ZioNaziYahuism.
>
hanson wrote:
Awww... Mehram, you are really a very, very sick
bastard, physically and mentally... "MS, AIDS and 
eating Glazier's shit, & finding that it "iss aaal good",
all the way to your sick conviction that Criminal 
Graveyard Vandalism is "Poetry".. & now, Maleki
is having an uncontrollable upwelling of hatred 
onto hanson as is seen when...
>
Mehram posted: 
Hanson is in a class of his own. I give him a look, 
and I spit on him.  Yeah. Enough of that.
>
hanson wrote:
.        And now, Mehram ran out of spit. 
.        But still, Mehram is full of shit. 
>
Mehram, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574840

On 05/02/2016 10:18 AM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT), HVAC wrote:
>
>> ClutterFreak
>> - show quoted text -
>> Ask him if he believes in Babadook
>> -----------
>>
>> I actually tried to watch that film. Let's just say that I had a less than enjoyable experience.
>>
>> But here's an anthological recommendation from yours truly... Tales Of Halloween. 10 short stories with Halloween as the central theme.
>
> I haven't seen that one. I think I'll pirate it now
> and see it!
>
> The Babadook movie was kind of nice cause it depicted
> what goes on inside a woman's head when she's
> progressively developing insanity, adversely affecting
> her kid and whoever had to depend on her for life (the
> dog). She somehow managed to contain her "Babadook"
> and keep living. What some lucky ones can achieve.
>
> I think Benj and scores of others who believe in
> ghosts and UFO and demon, ... all have some kind of
> Babadook in their lives that they have similarly
> managed to contain. It is real! But just for them.

And you think because HVAC SAYS I believe in ghosts that he really has 
the ESP to look in my mind? And you think that horror films represent 
actual science? And you think everyone ELSE has a "sanity" problem?

Logic and rationality aren't things you do, right? Fist bump?

PS. I not only have personally seen UFOs, but also have seen lasers, 
lightning and cellphones. I "BELIEVE" in them too! Does that make me a 
kook?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#574848

BJ quacked
> I think Benj and scores of others who believe in 
> ghosts and UFO and demon, ... all have some kind of 
> Babadook in their lives that they have similarly 
> managed to contain. It is real! But just for them. 

And you think because HVAC SAYS I believe in ghosts that he really has 
the ESP to look in my mind? And you think that horror films represent 
actual science? And you think everyone ELSE has a "sanity" problem? 
-------------

Oops! Now you've gone and done it, Freak. You've made BJ mad.

He honestly hates the very ideas that he holds. And he is ashamed of them. Any normal, rational adult would simply say no, I don't believe in ghosts, nor aliens, nor esp. 

But BJ won't. 

And then he expects people to respect him? Ummmmm no.

You mad BJ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web