Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572154 > unrolled thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:06 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:03 +0000

#572154 — Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:negcvv$hu8$3@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:neb0mr$bg8$5@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>> No seismograph readings means no exlosions of any kind.
>>>
>>>>THE ISSUE IS THE SEISMIC READINGS FOR WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were way
>>>>way
>>>>smaller than they should have been so something had to vaporize those 3
>>>>buildings before they could crash to the ground.   DUH.
>>>
>>> And the fact that there was no nuclear explosion signature any one of
>>> those 3 times proves once and for all that nukes could not be 
>>> responsible
>>> for any of that alleged "vaporization".
>
>>We are not talking about before anymore we are talking about what happened
>>when they finally hit the ground.
>
> We are talking about whether there is any seismic evidence for any
> nuclear detonations on 9/11 at the time of the collapses.

ROTFLMAO because the super small seismic activity when WTC7 was supposed to 
have crashed to the ground proves something is very strange about all the 
seismic readings like they were tampered with.  DUH

Oh, and don't forget that this is not the remains of a "Global Collaspe" 
idiot.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#572171

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:negcvv$hu8$3@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:neb0mr$bg8$5@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> No seismograph readings means no exlosions of any kind.
>>>>
>>>>>THE ISSUE IS THE SEISMIC READINGS FOR WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were way
>>>>>way
>>>>>smaller than they should have been so something had to vaporize those 3
>>>>>buildings before they could crash to the ground.   DUH.
>>>>
>>>> And the fact that there was no nuclear explosion signature any one of
>>>> those 3 times proves once and for all that nukes could not be 
>>>> responsible
>>>> for any of that alleged "vaporization".
>>
>>>We are not talking about before anymore we are talking about what happened
>>>when they finally hit the ground.
>>
>> We are talking about whether there is any seismic evidence for any
>> nuclear detonations on 9/11 at the time of the collapses.

>ROTFLMAO because the super small seismic activity when WTC7 was supposed to 
>have crashed to the ground proves
that there were no nukes because there simply wasn't *ANYTHING* that day
strong enough to be the distinctive nuclear explosion signature that all
nuclear explosions produce! Nothing at all!!!

Thanks for proving there were no nukes used on 9/11!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web