Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572171

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:negcvv$hu8$3@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:neb0mr$bg8$5@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> No seismograph readings means no exlosions of any kind.
>>>>
>>>>>THE ISSUE IS THE SEISMIC READINGS FOR WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were way
>>>>>way
>>>>>smaller than they should have been so something had to vaporize those 3
>>>>>buildings before they could crash to the ground.   DUH.
>>>>
>>>> And the fact that there was no nuclear explosion signature any one of
>>>> those 3 times proves once and for all that nukes could not be 
>>>> responsible
>>>> for any of that alleged "vaporization".
>>
>>>We are not talking about before anymore we are talking about what happened
>>>when they finally hit the ground.
>>
>> We are talking about whether there is any seismic evidence for any
>> nuclear detonations on 9/11 at the time of the collapses.

>ROTFLMAO because the super small seismic activity when WTC7 was supposed to 
>have crashed to the ground proves
that there were no nukes because there simply wasn't *ANYTHING* that day
strong enough to be the distinctive nuclear explosion signature that all
nuclear explosions produce! Nothing at all!!!

Thanks for proving there were no nukes used on 9/11!

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:06 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:03 +0000

csiph-web