Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540484 > unrolled thread

9/11: the attack of the CGIs

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 17:29 -0600
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-20 15:51 -0800
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 18:00 -0600
        Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-21 00:30 +0000
        Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-20 19:40 -0500
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-20 23:51 +0000
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 20:55 -0600
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 21:05 -0600
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 15:06 +0000
        Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-21 14:16 -0600
          Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 21:03 +0000
            Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:44 -0800
            Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-21 17:11 -0600
              Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-22 18:49 +0000
                Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-22 13:08 -0600
                  Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:52 -0600
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-22 12:31 -0800
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-22 14:45 -0600

#540484 — 9/11: the attack of the CGIs

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

Theory of Ghostplane
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#540490

"Rocky"  wrote in message 
news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

Theory of Ghostplane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

Rocky


*** Wockie, my wittle douche ... it was Muslim terrorists who 
hi-jacked 4 airliner at Boston's Logan airport and flew two of them 
into the WTC towers, one into the Pentagon and one into a field in PA.

End of story, you mentally challenged twerp.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540495

"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:8a18e$56773f0d$453ebb0b$27873@EVERESTKC.NET...
> "Rocky"  wrote in message 
> news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
> http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>
> Theory of Ghostplane
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>
> Rocky
>
>
> *** Wockie, my wittle douche ... it was Muslim terrorists who hi-jacked 4 
> airliner at Boston's Logan airport and flew two of them into the WTC 
> towers, one into the Pentagon and one into a field in PA.
>
> End of story, you mentally challenged twerp.

Don't forget that they were hijacked and taken out of good radar range where 
they were be replaced by CGIs and what we saw going into the Twin Towers is 
consistent with CGIs and not real jets.  DUH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540501

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "H?gar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:8a18e$56773f0d$453ebb0b$27873@EVERESTKC.NET...
>> "Rocky"  wrote in message 
>> news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>> http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>>
>> Theory of Ghostplane
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>> *** Wockie, my wittle douche ... it was Muslim terrorists who hi-jacked 4 
>> airliner at Boston's Logan airport and flew two of them into the WTC 
>> towers, one into the Pentagon and one into a field in PA.
>>
>> End of story, you mentally challenged twerp.
> 
> Don't forget that they were hijacked and taken out of good radar range where 
> they were be replaced by CGIs and what we saw going into the Twin Towers is 
> consistent with CGIs and not real jets.  DUH
> 
> Rocky 
 
Yep, still bat shit crazy. 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540502

Rocky wrote:
> "Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:8a18e$56773f0d$453ebb0b$27873@EVERESTKC.NET...
>> "Rocky"  wrote in message
>> news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>> http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>>
>> Theory of Ghostplane
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>> *** Wockie, my wittle douche ... it was Muslim terrorists who
>> hi-jacked 4 airliner at Boston's Logan airport and flew two of them
>> into the WTC towers, one into the Pentagon and one into a field in PA.
>>
>> End of story, you mentally challenged twerp.
>
> Don't forget that they were hijacked and taken out of good radar range
> where they were be replaced by CGIs and what we saw going into the Twin
> Towers is consistent with CGIs and not real jets.  DUH
>
> Rocky





Poor deluded hagar,.....he's still thinking I'm behind all these 9/11 was an 
inside job posts.
When the truth is that well over 90% of the world knows the US government 
has been lying about everything for years.
Their lies will put the US into a full on depression.

.....That's why all the money is moving to China and Russia now. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540494

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>  http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
> 
> Theory of Ghostplane
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
> 
> Rocky 
 
I see Rocky is still bat shit crazy.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540516

"joeturn" <joeturn2@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:67c42c30-2046-4ed0-a427-87ee3cbe35d4@googlegroups.com...
On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 6:31:07 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
> 9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
>  http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html
>
> Theory of Ghostplane
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc
>
> Rocky

The distance between the columns  allowed only a 24 inch space which would 
have sliced and airliner into shreds like making potato chips yet one flew 
through the building and out the other side unscaved "nose in noseout even 
flew through the pnet lines on a crane and did not even bobble the crane or 
the plain.

This video exposed 9/11 a hoax to me in 2010
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

===================

I've seen part of that video before and watched part of it again just now. 
Dang, that video is both good and funny.  Thanks.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540519

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n57pen$6mi$2@pcls7.std.com...
> joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>The distance between the columns  allowed only a 24 inch space which would
>>have sliced and airliner into shreds like making potato chips yet one flew
>>through the building and out the other side unscaved
>
> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the Twin
> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
> paint scratched, at least?

Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same 
video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it 
should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>

But I've also seen evidence that the nose out could have been caused by a 
napalm cannon because there was no hole on the north side of the South 
Tower.

>>even
>>flew through the pnet lines on a crane and did not even bobble the crane 
>>or=
>> the plain.
>
> Yup, that's the forged video clip Rocky used to prove all k00kvids are
> packed full of lies.

Don't forget it could also prove that the so called original video was 
altered after people realized the original video could be used to prove 9/11 
was an attack of CGIs.  <G>

And never forget this video, or the video where one of the Nuke York 
stations accidentally plays two videos without a jet.  <G>

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540608

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n57pen$6mi$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>>The distance between the columns  allowed only a 24 inch space which would
>>>have sliced and airliner into shreds like making potato chips yet one flew
>>>through the building and out the other side unscaved
>>
>> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the Twin
>> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
>> paint scratched, at least?

>Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same 
>video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it 
>should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>

I've never seen a video of any 767 nose coming out before.  Not even on a
k00kvid.  There are plenty showing relatively small (landing gear sized)  
unidentifiable debris (plus the fireball) exiting through holes in the
South Tower, however.

>>>even
>>>flew through the pnet lines on a crane and did not even bobble the crane 
>>>or=
>>> the plain.
>>
>> Yup, that's the forged video clip Rocky used to prove all k00kvids are
>> packed full of lies.

>Don't forget it could also prove that the so called original video was 
>altered after people realized the original video could be used to prove 9/11 
>was an attack of CGIs.  <G>

So you admit that kookvid has been tampered with to make it look like
something happened that didn't.  And using your logic how a reporter lying
at the Pentagon proves all 9/11 witnesses in Manhattan were lying, this
proves that all k00kvids have been tampered with to make it look like
something happened that didn't.

So you proved before that all k00kvids are lies.  Now you filled in the
details that they are all lies because they've all been tampered with to
make it look like something happened that didn't.

Great job, Rocky!!  We knew before (because of you) that all kookvids are
lies, now we know _why_ they are all lies!  Nice work!!!

>And never forget this video, or the video where one of the Nuke York 
>stations accidentally plays two videos without a jet.  <G>

Since you just proved all k00kvids have been tampered with, we know this
one was tampered with as well!  Can you find all the places in that 
k00kvid where it has been tampered with in order to lie to you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540669

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n594hl$ic6$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:n57pen$6mi$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>The distance between the columns  allowed only a 24 inch space which 
>>>>would
>>>>have sliced and airliner into shreds like making potato chips yet one 
>>>>flew
>>>>through the building and out the other side unscaved
>>>
>>> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the 
>>> Twin
>>> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
>>> paint scratched, at least?
>
>>Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same
>>video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it
>>should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>
>
> I've never seen a video of any 767 nose coming out before.

Oh bullshit.  You always remove the links just like you removed the 
following link:

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

And don't worry I'll dig up that other video too.

BTW the WesCam cameras they used to shoot Nuke York City on 9/11 should not 
have blurred the CGIs that bad.  See for yourself at:

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

Rocky  -  The 9/11 Attack of the CGIs. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540675

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n594hl$ic6$1@pcls7.std.com...

>>>> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the 
>>>> Twin
>>>> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
>>>> paint scratched, at least?
>>
>>>Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same
>>>video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it
>>>should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>
>>
>> I've never seen a video of any 767 nose coming out before.

>Oh bullshit.  You always remove the links just like you removed the 
>following link:

Of course I removed the link.  It's a k00kvid so we know it's full of
lies!  All k00kvids are nothing but lies!  You proved that!!  Not only is
it full of lies, it's been tampered with, too.  You just recently proved
that all k00kvids have also been tampered with!!

I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered 
with!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540683

On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 4:03:50 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
> 
> >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
> >news:n594hl$ic6$1@pcls7.std.com...
> 
> >>>> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the 
> >>>> Twin
> >>>> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
> >>>> paint scratched, at least?
> >>
> >>>Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same
> >>>video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it
> >>>should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>
> >>
> >> I've never seen a video of any 767 nose coming out before.
> 
> >Oh bullshit.  You always remove the links just like you removed the 
> >following link:
> 
> Of course I removed the link.  It's a k00kvid so we know it's full of
> lies!  All k00kvids are nothing but lies!  You proved that!!  Not only is
> it full of lies, it's been tampered with, too.  You just recently proved
> that all k00kvids have also been tampered with!!
> 
> I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered 
> with!

Real evidence for what What WHAT Michael Moroney?!

-- Mahipal "IPMM... Silence silence SILENCE..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540706

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n59pfg$o42$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
...
>
> I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered
> with!

ROTFLMAO because you even consider playing the videos you've already seen in 
slow motion as tampering.  You clown.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540847

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:


>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n59pfg$o42$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>...
>>
>> I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered
>> with!

>ROTFLMAO because you even consider playing the videos you've already seen in 
>slow motion as tampering.  You clown.

Playing a video in slow motion is fine.  Replacing the plane images in the
slow motion video with more detailed ones that just happen to weave in and
out of the crane is tampering and obvious fakery.  Everybody (except for
kooktards) knows this.

Remember, Rocky?  That video with the crane is the one you used to prove
all k00kvids have been tampered with and therefore all lies! Great job!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540853

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n5c5vd$isi$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:n59pfg$o42$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>...
>>>
>>> I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered
>>> with!
>
>>ROTFLMAO because you even consider playing the videos you've already seen 
>>in
>>slow motion as tampering.  You clown.
>
> Playing a video in slow motion is fine.  Replacing the plane images in the
> slow motion video with more detailed ones that just happen to weave in and
> out of the crane is tampering and obvious fakery.  Everybody (except for
> kooktards) knows this.
>
> Remember, Rocky?  That video with the crane is the one you used to prove
> all k00kvids have been tampered with and therefore all lies! Great job!!

You are such a liar.  I'll bet you really think those images in Nuke York 
City were real too despite the fact they never slowed down or lost parts 
just like a CGI would.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#541238

On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:08:07 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n5c5vd$isi$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:n59pfg$o42$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>...
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking for real evidence, not a lying k00kvid that's been tampered
>>>> with!
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because you even consider playing the videos you've already seen 
>>>in
>>>slow motion as tampering.  You clown.
>>
>> Playing a video in slow motion is fine.  Replacing the plane images in the
>> slow motion video with more detailed ones that just happen to weave in and
>> out of the crane is tampering and obvious fakery.  Everybody (except for
>> kooktards) knows this.
>>
>> Remember, Rocky?  That video with the crane is the one you used to prove
>> all k00kvids have been tampered with and therefore all lies! Great job!!
>
>You are such a liar.  

     I disagree. I also think you did a great job of proving all 9/11
k00k vids are lies.

>I'll bet you really think those images in Nuke York 
>City were real too despite the fact they never slowed down or lost parts 
>just like a CGI would.  <G>

     How, exactly, would a CGI slow down and/or lose parts? 
     Did I just catch you in another lie? I think I did.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540867

"Rocky"  wrote in message 
news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...


<< snip Wockie drivel >>

*** there is nothing wrong with you that a Frontal
Lobotomy couldn't take care of, Wockie ... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540869

"Hägar" <hsahm@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:f8udnddD8LS0LuTLnZ2dnUU7-QmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> "Rocky"  wrote in message 
> news:tcmdnZoIasqnp-rLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
>
> << snip Wockie drivel >>
>
> *** there is nothing wrong with you that a Frontal
> Lobotomy couldn't take care of, Wockie ...

Too bad you believed the person that told you that.

OP  ------------------>

9/11: 16 CGIs which fooled the world
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

Theory of Ghostplane
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web