Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #272142

Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n57pen$6mi$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>>The distance between the columns  allowed only a 24 inch space which would
>>>have sliced and airliner into shreds like making potato chips yet one flew
>>>through the building and out the other side unscaved
>>
>> What's this, a kooktard thinks an intact plane flew OUT of one of the Twin
>> Towers?  What happened next, did it fly off into the sunset?  Was the
>> paint scratched, at least?

>Michael, you have seen that nose in nose out video before.  It is the same 
>video where they zoom in twice and then suddenly a jet appears when it 
>should have been in the first wide shot if it had really been there.  <G>

I've never seen a video of any 767 nose coming out before.  Not even on a
k00kvid.  There are plenty showing relatively small (landing gear sized)  
unidentifiable debris (plus the fireball) exiting through holes in the
South Tower, however.

>>>even
>>>flew through the pnet lines on a crane and did not even bobble the crane 
>>>or=
>>> the plain.
>>
>> Yup, that's the forged video clip Rocky used to prove all k00kvids are
>> packed full of lies.

>Don't forget it could also prove that the so called original video was 
>altered after people realized the original video could be used to prove 9/11 
>was an attack of CGIs.  <G>

So you admit that kookvid has been tampered with to make it look like
something happened that didn't.  And using your logic how a reporter lying
at the Pentagon proves all 9/11 witnesses in Manhattan were lying, this
proves that all k00kvids have been tampered with to make it look like
something happened that didn't.

So you proved before that all k00kvids are lies.  Now you filled in the
details that they are all lies because they've all been tampered with to
make it look like something happened that didn't.

Great job, Rocky!!  We knew before (because of you) that all kookvids are
lies, now we know _why_ they are all lies!  Nice work!!!

>And never forget this video, or the video where one of the Nuke York 
>stations accidentally plays two videos without a jet.  <G>

Since you just proved all k00kvids have been tampered with, we know this
one was tampered with as well!  Can you find all the places in that 
k00kvid where it has been tampered with in order to lie to you?

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 17:29 -0600
  Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-20 15:51 -0800
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 18:00 -0600
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-21 00:30 +0000
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-12-20 19:40 -0500
  Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-20 23:51 +0000
  Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-20 17:46 -0800
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 02:51 +0000
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 21:05 -0600
        Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 15:06 +0000
          Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-21 14:16 -0600
            Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 21:03 +0000
              Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-21 17:11 -0600
                Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-22 18:49 +0000
                Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-22 13:08 -0600
                Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:52 -0600
                Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-22 22:18 -0800
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 20:55 -0600
  Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-22 12:31 -0800
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-22 14:45 -0600
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-23 00:00 -0800
    Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 18:14 -0500
      Re: 9/11: the attack of the CGIs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-02-09 20:07 -0500

csiph-web