Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527838 > unrolled thread

BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !!

Started by"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
First post2015-10-23 23:37 -0700
Last post2015-10-31 00:38 -0700
Articles 20 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 23:37 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 23:48 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 11:24 -0700
        Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 11:27 -0700
          Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0700
            Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:22 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Hoofington P. McSnort" <invalide@ezample.com> - 2015-10-24 10:14 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 08:22 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 16:11 +0000
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:18 -0700
        Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:52 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 01:22 -0700
        in loco parentis noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:24 -0700
        Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Gorzo Saddichi" <invalide@ezample.com> - 2015-10-27 22:17 -0700
          Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:14 -0700
            Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 15:41 -0700
              Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 23:08 -0700
                ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:28 -0700
                  Re: ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 00:38 -0700

#527838 — BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !!

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 23:37 -0700
SubjectBINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !!
Message-ID<7255acd0-0fd4-4900-b913-a18a387f5a0e@googlegroups.com>
BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
a
that is not the common understanding !!

TIA
Y.Porat
===========================================

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#527839

From"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-23 23:48 -0700
Message-ID<68dc0f7c-1e04-4fc5-9b87-e82e2347ee50@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527838
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> a
> that is not the common understanding !!
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ===========================================

Gluons as particles are not the fields at rest.

They're a convenience, force-carrier particles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_carrier

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527908

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-24 11:24 -0700
Message-ID<2dfaa064-4d6b-4481-b889-8b1b281cbc2d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527839
On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 9:48:50 AM UTC+3, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> > BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> > a
> > that is not the common understanding !!
> > 
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ===========================================
> 
> Gluons as particles are not the fields at rest.
> 
> They're a convenience, force-carrier particles.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_carrier

==========================
so 
how do  they make/create  force ??

TIA
Y.Porat
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527909

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-24 11:27 -0700
Message-ID<65855663-0038-4856-b162-9526f46b87b8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527908
On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 9:24:24 PM UTC+3, Y.Porat wrote:
> On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 9:48:50 AM UTC+3, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> > > BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> > > a
> > > that is not the common understanding !!
> > > 
> > > TIA
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ===========================================
> > 
> > Gluons as particles are not the fields at rest.
> > 
> > They're a convenience, force-carrier particles.
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_carrier
> 
> ==========================
> so 
> how do  they make/create  force ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> =============================

2
do you know that photons has mass - the only mass ??

TIA
Y.Porat
===================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527992

From"Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-24 19:06 -0700
Message-ID<f864cdd4-9874-4762-8017-09b8ad0abd31@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527909
On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 11:27:21 AM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> 
> 2
> do you know that photons has mass - the only mass ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ===================================

Nichtiges (nicht richtiges). E = mc^2 and no.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528012

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-24 22:22 -0700
Message-ID<7bab8311-cebd-4430-bc01-fd57107777f2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527992
On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 4:06:33 AM UTC+2, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 11:27:21 AM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> > 
> > 2
> > do you know that photons has mass - the only mass ??
> > 
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ===================================
> 
> Nichtiges (nicht richtiges). E = mc^2 and no.

===========================
right !!
yet peole still dont know that

ENERGY HAS MASS **THE ONLY (AGAIN :THE ONLY !! MASS !!
not relativistic andnot schmelativistic !!!

2
THE PHOTON IS A SPECIAL KIND OF  **SUB PARTICLE !!!!
(and that is a new unprecedented innovation of mine 
------------------------]
see google 
'The Y Porat Model an abstract'

the section that deals   NUMERICALLY !! with 
binding energies !!!

TIA
Y.Porat
=====================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527906

From"Hoofington P. McSnort" <invalide@ezample.com>
Date2015-10-24 10:14 -0700
Message-ID<n0ge92$49s$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#527838
Give it a rest, you raving lunatic.

"Y.Porat"  wrote in message 
news:7255acd0-0fd4-4900-b913-a18a387f5a0e@googlegroups.com...

BOOONDOING ENERGIES - OUR ACTUALLY - massive SUB POOOOTICLES !!
a
that is not the common understanding !!
I have not the common understanding !!
My skull is full of chimpanzee knuckles !!
Nothing I post !!

TIA !!
Y.Porat !!

I am a raving lunatic !!
===========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528040

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-25 08:22 -0700
Message-ID<5a3cf032-6d35-49ae-b12e-7d2498532e6d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527906
On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 8:14:15 PM UTC+3, Hoofington P. McSnort wrote:
> Give it a rest, you raving lunatic.
> 
> "Y.Porat"  wrote in message 
> news:7255acd0-0fd4-4900-b913-a18a387f5a0e@googlegroups.com...
> 
> BOOONDOING ENERGIES - OUR ACTUALLY - massive SUB POOOOTICLES !!
> a
> that is not the common understanding !!
> I have not the common understanding !!
> My skull is full of chimpanzee knuckles !!
> Nothing I post !!
> 
> TIA !!
> Y.Porat !!
> 
> I am a raving lunatic !!
> ===========================================

A C A M !!

next !!
Y.P
=======================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528230

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-10-26 16:11 +0000
Message-ID<n0ljaq$ss8$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#527838
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes:


>BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
>a
>that is not the common understanding !!

>TIA
>Y.Porat

Sub particles with negative mass? How can that be possible?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528265

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-26 11:18 -0700
Message-ID<27e64f59-ecfb-49ff-b3ec-67e6fe93f429@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528230
On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 6:11:09 PM UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
> >BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> >a
> >that is not the common understanding !!
> 
> >TIA
> >Y.Porat
> 
> Sub particles with negative mass? How can that be possible?
=======
thank you
you asked  an interesting question :
 
the thing that makes a particle negative/charged  
is not just/only its main body mass 

(ie that particle is not  a 'point particle' 
but a combination of its main body 
and its sub particles 
(it is a chain of orbitals'
while the 'charge' is by its  main body   
plus
 its sub sub    particles on its edges 
see for instance  my 
'Circlon mechanism '

TIA
Y.Porat
=================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528402

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-26 18:52 -0700
Message-ID<310180f0-5b50-414f-8bee-47a6c7828695@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528265
the secondpower of the speed of light:
do a dimensional some thing

> (ie that particle is not  a 'point particle' 
> but a combination of its main body 
> and its sub particles 
> (it is a chain of orbitals'
> while the 'charge' is by its  main body   
> plus
>  its sub sub    particles on its edges 
> see for instance  my 
> 'Circlon mechanism '
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> =================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528315

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-26 12:48 -0700
Message-ID<6abd674e-1de8-4203-8d4a-c7db365c744e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#527838
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> a
> that is not the common understanding !!
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ===========================================

Sub particles that make up the fabric of space gives it its spacetime curve,and thus the force we feel and call GRAVITY.Gravities force is measured by weight it gives to particles.No need for gravity waves .for its particles all the way down TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528447

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-27 01:22 -0700
Message-ID<a861902f-27c5-4bce-bbee-8d416a3ec24a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528315
On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 9:49:13 PM UTC+2, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 11:37:40 PM UTC-7, Y.Porat wrote:
> > BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
> > a
> > that is not the common understanding !!
> > 
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ===========================================
> 
> Sub particles that make up the fabric of space gives it its spacetime curve,and thus the force we feel and call GRAVITY.Gravities force is measured by weight it gives to particles.No need for gravity waves .for its particles all the way down TreBert

===========================
space time as a physics actor 
is a HUGE   B u l S H IT !!

just  once and for all
just forget about it
and save us and yourself that huge  
waist of precious human resources !!! 
Y,Porat
=========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528511 — in loco parentis

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-27 12:24 -0700
Subjectin loco parentis
Message-ID<ad122f78-12b8-4cab-88d1-b9d241a919ca@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528447
local in parentis,
timennspaenn is only a simple phase-spaec,
where the units for time are ne'er "orthogonal
to the units of space, eept in aformal semse,
as in quaternionic scalars
(vector mehanics thereof


>> by weight it gives to particles.No need for gravity waves .for its particles all the way down TreBert
> 
> ===========================
> space time as a physics actor 
> is a HUGE   B u l S H IT !!
> 
> just  once and for all
> just forget about it
> and save us and yourself that huge  
> waist of precious human resources !!! 
> Y,Porat
> =========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528664

From"Gorzo Saddichi" <invalide@ezample.com>
Date2015-10-27 22:17 -0700
Message-ID<n0ploo$6lu$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#528447
just  once and for all
just forget about it
and save us and yourself that huge  
waist of precious human resources !!! 

Learn the difference between "WAIST" and "WASTE",
you retarded lunatic!

Next!

Learn how to create simple English words,
using an ordinary computer keyboard.

Next!

Why Porat?  

Viaduct?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528668

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-27 23:14 -0700
Message-ID<cc71bd10-44bc-4a1a-b2fb-2678b0f2ed88@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528664
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 7:17:17 AM UTC+2, Gorzo Saddichi wrote:
> just  once and for all
> just forget about it
> and save us and yourself that huge  
> waist of precious human resources !!! 
> 
> Learn the difference between "WAIST" and "WASTE",
> you retarded lunatic!
> 
> Next!
> 
> Learn how to create simple English words,
> using an ordinary computer keyboard.
> 
> Next!
> 
> Why Porat?  
> 
> Viaduct?

========================
*** ANONYMOUS ** coward !! idiot sabotager
what  is your real F en dirty name ?? 

this is not a Shakespeare n g
it is a physics!!!! n g
got it little dreck hired gangster criminal ??

next!!!! to human beings 
Y.P
===================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528810

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-28 15:41 -0700
Message-ID<a3bd083a-a10d-4aaa-b8bb-361bdb3096c7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528668
everty newsgroup is a Shakespere newsgrouP,
if you can read Psalm 46 with the actaul so-called b.c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528878

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-28 23:08 -0700
Message-ID<bf604c7d-0b35-4310-9eb8-e8b650c2f9e3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528810
On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 12:41:19 AM UTC+2, noTthaTguY wrote:
> everty newsgroup is a Shakespere newsgrouP,
> if you can read Psalm 46 with the actaul so-called b.c

-----------------------------
A C A M !!
next 

Y.Porat
===================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529026 — ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-29 17:28 -0700
SubjectShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though
Message-ID<81a9d7cf-cf0a-4fc8-98a3-bc938d42bbf9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#528878
was to say, "biblECode, although
the original bOOk of the same name, was part of the hoax (although
the author may not have known of this, even if
he was a dedicated amateur, like me

> > everty newsgroup is a Shakespere newsgrouP,
> > if you can read Psalm 46 with the actaul so-called b.c
> 
> -----------------------------
> A C A M !!
> next 
> 
> Y.Porat
> ===================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529385 — Re: ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though

From"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Date2015-10-31 00:38 -0700
SubjectRe: ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though
Message-ID<a3d74e61-d58d-46de-8b11-be2120a82bef@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#529026
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 2:28:46 AM UTC+2, noTthaTguY wrote:
> was to say, "biblECode, although
> the original bOOk of the same name, was part of the hoax (although
> the author may not have known of this, even if
> he was a dedicated amateur, like me
> 
> > > everty newsgroup is a Shakespere newsgrouP,
> > > if you can read Psalm 46 with the actaul so-called b.c
> > 
> > -----------------------------
> > A C A M !!
> > next 
> > 
> > Y.Porat
> > ===================================================

Nest !!!

Y.P
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web