Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #528230

Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !!

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !!
Date 2015-10-26 16:11 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <n0ljaq$ss8$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <7255acd0-0fd4-4900-b913-a18a387f5a0e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes:


>BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY - massive SUB PARTICLES !!
>a
>that is not the common understanding !!

>TIA
>Y.Porat

Sub particles with negative mass? How can that be possible?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 23:37 -0700
  Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 23:48 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 11:24 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 11:27 -0700
        Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0700
          Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 22:22 -0700
  Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Hoofington P. McSnort" <invalide@ezample.com> - 2015-10-24 10:14 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 08:22 -0700
  Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-26 16:11 +0000
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 11:18 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:52 -0700
  Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0700
    Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 01:22 -0700
      in loco parentis noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:24 -0700
      Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Gorzo Saddichi" <invalide@ezample.com> - 2015-10-27 22:17 -0700
        Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 23:14 -0700
          Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 15:41 -0700
            Re: BINDING ENERGIES - ARE ACTUALLY SUB PARTICLES !! "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-28 23:08 -0700
              ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 17:28 -0700
                Re: ShakespearE was 46, when it was published (not in 1646, though "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 00:38 -0700

csiph-web