Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #527085 > unrolled thread

Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 16:35 -0500
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 22:46 +0100
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 17:13 -0500
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 23:39 +0100
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 19:14 -0400
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-20 19:38 -0400
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 06:36 +0100
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:22 -0500
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
                  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:52 -0500
                    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:48 +0000
                      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:40 -0500
                        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 23:12 +0000
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:04 -0500
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:40 +0000
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:00 -0500
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-20 23:01 +0000
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 16:48 -0700
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:15 -0500
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 17:54 -0400
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 19:45 -0400
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 21:07 -0400
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:55 +0000
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 23:05 -0400
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 14:34 +1100
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:34 -0500
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 19:09 +0000
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 14:46 -0500
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:34 -0400
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:38 -0400
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-22 02:52 +0000
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:12 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#527085 — Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>
>>>> In article <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>   alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned 9/11.
>>>>>
>>>>> His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the three
>>>>> towers, was
>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>
>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>> or
>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>
>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the gullible
>>> Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>
>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and 
>> blown
>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them 
> to 911.

People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that 
didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will 
not do you any good?

From: "Rocky"
Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.

911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs

Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.

--------------------------------------

And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying that the 
Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of the Twin Towers 
do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you 
planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of them and 
that can not be any more elementary.

The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the nukes had 
to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think jets hit 
the Twin Towers.

And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after WTC7 was 
nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be taken 
in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ because of 
the radiation.

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#527086

On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, georgewk10
>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> In article <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>    alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned 9/11.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the three
>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>
>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>> or
>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>
>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the gullible
>>>> Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>
>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and
>>> blown
>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them
>> to 911.
>
> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that
> didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will
> not do you any good?
>

Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack of 
an answer would seem to show you as a liar.

> From: "Rocky"
> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>
> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>
> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying that the
> Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of the Twin Towers
> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of them and
> that can not be any more elementary.
>

What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a comparison.

> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the nukes had
> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think jets hit
> the Twin Towers.
>

What has this to do with my question?

> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after WTC7 was
> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be taken
> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ because of
> the radiation.

What has this to do with my question?

>
> Rocky
>
>

So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527093

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>, 
>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>    alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned 9/11.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the three
>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the gullible
>>>>> Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and
>>>> blown
>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them
>>> to 911.
>>
>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that
>> didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will
>> not do you any good?
>>
>
> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack of an 
> answer would seem to show you as a liar.

Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the threeNuclear 
Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH

>> From: "Rocky"
>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>
>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>
>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying that the
>> Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of the Twin 
>> Towers
>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of them 
>> and
>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>
>
> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a 
> comparison.
>
>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the nukes 
>> had
>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think jets 
>> hit
>> the Twin Towers.
>>
>
> What has this to do with my question?
>
>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after WTC7 
>> was
>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be 
>> taken
>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ because 
>> of
>> the radiation.
>
> What has this to do with my question?
>
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.

It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term "pancake" 
when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are consistent with a 
Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people 
allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up and 
get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been working 
there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big lie.

TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527102

On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>     alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned 9/11.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the three
>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the gullible
>>>>>> Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and
>>>>> blown
>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them
>>>> to 911.
>>>
>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that
>>> didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will
>>> not do you any good?
>>>
>>
>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack of an
>> answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>
> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the threeNuclear
> Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>
>>> From: "Rocky"
>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>
>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>
>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known the
>>> media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>>
>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying that the
>>> Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of the Twin
>>> Towers
>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of them
>>> and
>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>
>>
>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>> comparison.
>>
>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the nukes
>>> had
>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think jets
>>> hit
>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>
>>
>> What has this to do with my question?
>>
>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after WTC7
>>> was
>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be
>>> taken
>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ because
>>> of
>>> the radiation.
>>
>> What has this to do with my question?
>>
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.
>
> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term "pancake"
> when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are consistent with a
> Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?

> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people
> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up and
> get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been working
> there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big lie.
>
> TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>

Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?

> Rocky
>
>

Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.

But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527109

Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>     <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned
>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the 
>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway
>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare
>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>
>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and
>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something
>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>
>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>
>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>
>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of
>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg 
>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of
>>>> them and
>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>> comparison.
>>>
>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>> nukes had
>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think
>>>> jets hit
>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>
>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after
>>>> WTC7 was
>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be
>>>> taken
>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>> because of
>>>> the radiation.
>>>
>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.
>>
>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>
>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people
>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had
>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC 
>> hit?
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>
>
> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
> lied.
> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.







Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah Sweetcheeks 
?
If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would wonder 
who's was who's.
Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?

The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided countless 
times, does not make anyone else a liar.
....It just makes you a fool.


9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.ae911truth.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527116

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:14:57 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:


>Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah Sweetcheeks ?

Everyone here logics[sic] like me, like Tony, like BDK, like Michael,
like the Shills.  We're all logical and rational.  You and Roger/Rocky
lie and when get your lies confused you lie again to try and cover it
up.  

>If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would wonder 
>who's was who's.

They might if they're not very bright .

>Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?

Only you and RogerRockhead hold memberships in the [C]lueless
[U]neducated [N]itwit [T]roll Club.   

Hth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527173

On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote:
> Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>      <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned
>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the
>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway
>>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare
>>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>>
>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and
>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something
>>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>>
>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>>
>>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>>
>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of
>>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of
>>>>> them and
>>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>>> comparison.
>>>>
>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>>> nukes had
>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think
>>>>> jets hit
>>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>
>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after
>>>>> WTC7 was
>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be
>>>>> taken
>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>>> because of
>>>>> the radiation.
>>>>
>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.
>>>
>>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>
>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>
>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people
>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had
>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC
>>> hit?
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>>
>>
>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>> lied.
>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah Sweetcheeks
> ?

Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant.

> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would wonder
> who's was who's.

Well a sensible person would not.

> Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?

Is that your best?

>
> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided countless
> times, does not make anyone else a liar.

I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not 
seen it, but if you can post it do so.
I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided 
countless times"

> ....It just makes you a fool.
>

So provide the answer to my question.

>
> 9/11 was an inside job.
> http://www.ae911truth.org
>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528055

<warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com...
> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote:
>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote:
>> > Tony Dragon wrote:
>> >> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>> >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> >>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>> >>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>> >>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>> >>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>> >>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>> >>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>> >>>>>>>> georgewk10
>> >>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In article
>> >>>>>>>>>      <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>> >>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned
>> >>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked 
>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> three
>> >>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>> >>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" 
>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>> >>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>> >>>>>>>>> or
>> >>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>> >>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway
>> >>>>>>> and blown
>> >>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>> >>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can 
>> >>>>>> compare
>> >>>>>> them to 911.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and
>> >>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for 
>> >>>>> something
>> >>>>> that will not do you any good?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>> >>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>> >>>
>> >>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>> >>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>> >>>
>> >>>>> From: "Rocky"
>> >>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>> >>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the 
>> >>>>> ground.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>> >>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>> >>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --------------------------------------
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>> >>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of
>> >>>>> the Twin Towers
>> >>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>> >>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if 
>> >>>>> you
>> >>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of
>> >>>>> them and
>> >>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>> >>>> comparison.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>> >>>>> nukes had
>> >>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think
>> >>>>> jets hit
>> >>>>> the Twin Towers.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What has this to do with my question?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after
>> >>>>> WTC7 was
>> >>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to 
>> >>>>> be
>> >>>>> taken
>> >>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>> >>>>> because of
>> >>>>> the radiation.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What has this to do with my question?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Rocky
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you 
>> >>>> lied.
>> >>>
>> >>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>> >>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>> >>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>> >>> 
>> >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>> >>
>> >>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first 
>> >>> people
>> >>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>> >>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had
>> >>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>> >>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC
>> >>> hit?
>> >>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>> >>
>> >>> Rocky
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>> >> lied.
>> >> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah 
>> > Sweetcheeks
>> > ?
>>
>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant.
>>
>> > If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would 
>> > wonder
>> > who's was who's.
>>
>> Well a sensible person would not.
>>
>> > Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?
>>
>> Is that your best?
>>
>> >
>> > The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided 
>> > countless
>> > times, does not make anyone else a liar.
>>
>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not
>> seen it, but if you can post it do so.
>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided
>> countless times"
>>
>> > ....It just makes you a fool.
>> >
>>
>> So provide the answer to my question.
>>
>> >
>> > 9/11 was an inside job.
>> > http://www.ae911truth.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed, 
> I'm sure they must have answered.

I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for 
NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he 
never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528095

On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote:
> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com...
>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote:
>>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote:
>>>> Tony Dragon wrote:
>>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>       <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway
>>>>>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can
>>>>>>>>> compare
>>>>>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and
>>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for
>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the
>>>>>>>> ground.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>>>>>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of
>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of
>>>>>>>> them and
>>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>>>>>> nukes had
>>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think
>>>>>>>> jets hit
>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after
>>>>>>>> WTC7 was
>>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>>>>>> because of
>>>>>>>> the radiation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>>>> lied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had
>>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC
>>>>>> hit?
>>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>> lied.
>>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah
>>>> Sweetcheeks
>>>> ?
>>>
>>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant.
>>>
>>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would
>>>> wonder
>>>> who's was who's.
>>>
>>> Well a sensible person would not.
>>>
>>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?
>>>
>>> Is that your best?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided
>>>> countless
>>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar.
>>>
>>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not
>>> seen it, but if you can post it do so.
>>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided
>>> countless times"
>>>
>>>> ....It just makes you a fool.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So provide the answer to my question.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 9/11 was an inside job.
>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed,
>> I'm sure they must have answered.
>
> I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for
> NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he
> never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides.
>
> Rooky

I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't 
answer?
It must be so bad for your ego when you make a statement that you can't 
back up and somebody notices your lack of answers.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528108

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n0jl7k$fln$1@dont-email.me...
> On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote:
>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com...
>>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote:
>>>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote:
>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in 
>>>>>>>>>>> everyway
>>>>>>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can
>>>>>>>>>> compare
>>>>>>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like 
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for
>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>>>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the
>>>>>>>>> ground.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>>>>>>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have 
>>>>>>>>> known
>>>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains 
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side 
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> them and
>>>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>>>>>>> nukes had
>>>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly 
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> jets hit
>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day 
>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>> WTC7 was
>>>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>>>>>>> because of
>>>>>>>>> the radiation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>>>>> lied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>>>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>>>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>>>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody 
>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>>>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd 
>>>>>>> WTC
>>>>>>> hit?
>>>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>>> lied.
>>>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah
>>>>> Sweetcheeks
>>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant.
>>>>
>>>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would
>>>>> wonder
>>>>> who's was who's.
>>>>
>>>> Well a sensible person would not.
>>>>
>>>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?
>>>>
>>>> Is that your best?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided
>>>>> countless
>>>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar.
>>>>
>>>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not
>>>> seen it, but if you can post it do so.
>>>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided
>>>> countless times"
>>>>
>>>>> ....It just makes you a fool.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So provide the answer to my question.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 9/11 was an inside job.
>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>
>>>
>>> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed,
>>> I'm sure they must have answered.
>>
>> I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for
>> NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he
>> never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides.
>
> I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't 
> answer?

You work hard at asking the wrong people questions and you know that.

Again, let me see any of the questions you had for NIST or the 9/11 
Commission about why four jets vanished without a trace and why buildings 
could collapse, float away and leave next to nothing on the ground.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

BTW this video reminds me of you:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528122

On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n0jl7k$fln$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 25/10/2015 18:22, Rocky wrote:
>>> <warrenbuckley1@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ccd85efb-0759-4102-ae7e-b7acb8f70381@googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 6:36:50 AM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote:
>>>>> On 21/10/2015 00:14, Bast wrote:
>>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in
>>>>>>>>>>>> everyway
>>>>>>>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>>>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can
>>>>>>>>>>> compare
>>>>>>>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for
>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>>>>>>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>>>>>>>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the
>>>>>>>>>> ground.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>>>>>>>       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have
>>>>>>>>>> known
>>>>>>>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>>>>>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>>>>>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> them and
>>>>>>>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>>>>>>>> comparison.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>>>>>>>> nukes had
>>>>>>>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly
>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>> jets hit
>>>>>>>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day
>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>> WTC7 was
>>>>>>>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> taken
>>>>>>>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>>>>>>>> because of
>>>>>>>>>> the radiation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>>>>>> lied.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>>>>>>>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>>>>>>>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first
>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>>>>>>>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody
>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>>>>>>>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd
>>>>>>>> WTC
>>>>>>>> hit?
>>>>>>>>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
>>>>>>> lied.
>>>>>>> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah
>>>>>> Sweetcheeks
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unlikely, even if they could understand what your post meant.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would
>>>>>> wonder
>>>>>> who's was who's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well a sensible person would not.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that your best?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided
>>>>>> countless
>>>>>> times, does not make anyone else a liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I await the evidence that pertains to my question, so far I have not
>>>>> seen it, but if you can post it do so.
>>>>> I should not be difficult, according to you it has been " provided
>>>>> countless times"
>>>>>
>>>>>> ....It just makes you a fool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So provide the answer to my question.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 9/11 was an inside job.
>>>>>> http://www.ae911truth.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've not seen their answers, is there something wrong with the newsfeed,
>>>> I'm sure they must have answered.
>>>
>>> I've told T-annoy a long time ago I want to see the questions he had for
>>> NIST or the 9/11 Commission so I can be sure he isn't taking sides and he
>>> never asked them any questions so he is clearly taking sides.
>>
>> I'm sorry, have the naughty people been asking questions that you can't
>> answer?
>
> You work hard at asking the wrong people questions and you know that.
>

Indeed I am asking questions of someone who can't/wont answer them, why 
is this?
If you truly believe what you post you should have all the answers 
filled just ready to access.

> Again, let me see any of the questions you had for NIST or the 9/11
> Commission about why four jets vanished without a trace and why buildings
> could collapse, float away and leave next to nothing on the ground.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

Evasion yet again noted.

> BTW this video reminds me of you:
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw
>
>
>

Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of 
conviction for your claims.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528134

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n0jpkj$1sd$2@dont-email.me...
> On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
...
>> BTW this video reminds me of you:
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw
>
> Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of 
> conviction for your claims.

OK, I guess you are right a burping Marmot has more brains than you do 
because they don't ask stupid questions over and over and over. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#528164

On 26/10/2015 01:40, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n0jpkj$1sd$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 25/10/2015 22:52, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ...
>>> BTW this video reminds me of you:
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGaokcCCjmw
>>
>> Oh dear, is that the best you can do, it really shows your lack of
>> conviction for your claims.
>
> OK, I guess you are right a burping Marmot has more brains than you do
> because they don't ask stupid questions over and over and over.
>
>

Evidence of editing/sniping post noted.
Evasion noted.
Lack of answers yet again noted,

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527108

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people 
>allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up and 
>get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been working 
>there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big lie.

Hah!  It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you
that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground
Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that
the President himself was there on the third day.  So you have to squirm
and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there...

What about your other lie?  You know, "nobody at all was allowed into
Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued
by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the
North Tower stairwell...

Squirm, squirm, squirm...

Lying kooktard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527239

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people
>>allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry up 
>>and
>>get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had been 
>>working
>>there the two days before Bush showed up but that was just another big 
>>lie.
>
> Hah!  It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you
> that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground
> Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that
> the President himself was there on the third day.  So you have to squirm
> and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there...

He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video.  DUH

> What about your other lie?  You know, "nobody at all was allowed into
> Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued
> by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the
> North Tower stairwell...

And they were rescued before WTC7 was nuked and even before Ground Zero was 
given the name Ground Zero becasue of the nukes that had gone of there.

Boy you are really digging yourself a hole.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527360

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com...

>> Hah!  It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you
>> that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground
>> Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that
>> the President himself was there on the third day.  So you have to squirm
>> and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there...

>He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video.  DUH

K⊙⊙ktard, that doesn't matter.  The fact Bush and all the other people
were there _at all_ proves that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers
were allowed into Ground Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie. You've
been caught lying yet again, k⊙⊙ktard.

>> What about your other lie?  You know, "nobody at all was allowed into
>> Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued
>> by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the
>> North Tower stairwell...

<snip evasion>

K⊙⊙ktard, why won't you talk about how you lied  when you kookclaimed
"nobody at all was allowed into Ground Zero the first two days"? In
addition to those in the North Tower stairwell, rescued about two hours
after it collapsed, Pasquale Buzzelli was rescued 3 hours after the
collapse, William Jimeno after 13 hours, John McLoughlin after 21 hours
and Genelle Guzman after 27 hours, over a day.  How could these people be
rescued if rescuers weren't even allowed into the site?  You lied,
kooktard!  And you *still* haven't provided any evidence to your kookclaim
that radiation was any higher after 9/11 than before!

>Boy you are really digging yourself a hole.

K⊙⊙ktard, it is you with the shovel, digging away....
<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527493

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n09iaf$rgg$1@pcls7.std.com...
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:n06hpq$j2u$2@pcls7.std.com...

>> Hah!  It's funny how you have to change your story after I proved to you
>> that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers were allowed into Ground
>> Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie, when I showed you proof that
>> the President himself was there on the third day.  So you have to squirm
>> and change your story to account for the fact President Bush was there...

>He certainly didn't stay very long as proven by your own video.  DUH

K??ktard, that doesn't matter.  The fact Bush and all the other people
were there _at all_ proves that your kookclaim "Nobody except iron workers
were allowed into Ground Zero on the third day" was a big fat lie. You've
been caught lying yet again, k??ktard.

>> What about your other lie?  You know, "nobody at all was allowed into
>> Ground Zero the first two days" when I showed you how people were rescued
>> by firefighters the first two days, including those who survived in the
>> North Tower stairwell...

<snip evasion>

K??ktard, why won't you talk about how you lied  when you kookclaimed
"nobody at all was allowed into Ground Zero the first two days"? In
addition to those in the North Tower stairwell, rescued about two hours
after it collapsed, Pasquale Buzzelli was rescued 3 hours after the
collapse, William Jimeno after 13 hours, John McLoughlin after 21 hours
and Genelle Guzman after 27 hours, over a day.  How could these people be
rescued if rescuers weren't even allowed into the site?  You lied,
kooktard!  And you *still* haven't provided any evidence to your kookclaim
that radiation was any higher after 9/11 than before!

>Boy you are really digging yourself a hole.

K??ktard, it is you with the shovel, digging away....
<snicker>

=========================

You are just too funny.

You see very bad CGIs ram into the Twin Towers and you don't call the news 
media liars?  And not only that the CGIs lost wings and skipped across the 
screen instead of moving like a real jets.

You see what was called "collapses" but the buildings fell at a speed that 
is consistent with a controlled demolition or a nuclear demolition.

And you see remains of buildings that only nuclear demolitions can leave so 
there are no ifs ands buts about it that the only country to nuke another 
country also nuked themselves on 9/11.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And above all you never ever saw any real proof that someone besides the 
Saudis were responsible for 9/11.  <G>

And do not forget about the 28 pages left out of the 9/11 Commission report 
and the fact the toasted cars at GZ were there to make some people think 
nukes were used at GZ.  They just were not told that the nukes used at GZ 
were part of the World Trade Center Demolition scheme that had been in place 
since they were built.  DUH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527105

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:

>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and 
>>> blown
>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>>
>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them 
>> to 911.

>People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that 
>didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will 
>not do you any good?

So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks like?
Why is that?  Is it because there is no such thing?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527118

controlled demos use very little, say, dynamite,
especially after much of the salvagable materials have
already been removed

> So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks like?
> Why is that?  Is it because there is no such thing?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527243

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n06h3r$j2u$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>
>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway and
>>>> blown
>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of collapses?
>>>>
>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare them
>>> to 911.
>
>>People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and that
>>didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something that will
>>not do you any good?
>
> So, you can't answer Tony's question what a nuclear demolition looks like?
> Why is that?  Is it because there is no such thing?

If you really were smart you would know that a deep underground nuke have a 
"vaporization range", a spread pattern that can change by the surrounding 
rock and is the only thing that can leave behind the near total destruction 
of the Twin Towers in the following:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And because the jets were not needed to vaporize the Twin Towers since nukes 
were used for that it is pretty easy to see that the jets were just part of 
the lies told by a series of corporations bent on throwing the US into 
endless debt.

And real jets do not skip across the sky the way CGIs do.  See:  "TV Fakery 
test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC hit?"
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo

Rocky
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web