Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #278225

Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned

From "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned
Date 2015-10-20 19:14 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n06hpi$kcm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me> <dbSdne2Ea-F-LrvLnZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me> <88KdnWq1ZYtaIbvLnZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> <n06fmm$e4f$3@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 20/10/2015 23:13, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:n06ckk$v6j$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 20/10/2015 22:35, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n03rua$d8t$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 19/10/2015 22:14, Rocky wrote:
>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MPG.308f1b21f1964ade98c360@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-5A3FDD.10241219102015@news.toast.net>,
>>>>>>> georgewk10
>>>>>>> @yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>     <9cd80520-2c74-45d3-be86-3e9e74007fc6@googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>>>> alukenichols24740@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump chided W Bush for 9/11 happening on his watch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Little does he know, that Bush insider, Paul Wolfowitz planned
>>>>>>>>> 9/11. His plan, after they summoned the demons that attacked the 
>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>> towers, was
>>>>>>>>> to implode them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The demons attacked, right on time, and then, they "pulled" the
>>>>>>>>> buildings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that, my friend Mr. Trump is the STOMP DOWN truth.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Luke Nichols
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The curious ones can always do research. into 9/11
>>>>>>>> I's suggest Google; 9/11 Truth
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> www.ae9/11truth.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And if they have a clue, they will laugh at them. Only the
>>>>>>> gullible Trooferish swallow that bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about the bullshit about jets that resemble CGIs in everyway
>>>>>> and blown
>>>>>> up buildings that resemble nuclear demolitions instead of
>>>>>> collapses? Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do please give an example of a nuclear demolition so we can compare
>>>>> them to 911.
>>>>
>>>> People have already posted what real airliner crashes look like and
>>>> that didn't make you any smarter so why are you asking for something
>>>> that will not do you any good?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Were these crashes examines of nuclear demolition, if not your lack
>>> of an answer would seem to show you as a liar.
>>
>> Or maybe all Nuclear Demolitions are mis-labeled the way the
>> threeNuclear Demolitions at Ground Zero were.  DUH
>>
>>>> From: "Rocky"
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:09 AM
>>>> Subject: 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>
>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground.
>>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs
>>>>
>>>> Too bad CGIs don't fall to the ground or everybody would have known
>>>> the media flew two CGIs into the Twin Towers.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> And do not forget, after NIST saw the following they quit saying
>>>> that the Twin Towers were a pancake collapse because the remains of
>>>> the Twin Towers
>>>> do not resemble a "pancake collapse."  DUH
>>>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg 
>>>> But the remains of the Twin Towers resemble what you would get if you
>>>> planted something capable of vaporizing them deep under one side of
>>>> them and
>>>> that can not be any more elementary.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What would that 'something' be? Give us a link so we can make a
>>> comparison.
>>>
>>>> The only real magic is the 9/11 hoaxsters knew exactly how big the
>>>> nukes had
>>>> to be to vaporize up to the locations that people incorrectly think
>>>> jets hit
>>>> the Twin Towers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>
>>>> And again, the above photo was obviously taken during the day after
>>>> WTC7 was
>>>> nuked and there is nobody in it or any cranes either so it had to be
>>>> taken
>>>> in the first two days after 9/11 when nobody was allowed into GZ
>>>> because of
>>>> the radiation.
>>>
>>> What has this to do with my question?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rocky
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you lied.
>>
>> It is the other way around.  The fact is NIST quit using the term
>> "pancake" when they realized the remains of the Twin Towers are
>> consistent with a Nuclear Demolition instead.  DUH
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
> Nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>
>> And I think it is funny that the president was one of the first people
>> allowed at GZ after 3 nukes were set off there but they had to hurry
>> up and get the massive cranes in place so it looked like somebody had
>> been working there the two days before Bush showed up but that was
>> just another big lie. TV Fakery test runs minutes before live 2nd WTC 
>> hit?
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuYe4kZUwLo
>>
>
> Again, nothing to do with my question, are you scared to answer it?
>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> Still  no answer to my question, that means no proof, that means you
> lied.
> But keep wriggling, it shows you for what you are.







Has anyone pointed out to you that you "logic" just like Sarah Sweetcheeks 
?
If anyone looked at your posts and one of hers, they really would wonder 
who's was who's.
Are you both members of C.U.N.T.  ?

The fact that you refuse to look at the evidence already provided countless 
times, does not make anyone else a liar.
....It just makes you a fool.


9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.ae911truth.org

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 16:35 -0500
  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 22:46 +0100
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-20 17:13 -0500
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 23:39 +0100
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 19:14 -0400
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-20 19:38 -0400
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 06:36 +0100
            Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 13:22 -0500
              Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 22:33 +0000
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 17:52 -0500
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-25 23:48 +0000
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:40 -0500
                Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-26 06:42 +0000
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:04 -0500
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:00 -0500
  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-20 16:19 -0700
  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:15 -0500
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 17:54 -0400
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 19:45 -0400
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 21:07 -0400
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:34 -0500
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 14:46 -0500
        Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:34 -0400
          Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:45 -0500
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:38 -0400
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:12 -0500
  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:31 -0700
  Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 16:37 -0800
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-06 16:40 -0800
      Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-11-07 05:14 -0700
    Re: Donald Trump is sort of right. 9/11 was pre-planned "G=EMC^2TreBert" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 13:49 -0800

csiph-web