Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519762 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 202 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Rocky has no clue about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 19:46 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:19 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:48 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 21:32 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 22:39 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 06:06 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 07:17 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:53 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 08:08 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken "Chad Fistpumper" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-09 17:50 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:21 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 19:30 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
Re: die ass hat spammer, die jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 03:34 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:48 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:09 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 16:15 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 04:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 13:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth (More proof, if any were needed, that Roger is mentally ill) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
edtiem subjectum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:37 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Roger is not mentally able to answer questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:25 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 01:45 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000
Re: More Rocky fantasy Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500
Re: more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cqidnUHyuccnmWrInZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520098 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mss1u0$584$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>> While there were objections, these objections were ignored. >>> Everything was examined. Very closely. > >>But if you read that DNA tests were preformed on EVEY body part in a few >>weeks of the over 3000 people that "officially" were killed, in under 2 >>weeks. > > They did not. > > While they did identify* all but 5 people from the Pentagon and everyone > from Flight 93 (not always via DNA), only about 1000 total were ever > identified from the Twin Towers. > > (*) some body parts/DNA profiles were never linked to known people, these > are presumed to be from the hijackers. I HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE if you want Bast to see your reply you have to post to alt.astronomy. But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. DUH. And a great video that points out how many lies we were told about the Pentagon is: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw And if you are interested in the movie bloopers and blunders made by the 9/11 Hoaxsters see: news:ZKCdndHJ-JcNYmvInZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com... Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtka0e$hr$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #521078 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mss1u0$584$1@pcls7.std.com... >> While they did identify* all but 5 people from the Pentagon and everyone >> from Flight 93 (not always via DNA), only about 1000 total were ever >> identified from the Twin Towers. >> >> (*) some body parts/DNA profiles were never linked to known people, these >> are presumed to be from the hijackers. >I HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE if you want Bast to see your reply you have to post >to alt.astronomy. If Bast wants to read my posts, Bast knows what to do. >But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. DUH. You can't tell anyone's religion from DNA, k00k. However, they can tell ethnicity, and the unknown DNA was all likely Middle Eastern. And two of them were brothers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k9WdnbHXzpOtm2PInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522064 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtka0e$hr$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mss1u0$584$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>> While they did identify* all but 5 people from the Pentagon and everyone >>> from Flight 93 (not always via DNA), only about 1000 total were ever >>> identified from the Twin Towers. >>> >>> (*) some body parts/DNA profiles were never linked to known people, >>> these >>> are presumed to be from the hijackers. > >>I HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE if you want Bast to see your reply you have to post >>to alt.astronomy. > > If Bast wants to read my posts, Bast knows what to do. > >>But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. DUH. > > You can't tell anyone's religion from DNA, k00k. However, they can tell > ethnicity, and the unknown DNA was all likely Middle Eastern. And two > of them were brothers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9JudncFB6NxEmmPInZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522064 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtka0e$hr$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mss1u0$584$1@pcls7.std.com... > >>> While they did identify* all but 5 people from the Pentagon and everyone >>> from Flight 93 (not always via DNA), only about 1000 total were ever >>> identified from the Twin Towers. >>> >>> (*) some body parts/DNA profiles were never linked to known people, >>> these >>> are presumed to be from the hijackers. > >>I HAVE TOLD YOU BEFORE if you want Bast to see your reply you have to post >>to alt.astronomy. > > If Bast wants to read my posts, Bast knows what to do. > >>But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. DUH. > > You can't tell anyone's religion from DNA, k00k. However, they can tell > ethnicity, and the unknown DNA was all likely Middle Eastern. And two > of them were brothers. Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA proved those two stories were bogus and the lack of crash dynamics at in Nuke York City proved those two stories were bogus. Besides you have yet to tell me why there were survivors in the bottom floors of the North Tower and why nothing ended up in the basement. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was coming from in the above photo. See: http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2009/05/covering-ground-zero-with-dirt.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtlfoc$pd$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #522131 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mtka0e$hr$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. DUH. >> >> You can't tell anyone's religion from DNA, k00k. However, they can tell >> ethnicity, and the unknown DNA was all likely Middle Eastern. And two >> of them were brothers. >Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA WHAT lack of airplane parts, lying kook? They recovered 95% of each of the two planes!! >Besides you have yet to tell me why there were survivors in the bottom >floors of the North Tower As I already said before, a combination of an off-center collapse and some pure luck that the large mass of the collapsing building didn't strike the stairwell. > and why nothing ended up in the basement. <G> It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows. There was nothing magical about the ground lobby floor that would have withstood 110 floors of building collapsing onto it. The collapse continued, stopping only when it reached bedrock 70' below. As your photo shows, the debris filled the basement below the towers up to street level. Of course much of the concourse level away from the towers' bases remained standing. We don't need to repeat the dozen or so reasons that disprove the totally ridiculous "nuclear detonation" kooktardery. We already know nuclear bombs there are absolutely impossible. >Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was coming >from in the above photo. You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and effectively from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers! Stoopid kooktard!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jP6dnYJUMtPmS2PInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522153 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtlfoc$pd$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mtka0e$hr$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>But there was no DNA from Muslims and they failed to tell you that. >>>>DUH. >>> >>> You can't tell anyone's religion from DNA, k00k. However, they can tell >>> ethnicity, and the unknown DNA was all likely Middle Eastern. And two >>> of them were brothers. > >>Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA > > WHAT lack of airplane parts, lying kook? They recovered 95% of each of > the two planes!! riiight. Maybe they recovered 95% of the airplane that crashed but they never let us know it was really a scale model that crashed. Besides where is your supporting link? >>Besides you have yet to tell me why there were survivors in the bottom >>floors of the North Tower > > As I already said before, a combination of an off-center collapse and some > pure luck that the large mass of the collapsing building didn't strike > the stairwell. > >> and why nothing ended up in the basement. <G> > > It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows. riiight. There was nothing in the basements as other videos proved and how you could deduce what ended up in the basement from an above ground photo? Could it be that you took your physics lessons from Wile E. Coyote? > There was nothing magical about the ground lobby floor that would have > withstood 110 floors of building collapsing onto it. The collapse > continued, stopping only when it reached bedrock 70' below. As your > photo shows, the debris filled the basement below the towers up to street > level. And yet it couldn't crush the Survivors or the outside walls that were left standing strong. BTW I don't follow the version of physics that only happened on 9/11. > Of course much of the concourse level away from the towers' bases remained > standing. But those wall were directly under the exoskeleton of the Twin Towers. Not only does your bullshit fail to hold water but if there was any truth to it then why didn't NIST address the issue? Heck, NIST wasn't even allowed to address what remained of the Twin Towers because they are not consistent with a collapse. > We don't need to repeat the dozen or so reasons that disprove the > totally ridiculous "nuclear detonation" kooktardery. We already know > nuclear bombs there are absolutely impossible. Too bad you have to tell so many lies about what happened on 9/11 like the lie about "a combination of an off-center collapse and some pure luck that the large mass of the collapsing building didn't strike the stairwell." Off-center collapse only happens with 9/11 physics, pure luck only happens with 9/11 physics and what "large mass" when the Twin Towers were reduced to dust that was so fine it could float up instead of down? >>Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was >>coming >>from in the above photo. > > You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for > neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and effectively > from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers! Who said it was to remove any radioactivity? It was used to cover the areas where the nukes were detonated to keep the radioactivity from spreading too fast. And there is nothing scientific at all about your "off-center" collapse", "pure luck" or "large mass" without evidence of a large mass. <G> > Stoopid kooktard! But you are the one that stooped to using off-center physics, pure luck physics or talk about a "large mass" when the only big parts of the Twin Towers that survived were either above the vaporization area or below the vaporization area of a deep underground nuke. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtn2q4$o2q$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #522220 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mtlfoc$pd$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA >> >> WHAT lack of airplane parts, lying kook? They recovered 95% of each of >> the two planes!! >riiight. Maybe they recovered 95% of the airplane that crashed but they >never let us know it was really a scale model that crashed. There you go again, making up crap again. >Besides where is your supporting link? K00ktard, you never give supporting links for your "lack of airplane parts" claim or your "scale model" claim. And don't respond with the URL of a 4 hour kookvid. That's not support, that's just the uneducated claim of another kooktard. That is, assuming it's not a pack of lies, I just got through proving that kookvids contain tampered videos. But here's a bone for you anyway. http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp >> It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows. >riiight. There was nothing in the basements as other videos proved and how >you could deduce what ended up in the basement from an above ground photo? Your photo shows the top of the debris field about level with street which is just about exactly right considering the volume of debris the towers would generate. Where else would the debris be? Why would it not crash through into the bathtub? After all, 1.5 million tons (108,222 truckloads!) was removed from the site, so we know it was there. And of course, you have *never* produced a photo of untouched bottom levels of either tower, free of debris. No, not a part of the concourse 500 feet away, the lower levels of the towers. >> There was nothing magical about the ground lobby floor that would have >> withstood 110 floors of building collapsing onto it. The collapse >> continued, stopping only when it reached bedrock 70' below. As your >> photo shows, the debris filled the basement below the towers up to street >> level. >And yet it couldn't crush the Survivors or the outside walls that were left >standing strong. BTW I don't follow the version of physics that only >happened on 9/11. Sometimes dumb luck just happens. It just so happened the major mass of the towers didn't crush the stairway. Note that there was no similar "Stairwell B" in the South Tower. Not to mention, of course, a nuke would have vaporized Stairwell B and all within it. >> Of course much of the concourse level away from the towers' bases remained >> standing. >But those wall were directly under the exoskeleton of the Twin Towers. Not >only does your bullshit fail to hold water but if there was any truth to it >then why didn't NIST address the issue? >Heck, NIST wasn't even allowed to address what remained of the Twin Towers >because they are not consistent with a collapse. You're just babbling. And again, you never provided proof nothing fell into the basement levels of the towers. >>>Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was >>>coming >>>from in the above photo. >> >> You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for >> neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and effectively >> from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers! >Who said it was to remove any radioactivity? It was used to cover the areas >where the nukes were detonated to keep the radioactivity from spreading too >fast. Your second sentence contradicts your first. You're babbling again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <__6dnf8eGdspiGLInZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522266 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtn2q4$o2q$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mtlfoc$pd$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA >>> >>> WHAT lack of airplane parts, lying kook? They recovered 95% of each of >>> the two planes!! > >>riiight. Maybe they recovered 95% of the airplane that crashed but they >>never let us know it was really a scale model that crashed. > > There you go again, making up crap again. > >>Besides where is your supporting link? > > K00ktard, you never give supporting links for your "lack of airplane > parts" > claim or your "scale model" claim. And don't respond with the URL of a > 4 hour kookvid. That's not support, that's just the uneducated claim of > another kooktard. That is, assuming it's not a pack of lies, I just got > through proving that kookvids contain tampered videos. > > But here's a bone for you anyway. > http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp Just as I suspected all talk and no show which is consistant with BS on the go. >>> It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows. > >>riiight. There was nothing in the basements as other videos proved and >>how >>you could deduce what ended up in the basement from an above ground photo? > > Your photo shows the top of the debris field about level with street which > is just about exactly right considering the volume of debris the towers > would generate. But that is assuming it used the basement which it did not and again where is your link? <G> Oh and this time try to find a link with photographic evidence instead of a story obviously full of BS. > Where else would the debris be? Why would it not crash through into the > bathtub? After all, 1.5 million tons (108,222 truckloads!) was removed > from the site, so we know it was there. But how many of those truckloads were hauled in? We know from Judy Wood that the very first 105 dumptrucks hauled something in. And we know from another site that whatever was hauled in was placed on one of the spots where they found molten metal. > And of course, you have *never* produced a photo of untouched bottom > levels of either tower, free of debris. No, not a part of the concourse > 500 feet away, the lower levels of the towers. I've seen a video by WCBS that proved the basements of the Twin Towers were untouched just like the lower 6 floors of Stairwell B in the North Tower were untouched and that wasn't because of off-center physics or pure luck physics either they were just under the vaporization range of the nuke that was deep under WTC3. >>> There was nothing magical about the ground lobby floor that would have >>> withstood 110 floors of building collapsing onto it. The collapse >>> continued, stopping only when it reached bedrock 70' below. As your >>> photo shows, the debris filled the basement below the towers up to >>> street >>> level. > >>And yet it couldn't crush the Survivors or the outside walls that were >>left >>standing strong. BTW I don't follow the version of physics that only >>happened on 9/11. > > Sometimes dumb luck just happens. It just so happened the major mass of > the towers didn't crush the stairway. Note that there was no similar > "Stairwell B" in the South Tower. But the nuke that destroyed the South Tower was closer to the west side of the South Tower instead of the South side so they were not destroyed the exact same way. DUH > Not to mention, of course, a nuke would have vaporized Stairwell B and all > within it. If that nuke were even deeper in the bedrock it wouldn't have destroyed any part of the North Tower at all because it would have just made a great big cavity underground. As it was the blast went nearly up as proven by what was left of both of the Towers in the following photo: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> Of course much of the concourse level away from the towers' bases >>> remained >>> standing. > >>But those wall were directly under the exoskeleton of the Twin Towers. >>Not >>only does your bullshit fail to hold water but if there was any truth to >>it >>then why didn't NIST address the issue? > >>Heck, NIST wasn't even allowed to address what remained of the Twin Towers >>because they are not consistent with a collapse. > > You're just babbling. And again, you never provided proof nothing fell > into the basement levels of the towers. I proved the masive debris did not crush the Survivors or crush the wall at the bottom of the exoskeleton and you have failed to prove the debris made it by those two parts into the basement. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And you then you have not proven were all the dust came from that covered large parts of Manhattan Island. <G> >>>>Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was >>>>coming >>>>from in the above photo. >>> >>> You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for >>> neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and >>> effectively >>> from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers! > >>Who said it was to remove any radioactivity? It was used to cover the >>areas >>where the nukes were detonated to keep the radioactivity from spreading >>too >>fast. > > Your second sentence contradicts your first. You're babbling again. Radiation goes down on it's own. By now the place where the nukes were detonated is safe to enter and it has probably been that way for years. As a matter of fact since the nuke under WTC7 was clearly smaller than the nukes under WTC3 and WTC4 they could rebuild WTC7 a lot faster than they could rebuild the Twin Towers. And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist. <G> BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0 Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE And you can find even more if you go to: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <j9guvatdh0443a7avbuvqu1o8gb6fijccc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522274 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:22:15 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:mtn2q4$o2q$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mtlfoc$pd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>>Again, the lack of airplane parts around the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA
>>>>
>>>> WHAT lack of airplane parts, lying kook? They recovered 95% of each of
>>>> the two planes!!
>>
>>>riiight. Maybe they recovered 95% of the airplane that crashed but they
>>>never let us know it was really a scale model that crashed.
>>
>> There you go again, making up crap again.
>>
>>>Besides where is your supporting link?
>>
>> K00ktard, you never give supporting links for your "lack of airplane
>> parts"
>> claim or your "scale model" claim. And don't respond with the URL of a
>> 4 hour kookvid. That's not support, that's just the uneducated claim of
>> another kooktard. That is, assuming it's not a pack of lies, I just got
>> through proving that kookvids contain tampered videos.
>>
>> But here's a bone for you anyway.
>> http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
>
>Just as I suspected all talk and no show which is consistant with BS on the
>go.
>
I like how you ALWAYS deny the validity of that which PROVES you
wrong.
>>>> It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows.
>>
>>>riiight. There was nothing in the basements as other videos proved and
>>>how
>>>you could deduce what ended up in the basement from an above ground photo?
>>
>> Your photo shows the top of the debris field about level with street which
>> is just about exactly right considering the volume of debris the towers
>> would generate.
>
>But that is assuming it used the basement which it did not
Once again I'll ask, and once again you'll not answer, where is
your evidence for this claim?
>and again where
>is your link? <G> Oh and this time try to find a link with photographic
>evidence instead of a story obviously full of BS.
>
Wouldn't he first need to offer a story full of BS, obvious or
not?
>> Where else would the debris be? Why would it not crash through into the
>> bathtub? After all, 1.5 million tons (108,222 truckloads!) was removed
>> from the site, so we know it was there.
>
>But how many of those truckloads were hauled in?
Very little diatomaceous earth was brought in. No where near the
1.5 million tons of debris that was removed.
>We know from Judy Wood
She's the crazy woman who claims a picture taken almost a week
after 9/11 was taken the day of 9/11, right? And she claims an energy
weapon was used to bring down the twin towers as well, right?
This is the woman you give credibility? Really?
>that the very first 105 dumptrucks hauled something in. And we know from
>another site that whatever was hauled in was placed on one of the spots
>where they found molten metal.
Where is your link? <G>
>> And of course, you have *never* produced a photo of untouched bottom
>> levels of either tower, free of debris. No, not a part of the concourse
>> 500 feet away, the lower levels of the towers.
>
>I've seen a video by WCBS that proved the basements of the Twin Towers were
>untouched just like the lower 6 floors of Stairwell B in the North Tower
>were untouched and that wasn't because of off-center physics or pure luck
>physics either they were just under the vaporization range of the nuke that
>was deep under WTC3.
>
Where is your link? <G>
>>>> There was nothing magical about the ground lobby floor that would have
>>>> withstood 110 floors of building collapsing onto it. The collapse
>>>> continued, stopping only when it reached bedrock 70' below. As your
>>>> photo shows, the debris filled the basement below the towers up to
>>>> street level.
>>
>>>And yet it couldn't crush the Survivors or the outside walls that were
>>>left
>>>standing strong. BTW I don't follow the version of physics that only
>>>happened on 9/11.
>>
>> Sometimes dumb luck just happens. It just so happened the major mass of
>> the towers didn't crush the stairway. Note that there was no similar
>> "Stairwell B" in the South Tower.
>
>But the nuke that destroyed the South Tower was closer to the west side of
>the South Tower instead of the South side so they were not destroyed the
>exact same way. DUH
Still, it would have destroyed the whole of the lower levels on
its way up to the middle levels. DUH.
>
>> Not to mention, of course, a nuke would have vaporized Stairwell B and all
>> within it.
>
>If that nuke were even deeper in the bedrock it wouldn't have destroyed any
>part of the North Tower at all because it would have just made a great big
>cavity underground.
It would have. This is how we KNOW no nukes were used.
Had a cavity formed, everything above it would have collapsed into
it. This would leave a very noticeable indentation in the ground. No
such indentation is seen.
Once again you help to PROVE no nukes were used. Thank you for
your valuable assistance in proving no nukes were ever used.
>As it was the blast went nearly up as proven by what
>was left of both of the Towers in the following photo:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
Once again, that image PROVES your claims wrong.
Note the lack of any indentation in the ground.
>>>> Of course much of the concourse level away from the towers' bases
>>>> remained standing.
>>
>>>But those wall were directly under the exoskeleton of the Twin Towers.
>>>Not
>>>only does your bullshit fail to hold water but if there was any truth to
>>>it then why didn't NIST address the issue?
>>
>>>Heck, NIST wasn't even allowed to address what remained of the Twin Towers
>>>because they are not consistent with a collapse.
>>
>> You're just babbling. And again, you never provided proof nothing fell
>> into the basement levels of the towers.
>
>I proved the masive debris did not crush the Survivors or crush the wall at
>the bottom of the exoskeleton and you have failed to prove the debris made
>it by those two parts into the basement. <G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
See above.
>And you then you have not proven were all the dust came from that covered
>large parts of Manhattan Island. <G>
>
It's been PROVED a few times. Things like Drywall, some concrete,
and other pulverized material accounts for the dust. You already know
this, so the question becomes, what do you believe you gain with your
deceptive question?
Please don't waste time with your usual avoidance games. Answer
the question I asked.
>>>>>Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was
>>>>>coming from in the above photo.
>>>>
>>>> You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for
>>>> neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and
>>>> effectively from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers!
>>
>>>Who said it was to remove any radioactivity? It was used to cover the
>>>areas
>>>where the nukes were detonated to keep the radioactivity from spreading
>>>too fast.
>>
>> Your second sentence contradicts your first. You're babbling again.
>
>Radiation goes down on it's own. By now the place where the nukes were
>detonated is safe to enter and it has probably been that way for years. As
>a matter of fact since the nuke under WTC7 was clearly smaller than the
>nukes under WTC3 and WTC4 they could rebuild WTC7 a lot faster than they
>could rebuild the Twin Towers.
>
Or, as is the case in reality, #7 was already planned to be
brought down due to black mold and asbestos. Most of the plans to
rebuild were in existence. This saved a great deal of time, allowing
reconstruction to begin quickly.
Since there were no plans to bring down the twin towers, there
were no plans to rebuild.
>And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly
>trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was
>dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist.
><G>
>
>BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY
>
Damn that Michael J. Fox! He was behind it all!
Parkinson's my ass! His tremors are the result of the guilt he's
hiding for masterminding the who 9/11 attacks.
>JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY
>
Naturally Christopher Lloyd (Doc Brown) had a part in it.
>Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0
>
Well, that prove it. Crispin Glover was one of the rank and file
members of this vast conspiracy!
>Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE
>
Not Lea Thompson as well? Damn her!
At least James Tolkan (Mr. Strickland) appears to have been
innocent in the matter.
>And you can find even more if you go to:
> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future
Not James Tolkan too? Now his baldness makes sense. It was all
due to 9/11 radiation!
For the benefit of Roger, since his learning disability is very real:
I'm being sarcastic. But my claims are every bit as valid as
yours. That is, not at all.
I have no doubt that if I were to devote the time, effort and
energy, I could find completely unrelated items that a mentally ill
person would believe connects to 9/11.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #522274 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mtn2q4$o2q$1@pcls7.std.com... >> But here's a bone for you anyway. >> http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp >Just as I suspected all talk and no show which is consistant with BS on the >go. Just like you, kook. Demand a link and when there is one that proves you wrong, you brush it off. >>>> It did end up in the basement, raving kook, as your photo shows. >> >>>riiight. There was nothing in the basements as other videos proved and Link? >But that is assuming it used the basement which it did not and again where >is your link? <G> Oh and this time try to find a link with photographic >evidence instead of a story obviously full of BS. It is your claim that there was nothing in the basement. You provide the link. And again, below the towers, not 500' away. >> Where else would the debris be? Why would it not crash through into the >> bathtub? After all, 1.5 million tons (108,222 truckloads!) was removed >> from the site, so we know it was there. >But how many of those truckloads were hauled in? I already accounted for the trivial 120 truckloads you say were hauled in. That's why I said 108,222 truckloads were hauled out, not 108,342 truckloads (official figure). > We know from Judy Wood HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! >that the very first 105 dumptrucks hauled something in. I thought you said 120 truckloads? Regardless, 105 or 120 truckloads is trivial compared to 108,342 truckloads hauled out. Even you, as a failed trucker, should understand that. > And we know from >another site that whatever was hauled in was placed on one of the spots >where they found molten metal. What molten metal? Image? (and no, not the excavator holding red-hot something, I mean actual molten metal) >> And of course, you have *never* produced a photo of untouched bottom >> levels of either tower, free of debris. No, not a part of the concourse >> 500 feet away, the lower levels of the towers. >I've seen a video by WCBS that proved the basements of the Twin Towers were >untouched Link? There's no way anyone will believe your broken brain when you say you saw something. >> Not to mention, of course, a nuke would have vaporized Stairwell B and all >> within it. >If that nuke were even deeper in the bedrock it wouldn't have destroyed any >part of the North Tower at all because it would have just made a great big >cavity underground. And the cavity would have collapsed, producing a 1200' crater. >> You're just babbling. And again, you never provided proof nothing fell >> into the basement levels of the towers. >I proved the masive debris did not crush the Survivors or crush the wall at >the bottom of the exoskeleton and you have failed to prove the debris made >it by those two parts into the basement. <G> You keep claiming nothing fell into the basement levels yet you haven't yet provided any support for this whatsoever. So I'll ask again: Link? >And you then you have not proven were all the dust came from that covered >large parts of Manhattan Island. <G> We all know that the trivial amount of dust (trivial compared to 1.5 million tons) came from pulverized drywall and concrete. >>>>>Or why there was so much M291 resin spread on the areas the haze was >>>>>coming >>>>>from in the above photo. >>>> >>>> You don't even know what "M291 resin" is. It's for the military for >>>> neutralizing and removing chemical warfare agents quickly and >>>> effectively >>>> from the skin, not for removing radioactivity from World Trade Centers! >> >>>Who said it was to remove any radioactivity? It was used to cover the >>>areas >>>where the nukes were detonated to keep the radioactivity from spreading >>>too >>>fast. >> >> Your second sentence contradicts your first. You're babbling again. >Radiation goes down on it's own. By now the place where the nukes were >detonated is safe to enter and it has probably been that way for years. As >a matter of fact since the nuke under WTC7 was clearly smaller than the >nukes under WTC3 and WTC4 they could rebuild WTC7 a lot faster than they >could rebuild the Twin Towers. You're babbling. M291 resin has nothing to do with radioactivity, it's for chemical warfare agent first aid (VX, mustard gas etc.) If there was a nuclear device, the area couldn't be entered for about 70 days, yet rescuers were there the first day and the freaking President of the United States was there the third day!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <xLydndT6jPkw6GLInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522408 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't notice. <G> And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist. <G> BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0 Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE And you can find even more if you go to: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mto39a$9f0$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #522418 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... >Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't >notice. <G> I have no idea whether those are more 4 hour kookvids, some sort of parody or paranoia-soaked ravings that "Back to the Future" movies somehow predicted 9/11, but I am not curious enough to look. URLs were deleted unwatched.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oeKdnaDnROl-e2LInZ2dnUU7-LOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522429 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mto39a$9f0$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... > >>Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't >>notice. <G> > > I have no idea whether those are more 4 hour kookvids, some sort of parody > or paranoia-soaked ravings that "Back to the Future" movies somehow > predicted 9/11, but I am not curious enough to look. URLs were deleted > unwatched. ROTFLMAO because there was clearly no prediction whatsoever in Back to the Future. It is sort of like this video: 9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment Planes Hit Towers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc Don't forget that the group of people that had CGIs added to videos of Nuke York City could also make movies about Nuke York City ahead of time so that is what they did. DUH. Put back in again for someone that spends so much time denying the evidence. And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist. <G> BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0 Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE And you can find even more if you go to: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future ======================================================== Given that everything else points to the use of nukes in Nuke York City including the sudden shaking of the North Tower, why Ground Zero was really Ground Zero and the fact that seismic reading can be tainted you might want to watch the following video if you can not watch any of the other videos above: 9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment Planes Hit Towers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4sWdnVasv7_4yJ3LnZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522453 |
"dmaster" <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:39fda942-d4e5-45ad-869e-a66686610890@googlegroups.com... On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 6:15:48 AM UTC-5, Rocky wrote: ... > 9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment > Planes > Hit Towers > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc > > Rocky Come on folks, if anyone had any thought that Rocky might actually, seriously believe anything he has been promoting about 9/11, this ought to dispel that notion for good. He is yanking your chain. When his latest nuttiness is wearing thin, ta da! something even nuttier. He has got to be trolling to see just how far you are willing to chase him. Dan (Woj...) ========================= ROTFLMAO because you have been in a constant state of denial for 14 years and the sad thing is there are more and more facts coming out that you are the idiot and not those that doubted the official bullshit about the alleged hijackers. And not only that I've caught you in a world of lies trying to support the lies of the media and the government. <G> 9/11 Exposed - 2nd Edition (2015) Full Documentary Film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXRDq9nKJ0U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <89o00bdqtq10au9c83s650uol1b6vhkmom@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522453 |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:14:55 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:mto39a$9f0$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>
>>>Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't
>>>notice. <G>
>>
>> I have no idea whether those are more 4 hour kookvids, some sort of parody
>> or paranoia-soaked ravings that "Back to the Future" movies somehow
>> predicted 9/11, but I am not curious enough to look. URLs were deleted
>> unwatched.
>
>ROTFLMAO because there was clearly no prediction whatsoever in Back to the
>Future. It is sort of like this video:
>
>9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment Planes
>Hit Towers
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc
>
>Don't forget that the group of people that had CGIs added to videos of Nuke
>York City could also make movies about Nuke York City ahead of time so that
>is what they did. DUH.
>
No CGIs were used. You've helped me to PROVE this.
>Put back in again for someone that spends so much time denying the evidence.
>
>And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly
>trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was
>dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist.
><G>
>
I don't recall the religion of the characters being mentioned. I
think you're falling victim to your own anti-Muslim bigotry. But I
will examine any and all evidence you present for your claim.
>BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY
>
>JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY
>
>Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0
>
>Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE
>
>And you can find even more if you go to:
> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future
>
>========================================================
>
>Given that everything else points to the use of nukes in Nuke York City
Nothing points to the use of nukes in NYC. You've helped me to
PROVE none were used.
>including the sudden shaking of the North Tower, why Ground Zero was really
>Ground Zero and the fact that seismic reading can be tainted you might want
>to watch the following video if you can not watch any of the other videos
>above:
>
>9-11 ON CLOCKS IN OVER A DOZEN MOVIES SINCE THE 60s !!! & Live Moment Planes
>Hit Towers
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtNBgxS04Uc
>
I imagine that if I devoted the time, I could find 6:02 in over a
dozen movies since the 60s. It won't mean anything, of course.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mtpl4q$af2$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #522418 |
On 21/09/2015 04:11, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... > > Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't > notice. <G> > > And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly > trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown was > dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist. > <G> > > BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY > > JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY > > Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0 > > Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE > > And you can find even more if you go to: > https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future > > Why did you remove most of his post, was the content embarrassing to you? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <I6WdnapxB56A9p3LnZ2dnUU7-UGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522531 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mtpl4q$af2$3@dont-email.me... > On 21/09/2015 04:11, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... >> >> Funny that you removed the following from your reply as if I wouldn't >> notice. <G> >> >> And do not forget about the following videos because somebody was clearly >> trying to tell us something. And do not forget in the video Doc Brown >> was >> dealing with Nuclear Terrorist and on top of that even Muslim Terrorist. >> <G> >> >> BACK TO THE FUTURE predicts 9/11 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY >> >> JFK and 9/11 in Back to the Future - Hidden Messages In Plain Sight >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFM02ItYKbY >> >> Back To the FUTURE 3: DECODED ? 1990 is 11 Years To 9/11 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB641NgMMZ0 >> >> Back to the Future Movie Decoded FULL VERSION >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_P_wLBxpYE >> >> And you can find even more if you go to: >> https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+back+to+the+future >> >> > > > Why did you remove most of his post, was the content embarrassing to you? I already replied to that part of the post. I also wanted to point out the stuff that he removed from his reply mr T-ANNOY.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <muWdndwudYMQj53LnZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522408 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >>If that nuke were even deeper in the bedrock it wouldn't have destroyed >>any >>part of the North Tower at all because it would have just made a great big >>cavity underground. > > And the cavity would have collapsed, producing a 1200' crater. link? From what I've seen 150 kt nuke would only create a cavity about 100 meters wide or about 25% of your bad guess. And it wasn't directly under the Twin Towers either it was off to one side. But the reason it wasn't 100 meters across was because once it found a way out the top of the cavity the blast went up instead. BTW I'm still looking for something you said that I found a video for. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mtpl4n$af2$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #522469 |
On 21/09/2015 15:21, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mtnnaf$n8t$2@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> >>> If that nuke were even deeper in the bedrock it wouldn't have destroyed >>> any >>> part of the North Tower at all because it would have just made a great big >>> cavity underground. >> >> And the cavity would have collapsed, producing a 1200' crater. > > link? > > From what I've seen 150 kt nuke would only create a cavity about 100 meters > wide or about 25% of your bad guess. And it wasn't directly under the Twin > Towers either it was off to one side. > What have you seen, link? > But the reason it wasn't 100 meters across was because once it found a way > out the top of the cavity the blast went up instead. > > BTW I'm still looking for something you said that I found a video for. > > Rocky > > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) |
| Message-ID | <Ksydncq5bbMbgWLInZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522266 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
news:mtn2q4$o2q$1@pcls7.std.com...
>
> But here's a bone for you anyway.
> http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
"STONYCREEK, Pa. -- The FBI said yesterday that it has finished its work at
the crash scene of United Flight 93 after recovering about 95 percent of the
downed airliner and concluding that explosives were not responsible for
bringing it down."
-----
Explosives were certainly not responsible for bringing down Flight 93
because someone forced it to land in Cleveland with a different flight
number.
So in reality 100% of Flight 93 was recovered and on top of that Flight 93
was even recovered intact.
See, that is exactly why your link needed photos so we knew they were not
just playing with the fact that the real Flight 93 landed safely in
Cleveland just like someone broadcasted on the news on 9/11/01. <G>
All you have done is piled your BS higher and deeper now that you claim
there is off-center physics and pure luck physics.
Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web