Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #520597 > unrolled thread

Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:34 -0500
    Re: Rocky still batshit crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 04:14 +0000
      Re: Rocky still batshit crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:32 -0400
        Re: Rocky still batshit crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:22 -0400
          Re: Rocky still batshit crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 10:28 -0400
            Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:49 -0500
            Re: Rocky still batshit crazy "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:44 -0500
              Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid caught in a BIG LIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:00 -0500
                Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid caught in a BIG LIE) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 19:10 -0400
                  Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid caught in a BIG LIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:27 -0500
                Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid caught in a BIG LIE) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:18 -0500
                  Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 07:34 -0500
                    Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:35 +0000
                      Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in a BIG LIE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:50 -0500
                        Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in a BIG LIE ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 18:49 +0000
                          Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 14:13 -0500
                            Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 19:50 +0000
                              Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 15:24 -0500
                                Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 16:05 +0000
                            Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 21:09 +0000
                            Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 15:42 +0000
                      Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( More on Michael's BIG LIE about the wide shot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:30 -0500
                        Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( More on Michael's BIG LIE about the wide shot ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 19:17 +0000
                          Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( More on Michael's BIG LIE about the wide shot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 14:33 -0500
                            Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 21:14 +0000
                          Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( More on Michael's BIG LIE about the wide shot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 14:55 -0500
                            Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( More on Michael's BIG LIE about the wide shot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 15:01 -0500
                    Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:35 -0500
                      Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid caught trying to run from his BIG LIEs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
                        Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Roger is caught lying yet again. Or is that still?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:11 -0500
                          Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid is caught lying yet again. Or is that still?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 16:16 -0500
                            Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  (Kid is caught lying yet again. Or is that still?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:42 -0500
                    Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 07:05 -0400
              Re: Rocky still batshit crazy "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 19:02 -0400
                Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:23 -0500
                  Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:46 -0400
                  Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-14 00:22 -0400
                    Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 23:51 -0500
                      Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-14 13:49 -0400
                        Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:59 -0500
            Re: Rocky still batshit crazy BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-14 09:54 -0400
              Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Now The 9/11 Hijacker Hoax Movie blunders ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:16 -0500
          Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:40 -0500
            Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:44 -0500
              Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:05 -0500
                Re: Ping FFN and jimp:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:19 -0500

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#520597 — Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers

To FFN and jimp

You both know I will not even open your post but I might make an exception 
for post on this thread considering the size of your post is kept as small 
as possible.

So what is your story about what remained of the Twin Towers and you can't 
claim anything went into the basements because nothing did.

And you also have to consider the fact there were about a dozen survivors in 
the North Tower and free standing walls of both the Twin Towers.

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep underground 
nukes were detonated?  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#520617 — Re: Rocky still batshit crazy

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep underground 
> nukes were detonated?  <G>

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Everything else is kook babble.

Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520646 — Re: Rocky still batshit crazy

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep
>> underground nukes were detonated?  <G>
>
> The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
>
> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
> almost 2 hours later.
>
> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
> western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
>
> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>
> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
> collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
> and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.
>
> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>
> Everything else is kook babble.
>
> Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?



Anatomy Of A Great Deception
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520680 — Re: Rocky still batshit crazy

In article <mt3mpc$cdq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep
> >> underground nukes were detonated?  <G>
> >
> > The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
> >
> > Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
> > which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
> > almost 2 hours later.
> >
> > One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
> > western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
> >
> > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
> > that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
> >
> > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
> > collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
> > and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.
> >
> > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
> >
> > Everything else is kook babble.
> >
> > Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?
> 
> 
> 
> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc

A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".

Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the 
ridiculous claims made in it.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520683 — Re: Rocky still batshit crazy

BDK wrote:
> In article <mt3mpc$cdq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep
>>>> underground nukes were detonated?  <G>
>>>
>>> The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
>>>
>>> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
>>> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings
>>> collapesed almost 2 hours later.
>>>
>>> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of
>>> the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
>>>
>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>
>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>> collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
>>> and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.
>>>
>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>> Everything else is kook babble.
>>>
>>> Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?
>>
>>
>>
>> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>
> A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".
>
> Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the
> ridiculous claims made in it.





You mean VERIFIED claims.....that will seem ridiculous to those who would 
rather live happly with a lie.

But, okay,...point out ONE fact mentioned in the video that you can actually 
disprove.
Merely saying it's wrong, or resorting to insulting me, doesn't 
count.....Unless you are 4 years old. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520688

"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mt412n$j3u$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> BDK wrote:
>> In article <mt3mpc$cdq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep
>>>>> underground nukes were detonated?  <G>
>>>>
>>>> The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
>>>>
>>>> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
>>>> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings
>>>> collapesed almost 2 hours later.
>>>>
>>>> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of
>>>> the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
>>>>
>>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>>> collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
>>>> and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.
>>>>
>>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on
>>>> 9/11.
>>>>
>>>> Everything else is kook babble.
>>>>
>>>> Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>>
>> A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".
>>
>> Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the
>> ridiculous claims made in it.
>
>
>
>
>
> You mean VERIFIED claims.....that will seem ridiculous to those who would 
> rather live happly with a lie.
>
> But, okay,...point out ONE fact mentioned in the video that you can 
> actually disprove.
> Merely saying it's wrong, or resorting to insulting me, doesn't 
> count.....Unless you are 4 years old.

Not only that but the fact that most the videos taken with a CGI added to 
them didn't show much of the South Tower after the alleged impact because 
they didn't want to show thermate cutting out the roadrunner shaped holes.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520726 — Re: Rocky still batshit crazy

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 10:28:21 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:

>BDK wrote:
>> In article <mt3mpc$cdq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>
>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze comes from where three deep
>>>>> underground nukes were detonated?  <G>
>>>>
>>>> The facts are some airliners were hijacked.
>>>>
>>>> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
>>>> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings
>>>> collapesed almost 2 hours later.
>>>>
>>>> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of
>>>> the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
>>>>
>>>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
>>>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet.
>>>>
>>>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the
>>>> collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
>>>> and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.
>>>>
>>>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on
>>>> 9/11.
>>>>
>>>> Everything else is kook babble.
>>>>
>>>> Have you found a job yet, delusional, bat shit crazy, stalker?
>>>
>>>
>>> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>>
>> A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".
>>
>> Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the
>> ridiculous claims made in it.
>
>
>
>You mean VERIFIED claims.....that will seem ridiculous to those who would 
>rather live happly with a lie.
>
>But, okay,...point out ONE fact mentioned in the video that you can actually 
>disprove.
>Merely saying it's wrong, or resorting to insulting me, doesn't 
>count.....Unless you are 4 years old. 
>

     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
the truth?

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520741 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers (Kid caught in a BIG LIE)

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:bvgbval9h2609i03uq1k2m4kes2dkr92hg@4ax.com...
>
>     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
> the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
> you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
> the truth?

And what about you when you were faced with the fact that there was no jet 
in the wide shot by Chopper 5.  See:

>07 - The Key
>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s

You came up with the stupid remark of:  "Do you have any idea how much area 
a plane traveling between 300 and 500 MPH covers?"

And all  you really had to do to see how big your bullshit was was to keep 
watching that video because after they showed the missing jet they showed 
what a big liar a person just like you was.  <G>

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520849 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers (Kid caught in a BIG LIE)

Rocky wrote:
> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bvgbval9h2609i03uq1k2m4kes2dkr92hg@4ax.com...
>>
>>     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
>> the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
>> you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
>> the truth?
>
> And what about you when you were faced with the fact that there was no
> jet in the wide shot by Chopper 5.  See:
>
>> 07 - The Key
>> ( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>
> You came up with the stupid remark of:  "Do you have any idea how much
> area a plane traveling between 300 and 500 MPH covers?"
>
> And all  you really had to do to see how big your bullshit was was to
> keep watching that video because after they showed the missing jet they
> showed what a big liar a person just like you was.  <G>
>
> Rocky







Even if the cameraman had moved to a tight shot on the tower.
The pilot of the helicopter would have certainly been paying attention to 
the airspace around him, and seen a plane approaching and yelled something 
to draw attention to it.

However it's easy enough to see in the video that there was nothing in the 
wide shot for anyone to see.
Which is WHY he zoomed in. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520855 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers (Kid caught in a BIG LIE)

"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mt4vmd$cl7$1@dont-email.me...
>
>
> Rocky wrote:
>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:bvgbval9h2609i03uq1k2m4kes2dkr92hg@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
>>> the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
>>> you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
>>> the truth?
>>
>> And what about you when you were faced with the fact that there was no
>> jet in the wide shot by Chopper 5.  See:
>>
>>> 07 - The Key
>>> ( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>>
>> You came up with the stupid remark of:  "Do you have any idea how much
>> area a plane traveling between 300 and 500 MPH covers?"
>>
>> And all  you really had to do to see how big your bullshit was was to
>> keep watching that video because after they showed the missing jet they
>> showed what a big liar a person just like you was.  <G>
>>
>> Rocky
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Even if the cameraman had moved to a tight shot on the tower.
> The pilot of the helicopter would have certainly been paying attention to 
> the airspace around him, and seen a plane approaching and yelled something 
> to draw attention to it.
>
> However it's easy enough to see in the video that there was nothing in the 
> wide shot for anyone to see.
> Which is WHY he zoomed in.

Yep, that missing jet in the wide show is obviously evidence that the media 
used CGIs on 9/11 because they didn't need any airplanes at all to destroy 
the Twin Towers and WTC7 the way they did.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520969 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers (Kid caught in a BIG LIE)

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:00:01 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:bvgbval9h2609i03uq1k2m4kes2dkr92hg@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>>>>
>>>> A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".
>>>>
>>>> Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the
>>>> ridiculous claims made in it.
>>>
>>>
>>>You mean VERIFIED claims.....that will seem ridiculous to those who would 
>>>rather live happly with a lie.
>>>
>>>But, okay,...point out ONE fact mentioned in the video that you can actually 
>>>disprove.
>>>Merely saying it's wrong, or resorting to insulting me, doesn't 
>>>count.....Unless you are 4 years old. 
>>>
>>
>>     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
>>the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
>>you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
>>the truth?
>
>And what about you when you were faced with the fact that there was no jet 
>in the wide shot by Chopper 5.  See:
>
>>07 - The Key
>>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>
>You came up with the stupid remark of:  "Do you have any idea how much area 
>a plane traveling between 300 and 500 MPH covers?"
>
>And all  you really had to do to see how big your bullshit was was to keep 
>watching that video because after they showed the missing jet they showed 
>what a big liar a person just like you was.  <G>

     How does this prove Bast's position about the accuracy of the
video s/he linked to above? Be specific.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520997 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE )

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:a74dvap8mfbmms5qtou2jgrqdphaqndlrj@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:00:01 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:bvgbval9h2609i03uq1k2m4kes2dkr92hg@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>>> Anatomy Of A Great Deception
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc
>>>>>
>>>>> A better title would be "Anatomy of a desent into kOOktardism".
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another stupid Troofer video. Only the gullible will fall for the
>>>>> ridiculous claims made in it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You mean VERIFIED claims.....that will seem ridiculous to those who 
>>>>would
>>>>rather live happly with a lie.
>>>>
>>>>But, okay,...point out ONE fact mentioned in the video that you can 
>>>>actually
>>>>disprove.
>>>>Merely saying it's wrong, or resorting to insulting me, doesn't
>>>>count.....Unless you are 4 years old.
>>>>
>>>
>>>     It befalls the maker of the video or his/her agent(s) to prove
>>>the claims valid. It is not the burden of BDK to disprove them. Will
>>>you prove them valid, or continue to prove you can't prove a lie to be
>>>the truth?
>>
>>And what about you when you were faced with the fact that there was no jet
>>in the wide shot by Chopper 5.  See:
>>
>>>07 - The Key
>>>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
>>> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s
>>
>>You came up with the stupid remark of:  "Do you have any idea how much 
>>area
>>a plane traveling between 300 and 500 MPH covers?"
>>
>>And all  you really had to do to see how big your bullshit was was to keep
>>watching that video because after they showed the missing jet they showed
>>what a big liar a person just like you was.  <G>
>
>     How does this prove Bast's position about the accuracy of the
> video s/he linked to above? Be specific.

We were talking about the accuracy of your bullshit that you used to deny 
the fact the CGI should have been in the wide shot idiot.  Because the 
person that made the claim in the above video proved the jet should have 
been in the wide shot in that same video you idiot.

Not only was your BS already taken care of in the above video but even math 
proves the jet would not have disappeared from view by using a zoom out 
because the jet was way too big in the narrow shot.  <G>

BTW according to the following Live Free or Die Hard (2007) had 104 movie 
mistakes.
 http://www.moviemistakes.com/film6823

The Prime Time 9/11 hijacker's movie also had a bunch of movie mistakes and 
that was the easiest way to see it was just a movie from day one.

So in other words your complete failure to catch any of the 9/11 the prime 
time movie mistakes ended up making you a total idiot.

Now talking about the 9/11 Prime Time Hijacker Movie mistakes see:

9/11 and Media Fakery
 http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html

Or this one:
 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+the+ball

Or this one:
9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg

Or this one:
07 - The Key
 https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?list=PLEA05F393EC843D80

Or this one:
9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

Or this one:
Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U

Or this one:
Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
 https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s

Oh, and I can't forget this media fcukup
9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ

Ad oddly enough I think I heard Jamie Mcintyre say that on TV and that
changed my mind from thinking we were lied to about the Pentagon to knowing
we were lied to about the Pentagon.

Or this media fcuk up by the BBC:
9/11 BBC World News Reports World Trade Center Tower 7 Collapse Before it
Happens
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx4p9pUREZ8

Keep in mind Jane Stanley in the above video was claiming that WTC7 
collapsed but you can see WTC7 standing behind her.

"9/11 was a big lie, and the media showed us a poorly made film."

Sadly I also recently learned that  "Reason and evidence can't change ones 
opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to 
start with." so you are pretty much going to be a big liar for the rest of 
your life because lies are needed to maintain lies despite who started the 
lies.
 http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1412144-1561.htm

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521079 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Kid caught running from his BIG LIE )

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>We were talking about the accuracy of your bullshit that you used to deny 
>the fact the CGI should have been in the wide shot idiot.  Because the 
>person that made the claim in the above video proved the jet should have 
>been in the wide shot in that same video you idiot.

The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not flying
level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes, descending
at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.

Regardless, hundreds if not thousands of video cameras were fixed on the
World Trade Center at that time.  They all recorded a jet crashing into 
the South Tower.  Thousands of New Yorkers staring at the towers saw that
as well.  As did millions of people watching TV news, who saw it *live*.
That makes it quite certain that a jet crashed into the South Tower.
Arguing that a minor question with one of the thousand videos when the 
others (and that one as well) showed a jet crash into the South Tower is
insane nitpicking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521082 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in a BIG LIE )

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mt70hh$pqr$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>We were talking about the accuracy of your bullshit that you used to deny
>>the fact the CGI should have been in the wide shot idiot.  Because the
>>person that made the claim in the above video proved the jet should have
>>been in the wide shot in that same video you idiot.
>
> The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
> because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not flying
> level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes, descending
> at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.

Oh bullshit and I have two links to prove that below.

> Regardless, hundreds if not thousands of video cameras were fixed on the
> World Trade Center at that time.  They all recorded a jet crashing into
> the South Tower.  Thousands of New Yorkers staring at the towers saw that
> as well.  As did millions of people watching TV news, who saw it *live*.
> That makes it quite certain that a jet crashed into the South Tower.
> Arguing that a minor question with one of the thousand videos when the
> others (and that one as well) showed a jet crash into the South Tower is
> insane nitpicking.

TOO BAD THAT ONE MAJOR SCREW UP CAST A DOUBT ON EVERYTHING 9/11

As a matter of fact the jet that is missing in the wide shot is the very 
first thing in the following list and then you can see a lot more about the 
missing CGI if you go to the video listed below called "07 - The Key" and 
fast forward it to 4:04.

9/11 and Media Fakery
 http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html

This will give you a list of videos that show that some people replaced a
CGI of a jet with a CGI of a ball instead.
 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+the+ball

9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg

9/11 Pentagon Special Effects - Jim Fetzer
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKKZY2zpYiU

07 - The Key
 https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?list=PLEA05F393EC843D80

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U

Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
 https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s

9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ

Ad oddly enough I think I heard Jamie Mcintyre say that on TV and that
changed my mind from thinking we were lied to about the Pentagon to knowing
we were lied to about the Pentagon.

9/11 BBC World News Reports World Trade Center Tower 7 Collapse
 Before it Happens
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx4p9pUREZ8

Keep in mind Jane Stanley in the above video was claiming that WTC7
collapsed but you can see WTC7 standing behind her.

Sadly I also recently learned that  "Reason and evidence can't change ones
opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to
start with." so the 9/11 hoaxsters are pretty much going to be big liars for
the rest of their lives because lies are needed to maintain lies despite who
started the lies.
 http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1412144-1561.htm

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521106 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in a BIG LIE )

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:


>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mt70hh$pqr$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>We were talking about the accuracy of your bullshit that you used to deny
>>>the fact the CGI should have been in the wide shot idiot.  Because the
>>>person that made the claim in the above video proved the jet should have
>>>been in the wide shot in that same video you idiot.
>>
>> The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
>> because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not flying
>> level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes, descending
>> at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.

>Oh bullshit and I have two links to prove that below.

If you actually have any proof, let's hear it.  Some vacuum-head yammering
away on a kook video is not proof.  You've already demonstrated the total
lack of knowledge of your "experts" with your Russian "expert" who doesn't
have a clue what a nuclear blast wave does.  (I'm *still* laughing!)  The
descent info is from FAA records tracking the plane.
 
>> Regardless, hundreds if not thousands of video cameras were fixed on the
>> World Trade Center at that time.  They all recorded a jet crashing into
>> the South Tower.  Thousands of New Yorkers staring at the towers saw that
>> as well.  As did millions of people watching TV news, who saw it *live*.
>> That makes it quite certain that a jet crashed into the South Tower.
>> Arguing that a minor question with one of the thousand videos when the
>> others (and that one as well) showed a jet crash into the South Tower is
>> insane nitpicking.

>TOO BAD THAT ONE MAJOR SCREW UP CAST A DOUBT ON EVERYTHING 9/11

No major screwup.  Thousands of cameras caught UA 175 crashing into the
south tower.  Millions saw it live.  No denying that boatload of evidence!  
Except by insane brainwashed kooktards.

>As a matter of fact the jet that is missing in the wide shot is the very 
>first thing in the following list and then you can see a lot more about the 
>missing CGI if you go to the video listed below called "07 - The Key" and 
>fast forward it to 4:04.

>9/11 and Media Fakery
> http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html

Yup. He plots it coming in _dead level_ and wonders where it was when he
extrapolates its position back in time coming in dead level with the
impact level.  That's because he didn't look up.  Of course he couldn't
look up, the camera didn't look up.  It was focusing on the North Tower,
not looking for a second plane.

>This will give you a list of videos that show that some people replaced a
>CGI of a jet with a CGI of a ball instead.

I am not interested in the videos you kooktards shrank and compressed to
the point where the incoming plane is no longer recognizable.

>9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?

MPEG artifact, most likely.  What was the make/model of that videocamera
and what method does it use for video compression?

<snip list of kook videos>

When you come up with actual evidence, let's see it.  I am not watching
multiple 4 hour kook videos.

>Sadly I also recently learned that  "Reason and evidence can't change ones
>opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to
>start with."

You don't know how amazingly well this applies to you, Rocky.

> so the 9/11 hoaxsters are pretty much going to be big liars for
>the rest of their lives because lies are needed to maintain lies despite who
>started the lies.

Yup. You kooktards will go to your graves disbelieving the simple fact 
that a bunch of hijackers hijacked four airliners and deliberately crashed
them, causing enormous damage.  But why are you 9/11 hoaxters trying to
perpetrate your hoax on everyone in the first place?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521111 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs )

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mt74rj$drc$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mt70hh$pqr$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>We were talking about the accuracy of your bullshit that you used to 
>>>>deny
>>>>the fact the CGI should have been in the wide shot idiot.  Because the
>>>>person that made the claim in the above video proved the jet should have
>>>>been in the wide shot in that same video you idiot.
>>>
>>> The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
>>> because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not 
>>> flying
>>> level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes, 
>>> descending
>>> at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.
>
>>Oh bullshit and I have two links to prove that below.
>
> If you actually have any proof, let's hear it.  Some vacuum-head yammering
> away on a kook video is not proof.  You've already demonstrated the total
> lack of knowledge of your "experts" with your Russian "expert" who doesn't
> have a clue what a nuclear blast wave does.  (I'm *still* laughing!)  The
> descent info is from FAA records tracking the plane.

Wait a second.  I've asked you to come forward with information from nukes 
that are detonated underground in solid rock and you have not so all you 
continue to do is give me bullshit from above ground nukes or nukes 
detonated in dirt.

You fcuked yourself up on that one and you are misleading a lot of others in 
the process.

And AGAIN if the following was not done by deep underground nukes then how 
was it done where a building could collapse, not crush the survivors in 
floors 2-6 of stairwell B, leave free standing walls and not end up in the 
basement either?
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And don't forget their was a way to set off nukes without leaving a seismic 
record and that was to have the cavities already there.

And your bullshit about the radiation was faced with the fact they didn't 
test the soil samples at GZ and they certainly didn't take the samples from 
anywhere near where the haze in the following photo is either.  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


>>> Regardless, hundreds if not thousands of video cameras were fixed on the
>>> World Trade Center at that time.  They all recorded a jet crashing into
>>> the South Tower.  Thousands of New Yorkers staring at the towers saw 
>>> that
>>> as well.  As did millions of people watching TV news, who saw it *live*.
>>> That makes it quite certain that a jet crashed into the South Tower.
>>> Arguing that a minor question with one of the thousand videos when the
>>> others (and that one as well) showed a jet crash into the South Tower is
>>> insane nitpicking.
>
>>TOO BAD THAT ONE MAJOR SCREW UP CAST A DOUBT ON EVERYTHING 9/11
>
> No major screwup.  Thousands of cameras caught UA 175 crashing into the
> south tower.  Millions saw it live.  No denying that boatload of evidence!
> Except by insane brainwashed kooktards.

BULLSHIT  And do not forget at the time the South Tower was blown up both 
ABC and FOX were interviewing eye-witnesses that didn't see or hear the 
CGIs.  <G>

And a lot missed miss the jets and one camera even substuted a ball for the 
jet.  <G>

This will give you a list of videos that show that some people replaced a
CGI of a jet with a CGI of a ball instead.
 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+the+ball

9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw

>>As a matter of fact the jet that is missing in the wide shot is the very
>>first thing in the following list and then you can see a lot more about 
>>the
>>missing CGI if you go to the video listed below called "07 - The Key" and
>>fast forward it to 4:04.
>
>>9/11 and Media Fakery
>> http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html
>
> Yup. He plots it coming in _dead level_ and wonders where it was when he
> extrapolates its position back in time coming in dead level with the
> impact level.  That's because he didn't look up.  Of course he couldn't
> look up, the camera didn't look up.  It was focusing on the North Tower,
> not looking for a second plane.

Even if you took it up a few degrees it would still be in the wide shot you 
idiot.

Why don't you just take a protractor and see how steep the dive would have 
to be not to be in the wide shot?  <G>  I'm sure you will find out that the 
angle of decent still should have put a real jet in the wide shot.

Or are you afraid you will be proven wrong?


>>9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
>
> MPEG artifact, most likely.  What was the make/model of that videocamera
> and what method does it use for video compression?

ROTFLMAO because to this date the only person that could recreate that 
anomaly was someone using a 3D program and having the wings reflect the sky. 
Here you can see that in:

Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U

So you can't face the facts that 9/11 was just a scripted movie complete 
with all sort of movie blunders just like other movies.  <G>

You have proven to be a pack of lies and you can't help that because you are 
unaware that 9/11 was a pack of lies from day one and the only way to 
support lies is with more lies.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521119 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs )

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mt74rj$drc$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
>>>> because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not 
>>>> flying
>>>> level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes, 
>>>> descending
>>>> at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.
>>
>>>Oh bullshit and I have two links to prove that below.
>>
>> If you actually have any proof, let's hear it.  Some vacuum-head yammering
>> away on a kook video is not proof.  You've already demonstrated the total
>> lack of knowledge of your "experts" with your Russian "expert" who doesn't
>> have a clue what a nuclear blast wave does.  (I'm *still* laughing!)  The
>> descent info is from FAA records tracking the plane.

>Wait a second.  I've asked you to come forward with information from nukes 
>that are detonated underground in solid rock and you have not so all you 
>continue to do is give me bullshit from above ground nukes or nukes 
>detonated in dirt.

We're talking about that video from New Jersey that doesn't show UA 175
until the last moment, not your imaginary nukes, k00ktard.  Besides, I
already pointed you to a video of the "Sedan" shot, showing how a nuke
buried 650 feet deep produces a 290' dome (imagine the Twin Towers on top
of that dome!) before the dome ruptured, producing a 12,000 foot mushroom
cloud, a 1200' crater and radiation across half the US.  That was 104 kT, 
too.

>And AGAIN if the following was not done by deep underground nukes then how 
>was it done where a building could collapse, not crush the survivors in 
>floors 2-6 of stairwell B, leave free standing walls and not end up in the 
>basement either?

A nuke would have vaporized the people in Stairwell B, k00ktard.

>And don't forget their was a way to set off nukes without leaving a seismic 
>record and that was to have the cavities already there.

Liar.  Let's see your proof.  And not that Russian kook either, he has 
already proven he doesn't know WTF he's talking about.

>And your bullshit about the radiation was faced with the fact they didn't 
>test the soil samples at GZ and they certainly didn't take the samples from 
>anywhere near where the haze in the following photo is either.

Liar.  The "bathtub" would be so radioactive it couldn't be accessed
for 70 days (based on the Sedan shot).  They did test for radiation.  
The sediment layer from the Hudson containing 9/11 debris was _less_ 
radioactive than adjacent layers from before and after 9/11!

>> No major screwup.  Thousands of cameras caught UA 175 crashing into the
>> south tower.  Millions saw it live.  No denying that boatload of evidence!
>> Except by insane brainwashed kooktards.

>BULLSHIT

It's not bullshit to say that thousands of people saw the jet live with
their own eyes, or that thousands of cameras were trained on the towers,
or millions saw it on live TV.

>  And do not forget at the time the South Tower was blown up both 
>ABC and FOX were interviewing eye-witnesses that didn't see or hear the 
>CGIs.  <G>

Never said *everyone* saw it.  Someone to the north having a good view of 
the first impact hole would not see the south tower impact, just the
fireball.  I'm sure many happened to be looking away at the wrong time.

>And a lot missed miss the jets and one camera even substuted a ball for the 
>jet.  <G>

>This will give you a list of videos that show that some people replaced a
>CGI of a jet with a CGI of a ball instead.

I already said nobody's interested in overcompressed, overshrunk videos
that make the plane no longer recognizable.  And it doesn't take away
from the fact there are still thousands of other videos that do show the 
plane.

>> Yup. He plots it coming in _dead level_ and wonders where it was when he
>> extrapolates its position back in time coming in dead level with the
>> impact level.  That's because he didn't look up.  Of course he couldn't
>> look up, the camera didn't look up.  It was focusing on the North Tower,
>> not looking for a second plane.

>Even if you took it up a few degrees it would still be in the wide shot you 
>idiot.

Nope.  He didn't level out until just before impact.  At 30 seconds out 
he'd be 4.5 miles out and a mile high.  Off the screen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521131 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs )

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:mt78en$juv$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:mt74rj$drc$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>> The jet was likely off the screen at the time of the wide angle shot
>>>>> because it was ABOVE the field of view of the shot.  UA 175 was not
>>>>> flying
>>>>> level, it was making a power dive during its last five minutes,
>>>>> descending
>>>>> at between 5000-10,000 feet per minute.
>>>
>>>>Oh bullshit and I have two links to prove that below.
>>>
>>> If you actually have any proof, let's hear it.  Some vacuum-head 
>>> yammering
>>> away on a kook video is not proof.  You've already demonstrated the 
>>> total
>>> lack of knowledge of your "experts" with your Russian "expert" who 
>>> doesn't
>>> have a clue what a nuclear blast wave does.  (I'm *still* laughing!) 
>>> The
>>> descent info is from FAA records tracking the plane.
>
>>Wait a second.  I've asked you to come forward with information from nukes
>>that are detonated underground in solid rock and you have not so all you
>>continue to do is give me bullshit from above ground nukes or nukes
>>detonated in dirt.
>
> We're talking about that video from New Jersey that doesn't show UA 175
> until the last moment, not your imaginary nukes, k00ktard.  Besides, I
> already pointed you to a video of the "Sedan" shot, showing how a nuke
> buried 650 feet deep produces a 290' dome

THAT WAS IN DIRT ASSHOLE AND NOT ROCK.


> (imagine the Twin Towers on top
> of that dome!) before the dome ruptured, producing a 12,000 foot mushroom
> cloud, a 1200' crater and radiation across half the US.  That was 104 kT,
> too.
>
>>And AGAIN if the following was not done by deep underground nukes then how
>>was it done where a building could collapse, not crush the survivors in
>>floors 2-6 of stairwell B, leave free standing walls and not end up in the
>>basement either?
>
> A nuke would have vaporized the people in Stairwell B, k00ktard.

Don't give me shit about what I believe if you can't come up with a valid 
way that the collapse of the Twin Towers could not crush the Survivors, not 
end up in the basement, leave free standing walls and at the same time leave 
a pile of debris that is smaller than a 10 story building would leave.

And besides you have proven over and over and over again you have no working 
knowledge of how deep underground nukes work.  <G>


>>And don't forget their was a way to set off nukes without leaving a 
>>seismic
>>record and that was to have the cavities already there.
>
> Liar.  Let's see your proof.  And not that Russian kook either, he has
> already proven he doesn't know WTF he's talking about.

ROTFLMAO when it is you who can not provide an explanation for what was left 
of the Twin Towers or why there were survivors that were not buried in a 
shit load of debris.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

>>And your bullshit about the radiation was faced with the fact they didn't
>>test the soil samples at GZ and they certainly didn't take the samples 
>>from
>>anywhere near where the haze in the following photo is either.
>
> Liar.  The "bathtub" would be so radioactive it couldn't be accessed
> for 70 days (based on the Sedan shot).  They did test for radiation.
> The sediment layer from the Hudson containing 9/11 debris was _less_
> radioactive than adjacent layers from before and after 9/11!

And I'll bet CNN was responsible for those test.  Yeah, CNN also tried to 
convince us that real jets made the cartoon cutouts in the Twin Towers even 
though people filmed white smoke coming from those holes that is consistent 
with Thermate and not jet fuel.  <G>


>>> No major screwup.  Thousands of cameras caught UA 175 crashing into the
>>> south tower.  Millions saw it live.  No denying that boatload of 
>>> evidence!
>>> Except by insane brainwashed kooktards.
>
>>BULLSHIT

> Nope.  He didn't level out until just before impact.  At 30 seconds out
> he'd be 4.5 miles out and a mile high.

I asked for a degree of decent and not another piece of bullshit.  And if 
that were true it would have ripped the wings off when it tried to level out 
unless of course they were flying CGI air.  <G>

Besides the fact still remains, neither you or NIST can explain what was 
left of the Twin Towers.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And that is really the number one issue because that issue by itself tells 
us why Ground Zero was really called Ground Zero.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521293 — Re: Ping FFN and jimp: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Michael caught in BIG LIEs )

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mt78en$juv$1@pcls7.std.com...

>> We're talking about that video from New Jersey that doesn't show UA 175
>> until the last moment, not your imaginary nukes, k00ktard.  Besides, I
>> already pointed you to a video of the "Sedan" shot, showing how a nuke
>> buried 650 feet deep produces a 290' dome

>THAT WAS IN DIRT ASSHOLE AND NOT ROCK.

Kooktard, let's assume it was all dirt for a moment.  A nuke that was 
powerful enough to throw 650' of dirt above it out of the hole leaving
a 1200' wide, 300' deep crater would have no problem blasting through
a mere 27 feet of rock.  You may want to consider changing your story back
to nukes buried 32-96 miles deep.

Even when they did detonate nukes in solid rock deep enough to leave a
cavity and not blast through the surface (depths of 1000 feet or more)
what happens is initially you have an expanded cavity full of vaporized
rock, which then cools and condenses to liquid, then solid rock leaving
a vacuum.  The pressure of the atmosphere and weakened overlaying rock
then forms a subsistence crater later as the cavity collapses.  The Nevada
Test Site is pockmarked with them.  (but none at the World Trade Center!)

>> A nuke would have vaporized the people in Stairwell B, k00ktard.

>Don't give me shit about what I believe if you can't come up with a valid 
>way that the collapse of the Twin Towers could not crush the Survivors, not 
>end up in the basement, leave free standing walls and at the same time leave 
>a pile of debris that is smaller than a 10 story building would leave.

A nuke would have vaporized Stairwell B and everyone in it, k00ktard.  
Simple as that.

>And besides you have proven over and over and over again you have no working 
>knowledge of how deep underground nukes work.  <G>

I certainly know more than Dmitri!

"What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?" "Nothing!"

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

>> Liar.  The "bathtub" would be so radioactive it couldn't be accessed
>> for 70 days (based on the Sedan shot).  They did test for radiation.
>> The sediment layer from the Hudson containing 9/11 debris was _less_
>> radioactive than adjacent layers from before and after 9/11!

>And I'll bet CNN was responsible for those test.  Yeah, CNN also tried to 
>convince us that real jets made the cartoon cutouts in the Twin Towers even 
>though people filmed white smoke coming from those holes that is consistent 
>with Thermate and not jet fuel.  <G>

CNN has nothing to do with the NY Police and Fire Department testing for
radiation, which they did before the buildings fell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521146 — Re: Rocky's delusions

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> And don't forget their was a way to set off nukes without leaving a seismic 
> record and that was to have the cavities already there.

Even if you build a cavity a hundred miles in diameter and set off
the device in the center, the enormous shock wave would still generate
a seismic signature, raving lunatic.

> And your bullshit about the radiation was faced with the fact they didn't 
> test the soil samples at GZ and they certainly didn't take the samples from 
> anywhere near where the haze in the following photo is either.

Yet another lie from the delusional fuckwit.

Radiation readings were taken all over the site finding nothing
unusual AND samples were taken to labratories for further analysis,
raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web