Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #515495 > unrolled thread

New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:57 -0500
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 09:34 -0700
      Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-21 10:32 -0700
    Re: New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:44 -0500
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 11:54 -0700
      Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-22 14:06 -0700
        Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:14 -0700
          Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:53 -0400
          Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:19 -0700
            Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-24 17:45 -0700
      Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:47 -0400
      Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:22 -0400

#515495 — New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
approach
> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html


> Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> signals from this radiation.

> The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> but they have not yet detected it.

> It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.

> "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.

> Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> Physical Review Letters.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#515565 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> approach
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> 
> 
> > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > signals from this radiation.
> 
> > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > but they have not yet detected it.
> 
> > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> 
> > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> 
> > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > Physical Review Letters.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Look between the stars,and its there you will find the missing gravity.Leave classical matter out of the picture. This is reality because its good GR thinking. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515582 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Swine Glazier "reber g=emc^2" wrote:
" This is reality because"... 
 >
(3)
On 06Dec2014, when Swine Glazier said to Jacoby "benj" 
<nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under
me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
(2)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, when the Jewish Swine wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". ... and he continued after
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have agood laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
>
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy>
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515672

On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:57:36 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:

> New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different
> approach
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> 
> 
>> Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe that
>> dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation when
>> they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the signals
>> from this radiation.
>> <snip>

And not a word about what "dark radiation" may actually be.  A new force, 
new vector bosons...?  Lots of papers, saying in essence, "There may be 
dark radiation, no one knows what it is, but it may follow these rules."

I'm not sure this notion qualifies as physics yet.  Then again, I'm not a 
physicist.  Then again, for a long time people said the same thing about 
neutrinos....

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515818 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> approach
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> 
> 
> > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > signals from this radiation.
> 
> > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > but they have not yet detected it.
> 
> > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> 
> > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> 
> > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > Physical Review Letters.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives weight to all.  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515862 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:54:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> > approach
> > > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> > 
> > 
> > > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > > signals from this radiation.
> > 
> > > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > > but they have not yet detected it.
> > 
> > > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> > 
> > > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> > 
> > > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > > Physical Review Letters.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > community, and physics-related social issues.
> 
> Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives weight to all.  TreBert


Did it occur to anyone that black radiation might be the reason that the sky between the stars looks black?!!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516214 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 2:06:33 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:54:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> > > approach
> > > > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > > > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > > > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > > > signals from this radiation.
> > > 
> > > > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > > > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > > > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > > > but they have not yet detected it.
> > > 
> > > > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > > > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > > > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > > > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> > > 
> > > > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > > > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > > > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > > > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> > > 
> > > > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > > > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > > > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > > > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > > > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > > > Physical Review Letters.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 
> > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > 
> > Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives weight to all.  TreBert
> 
> 
> Did it occur to anyone that black radiation might be the reason that the sky between the stars looks black?!!
> 
> Double-A

AA Nice thinking.We need more thinking here. Using your idea one could say its a "BLACK AND WHITE " Universe. With white the minority.Like microbes on Earth weigh more than all other type of life combined .The black of cosmic space weighs more than all the white stuff in it. It fits Its reality.Why not? Its a simple picture.Simple goes good. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516394 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On 8/23/2015 3:14 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>
>> Did it occur to anyone that black radiation might be the reason
>> that the sky between the stars looks black?!!
>>
>> Double-A
>
> AA Nice thinking.We need more thinking here. Using your idea one
> could say its a "BLACK AND WHITE " Universe. With white the
> minority.Like microbes on Earth weigh more than all other type of
> life combined .The black of cosmic space weighs more than all the
> white stuff in it. It fits Its reality.Why not? Its a simple
> picture.Simple goes good. TreBert


Well, you've got simple down pat.


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516591 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 12:14:37 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 2:06:33 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:54:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> > > > approach
> > > > > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > > > > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > > > > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > > > > signals from this radiation.
> > > > 
> > > > > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > > > > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > > > > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > > > > but they have not yet detected it.
> > > > 
> > > > > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > > > > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > > > > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > > > > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> > > > 
> > > > > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > > > > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > > > > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > > > > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> > > > 
> > > > > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > > > > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > > > > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > > > > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > > > > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > > > > Physical Review Letters.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 
> > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > 
> > > Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives weight to all.  TreBert
> > 
> > 
> > Did it occur to anyone that black radiation might be the reason that the sky between the stars looks black?!!
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> AA Nice thinking.We need more thinking here. Using your idea one could say its a "BLACK AND WHITE " Universe. With white the minority.Like microbes on Earth weigh more than all other type of life combined .The black of cosmic space weighs more than all the white stuff in it. It fits Its reality.Why not? Its a simple picture.Simple goes good. TreBert

Just added a new post with answer to all of 'dark matter" its a good read TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516671 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> the loaded drunkard Glazier "reber g=emc^2" 
the Swine had <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> and wrote that 
"Bert is Heavily Brain Damaged, Mentally ill and fuqed in his head".
> 
For reasons of piety & mercy Bert's Shit & Glazierola is snipped, save
Swine Glazier's daily Gutter physics to which Glazier, the Cretin "Just 
added a new compost with answer to all of 'dark matter".. like he did..
 >
(3)
On 06Dec2014, when Swine Glazier said to Jacoby "benj" 
<nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under
me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which...
(2)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, when the Jewish Swine wrote:
Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face
to take a shit & say: "Open wide". ... and he continued after
>
(1)
On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have agood laugh
when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
>
<http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy>
<http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515960 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On 08/22/2015 02:54 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a
>> different approach
>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
>>
>>
>>> Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They
>>> believe that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark
>>> radiation when they collide. If true, then we should be able to
>>> detect the signals from this radiation.
>>
>>> The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown.
>>> Despite knowing very little about dark matter, its overall
>>> abundance is precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know
>>> it is out there, but they have not yet detected it.
>>
>>> It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
>>> postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle
>>> Physics Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and
>>> Pharmacy, University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State,
>>> USA.
>>
>>> "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter,
>>> if we detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When
>>> scientists discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a
>>> curiosity. Today, quantum mechanics plays an important role in
>>> computers," he says.
>>
>>> Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
>>> attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow
>>> scientists, Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and
>>> John F. Cherry, postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National
>>> Laboratory, USA, suggest a new approach. They present their work
>>> in the journal Physical Review Letters.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
>> of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
>> social issues.
>
> Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff
> between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that
> includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that
> is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives
> weight to all.  TreBert
>
Sam, Herb is willing to think about science. You just parrot things.
That's why Herb knows goat black matter gives weight and stink to all!
You know nothing.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516027 — Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

On 8/22/2015 2:54 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>
> Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.


Da fuck is Goat Black Matter?



-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web