Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #516591

Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2015-08-24 13:19 -0700
References <-omdnRuoyZ8NGEvInZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> <f7017d5c-7422-4578-8405-265503da9859@googlegroups.com> <3bce9d5e-a456-42be-8a7e-89b5d3e6e7bb@googlegroups.com> <2fb88b69-212f-481a-bfc9-f6f7bc6ccea7@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <f6229e4e-e916-4aa7-a2d0-3924f800bf53@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach
From "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 12:14:37 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 2:06:33 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 11:54:31 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 6:57:39 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > > New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different 
> > > > approach
> > > > > http://phys.org/news/2015-08-theoryif-dark-approach.html
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Physicists suggest a new way to look for dark matter: They believe
> > > > > that dark matter particles annihilate into so-called dark radiation
> > > > > when they collide. If true, then we should be able to detect the
> > > > > signals from this radiation.
> > > > 
> > > > > The majority of the mass in the universe remains unknown. Despite
> > > > > knowing very little about dark matter, its overall abundance is
> > > > > precisely measured. In other words: Physicists know it is out there,
> > > > > but they have not yet detected it.
> > > > 
> > > > > It is definitely worth looking for, argues Ian Shoemaker, former
> > > > > postdoctoral researcher at Centre for Cosmology and Particle Physics
> > > > > Phenomenology (CP3), Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy,
> > > > > University of Southern Denmark, now at Penn State, USA.
> > > > 
> > > > > "There is no way of predicting what we can do with dark matter, if we
> > > > > detect it. But it might revolutionize our world. When scientists
> > > > > discovered quantum mechanics, it was considered a curiosity. Today,
> > > > > quantum mechanics plays an important role in computers," he says.
> > > > 
> > > > > Ever since dark matter was first theorized, there have been many
> > > > > attempts to look for it, and now Ian Shoemaker and fellow scientists,
> > > > > Associate Professor Mads Toudal Frandsen, CP3, and John F. Cherry,
> > > > > postdoctoral researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA,
> > > > > suggest a new approach. They present their work in the journal
> > > > > Physical Review Letters.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 
> > > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> > > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> > > > community, and physics-related social issues.
> > > 
> > > Goat Black matter is intrensic to all of the universe.It is the stuff between the stars.It is the gravity energy of all space and that includes quantum space right into the Planck size of space.All that is feels the attraction,and compression of gravity. Its force gives weight to all.  TreBert
> > 
> > 
> > Did it occur to anyone that black radiation might be the reason that the sky between the stars looks black?!!
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> AA Nice thinking.We need more thinking here. Using your idea one could say its a "BLACK AND WHITE " Universe. With white the minority.Like microbes on Earth weigh more than all other type of life combined .The black of cosmic space weighs more than all the white stuff in it. It fits Its reality.Why not? Its a simple picture.Simple goes good. TreBert

Just added a new post with answer to all of 'dark matter" its a good read TreBert

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:57 -0500
  Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 09:34 -0700
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-21 10:32 -0700
  Re: New theory—If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:44 -0500
  Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 11:54 -0700
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-22 14:06 -0700
      Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:14 -0700
        Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 05:53 -0400
        Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 13:19 -0700
          Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-24 17:45 -0700
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:47 -0400
    Re: New theory--If we want to detect dark matter we might need a different approach HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:22 -0400

csiph-web