Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #507427 > unrolled thread
| Started by | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox |
| Message-ID | <mo869g$kgr$1@pcls7.std.com> |
"Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> writes: >"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message >news:d0otdmFdu7qU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 16/07/2015 12:53 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: ><snip> >>> <http://seprogrammo.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/symmetric-twins-paradox.html> >> >> What I see is a description of an experiment, together with an assertion >> as to the result of applying SR. >That is correct: the result is obvious, the consequences are not obvious. >> What I don't see is any math to support the assertion. >> >> If you had presented the math, we could point to the errors you've made. >This is not a maths forum: anyway, if you knew anything about special >relativity, you would not need to ask. If you knew about special relativity, you'd do the math, show it, and find out that the two twins would be the same age (but younger than a hypothetical triplet left behind on the planet).
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web