Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #507427
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox |
| Date | 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <mo869g$kgr$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mo5s70$vaf$1@dont-email.me> <d0otdmFdu7qU1@mid.individual.net> <mo7s5u$af7$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> writes: >"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message >news:d0otdmFdu7qU1@mid.individual.net... >> On 16/07/2015 12:53 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: ><snip> >>> <http://seprogrammo.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/symmetric-twins-paradox.html> >> >> What I see is a description of an experiment, together with an assertion >> as to the result of applying SR. >That is correct: the result is obvious, the consequences are not obvious. >> What I don't see is any math to support the assertion. >> >> If you had presented the math, we could point to the errors you've made. >This is not a maths forum: anyway, if you knew anything about special >relativity, you would not need to ask. If you knew about special relativity, you'd do the math, show it, and find out that the two twins would be the same age (but younger than a hypothetical triplet left behind on the planet).
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-16 11:58 +0000
csiph-web