Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #535584 > unrolled thread

Happy Thanksgiving

Started byHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-26 05:30 -0800
Last post2015-11-26 16:39 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 105 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 05:30 -0800
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 09:10 -0600
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 07:44 -0800
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 17:51 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 12:00 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 11:29 -0800
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:27 -0600
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:28 -0500
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:47 -0800
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 21:01 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 15:31 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 22:19 +0000
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 16:41 -0600
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 23:20 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 17:53 -0600
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 02:14 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 02:46 +0000
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 03:45 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 05:18 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-27 14:06 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 15:55 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 10:01 -0600
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:38 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 16:55 +0000
                        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 20:06 +0000
                          Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 20:32 +0000
                            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 20:56 +0000
                              Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 23:14 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-28 14:26 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-27 11:26 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-28 14:26 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 17:08 -0500
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 22:24 +0000
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 18:50 -0500
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 02:20 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-26 21:29 -0500
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 11:09 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 05:31 -0800
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:02 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-28 14:18 -0800
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 15:39 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:46 -0600
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:12 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 10:22 -0600
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 19:09 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-05 20:21 -0600
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 10:47 -0500
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:25 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Edward Stansfield <stansfield5REM6@linuxmail.org> - 2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 11:57 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 19:07 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 08:45 -0500
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 08:13 -0600
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:05 -0500
              Re: Free PCs. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-28 14:16 -0800
                Re: I prefer (urban) walking. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 10:17 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 10:40 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 03:10 -0500
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 05:16 -0800
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 09:40 -0600
                        Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 09:35 -0800
                Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-30 14:28 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 18:59 -0800
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:06 -0500
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 21:04 -0600
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:09 -0500
                    Re: .64 cents per cig, after tax/shipping. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:11 -0500
                    Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 07:36 -0500
                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 04:51 -0800
                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 18:10 -0500
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 05:50 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-02 09:36 -0600
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:29 -0500
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 05:09 -0800
                                Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 15:13 -0500
                                  Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 10:16 -0800
                                    Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 14:15 -0500
                                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 17:06 -0800
                                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 20:30 -0500
                                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 05:28 -0800
                                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:56 -0500
                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 08:05 -0800
                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 08:48 -0800
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:24 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:36 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:57 -0800
                                Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:04 -0800
                                  Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:27 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:37 -0800
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 18:23 -0500
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 05:53 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 06:36 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:29 -0500
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-01 14:39 -0800
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:54 -0600
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:52 -0800
                  Re: Lower eXpenses make me "richer". Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-01 14:37 -0800
                    Re: Lower eXpenses make me "richer". Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:57 -0600
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-26 21:26 -0500
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Marly Parlor <lingdingwah@teachers.org> - 2015-11-27 16:35 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 12:04 -0500
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:26 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 16:39 -0600

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#535898

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-27 15:39 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.27.15.40.04@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535862
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:09:34 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote:

> 
> Yet more proof that using Linux turns you into a socially inept loser 
> who can do nothing more than shout and hurl insults. It's that or it 
> attracts that sort of person.
>

Oh yeah!

Linux bring out the aristocrat that is within all of us.  Linux inspires
the soul to rise above the level of the commercial crap that stifles freedom
and creativity.  Linux demands a transcendence of staleness and commonality.
Linux open the road to a better and more perfected world.

Linux forever!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535899

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-27 09:46 -0600
Message-ID<nsednUNkNK1R58XLnZ2dnUU7-N0AAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#535898
On 11/27/15 9:39 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:09:34 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>
>>
>> Yet more proof that using Linux turns you into a socially inept loser
>> who can do nothing more than shout and hurl insults. It's that or it
>> attracts that sort of person.
>>
>
> Oh yeah!
>
> Linux bring out the aristocrat that is within all of us.  Linux inspires
> the soul to rise above the level of the commercial crap that stifles freedom
> and creativity.  Linux demands a transcendence of staleness and commonality.
> Linux open the road to a better and more perfected world.
>
> Linux forever!
>

   Linux requires more work on the part of the user compared to
   other OSs. Like Chicken Man being everywhere, he's everywhere,
   most Linux uses have to do everything, do everything themselves.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535907

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-27 16:12 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.27.16.12.45@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535899
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
>    Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>

That's just an uninformed rumor.

Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.

I would claim that MS Windows requires more work because the user
must keep a vigilant eye on all the undocumented policies that tend
to mess up a clean configuration.  For example, on MS Windows 8.1
I've got to constantly watch the process list for the appearance
of the "Store Broker," and this is just one of many other annoyances
that could be problematic.  (I will make no comment on that heap
of stinking garbage known as MS Windows 10.)

With MS Windows, the concerned user must never let his guard down
because the system belongs to Microsoft and its software vassals.

With GNU/Linux, the user is rightly lord of his own machine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535909

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-27 10:22 -0600
Message-ID<nsednX1kNK3aHsXLnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#535907
On 11/27/15 10:12 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>>     Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>>
>
> That's just an uninformed rumor.
>
> Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
> contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
> relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.
>
> I would claim that MS Windows requires more work because the user
> must keep a vigilant eye on all the undocumented policies that tend
> to mess up a clean configuration.  For example, on MS Windows 8.1
> I've got to constantly watch the process list for the appearance
> of the "Store Broker," and this is just one of many other annoyances
> that could be problematic.  (I will make no comment on that heap
> of stinking garbage known as MS Windows 10.)
>
> With MS Windows, the concerned user must never let his guard down
> because the system belongs to Microsoft and its software vassals.
>
> With GNU/Linux, the user is rightly lord of his own machine.
>

   My personal experience was this wouldn't work or that wouldn't work.
   I spent a lot of time finding coding work-a-rounds. I love the Linux
   OS and coding environment, but many things that "just work" on other
   OSs won me over. Now I have stuff "that just works" in addition to
   the Unix environment.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535914

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
Message-ID<n3a073$j8h$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#535907
Lester Thorpe wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>    Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>
> That's just an uninformed rumor.
>
> Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
> contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
> relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.
>
> I would claim that MS Windows requires more work because the user
> must keep a vigilant eye on all the undocumented policies that tend
> to mess up a clean configuration.  For example, on MS Windows 8.1
> I've got to constantly watch the process list for the appearance
> of the "Store Broker," and this is just one of many other annoyances
> that could be problematic.  (I will make no comment on that heap
> of stinking garbage known as MS Windows 10.)
>
> With MS Windows, the concerned user must never let his guard down
> because the system belongs to Microsoft and its software vassals.
>
> With GNU/Linux, the user is rightly lord of his own machine.

IAWTP

-- 
Save energy: be apathetic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535922

FromDesk Rabbit <me@example.com>
Date2015-11-27 16:53 +0000
Message-ID<n3a1l5$pqa$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org>
In reply to#535907
On 27/11/2015 16:12, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>>     Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>>
>
> That's just an uninformed rumor.
>
> Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
> contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
> relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.

Did you enjoying building your last car, refrigerator, tv etc. etc. 
Neither did most most computer users.


> I would claim that MS Windows requires more work because the user
> must keep a vigilant eye on all the undocumented policies that tend
> to mess up a clean configuration.  For example, on MS Windows 8.1
> I've got to constantly watch the process list for the appearance
> of the "Store Broker," and this is just one of many other annoyances
> that could be problematic.  (I will make no comment on that heap
> of stinking garbage known as MS Windows 10.)
>
> With MS Windows, the concerned user must never let his guard down
> because the system belongs to Microsoft and its software vassals.

FUD, pure, unadulterated, 100% free range FUD

>
> With GNU/Linux, the user is rightly lord of his own machine.

And as a result will spend more time fiddling with it than getting 
anything productive done.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535950

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-11-27 19:09 +0000
Message-ID<4cmmic-j8b.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#535907
In sci.physics Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>> 
>>    Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>>
> 
> That's just an uninformed rumor.
> 
> Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
> contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
> relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.

The setup and configuration of Linux systems is well hidden behind
a giant pile of scripts so any idiot can get it running.

You have no clue what system administration on a real OS such as Solaris
Unix is like.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#537605

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-12-05 20:21 -0600
Message-ID<n40649$qur$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#535907
On 11/27/2015 10:12 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:46:20 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>>     Linux requires more work on the part of the user
>>
>
> That's just an uninformed rumor.
>
> Once a Linux system is set up and configured -- a process which
> contributes to understanding and which most users embrace with
> relish -- there is only occasional and easy maintenance to perform.

not so, lots of updates required.


> I would claim that MS Windows requires more work because the user
> must keep a vigilant eye on all the undocumented policies that tend
> to mess up a clean configuration.

true. one has to filter windows update, keep it off automatic.

> For example, on MS Windows 8.1
> I've got to constantly watch the process list for the appearance
> of the "Store Broker," and this is just one of many other annoyances
> that could be problematic.  (I will make no comment on that heap
> of stinking garbage known as MS Windows 10.)

I have win 7, and CentOS.  both are nice.

Win Pigsta, 8, 8.1, 10 blow monkey turds.


>
> With MS Windows, the concerned user must never let his guard down
> because the system belongs to Microsoft and its software vassals.

turn off automatic updates.

>
> With GNU/Linux, the user is rightly lord of his own machine.

you are right, Windows 10 users do not control or own their own machine, 
Microsoft uses them in peer to peer networking, they have become the 
spammer, using their OS

China will step in shortly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535900

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-27 10:47 -0500
Message-ID<n39tq7$afb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#535898
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2015-11-27 10:39 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:09:34 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yet more proof that using Linux turns you into a socially inept
>> loser who can do nothing more than shout and hurl insults. It's
>> that or it attracts that sort of person.
>> 
> 
> Oh yeah!
> 
> Linux bring out the aristocrat that is within all of us.  Linux
> inspires the soul to rise above the level of the commercial crap
> that stifles freedom and creativity.  Linux demands a transcendence
> of staleness and commonality. Linux open the road to a better and
> more perfected world.
> 
> Linux forever!

Free software does, not just Linux. You don't NEED to sacrifice
quality with Linux to use something like VLC, Thunderbird, GnuPG or
LibreOffice. In fact, considering how terrible the power management in
Linux is, it would make sense to NOT use it and rely on an operating
system which helps to save electricity by ALLOWING the damned machine
to go to sleep or hibernate rather than always run at full blast like
a Linux install does.

- -- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
Wretched Stallman says: "Only YOU can prevent Snit's leftist, atheist
propaganda machine."

"I am clearly quite ethical / moral." - Snit, lying shamelessly,
November 24th, 2015
<D27A422F.6521B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWWHsWAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uco8H+gKCLVq00DefnCpSNgqMUwTj
j/r24yRDZjGLsUxVNmj4aX5y5OIpGLSnCWJwPvaNHvOI/VGxmDbqu38BZ1oJH3f9
UoqNblsgUx/dIRCd103RG8Qe0+6+SZ+TDtF4wCietd3Z0ackp+2vjm65MOVVtpah
MGayvWUhmSQAjPOvH8SnIbH5yhyhJhRr8orGTq8+Ci1DSQByl1fjkoYzAKkK/evg
Ut/1pyx89aLI/HJUPkDZNKVeX9qRWKSHrzPLL4uZSK/2NVAL0cx99LWgSvPSOkmW
NUq2piRnlti+cgE+qXSzAYX90uZjFRJy5xlMmzZRBN+RUn58mB4viuaxxZDw+LY=
=bdVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535911

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-27 16:25 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.27.16.25.16@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535900
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:47:34 -0500, Slimer wrote:

> 
> 
> You don't NEED to sacrifice
> quality with Linux to use something like VLC, Thunderbird, GnuPG or
> LibreOffice.
>

Using open source software with MS Windows is like putting 
whipped cream on a pile of dog shit.  Need I say more?

Bon appetit, asshole.



>
> In fact, considering how terrible the power management in
> Linux is
>

Only a brain-dead, drooling retard uses a laptop or anything else
that would require power management.  (Of course, you certainly
do qualify.)

How can anyone be productive on a ridiculous laptop?  Heck, I could
not even type a single word without my expansive ergonomic keyboard
in front of me.

Serious computing requires serious SPACE and a laptop is at best a token.


> - -- 
> Slimer
> EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
>

PETA?

Whew!  I knew this guy was an idiot but I didn't realize how much
of an idiot.

But then, MS Windows users do possess the intelligence of animals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535913

FromEdward Stansfield <stansfield5REM6@linuxmail.org>
Date2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
Message-ID<n3a06h$jld$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#535911
On 27 Nov 2015 16:25:10 GMT, Lester Thorpe wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:47:34 -0500, Slimer wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> You don't NEED to sacrifice
>> quality with Linux to use something like VLC, Thunderbird, GnuPG or
>> LibreOffice.
>>
> 
> Using open source software with MS Windows is like putting 
> whipped cream on a pile of dog shit.  Need I say more?
> 
> Bon appetit, asshole.
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> In fact, considering how terrible the power management in
>> Linux is
>>
> 
> Only a brain-dead, drooling retard uses a laptop or anything else
> that would require power management.  (Of course, you certainly
> do qualify.)
> 
> How can anyone be productive on a ridiculous laptop?  Heck, I could
> not even type a single word without my expansive ergonomic keyboard
> in front of me.
> 
> Serious computing requires serious SPACE and a laptop is at best a token.
> 
> 
>> - -- 
>> Slimer
>> EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
>>
> 
> PETA?
> 
> Whew!  I knew this guy was an idiot but I didn't realize how much
> of an idiot.
> 
> But then, MS Windows users do possess the intelligence of animals.

Hello Fabio.

-- 
Edward Stansfield

"I am clearly quite ethical / moral." - Snit, lying shamelessly,
November 24th, 2015
<D27A422F.6521B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535924

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-27 11:57 -0500
Message-ID<n3a1ts$qu2$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#535911
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2015-11-27 11:25 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:47:34 -0500, Slimer wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> You don't NEED to sacrifice quality with Linux to use something 
>> like VLC, Thunderbird, GnuPG or LibreOffice.
>> 
> 
> Using open source software with MS Windows is like putting whipped 
> cream on a pile of dog shit.  Need I say more?
> 
> Bon appetit, asshole.

I suspect that you're an idiot.

>> In fact, considering how terrible the power management in Linux 
>> is
> 
> Only a brain-dead, drooling retard uses a laptop or anything else 
> that would require power management.  (Of course, you certainly do 
> qualify.)
> 
> How can anyone be productive on a ridiculous laptop?  Heck, I could
> not even type a single word without my expansive ergonomic keyboard
> in front of me.
> 
> Serious computing requires serious SPACE and a laptop is at best a 
> token.

Confirmed.

>> - -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
>> 
> 
> PETA?
> 
> Whew!  I knew this guy was an idiot but I didn't realize how much 
> of an idiot.
> 
> But then, MS Windows users do possess the intelligence of animals.

I believe in helping the helpless. That's why any new material I write
will be educational and free for developing countries.

And you're plonked once more.

- -- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
Wretched Stallman says: "Only YOU can prevent Snit's leftist, atheist
propaganda machine."

"I am clearly quite ethical / moral." - Snit, lying shamelessly,
November 24th, 2015
<D27A422F.6521B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWWIuMAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uiuwH/RyJr+FsJFKRTnGJk+LE6QNW
T3plT/9ghmTe12cMqD89+yIxGHbXcXr3hKBLePZFbvKtZVkblSLNQ+jVGOlk15+Z
8NCfyS2NFexASN7pvJlY/c2iqYvIZaqUPdCFyhGGw20Y9dVK6eZRARn8SWtnGg61
Zm59C9dlA0DTsSHrq/weqgDxh95XDiD3Je+3dc1+RTpadf/T+DNMN+eE9DYEJYOl
Q2FR2EtK2lOOowYZGHcojNOGoQihoQN26LzMjuf5Xm8zQDaKQAull3OOI7Kcltkk
hzWDdoatDLZE2ky5UAmQy7Ce9ycxhEvFno6vB+vg/LWfDsg0TVhEfznV60lz3VI=
=0gBt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535949

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-11-27 19:07 +0000
Message-ID<m7mmic-j8b.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#535898
In sci.physics Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:09:34 +0000, Desk Rabbit wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yet more proof that using Linux turns you into a socially inept loser 
>> who can do nothing more than shout and hurl insults. It's that or it 
>> attracts that sort of person.
>>
> 
> Oh yeah!
> 
> Linux bring out the aristocrat that is within all of us.  Linux inspires
> the soul to rise above the level of the commercial crap that stifles freedom
> and creativity.  Linux demands a transcendence of staleness and commonality.
> Linux open the road to a better and more perfected world.
> 
> Linux forever!

Linux is the Windows of the Unix world; just about everything about
the system is hidden behind scripts that you can not find without
hours of digging.

Want to apply patches? There are at least 3 differenct patching systems,
no two of which give the same results more often than not.

I think I'll stick to Solaris Unix for anything real.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535877

FromSlimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2015-11-27 08:45 -0500
Message-ID<n39mkp$c9s$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#535809

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2015-11-26 9:20 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:50:44 -0500, Slimer wrote:
> 
>>
>> I demand excellence out of my students, myself and the software I use.
>> That's why I DON'T use Linux.
>>
> 
> If your students had any inkling of your true intellectually depraved
> character, they would gladly resurrect the practice of fragging:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragging
> 
> But your students are most likely demented American brats who are
> lost in a world of dreams and who couldn't distinguish quality and
> integrity from a hole in the ground.

My students aren't American.


-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter
Wretched Stallman says: "Only YOU can prevent Snit's leftist, atheist
propaganda machine."

"I am clearly quite ethical / moral." - Snit, lying shamelessly,
November 24th, 2015
<D27A422F.6521B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535886

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-27 08:13 -0600
Message-ID<oY-dncaJ3YFl-cXLnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#535877
On 11/27/15 7:45 AM, Slimer wrote:
> My students aren't American.

   Oh, so they know how to do trigonometry then.
   Good for them.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535905

Frombenj <nobody@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-27 11:05 -0500
Message-ID<pb%5y.227869$MN.130128@fx12.iad>
In reply to#535886
On 11/27/2015 09:13 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 11/27/15 7:45 AM, Slimer wrote:
>> My students aren't American.
>
>    Oh, so they know how to do trigonometry then.
>    Good for them.

Sam, everyone admits that once they left school they never ever used 
math again! So why teach it? So we don't. This is the American idea and 
why kids today (like the ones cutting and pasting for you) are as 
ignorant as you are. Do you do cursive? Didn't think so even though they 
used to teach it back then.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#536170 — Re: Free PCs.

FromDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date2015-11-28 14:16 -0800
SubjectRe: Free PCs.
Message-ID<5029ed34-7ba8-4720-bc3b-00c2613c131a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#535809
On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 5:59:33 AM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>  
> Relatively rich people have a TV with XBox One and other consoles,
> a gaming/office PC (Windows), a Mac Pro (desktop, to edit videos),
> MacBooks and iPads (for travel)... no Linux anything.
> 
> The very poor have an Android and, maybe,
> a second hand PC, running a scrounged/old copy of Windows.
> 
> You could get a boat load of free, second hand PCs
> and load them up with Linux, at zero cost, but few do it.


The poor do their computing at the library.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#536363 — Re: I prefer (urban) walking.

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-29 10:17 -0800
SubjectRe: I prefer (urban) walking.
Message-ID<1b078dfc-961d-4014-bc20-b15040bd80a8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#536170
On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 1:16:24 AM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>  
> You (DoubleA) replied (to me):
> > > You could get a boat load of free, second hand PCs
> > > and load them up with Linux, at zero cost, but few do it.
> > 
> > The poor do their computing at the library.
> 
> Very likely, your income is twice as large as mine.
> I share an internet connection with others in the house.
> 
> Like Bert, you don't like sharing your house;
> so you live on the edge of the city, with no internet.
> 
> unLike me, you enjoy public transportation; 
> I prefer (urban) walking.

Jeff I walk too but driving is away to go.I hate buses.Everywhere I go I pay nothing for internet. McDonalds gets the signal. My Samsung laptop cost $250 and that included tax. Income wise I always added to my SS.I told AA and will tell you Jeff email me and I will show you how to add $1,000 or more each month working 3 hours each week.TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#536368 — Re: I prefer (urban) walking.

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-29 10:40 -0800
SubjectRe: I prefer (urban) walking.
Message-ID<4ba70888-486c-410a-b9ea-4daec7ac82ab@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#536363
 Jeff email me and I will show you how to add $1,000 or more each month working 3 hours each week.TreBert
------

At home in your spare time!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#536453 — Re: I prefer (urban) walking.

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-30 03:10 -0500
SubjectRe: I prefer (urban) walking.
Message-ID<OvT6y.216297$rM.118631@fx16.iad>
In reply to#536363
On 11/29/2015 01:17 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 1:16:24 AM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>> You (DoubleA) replied (to me):
>>>> You could get a boat load of free, second hand PCs
>>>> and load them up with Linux, at zero cost, but few do it.
>>>
>>> The poor do their computing at the library.
>>
>> Very likely, your income is twice as large as mine.
>> I share an internet connection with others in the house.
>>
>> Like Bert, you don't like sharing your house;
>> so you live on the edge of the city, with no internet.
>>
>> unLike me, you enjoy public transportation;
>> I prefer (urban) walking.
>
> Jeff I walk too but driving is away to go.I hate buses.Everywhere I go I pay nothing for internet. McDonalds gets the signal. My Samsung laptop cost $250 and that included tax. Income wise I always added to my SS.I told AA and will tell you Jeff email me and I will show you how to add $1,000 or more each month working 3 hours each week.TreBert
>
Rolf, just do what Herb does and sell filters that don't exist. A little 
fraud and really boost your income! Works for Herb!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web