Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #526493 > unrolled thread

What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 19:17 -0500
    Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-16 20:23 -0500
    Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 16:48 -0500
      Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 18:28 -0500
        Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-18 03:08 +0000
          Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 18:20 -0500
            Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-18 23:57 +0000
              Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:08 -0500
                Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 00:46 +0000
                  Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 09:23 -0500
                    Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-24 18:44 +0000
            Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:36 -0700
      urban heat-islanding in CA noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 15:25 -0700

#526493 — What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic

What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html


> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's
> Northwest Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic
> effects of global warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an
> average increase of roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the
> northern reaches of the province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and
> temperatures in central regions have increased by 3.6 degrees.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#526508

On 10/16/2015 7:17 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>
>
>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's
>> Northwest Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic
>> effects of global warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an
>> average increase of roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the
>> northern reaches of the province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and
>> temperatures in central regions have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>

Obviously  Income inequality.


To average out, other parts of the planet must have cooled off by 5.4 
degrees, and 3.6 degrees as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526614

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:

> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
> 
> 
>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.

Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military 
are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying 
to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how 
to adapt to it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526629

On 10/17/15 4:48 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>>
>>
>>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>
> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military
> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying
> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how
> to adapt to it.
>

   When there is low food production, places too hot to live, collapsed
   economies, wars over fresh water and food and major cities underwater,
   things might get bad.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526662

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/15 4:48 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>>> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>>>
>>>
>>>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>>>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>>>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>>>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>>>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>>>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>>
>> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military
>> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying
>> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how
>> to adapt to it.
>>
> 
>   When there is low food production, places too hot to live, collapsed
>   economies, wars over fresh water and food and major cities underwater,
>   things might get bad.

Yes, that is why it is a good thing that all of that is silly, Chicken
Little nonsense, ass hole.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526767

On 10/17/15 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/17/15 4:48 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>
>>>> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>>>>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>>>>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>>>>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>>>>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>>>>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>>>
>>> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military
>>> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying
>>> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how
>>> to adapt to it.
>>>
>>
>>    When there is low food production, places too hot to live, collapsed
>>    economies, wars over fresh water and food and major cities underwater,
>>    things might get bad.
>
> Yes, that is why it is a good thing that all of that is silly, Chicken
> Little nonsense, ass hole.
>
>

   Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp. The sky would only fall if it was
   frozen.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526772

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/15 10:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/17/15 4:48 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>>>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>>>>>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>>>>>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>>>>>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>>>>>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>>>>>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>>>>
>>>> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military
>>>> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying
>>>> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how
>>>> to adapt to it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>    When there is low food production, places too hot to live, collapsed
>>>    economies, wars over fresh water and food and major cities underwater,
>>>    things might get bad.
>>
>> Yes, that is why it is a good thing that all of that is silly, Chicken
>> Little nonsense, ass hole.
>>
>>
> 
>   Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp. The sky would only fall if it was
>   frozen.

The ass hole, piece of shit spammer apparently doesn't understand the
meaning of Chicken Little absent a web site. 
 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526775

On 10/18/15 6:57 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>    Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp. The sky would only fall if it was
>>    frozen.
>
> The ass hole, piece of shit spammer apparently doesn't understand the
> meaning of Chicken Little absent a web site.
>

   Hey jimp, you want to fill in our readers on little chicken?

   We should do pod-casts, jimp, as we would have lots of listeners.

   What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html


 > Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's
 > Northwest Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic
 > effects of global warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an
 > average increase of roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the
 > northern reaches of the province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and
 > temperatures in central regions have increased by 3.6 degrees.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526778

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/15 6:57 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp. The sky would only fall if it was
>>>    frozen.
>>
>> The ass hole, piece of shit spammer apparently doesn't understand the
>> meaning of Chicken Little absent a web site.
>>
> 
>   Hey jimp, you want to fill in our readers on little chicken?

Hey you self important, piece of shit, spamming ass hole, fuck off and
die soon.

Find a kindergarten teacher and have him/her explain Chicken Little
to you.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527877

On 10/18/15 7:46 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Hey you self important, piece of shit, spamming ass hole, fuck off and
> die soon.
>
> Find a kindergarten teacher and have him/her explain Chicken Little
> to you.



   Hey jimp, you want to fill in our readers on little chicken?

   We should do pod-casts, jimp, as we would have lots of listeners.

   What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html


 > Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's
 > Northwest Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic
 > effects of global warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an
 > average increase of roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the
 > northern reaches of the province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and
 > temperatures in central regions have increased by 3.6 degrees.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#527916

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:

Yet again, nothing.

Have you ever wondered what your life might have been like if you had
the competence to do more than just copy the words of others, spamming
piece of shit?



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526796

he is just nasty; you are just botty

>    Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp. The sky would only fall if it was
>    frozen.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#526753 — urban heat-islanding in CA

yeah, but seeint that nine tenths of Canuckians live
within a day's drive of the border,
they still do not bother to account u.h.i

> >> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
> >> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
> 
> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military 
> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying 
> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how 
> to adapt to it.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web