Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #526662

Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
Date 2015-10-18 03:08 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <r2fbfc-va9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <r8CdnR3iGe_hDrzLnZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <AYqdnVQqEOCIX7_LnZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <VcednQrbXNc-RL_LnZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/15 4:48 PM, Lofty Goat wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:17:00 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>
>>> What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic
>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-10-exxon-knew-global-impact-arctic.html
>>>
>>>
>>>> Today, as Exxon's scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada's Northwest
>>>> Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global
>>>> warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of
>>>> roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the
>>>> province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions
>>>> have increased by 3.6 degrees.
>>
>> Oil companies, shipping concerns, insurance underwriters and the military
>> are the only ones reacting sanely to global warming:  They aren't trying
>> to stop it, knowing that isn't possible.  Rather they are figuring out how
>> to adapt to it.
>>
> 
>   When there is low food production, places too hot to live, collapsed
>   economies, wars over fresh water and food and major cities underwater,
>   things might get bad.

Yes, that is why it is a good thing that all of that is silly, Chicken
Little nonsense, ass hole.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 19:17 -0500
  Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-16 20:23 -0500
  Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 16:48 -0500
    Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 18:28 -0500
      Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-18 03:08 +0000
        Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 18:20 -0500
          Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-18 23:57 +0000
            Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:08 -0500
              Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 00:46 +0000
                Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 09:23 -0500
                Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-24 18:44 +0000
          Re: What Exxon knew about global warming's impact on the Arctic noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:36 -0700
    urban heat-islanding in CA noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 15:25 -0700

csiph-web