Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #524462 > unrolled thread

9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 21:32 -0400
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:04 -0400
      Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:00 -0400
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:31 -0700
      Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:40 -0500
        Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:49 -0400
        Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 17:20 +0000
          Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 17:26 -0400
            Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 21:50 +0000
              Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:58 -0400
            Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:57 -0400
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 06:48 -0500

#524462 — 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files

WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM

Watch the video, and make your own conclusions. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#524480

On 10/03/2015 09:32 PM, Bast wrote:
> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>
> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>
You can be SURE that whenever some programs is touted as "Sets the 
record straight" on conspiracy theories that it was generated by 
"strategic writers" to further a cover-up.

Anyway, what happened to tower 7 is obvious to any reasonable thinking 
person. Tower 7 after seeing it's two longtime friends and neighbors 
destroyed simply got so depressed and overcome with emotion that it 
collapsed itself. Case closed. No conspiracy!

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524484

benj wrote:
> On 10/03/2015 09:32 PM, Bast wrote:
>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>
>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>
> You can be SURE that whenever some programs is touted as "Sets the
> record straight" on conspiracy theories that it was generated by
> "strategic writers" to further a cover-up.
>
> Anyway, what happened to tower 7 is obvious to any reasonable thinking
> person. Tower 7 after seeing it's two longtime friends and neighbors
> destroyed simply got so depressed and overcome with emotion that it
> collapsed itself. Case closed. No conspiracy!






FINALLY, Someone who gets it.
Suicidal depression is the only justifiable reason WTC 7 fell.

BUILDING LIVES MATTER , too 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524485

On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
> 
> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.


Blast, which tower was it that your sister died in on 9/11?

BWAhahahahaha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524494

added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy

"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>
>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>
>
> Blast

HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above video 
that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.

Keep in mind there are similarities to Nuclear Demolitions and I didn't say 
Nuclear "Controlled" Demolitions because they are not really controlled the 
way a standard Controlled Demolition is.

When the underground nuke is detonated the ground shakes as proven by what 
happened with WTC2.  AM radios can also receive static at this time as 
proven by WCBS in Nuke York City.

Then nothing appears to happen while the underground cavity gets bigger and 
bigger and the atmospheric pressure drops at that time too but it doesn't 
need pressure to pulverize the rock or the building/buildings above it.

Now back to the video.  You can hear Lieutenant Frank Papalia.say in the 
following time indexed link:
 https://youtu.be/vZbMfTtHkYM?t=42m46s
"We heard what sounded like a jet engine and . . . we looked over at
the buildings you could see the top of building 7 and it just started to
shake and then just disappeared down"

But then he says he never heard any explosions but when he heard what 
sounded like a jet engine he had just heard the detonation of an underground 
nuke.

And there are other parts in the above video that point out parts of WTC7 
were just vaporized and that is another characteristic of a Nuclear 
Demolition.

Oh yes, one more characteristic of a Nuclear Demolitions is people will call 
a place where a Nuclear Demolition took place Ground Zero.  DUH

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524512

On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 08:40:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
>
>"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>>
>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>
>>
>> Blast
>
>HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above video 
>that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.
>
>Keep in mind there are similarities to Nuclear Demolitions and I didn't say 
>Nuclear "Controlled" Demolitions because they are not really controlled the 
>way a standard Controlled Demolition is.
>
>When the underground nuke is detonated the ground shakes as proven by what 
>happened with WTC2.  AM radios can also receive static at this time as 
>proven by WCBS in Nuke York City.
>
>Then nothing appears to happen while the underground cavity gets bigger and 
>bigger and the atmospheric pressure drops at that time too but it doesn't 
>need pressure to pulverize the rock or the building/buildings above it.
>
>Now back to the video.

For you, Roger Rocky  it's back to the rubber room.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524528

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
> 
> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>>
>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>
>>
>> Blast
> 
> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above video 
> that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524562

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
>>
>> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
>>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>>>
>>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blast
>>
>> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above
>> video that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.
>
> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.
>
> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
> seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
> as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
> by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
> Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.
>
> A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
> fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.
>
> Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
> has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.
>
> Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
> on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.
>
> Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
> governmental agency.
>
> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>
> http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
>
> Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.
>
> <snip remaining kook babble>







You really think that bombs from the 1940's are the same as what they have 
now ?

Here's more for you to swallow since you seem to think that anything on the 
web is proof of reality unto itself.

http://www.simonpanrucker.com/beans.swf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524565

In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
>>>
>>> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>>>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>>>>
>>>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blast
>>>
>>> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above
>>> video that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.
>>
>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
>> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.
>>
>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
>> seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
>> as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
>> by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
>> Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.
>>
>> A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
>> fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.
>>
>> Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
>> has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.
>>
>> Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
>> on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.
>>
>> Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
>> governmental agency.
>>
>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
>>
>> http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
>>
>> Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.
>>
>> <snip remaining kook babble>
> 
> 
> You really think that bombs from the 1940's are the same as what they have 
> now ?

You mean the bombs that were dropped on Japan?

In which case, yes the seismic signature of a nuclear device does not
depend on the year of manufacture, only the yield.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524650

In article <kij8ec-4h6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
says...
> 
> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
> >>>
> >>> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
> >>>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
> >>>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blast
> >>>
> >>> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above
> >>> video that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.
> >>
> >> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
> >> signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.
> >>
> >> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
> >> seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
> >> as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
> >> by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
> >> Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.
> >>
> >> A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
> >> fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.
> >>
> >> Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
> >> has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.
> >>
> >> Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
> >> on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.
> >>
> >> Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
> >> governmental agency.
> >>
> >> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
> >>
> >> http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
> >>
> >> Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.
> >>
> >> <snip remaining kook babble>
> > 
> > 
> > You really think that bombs from the 1940's are the same as what they have 
> > now ?
> 
> You mean the bombs that were dropped on Japan?
> 
> In which case, yes the seismic signature of a nuclear device does not
> depend on the year of manufacture, only the yield.
> 
> <snip remaining kook babble>

I did a spit take on that one. WTF happened to Bast to make her this 
way?

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524649

In article <mus5dj$kad$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
> 
> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
> >>
> >> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
> >>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
> >>>>
> >>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blast
> >>
> >> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above
> >> video that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.
> >
> > When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
> > signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.
> >
> > There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
> > seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
> > as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
> > by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
> > Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.
> >
> > A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
> > fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.
> >
> > Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
> > has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.
> >
> > Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
> > on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.
> >
> > Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
> > governmental agency.
> >
> > This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.
> >
> > http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
> > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
> > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
> >
> > Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.
> >
> > <snip remaining kook babble>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You really think that bombs from the 1940's are the same as what they have 
> now ?

BWHAHAHAHAHA! You post the funniest, and most stupid stuff. 

> 
> Here's more for you to swallow since you seem to think that anything on the 
> web is proof of reality unto itself.
> 
> http://www.simonpanrucker.com/beans.swf

That can almost certainly has a higher IQ than you do.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#524488

added alt.conspiracy

"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mupvg2$uip$1@dont-email.me...

WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM

 Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.

  ===================================

Well, I like the video except at 4:32 when Bush states:  "The people who 
knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon."
 https://youtu.be/vZbMfTtHkYM?t=4m32s

Bush would have been telling the truth if he had stated "The people who 
nuked these buildings down will hear lies from us soon since we will use 
those lies to start wars."

Too bad the movie was centered around WTC7 and not any of the lies leading 
up to it like there never was a Flight 11 on 9/11/01.

  - - - - -

And 11:43 is pretty interesting because they find one of the people dressed 
up to move nukes in an underground tunnel system:
 https://youtu.be/vZbMfTtHkYM?t=11m43s

Only problem is there was more to that meeting than they us showed above. 
As a matter of fact the entire video could have been focused on what in the 
heck was a "Nuclear Demolitions Man" doing in WTC7 and why was he dressed 
like that?

  - - - - -

At 19:23 the video says "the two tallest buildings in New York had just 
collapsed" but in reality they collapsed after they were turned to ultra 
fine particles and not before.  But the upper floors of the Twin Towers had 
to turn to ultra fine particles on the way down since the underground nukes 
were not big enough to reach the top part of the Twin Towers.

In other words different schemes were used on different parts of the Twin 
Towers but only one thing could vaporize the Twin Towers the way they were 
vaporized and just like with the Pentagon there are different fairy tales 
used but in Nuke York City the different tales were used to try and explain 
why so little remained on the ground of the Twin Towers.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

  ------------------------------

Very good point at 19:31 talking to Peter Hayden the "Deputy Chief of the 
Nuke York Fire Department"
 https://youtu.be/vZbMfTtHkYM?t=19m31s
where he states: and we had a discussion with one particular engineer there 
and we asked him if we allowed it to burn could we anticipate a collapse and 
if so how soon and it turned out that he was pretty much right on the money 
that he said in it's current state you have about 5 hours.  ( He was 
obviously talking to one of the nuclear demolitions engineers at Ground Zero 
that knew exactly when WTC7 was scheduled to be nuked.)

-----------------------------------------

Around 27:49 they talk to the shifty-eyed (means he is lying) Mark Loizeaus. 
But let us assume Mark is telling the truth that it would have been 
impossible to use a Controlled Demolition on the Twin Towers.  That still 
leaves an NCD.  <G>

That's it for me.  I've seen enough of the above video to know it too had to 
avoid the possibility of a Nuclear Controlled Demolition but that is the 
only thing left that could do what was done to the Twin Towers.

  **************************************

BUT WAIT.  I just fast forwarded and happened to hear this in the above 
video at 42:46 from Lieutenant Frank Papalia.
 https://youtu.be/vZbMfTtHkYM?t=42m46s
(SIC) "We heard what sounded like a jet engine and . . . we looked over at 
the buildings you could see the top of building 7 and it just started to 
shake and then just disappeared down"

And where was WCBS when I needed them because they would have recorded 
another EMP when WTC7 started to shake about 11 seconds before it 
"disappeared down."

In other words, thanks to the above video there is now evidence that both 
WTC2 and WTC7 were brought down by a Nuclear Controlled Demolition where 
they shook first and then second later once the underground nuke reached the 
surface they were partially converted to ultra fine debris and the top of 
them crushed the lower and pulverized part of the buildings.

Bottom line:  The evidence of three Nuclear Controlled Demolitions in Nuke 
York City just keep piling up.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web