Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #277427

Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
Date 2015-10-04 17:20 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <en38ec-4v4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <mupvg2$uip$1@dont-email.me> <f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com> <hNadnfYFS_4TsYzLnZ2dnUU7-X2dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> added alt.astronomy and alt.conspiracy
> 
> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:f5e15671-2de9-4cec-9c9f-b4c8187e2275@googlegroups.com...
>> On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 1:32:48 AM UTC, Bast wrote:
>>> WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZbMfTtHkYM
>>>
>>> Watch the video, and make your own conclusions.
>>
>>
>> Blast
> 
> HVAC that is not funny especially when you see the part of the above video 
> that supports the fact that WTC7 was nuked.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

Be sure to follow all the links in the above links.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 21:32 -0400
  Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 04:04 -0400
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 07:00 -0400
  Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 06:48 -0500
  Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 08:40 -0500
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:49 -0400
    Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 17:20 +0000
      Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 17:26 -0400
        Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 21:50 +0000
          Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:58 -0400
        Re: 9/11 WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:57 -0400

csiph-web