Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #568169 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-05 21:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-12 18:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 9 on this page of 29 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-05 21:49 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2016-04-06 21:30 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-07 06:07 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:45 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Thomas Womack <twomack@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-04-08 16:41 +0100
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-08 18:27 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2016-04-07 17:43 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:56 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-08 18:26 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2016-04-10 08:40 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-04-11 06:11 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin "Greg \(Strider\) Moore" <mooregr@deletethisgreenms.com> - 2016-04-11 06:37 -0400
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 23:13 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 22:01 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 06:27 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:08 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 19:03 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:20 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-09 21:17 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:22 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 06:11 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 06:43 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:09 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:39 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:13 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 19:59 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 06:10 +0000
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 07:12 -0700
Re: Successful flight by Blue Origin jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:25 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 06:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jd7ptc-3mj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569354 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding >>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover >>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first >>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first >>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks, >>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were >>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent >>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover" >>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be >>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover, >>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a >>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you >>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have >>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cite? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear >>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or >>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to >>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do >>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said. >>>>> >>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp. >>>> >>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet. >>>> >>> >>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp. >> >>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated >>environment. >> > > Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I > prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four. Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting diapers on their babies since antiquity. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 06:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <04mkgblph2h5lhr799e2h3hr06inj3cbk7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569416 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding
>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover
>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first
>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first
>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were
>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent
>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover"
>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be
>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover,
>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a
>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you
>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have
>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cite?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear
>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or
>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to
>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do
>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp.
>>>>>
>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp.
>>>
>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated
>>>environment.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I
>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four.
>
>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting
>diapers on their babies since antiquity.
>
It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat.
--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hvdqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569422 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding >>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover >>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first >>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first >>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were >>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent >>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover" >>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be >>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover, >>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a >>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you >>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have >>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cite? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear >>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or >>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to >>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do >>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp. >>>>>> >>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp. >>>> >>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated >>>>environment. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I >>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four. >> >>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting >>diapers on their babies since antiquity. >> > > It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat. Cloth is raw stock. Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 17:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <igslgb1cjm6h9mirpqhnu9vei55biniv0h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569477 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you
>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have
>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cite?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear
>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or
>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to
>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do
>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated
>>>>>environment.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I
>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four.
>>>
>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting
>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity.
>>>
>>
>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat.
>
>Cloth is raw stock.
>
>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat.
>
And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you
dumb cunt.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2k9ttc-714.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569577 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you >>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have >>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cite? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear >>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or >>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to >>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do >>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated >>>>>>environment. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I >>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four. >>>> >>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting >>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity. >>>> >>> >>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat. >> >>Cloth is raw stock. >> >>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat. >> > > And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you > dumb cunt. So what, space cadet? Both cloth and finished goods are imported to the US from Sri Lanka. Does that mean you can not survive in the US without imports from Sri Lanka, space cadet? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 19:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q0pogb130i0r55d6kau759734m9gub338b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569785 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or
>>>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to
>>>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do
>>>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated
>>>>>>>environment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I
>>>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting
>>>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat.
>>>
>>>Cloth is raw stock.
>>>
>>>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat.
>>>
>>
>> And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you
>> dumb cunt.
>>
>
>So what, space cadet?
>
So your claims in this regard, like so many of your claims, are
chimpshit, chimpshit.
>
>Both cloth and finished goods are imported to the US from Sri Lanka.
>
Yeah, they are, so we still don't qualify as a successful colony by
your definitions because we can't cloth ourselves without imports.
>
>Does that mean you can not survive in the US without imports from
>Sri Lanka, space cadet?
>
There's more of that chimpshit wriggling between "survive" and "live
in a rich suburb"...
--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 06:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k3gutc-9t7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569857 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or >>>>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to >>>>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do >>>>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated >>>>>>>>environment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I >>>>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting >>>>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat. >>>> >>>>Cloth is raw stock. >>>> >>>>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat. >>>> >>> >>> And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you >>> dumb cunt. >>> >> >>So what, space cadet? >> > > So your claims in this regard, like so many of your claims, are > chimpshit, chimpshit. > >> >>Both cloth and finished goods are imported to the US from Sri Lanka. >> > > Yeah, they are, so we still don't qualify as a successful colony by > your definitions because we can't cloth ourselves without imports. > >> >>Does that mean you can not survive in the US without imports from >>Sri Lanka, space cadet? >> > > There's more of that chimpshit wriggling between "survive" and "live > in a rich suburb"... Nope, I've never deviated from the facts that it is trivial to survive on the Earth just about anywhere and impossible to survive on Mars without 21st century technology, and a lot of it. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 07:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ai0qgb1rs7mlapvdfpva34bc82foff2057@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569894 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or
>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to
>>>>>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do
>>>>>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated
>>>>>>>>>environment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I
>>>>>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting
>>>>>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat.
>>>>>
>>>>>Cloth is raw stock.
>>>>>
>>>>>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you
>>>> dumb cunt.
>>>>
>>>
>>>So what, space cadet?
>>>
>>
>> So your claims in this regard, like so many of your claims, are
>> chimpshit, chimpshit.
>>
>>>
>>>Both cloth and finished goods are imported to the US from Sri Lanka.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, they are, so we still don't qualify as a successful colony by
>> your definitions because we can't cloth ourselves without imports.
>>
>>>
>>>Does that mean you can not survive in the US without imports from
>>>Sri Lanka, space cadet?
>>>
>>
>> There's more of that chimpshit wriggling between "survive" and "live
>> in a rich suburb"...
>>
>
>Nope, I've never deviated from the facts that it is trivial to survive
>on the Earth just about anywhere and impossible to survive on Mars without
>21st century technology, and a lot of it.
>
And you've never explained all those failed colonies and dead people.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <95rvtc-3gf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569904 |
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.space.policy Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're reasonable if they work. SpaceX is trying to avoid adding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other engines to the Falcon 9 first stage. The stage could hover >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and land, for example, if it added Super Draco engines to the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage. But, they require different fuel and oxidizer than the first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage carries. This would mean adding completely different tanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumbing, and etc. for those engines. Also, if Super Dracos were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used, it would be advantageous to deplete the kerosene and then vent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any remaining LOX in the tanks before landing. So, any "leftover" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuel and oxidizer would be "wasted". In my book, this would not be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a good trade to make. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If one wanted to give the Falcon 9 first stage the ability to hover, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't the most straightforward way to do that be create a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>deeply-throttled Merlin? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Straightforward, perhaps, but it's a very big design change so you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start with having to requalify as if it's a whole new engine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yet you were just saying in another thread space stuff doesn't have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, it was by someone called Fred J. McCall talking about nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>reactors on Mars being cheap for lack of bureaucrat bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, you REALLY don't comprehend English, do you? Either that or >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just so intellectually dishonest everything sounds different to >>>>>>>>>>>>> you. Note that even if you interpret that one instance the way you do >>>>>>>>>>>>> (which is twisted) it doesn't say what you claim I've said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop making up lies, Chimp. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Stop taking mind altering drugs, space cadet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Stop begging to suck my dick, Chimp. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Sounds like someone would really like being in an all male isolated >>>>>>>>>>environment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, but it doesn't matter how much you beg. You're not my type. I >>>>>>>>> prefer them female, smart, cute, and human. You miss on all four. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yet you seem to know nothing about them such as they have been putting >>>>>>>>diapers on their babies since antiquity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's called 'cloth', not 'diapers', you stupid twat. >>>>>> >>>>>>Cloth is raw stock. >>>>>> >>>>>>Diapers, shirts, pants, sheets, etc. are finished goods, you stupid twat. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And BOTH cloth and finished goods were IMPORTED to the Colonies, you >>>>> dumb cunt. >>>>> >>>> >>>>So what, space cadet? >>>> >>> >>> So your claims in this regard, like so many of your claims, are >>> chimpshit, chimpshit. >>> >>>> >>>>Both cloth and finished goods are imported to the US from Sri Lanka. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, they are, so we still don't qualify as a successful colony by >>> your definitions because we can't cloth ourselves without imports. >>> >>>> >>>>Does that mean you can not survive in the US without imports from >>>>Sri Lanka, space cadet? >>>> >>> >>> There's more of that chimpshit wriggling between "survive" and "live >>> in a rich suburb"... >>> >> >>Nope, I've never deviated from the facts that it is trivial to survive >>on the Earth just about anywhere and impossible to survive on Mars without >>21st century technology, and a lot of it. >> > > And you've never explained all those failed colonies and dead people. Sure I have but they have nothing to do with surviving on Mars. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web