Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #520703 > unrolled thread

Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-09-13 11:23 -0500
Last post2015-09-14 04:22 -0500
Articles 10 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:23 -0500
    Re: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-13 14:30 -0400
      Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:42 +0100
        Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:54 -0500
          Re: Rocky's delusions of persecution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:11 +0000
        Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:43 -0400
          Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:48 -0500
            Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:57 -0400
            Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:43 -0500
        Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:22 -0500

#520703 — Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 11:23 -0500
SubjectPing KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<OeOdnWkzHu6zPmjInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Kid,

I find it very hard to find replies to my post when you make so many changes 
to them so once again.

Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of 
good faith in a Malicious Prosecution lawsuit when that evidence classifies 
as the "Probable Cause" itself and it helps prove that both Judge Brinn and 
John Kinser knew they were helping prosecute me maliciously when they 
brought charges against me?

And do not forget since day one I wanted to prove that the probable cause 
was reckless and all I get are false assumptions about the probable cause 
that are inconsistent with the fact the probable cause was used to 
completely impeach all three of the State's witnesses with prior 
inconsistent statements.  <G>

What you fail to see is that I was up against a world of lies told by Duane 
Thompson just like people are up against a world of lies told by the media 
where 9/11/01 is concerned.

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#520716

Fromburfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo>
Date2015-09-13 14:30 -0400
Message-ID<20150913143008.00005a1a@uk.mo>
In reply to#520703
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931


Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520763 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

FromTony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date2015-09-13 20:42 +0100
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<mt4jfu$prp$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#520716
On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>
>
> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>

At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520768 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 14:54 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<0J-dnbFOd7YFSWjInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520763
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mt4jfu$prp$4@dont-email.me...
> On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>
>>
>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>
>
> At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.

Looks like Burfart has found a co-conspirator of hecklers.

Oh yes, I'll have to put the OP back in too:

********   OP   ***********

Kid,

I find it very hard to find replies to my post when you make so many changes
to them so once again.

Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of
good faith in a Malicious Prosecution lawsuit when that evidence classifies
as the "Probable Cause" itself and it helps prove that both Judge Brinn and
John Kinser knew they were helping prosecute me maliciously when they
brought charges against me?

And do not forget since day one I wanted to prove that the probable cause
was reckless and all I get are false assumptions about the probable cause
that are inconsistent with the fact the probable cause was used to
completely impeach all three of the State's witnesses with prior
inconsistent statements.  <G>

What you fail to see is that I was up against a world of lies told by Duane
Thompson just like people are up against a world of lies told by the media
where 9/11/01 is concerned.

Rocky


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520852 — Re: Rocky's delusions of persecution

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-13 23:11 +0000
SubjectRe: Rocky's delusions of persecution
Message-ID<hechcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520768
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of
> good faith in a Malicious Prosecution lawsuit when that evidence classifies
> as the "Probable Cause" itself and it helps prove that both Judge Brinn and
> John Kinser knew they were helping prosecute me maliciously when they
> brought charges against me?

Perhaps because probable cause doesn't apply to civil suites, raving
lunatic.

Probable cause is a reason for persons acting under the color of law
to act.

Are you saying you are a cop or judge, lunatic?

> And do not forget since day one I wanted to prove that the probable cause
> was reckless and all I get are false assumptions about the probable cause
> that are inconsistent with the fact the probable cause was used to
> completely impeach all three of the State's witnesses with prior
> inconsistent statements.  <G>

Total kook babble, kook. 

> What you fail to see is that I was up against a world of lies told by Duane
> Thompson just like people are up against a world of lies told by the media
> where 9/11/01 is concerned.

Yes, kook, the entire world sees you as a worthless, raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520812 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-13 17:43 -0400
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<3erbvaddni7srmeje5t2kfk1cb7dolgsav@4ax.com>
In reply to#520763
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:42:38 +0100, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

>On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>
>>
>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>
>
>At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.

Nothing about child stalker harasser Roger/Rocky should surprise
anyone.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521056 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-14 10:48 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<ho2dndv4wL4VcWvInZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#520812
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:3erbvaddni7srmeje5t2kfk1cb7dolgsav@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:42:38 +0100, Tony Dragon
> <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>>
>>
>>At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.
>
> Nothing about child stalker harasser Roger/Rocky should surprise
> anyone.

See, once again you prove you can lie about anything at all.

Pardon me but I can't help calling you a bitch and I hope you are happy now.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521058 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

FromSarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
Date2015-09-14 11:57 -0400
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<ferdvat7ektcggdani6kr8ei4as7k14lkq@4ax.com>
In reply to#521056
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:48:43 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:3erbvaddni7srmeje5t2kfk1cb7dolgsav@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:42:38 +0100, Tony Dragon
>> <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>>>
>>>
>>>At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.
>>
>> Nothing about child stalker harasser Roger/Rocky should surprise
>> anyone.
>
>See, once again you prove you can lie about anything at all.

Is your address ....?    

167 40th Avenue  
East Moline, IL 61244 

>Pardon me but I can't help calling you a bitch and I hope you are happy now.

Missile type and platform will make me happy, Roger.


>Rocky 
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#521186 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-14 18:43 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<fsmevadbi1gq9s6ubui6n392d9co6okt50@4ax.com>
In reply to#521056
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:48:43 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:3erbvaddni7srmeje5t2kfk1cb7dolgsav@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:42:38 +0100, Tony Dragon
>> <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>>>
>>>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>>
>>>At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.
>>
>> Nothing about child stalker harasser Roger/Rocky should surprise
>> anyone.
>
>See, once again you prove you can lie about anything at all.
>

     Where is the lie?

>Pardon me but I can't help calling you a bitch and I hope you are happy now.

     You are often reduced to insults when you've lost. Rather sad,
really.

"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he claims nukes were used on
9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#520977 — Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?

From"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-14 04:22 -0500
SubjectRe: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith?
Message-ID<qe4dvah8cit1ucfkah8r88bk5jmvfj3kv8@4ax.com>
In reply to#520763
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:42:38 +0100, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

>On 13/09/2015 19:30, burfordtjustice wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:23:27 -0500
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
>>> Subject: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present
>>> evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Date: Sun, 13 Sep
>>> 2015 11:23:27 -0500 Newsgroups:
>>> alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics X-Newsreader: Microsoft
>>> Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>
>>
>> Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
>>
>
>At the moment he seems to be having some fantasy about young goats.

     And he's still getting less action than the Pope.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web