Groups > sci.physics > #520852

Re: Rocky's delusions of persecution

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Rocky's delusions of persecution
Date	2015-09-13 23:11 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<hechcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<OeOdnWkzHu6zPmjInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <20150913143008.00005a1a@uk.mo> <mt4jfu$prp$4@dont-email.me> <0J-dnbFOd7YFSWjInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of
> good faith in a Malicious Prosecution lawsuit when that evidence classifies
> as the "Probable Cause" itself and it helps prove that both Judge Brinn and
> John Kinser knew they were helping prosecute me maliciously when they
> brought charges against me?

Perhaps because probable cause doesn't apply to civil suites, raving
lunatic.

Probable cause is a reason for persons acting under the color of law
to act.

Are you saying you are a cop or judge, lunatic?

> And do not forget since day one I wanted to prove that the probable cause
> was reckless and all I get are false assumptions about the probable cause
> that are inconsistent with the fact the probable cause was used to
> completely impeach all three of the State's witnesses with prior
> inconsistent statements.  <G>

Total kook babble, kook. 

> What you fail to see is that I was up against a world of lies told by Duane
> Thompson just like people are up against a world of lies told by the media
> where 9/11/01 is concerned.

Yes, kook, the entire world sees you as a worthless, raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:23 -0500
  Re: Ping KID Wills:  Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-13 14:30 -0400
    Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:42 +0100
      Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:54 -0500
        Re: Rocky's delusions of persecution jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:11 +0000
      Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:43 -0400
        Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 10:48 -0500
          Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 11:57 -0400
          Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:43 -0500
      Re: Ping KID Wills: Why shouldn't I be allowed to present evidence of malice and a total lack of good faith? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:22 -0500

csiph-web