Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #506364 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-11 14:32 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-07-17 06:08 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 104 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 14:32 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 22:09 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 05:01 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-12 12:01 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 05:15 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 13:48 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 14:36 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 00:42 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 06:24 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 14:24 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 05:32 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-07-13 10:29 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 10:34 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-07-13 20:05 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 18:12 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 00:29 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 00:39 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 08:46 +0000
Re: Photon and its Duelity trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-07-14 12:36 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:24 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:45 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 16:06 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-07-15 05:21 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2015-07-15 05:30 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 08:55 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 10:51 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 13:45 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-15 15:47 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 15:59 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-15 22:07 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 01:53 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 04:03 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-16 05:15 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:40 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:34 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:42 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 19:55 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:53 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 06:04 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 02:57 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 09:47 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:27 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 02:57 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 10:52 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-19 11:13 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 07:55 -0500
hm, things tha make y'go noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 07:24 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 03:44 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 12:04 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-20 11:14 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 14:42 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 05:20 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 19:21 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 19:57 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-16 09:41 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 14:09 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 16:49 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:41 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 19:49 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:52 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 09:40 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 10:57 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 10:10 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:50 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:08 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:40 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:11 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:26 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 17:05 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:57 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 00:27 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-18 07:25 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-20 11:15 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 01:59 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-16 09:45 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:20 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 09:35 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 04:03 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-16 09:50 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:22 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:41 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 09:37 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 12:25 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 14:13 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-17 17:05 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:54 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 03:42 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-07-20 11:10 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 12:07 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 22:46 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 11:32 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 15:41 -0500
three was pi (ten, in base_pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 14:27 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 19:52 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 03:53 -0500
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-15 10:12 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-16 13:40 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 16:52 -0400
Re: Photon and its Duelity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-16 14:10 -0700
Re: Photon and its Duelity HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 06:08 -0400
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-14 15:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mo3r53$1o5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #507064 |
On 7/14/2015 2:36 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote: > One other question I have is why can you not consider a complete cycle of frequency to be a photon? One obvious reason is that there are photons of frequency 1 MHz. This would mean that a "complete cycle" would take a full microsecond to pass by you. If that were true, then you would be able to watch on a cheap oscilloscope with a 10 nanosecond resolution while a single photon takes a full microsecond to deposit its energy. But photons do not deposit their energy over a measurably long period of time like a full microsecond. They always deposit their energy all at once, much faster than the resolution of the cheap oscilloscope. So you know right away that this model of the photon doesn't work. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-14 15:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hOqdnc0d6ZZp6TjInZ2dnUU7-KUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #507064 |
On 7/14/15 2:36 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote:
> One other question I have is why can you not consider a complete cycle of frequency to be a photon?
1. photons are emitted (by charged particles)
2. photons propagate at c
3. photons are absorbed (by charged particles)
Photon momentum
p = hν/c = h/λ
Photon Energy
E = hν = hc/λ
What do you mean by cycle? A photon is a quantum entity, not a
Newtonian object that you can watch go by.
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-14 16:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mo3tk1$8tc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #507064 |
On 7/14/2015 2:36 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote: > One other question I have is why can you not consider a complete cycle of frequency to be a photon? I think one of the things that's surprising to me about you being a retired engineer is the fact that you are willing to disconnect physics from real-life observation. I thought for sure that an engineer would be extremely tuned into checking hypotheses against real-life scenarios and discarding ideas that simply don't work in application. In the matter of how you conceive a photon, you seem to be perfectly willing to just explore it at the conceptual level, the logical level. You're asking whether it makes LOGICAL sense or CONCEPTUAL sense to consider a photon to be one complete cycle of the oscillation. (Of course it makes logical and conceptual sense.) But you didn't ask whether it makes sense against things you can actually observe in real life. Which is why I brought up the cheap oscilloscope and how you can tell RIGHT AWAY in a practical application that a photon can't be a single complete cycle of oscillation. If anything, I would expect you as a trained engineer to ask yourself with every hypothesis you dream up, "Well, if that were true, then how could I check to see if that makes sense with something I can rig up out of scrapyard parts?" -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | trudi.schwander@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 05:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0af11469-f663-4a9c-88ce-cab9fca0462d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #507086 |
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 11:06:15 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/14/2015 2:36 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote: > > One other question I have is why can you not consider a complete cycle of frequency to be a photon? > > I think one of the things that's surprising to me about you being a > retired engineer is the fact that you are willing to disconnect physics > from real-life observation. I thought for sure that an engineer would be > extremely tuned into checking hypotheses against real-life scenarios and > discarding ideas that simply don't work in application. > > In the matter of how you conceive a photon, you seem to be perfectly > willing to just explore it at the conceptual level, the logical level. > You're asking whether it makes LOGICAL sense or CONCEPTUAL sense to > consider a photon to be one complete cycle of the oscillation. (Of > course it makes logical and conceptual sense.) But you didn't ask > whether it makes sense against things you can actually observe in real > life. Which is why I brought up the cheap oscilloscope and how you can > tell RIGHT AWAY in a practical application that a photon can't be a > single complete cycle of oscillation. > > If anything, I would expect you as a trained engineer to ask yourself > with every hypothesis you dream up, "Well, if that were true, then how > could I check to see if that makes sense with something I can rig up out > of scrapyard parts?" > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables What you say makes sense to me if the wave is sinusoidal. How about when the wave is not sinusoidal but rather square, with very short pulses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | trudi.schwander@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 05:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d79f2385-41d0-4a45-b74e-cd7a2b077bd3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #507064 |
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 1:08:44 AM UTC+2, benj wrote: > On 07/14/2015 03:36 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 8:16:32 PM UTC+2, benj wrote: > >> On 07/13/2015 01:34 PM, trudi.schwander@gmail.com wrote: > > ..... > >> > >>> The light that our eyes can detect is just a small part of the > >>> electromagnetic (EM) spectrum, a continuum of all EM waves arranged > >>> according to frequency and wavelength. There seem to be no upper and > >>> lower limits to the frequency or wavelength of EM waves and no gaps > >>> in the spectrum. All EM waves travel at the speed of light c, in a > >>> vacuum. > >> > >> Wrong. > >> > > ................................. > > Thanks for your reply > > Can you be more precise and tell me what is wrong and what you think would be correct? > > To say "no limits" is wrong because the low limit is zero and the upper > limit has only been observed as fast as cosmic rays. To say it goes on > without limit is to imply some kind of infinity which is mathematics > which is nothing but fantasy. If you want to say your FANTASY goes on > without limit, well, that is proper. > ............................ Thanks for your answer. How about if the lower limit of frequency is a wavelength that is the size of the universe, and the upper limit is not infinity, but much much higher than any instrument can detect. > >> But statement that there is no need for photons is wrong. Photoelectric > >> energy transfer requires it. > >> > >>> EM waves of any frequency are seen to be emitted and absorbed in > >>> discreet packets, also called photons. This packet of radiation can > >>> be considered as 1 complete cycle of its frequency instead of a > >>> particle. > >> > >> No. (for many reasons) Is an old wrong idea. > >> > >> ................................ > > What are the many reasons? > > Too complex to explain here. In a nutshell, because of the transform > nature of light trimming the time function to exactly one cycle or even > a Gaussian variation of such does not trim energy distribution enough. > The problem needing photons is that energy distribution is measured to > be compact. So compact it can't possibly be from waves. ........................... How about very very short pulses. > > >> > >> You can't possibly hope to be getting any help with your ideas from the > >> clowns, idiots and government strategic writers that infest this final > >> last gasp of USENET, can you? > >> > > ..................... > > You are helping me with my ideas, and I really thank you for it. > > One other question I have is why can you not consider a complete cycle of frequency to be a photon? > > Sure but I'm an exception. After all. I am a Kook and have actually been > banned for life from "physics Forums" for being a "crank". Ask any of > the regulars here and they'll tell you I am insane and believe in all > sorts of kooky things that they make up. (including Aether) Only real > scientists listen to insane rants (and then steal the ideas and call > them their own). Engineers (especially retired ones) are practical > enough to know better than to waste their time on someone an > establishment spokesman has identified as insane. > Thanks again for your time. I really appreciate it. > > -- > > ___ ___ ___ ___ > /\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \ > /::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \ > /:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\ > /::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/ > /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ / > \:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ / > \:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/ > \:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ / > \::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ / > ~~ \/__/ \/__/ Thanks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 08:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mo5l3o$5le$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #506364 |
On 7/14/2015 2:16 PM, benj wrote: > > True that ALL waves require a medium by the very definition of a wave. > "Waves in nothing at all" is babbling nonsense not worthy to be called > science. The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim that ESP is worthy of being called science. It's the Kook Wave theory(tm) > Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the > missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are > all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms. Kooks love ether. -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 10:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Crupx.83340$gG6.77890@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #507179 |
On 07/15/2015 08:55 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 7/14/2015 2:16 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>> True that ALL waves require a medium by the very definition of a wave.
>> "Waves in nothing at all" is babbling nonsense not worthy to be called
>> science.
>
>
> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>
> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
HVAC's fanasty. I never made such a claim except in Harlow's wet dreams.
>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>
>
> Kooks love ether.
You love "ether". Your babbling insane nonsense sure pegs you as a
huffer for sure! I find fantasy works better without the chemicals.
I love to pull the chain of official disinformationists by mentioning
"forbiden topics". A mention of Aether is as sure to set them into "you
are a kook" mode as mentioning UFOs.
I love the sound of debunkers frothing in the morning.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 13:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mo6643$8bo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #507195 |
On 7/15/2015 10:51 AM, benj wrote: > On 07/15/2015 08:55 AM, HVAC wrote: >> On 7/14/2015 2:16 PM, benj wrote: >>> >>> True that ALL waves require a medium by the very definition of a wave. >>> "Waves in nothing at all" is babbling nonsense not worthy to be called >>> science. >> >> >> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim >> that ESP is worthy of being called science. >> >> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm) > > HVAC's fanasty. I never made such a claim except in Harlow's wet dreams. Good. Then we agree that ESP is complete and utter bullshit. Now...How about remote viewing? Is it science or bullshit? >> Kooks love ether. > > You love "ether". Your babbling insane nonsense sure pegs you as a > huffer for sure! I find fantasy works better without the chemicals. > > I love to pull the chain of official disinformationists by mentioning > "forbiden topics". A mention of Aether is as sure to set them into "you > are a kook" mode as mentioning UFOs. I bet that if ether was real it would be made of froth. "Quantum froth" -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 15:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.301082e1712f2ba898c196@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #507179 |
In article <mo5l3o$5le$1@dont-email.me>, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com says... > > On 7/14/2015 2:16 PM, benj wrote: > > > > True that ALL waves require a medium by the very definition of a wave. > > "Waves in nothing at all" is babbling nonsense not worthy to be called > > science. > > > The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim > that ESP is worthy of being called science. > > It's the Kook Wave theory(tm) > > > > Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the > > missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are > > all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms. > > > Kooks love ether. I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe the gold paint? -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 15:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mo6duv$78h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #507317 |
On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote: > >> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim >> that ESP is worthy of being called science. >> >> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm) >> >> >>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the >>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are >>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms. >> >> >> Kooks love ether. > > I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe > the gold paint? Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too, but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad. Nawmean? -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-15 22:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3010dbd3efc1f13d98c198@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #507322 |
In article <mo6duv$78h$1@dont-email.me>, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com says... > > On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote: > > > >> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim > >> that ESP is worthy of being called science. > >> > >> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm) > >> > >> > >>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the > >>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are > >>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms. > >> > >> > >> Kooks love ether. > > > > I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe > > the gold paint? > > > Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's > all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too, > but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad. > > Nawmean? I like Benjy's anger. An angry kOOk is a funny one. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 01:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <UFHpx.253267$Pb6.144524@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #507322 |
On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>
>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>
>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kooks love ether.
>>
>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>> the gold paint?
>
>
> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>
> Nawmean?
Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
I just proved you a ignorant idiot again. And everything you say is a
lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 04:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qqseqa9skk8o12umc20abftl58b0d8pp2l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #507407 |
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:53:56 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>>
>>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>>
>>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>>
>>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>>
>>>> Kooks love ether.
>>>
>>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>>> the gold paint?
>>
>>
>> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
>> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
>> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>>
>> Nawmean?
>
>Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
>lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
>
If your posts are an accurate indication, no one had to lead you.
You lead the pack willingly.
>I just proved you a ignorant idiot again.
Where? When?
In reality, please.
>And everything you say is a
>lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
>Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
>
>Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 05:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mo877i$epc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #507417 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> HVAC Harlow wrote: >>> BDK wrote: >>>> <snip Photonic Dueling> > "K Wills wrote: > I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster. > -- > Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator > and FEMA camp counselor > hanson wrote: "Treeb", Treb, Trebert, Bert Glazier is another poster alright, one who is in need of your Psycho counseling why/which will become clear to you right after... > <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier, the Swine, Hate monger, Jewish Jailbird, Faceshitter & Graveyard vandal, Racist and Bigot "reber g=emc^2" has introduced himself as/with > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 letters from two Popes. Bert :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: ***** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert ***** :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur,carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" ... which happened after.... (3) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015: when <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, the Jewish Swine wrote: Harlow HVAC, Saul Levy & Benj, I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide". ... after. > (2) On 06Dec2014, you, Hebe Herbie, said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after > (1) On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have agood laugh when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > (above template to be used to snip Bert's Glazierolia and to administer loving "Recall Therapy" for Swine Glazier)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 15:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qj5gqad5ll1mi68depmh98pr63l5ccmrsa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #507428 |
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:15:49 -0700, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> HVAC Harlow wrote:
>>>> BDK wrote:
>>>>> <snip Photonic Dueling>
>>
>"K Wills wrote:
>> I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
>> --
>> Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator
>> and FEMA camp counselor
>>
>hanson wrote:
>"Treeb", Treb, Trebert, Bert Glazier is another poster
>alright, one who is in need of your Psycho counseling
>why/which will become clear to you right after...
>>
><herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier, the Swine,
>Hate monger, Jewish Jailbird, Faceshitter & Graveyard
>vandal, Racist and Bigot "reber g=emc^2" has introduced
>himself as/with
>>
>:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
>:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.."
If so, could Treeb explain why my '48 Panhead is acting up?
>:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
>:B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew I'm the only Jew that
>:B:: got 2 letters from two Popes. Bert
If I were a betting man, I'd bet Treeb is not the only Jew to get
two letters from two Popes.
>:B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world"
I recognize the formula. I've seen it posted in the past, though
I don't recall when.
>:B:: ***** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert *****
No one is loved by all.
>:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
>:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
>:B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur,carbon & iron together
>:B:: to make gun powder" ... which happened after....
Unless you were planning on using the gunpowder for illegal
purposes, I don't think the FBI would block your calls. In fact, they
would probably prefer that you could call them.
The ATF would certainly take some interest. Though how much is
unknown.
>(3)
>On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015:
>when <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, the Jewish Swine wrote:
>Harlow HVAC, Saul Levy & Benj, I'll be sitting on your face
>to take a shit & say: "Open wide". ... after.
OK. Treeb has a scat fetish. Not my cup of tea, but so long as
his partner is able to consent and does so, his fetish does me no
harm.
>>
>(2)
>On 06Dec2014, you, Hebe Herbie, said to
>"benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under
>me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser.
>Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after
>>
I don't know, of course, but nothing in Benj's posts suggests he
has a scat fetish.
>(1)
>On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in:
>https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a
>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J
>Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have agood laugh
>when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert.
It's extremely unlikely the urine would get through the vault.
Even if it somehow did, it wouldn't likely get through the casket.
>>
>(above template to be used to snip Bert's Glazierolia and
>to administer loving "Recall Therapy" for Swine Glazier)
The samples you've sent are certainly interesting.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 11:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <zaQpx.103377$0i5.52762@fx26.iad> |
| In reply to | #507417 |
On 07/16/2015 05:03 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:53:56 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kooks love ether.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>>>> the gold paint?
>>>
>>>
>>> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
>>> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
>>> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>>>
>>> Nawmean?
>>
>> Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
>> lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
>>
>
> If your posts are an accurate indication, no one had to lead you.
> You lead the pack willingly.
>
>> I just proved you a ignorant idiot again.
>
> Where? When?
> In reality, please.
>
>> And everything you say is a
>> lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
>> Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
>>
>> Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
>
> I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
>
You were BORN lost. On the INTERNET that is called a "looser"!
Yup, You are one. "shill #3" says it all! #3!!!!! Bwahahahahaha!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 15:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lo5gqalocnnqsl0f4191peo4ef3qi2cid3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #507457 |
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:34:55 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 07/16/2015 05:03 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:53:56 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>>>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kooks love ether.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>>>>> the gold paint?
>>>>
>>>> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
>>>> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
>>>> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>>>>
>>>> Nawmean?
>>>
>>> Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
>>> lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
>>
>> If your posts are an accurate indication, no one had to lead you.
>> You lead the pack willingly.
>>
>>> I just proved you a ignorant idiot again.
>>
>> Where? When?
>> In reality, please.
>>
Benj? You gonna answer my questions?
>>> And everything you say is a
>>> lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
>>> Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
>>>
>>> Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
>>
>> I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
>
>You were BORN lost.
Whereas everyone is born not really knowing anything, your claim
is technically correct. Not in the highly deceptive manner in which
you present it, but technically.
>On the INTERNET that is called a "looser"!
So, how does one become a tighter? :)
>
>Yup, You are one.
No. I am three. Do pay attention.
>"shill #3" says it all! #3!!!!! Bwahahahahaha!
BDK is #1. #2 is, well, #2. I'm number three, although Ed should
have been given the number. But he doesn't use the Shill title, so I
got it.
Do you often laugh at items that aren't the least bit funny?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-16 19:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <svXpx.166206$_a4.50370@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #507537 |
On 07/16/2015 04:42 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:34:55 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/16/2015 05:03 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:53:56 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>>>>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>>>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>>>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kooks love ether.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>>>>>> the gold paint?
>>>>>
>>>>> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
>>>>> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
>>>>> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nawmean?
>>>>
>>>> Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
>>>> lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
>>>
>>> If your posts are an accurate indication, no one had to lead you.
>>> You lead the pack willingly.
>>>
>>>> I just proved you a ignorant idiot again.
>>>
>>> Where? When?
>>> In reality, please.
>>>
>
> Benj? You gonna answer my questions?
>
>>>> And everything you say is a
>>>> lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
>>>> Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
>>>>
>>>> Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
>>>
>>> I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
>>
>> You were BORN lost.
>
> Whereas everyone is born not really knowing anything, your claim
> is technically correct. Not in the highly deceptive manner in which
> you present it, but technically.
>
>> On the INTERNET that is called a "looser"!
>
> So, how does one become a tighter? :)
>
>>
>> Yup, You are one.
>
> No. I am three. Do pay attention.
>
>> "shill #3" says it all! #3!!!!! Bwahahahahaha!
>
> BDK is #1. #2 is, well, #2. I'm number three, although Ed should
> have been given the number. But he doesn't use the Shill title, so I
> got it.
> Do you often laugh at items that aren't the least bit funny?
No, but you do and if you don't shut up I'll call you insane and a kook
again! Anyway, HVAC is ALWAYS #1. If you disagree he'll hit you with so
many lefts you'll beg for a right. Never forget that sonny! He's a
winner. You are a looser!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-17 03:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gjghqadliboiuduvbpd46mpba2ff16duql@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #507577 |
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:55:03 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 07/16/2015 04:42 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:34:55 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/16/2015 05:03 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:53:56 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 07/15/2015 03:59 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/15/2015 3:47 PM, BDK wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The REAL duality is how BJ can say what he said above, yet STILL claim
>>>>>>>> that ESP is worthy of being called science.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the Kook Wave theory(tm)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fact is AETHER is the KEY to the theory of Everything. Fact is that the
>>>>>>>>> missing part of this theory here is that all MATTER, all PARTICLES are
>>>>>>>>> all nothing but aether in one of it's condensed forms.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kooks love ether.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if Benjy hit the "starter fluid" a few too many times? Or maybe
>>>>>>> the gold paint?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seriously tho, ask nay kook worth a shit. They all *love* ether. It's
>>>>>> all a part of the kook gestalt. They have all done some gay shit too,
>>>>>> but let's not discuss that...BJ will get mad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nawmean?
>>>>>
>>>>> Never mad from you Hardblow. How long have you been paid to generate
>>>>> lies to lead people away from aether and sanity?
>>>>
>>>> If your posts are an accurate indication, no one had to lead you.
>>>> You lead the pack willingly.
>>>>
>>>>> I just proved you a ignorant idiot again.
>>>>
>>>> Where? When?
>>>> In reality, please.
>>>>
>>
>> Benj? You gonna answer my questions?
>>
So that's a no, then.
Your default admission that you lied is noted and accepted, Benj.
>>>>> And everything you say is a
>>>>> lie, so what is left of value? Well, OK, I'll give you your act with
>>>>> Treebert IS worth the price of admission, but no more than that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Say! Where is Treeb? Did he finally leave in the barrel boat?
>>>>
>>>> I'm lost here. I presume Treeb is another poster.
>>>
>>> You were BORN lost.
>>
>> Whereas everyone is born not really knowing anything, your claim
>> is technically correct. Not in the highly deceptive manner in which
>> you present it, but technically.
>>
>>> On the INTERNET that is called a "looser"!
>>
>> So, how does one become a tighter? :)
>>
>>>
>>> Yup, You are one.
>>
>> No. I am three. Do pay attention.
>>
>>> "shill #3" says it all! #3!!!!! Bwahahahahaha!
>>
>> BDK is #1. #2 is, well, #2. I'm number three, although Ed should
>> have been given the number. But he doesn't use the Shill title, so I
>> got it.
>> Do you often laugh at items that aren't the least bit funny?
>
>No, but you do and if you don't shut up I'll call you insane and a kook
>again!
You may project your apparent mental health state onto me, or
anyone else, if your mind requires it.
>Anyway, HVAC is ALWAYS #1.
He doesn't appear to use the title of Shill.
Or are you referring to his level of importance in your life?
>If you disagree he'll hit you with so
>many lefts you'll beg for a right.
I think you're lying.
>Never forget that sonny! He's a
>winner. You are a looser!
How can I be a tighter? :)
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-17 06:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <moajsd$791$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #507616 |
On 7/17/2015 4:53 AM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > >> Anyway, HVAC is ALWAYS #1. > > He doesn't appear to use the title of Shill. > Or are you referring to his level of importance in your life? Lol From your lips to god's ear! -- Cut off one head, two more shall take its place. HAIL HYDRA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web