Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #728693 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-22 09:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-03-04 11:48 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 297 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-22 09:13 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-22 06:17 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-22 07:24 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2019-02-22 15:06 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare ... "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2019-02-22 08:27 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 11:43 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 11:10 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2019-02-22 15:53 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Agent 007" <007@who.cares> - 2019-02-22 22:58 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 00:35 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-23 23:50 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 00:22 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-24 14:09 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-24 07:54 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-24 11:42 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-24 19:50 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 21:17 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 02:59 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-25 10:51 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 12:10 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 12:36 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:46 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 15:59 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:11 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 16:32 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:38 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 23:55 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:39 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-02 05:47 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 07:04 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 13:34 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 17:48 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 23:57 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 10:52 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-23 20:08 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 15:16 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-23 22:12 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 18:36 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-24 14:13 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-24 18:07 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-25 20:06 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 13:11 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 19:33 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-24 19:51 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 13:06 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 00:17 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-24 16:29 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 20:53 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-25 10:48 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 09:52 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 10:08 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 10:53 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 12:18 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 12:38 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 12:32 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 12:36 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 13:32 -0600
Re: DEATH PANELS HAVE BEEN HERE FOR 10 YEARS Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 14:17 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IPCflKvwn5Sr8J+Uq+KPsCBQT1RFTlRJQUwg ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 13:34 -0600
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 12:21 +0000
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 12:39 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 13:18 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 11:37 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 14:39 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 14:08 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 14:33 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 14:36 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 12:37 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-03 01:09 +0000
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-03-02 20:16 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 18:20 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 18:33 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-01 19:41 +0000
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 16:30 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 16:40 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:44 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 17:14 -0500
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 15:16 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 19:27 -0600
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 18:33 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 19:59 -0600
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 19:02 -0700
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-01 21:38 -0600
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:40 +0200
Re: Retarded, illiterate crap removed. Death panels Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 18:20 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄=?UTF-8?B?UmU6IPCflKvwn5Sr8J+Uq+KPsCBQT1RFTlRJQUwg ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 12:38 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 10:51 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 21:26 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-25 10:50 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 09:57 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The foam-drooling cowardly domestic terrorist currently socked up as "Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 10:55 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 12:35 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-25 15:08 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 13:39 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 12:24 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 13:33 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 13:31 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-25 14:09 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-25 20:20 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-25 15:08 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 13:05 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-25 20:02 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-02-25 12:28 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-25 09:56 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 19:30 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-02-23 22:36 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-23 10:53 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-02-24 14:22 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2019-02-24 21:37 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-02-25 12:21 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-02-24 14:16 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 15:47 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 12:54 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 12:43 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:42 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 10:30 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-03-02 15:55 +0000
Men are raped more often than women. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-02 18:50 -0800
Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:59 +0200
Men are raped more often than women. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-03 02:11 -0800
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 11:32 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:35 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 11:43 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:08 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:11 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:13 +0000
Re: Men are raped more often than women. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 08:00 -0600
Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 08:39 -0600
There will always be "rich" and "poor". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-03 09:15 -0800
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-03-03 09:21 -0800
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:25 +0000
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:29 -0500
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:37 +0000
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:56 -0700
SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-03 09:26 -0800
Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:30 +0000
Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:57 -0700
Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:25 -0700
Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:40 -0700
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:58 -0700
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 13:34 -0500
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 18:57 +0000
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 14:22 -0600
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:08 -0500
Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> - 2019-03-03 13:00 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 13:35 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:52 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> - 2019-03-03 19:59 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-04 16:15 +0000
Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 14:23 -0600
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:19 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 19:44 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 00:52 +0000
Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 10:21 -0600
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-05 11:56 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 17:00 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:40 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 18:40 +0000
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:13 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:34 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:55 -0700
Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 15:17 -0500
Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 14:45 -0700
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:18 -0500
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:31 +0000
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:53 -0500
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:35 -0800
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 19:59 +0000
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:03 -0700
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:29 -0600
Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:27 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-02 05:43 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 07:04 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 10:28 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 08:35 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 08:41 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 10:49 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 08:56 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-03-02 07:58 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 20:36 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 13:44 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 16:59 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 15:02 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 18:18 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 18:48 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 17:22 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-03-03 10:41 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 09:39 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:23 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 14:11 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 12:15 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:06 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:07 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 10:05 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 07:26 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 10:50 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 08:01 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-04 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 11:32 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-04 12:32 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 09:42 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 09:32 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:58 -0700
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-03-04 12:10 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:39 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 14:03 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 14:09 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 10:10 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 13:46 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 20:40 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-02 23:07 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 13:50 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 17:27 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 15:43 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-03-03 03:28 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-03-03 00:32 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 19:49 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 21:00 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 07:00 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 23:25 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-03-03 10:51 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 14:01 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:19 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:02 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 19:33 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 07:03 +0200
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 05:22 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 19:02 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:45 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:53 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-03 18:55 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 14:14 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 14:12 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:06 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:10 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:05 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:04 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:18 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 13:10 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 14:16 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-03-04 13:47 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 14:21 -0600
Re: Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-03-04 14:28 -0600
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Climate change could make female orgasms rare and ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 23:19 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 19:58 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:04 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 15:09 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:11 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:36 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 14:38 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 16:45 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 15:00 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 17:13 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 15:22 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 17:24 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 16:01 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:32 -0800
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-03-04 13:36 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 13:59 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-03-04 14:18 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 23:29 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-03-05 06:07 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 09:33 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-05 10:41 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 05:25 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-03 00:58 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 01:04 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 20:13 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-02 10:21 -0700
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-03 00:56 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-02 21:02 -0500
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-02 16:13 +0000
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-01 21:42 -0600
Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-04 11:48 +0000
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 14:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5h8d9$18ol$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730123 |
On 3/3/2019 1:43 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <r3sn7e97857peu7k1v7tvbk6erkkhddlo6@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >>> mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: >>>> Crapstain Neal Warren aka Gergory Hall <crapstain.neal@fake.yacht_mooter> skidmarked: >>>>> Paul Derbyshire in his transvestite "Nerdegda" frock mooted: >>>>> <...> >>>>>> It's about all that troglodyte does these days. That, and grunt and >>>>>> fart in his cave somewhere in Appalachia while dreaming of some >>>>>> underage niece or cousin who won't ever let him anywhere near her. >>>>> >>>>> Yah, that's the ticket. Marcy Darcy's niece, Amber. <---[skidmark] >>>>> She will fuck anybody and, unlike you, she's hawt. <---[skidmark] >>>> >>>> D'Arcy >>> >>>Is he saying that Marcy D'Arcy's arsey? >>>No wonder Teh Gerg is interested. >> >> No, Marcy D'Arcy's flat-chested and will never >> appear in the "Big 'Uns" magazine. And, her arse >> is rather on the phlat side, too. But, her teenage >> niece, Amber D'Arcy, is as hot as a trébuché's >> flaming load. > > Amber wouldn't be a D'Arcy, but she's got the body of a goddess. Just > gazing at those perky little conical protrusions causes my codpiece to > runneth over. I made codfish cakes a couple of weeks ago. Crunchy on the outside, soft, and very tasty on the inside. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 14:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kh9o7edc2ojede5ts7oc6t3f610v7n3i2n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730123 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:43:39 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: <...> >Amber wouldn't be a D'Arcy, but she's got the body of a goddess. Just >gazing at those perky little conical protrusions causes my codpiece to >runneth over. Amber definitely has no need for a bra. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 10:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e466fbc7426f5d996783@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729929 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <e39l7e9i5j1hdjcrp5rqucb962vocitn98@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... ¤ ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: ¤ >> ¤ >> <...> ¤ >> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. ¤ >> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! ¤ > ¤ >Incorrect. ¤ ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta males. ¤ ¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. ¤ > ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of success ¤ >as having more children? ¤ ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of feminization of the western male will change it. That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 13:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hfjl7elra0ooumnr3bg2fv2hfemv74vprk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729942 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >¤ >> >¤ >> <...> >¤ >> >¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash out in >¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know this. Thanks for >¤ >>> making that clear. >¤ >> >¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >¤ > >¤ >Incorrect. >¤ >¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to >¤ the top of the food chain not because of wimps and >¤ pussies but because of the stronger more intelligent >¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more of their >¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker >¤ beta males. >¤ >¤ >> Manly men >¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more >¤ >> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >¤ > >¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of success >¤ >as having more children? >¤ >¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating >¤ a greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger >¤ participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount >¤ of feminization of the western male will change it. > >That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more equal. Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are all the purview of the male of the human species. Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male dominance, strength, violence and greater intelligence. Feminist types may not like it but I say, TOUGH! -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 20:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5epod$4tf$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #729945 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:46:37 -0500, Stinky Grishnakh Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Orc and RAPIST, gurgled: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >>¤ >> >>¤ >> <...> >>¤ >> >>¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash >>out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know >>this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. >>¤ >> >>¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >>¤ > >>¤ >Incorrect. >>¤ >>¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the >>food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the >>stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more >>of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta >>males. >>¤ >>¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >>>> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >>¤ > >>¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of >>success ¤ >as having more children? >>¤ >>¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >>¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a >>greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >>¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >>¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ >>participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of >>feminization of the western male will change it. >> >>That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. > > Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and > weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which > fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. > Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more > equal. > > Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution > and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are > all the purview of the male of the human species. > > Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male > dominance, strength, vio<NUTKICK!> You misspelled "female strength, endurance, and ingenuity". HTH. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ge08ieFqa7mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729968 |
On 3/2/19 1:40 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:46:37 -0500, Stinky Grishnakh Hell, Fleabitten > Nazi Orc and RAPIST, gurgled: > >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> <...> >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash >>> out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know >>> this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >Incorrect. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the >>> food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the >>> stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more >>> of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta >>> males. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >>>>> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of >>> success ¤ >as having more children? >>> ¤ >>> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >>> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a >>> greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >>> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >>> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ >>> participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of >>> feminization of the western male will change it. >>> >>> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. >> >> Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and >> weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which >> fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. >> Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more >> equal. >> >> Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution >> and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are >> all the purview of the male of the human species. >> >> Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male >> dominance, strength, vio<NUTKICK!> > > You misspelled "female strength, endurance, and ingenuity". HTH. > He shows deep insecurity with the idea of equal rights. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c1bfpj.ip.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #729968 |
On 2019-03-02 1:40 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:46:37 -0500, Stinky Grishnakh Hell, Fleabitten > Nazi Orc and RAPIST, gurgled: > >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> <...> >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash >>> out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know >>> this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >Incorrect. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the >>> food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the >>> stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more >>> of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta >>> males. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >>>>> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of >>> success ¤ >as having more children? >>> ¤ >>> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >>> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a >>> greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >>> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >>> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ >>> participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of >>> feminization of the western male will change it. >>> >>> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. >> >> Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and >> weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which >> fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. >> Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more >> equal. >> >> Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution >> and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are >> all the purview of the male of the human species. >> >> Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male >> dominance, strength, vio<NUTKICK!> > > You misspelled "female strength, endurance, and ingenuity". HTH. > you can't spell non existing things
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 17:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5f1gs$1m4c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729968 |
On 3/2/2019 3:40 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:46:37 -0500, Stinky Grishnakh Hell, Fleabitten > Nazi Orc and RAPIST, gurgled: > >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> <...> >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash >>> out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know >>> this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. >>> ¤ >> >>> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >Incorrect. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the >>> food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the >>> stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more >>> of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta >>> males. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >>>>> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >>> ¤ > >>> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of >>> success ¤ >as having more children? >>> ¤ >>> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >>> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a >>> greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >>> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >>> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ >>> participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of >>> feminization of the western male will change it. >>> >>> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. >> >> Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and >> weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which >> fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. >> Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more >> equal. >> >> Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution >> and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are >> all the purview of the male of the human species. >> >> Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male >> dominance, strength, vio<NUTKICK!> > > You misspelled "female strength, endurance, and ingenuity". HTH. > Dykes like Nads are funny as hell. They yell how superior "women" are and then try to act and dress like men. They are nothing but cartoons. If Nads and her butch buddies think they can win a war against men, they are way more stupid than even WE think they are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 23:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11EeE.61949$ri3.28956@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #729992 |
On 2019-03-02, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/2/2019 3:40 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 13:46:37 -0500, Stinky Grishnakh Hell, Fleabitten >> Nazi Orc and RAPIST, gurgled: >> >>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >>>> ¤ >> >>>> ¤ >> <...> >>>> ¤ >> >>>> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash >>>> out in ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know >>>> this. Thanks for ¤ >>> making that clear. >>>> ¤ >> >>>> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >>>> ¤ > >>>> ¤ >Incorrect. >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to ¤ the top of the >>>> food chain not because of wimps and ¤ pussies but because of the >>>> stronger more intelligent ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more >>>> of their ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker ¤ beta >>>> males. >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ >> Manly men ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more ¤ >>>>>> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >>>> ¤ > >>>> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of >>>> success ¤ >as having more children? >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >>>> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating ¤ a >>>> greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >>>> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >>>> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger ¤ >>>> participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount ¤ of >>>> feminization of the western male will change it. >>>> >>>> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. >>> >>> Civilized societies come and go. They go because they become effete and >>> weak and are supplanted by more violent and masculine societies which >>> fill the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate emasculation. >>> Everybody is supposed to be equal but the dear (male) leaders are more >>> equal. >>> >>> Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions of years of evolution >>> and genetic selection for strength, violence and dominance. These are >>> all the purview of the male of the human species. >>> >>> Humanity has risen to the top of the animal kingdom because of male >>> dominance, strength, vio<NUTKICK!> >> >> You misspelled "female strength, endurance, and ingenuity". HTH. >> > Dykes like Nads are funny as hell. They yell how superior "women" are > and then try to act and dress like men. They are nothing but cartoons. > > If Nads and her butch buddies think they can win a war against men, they > are way more stupid than even WE think they are. Nadegda is a female? -- Ratchet Jaw The Locked and Loaded Jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ge08juFqa7mU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729945 |
On 3/2/19 11:46 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote: >> ¤ >> >> ¤ >> <...> >> ¤ >> >> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash out in >> ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know this. Thanks for >> ¤ >>> making that clear. >> ¤ >> >> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool! >> ¤ > >> ¤ >Incorrect. >> ¤ >> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to >> ¤ the top of the food chain not because of wimps and >> ¤ pussies but because of the stronger more intelligent >> ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more of their >> ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker >> ¤ beta males. >> ¤ >> ¤ >> Manly men >> ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more >> ¤ >> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool. >> ¤ > >> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of success >> ¤ >as having more children? >> ¤ >> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary, >> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating >> ¤ a greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them. >> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment >> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger >> ¤ participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount >> ¤ of feminization of the western male will change it. >> >> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society. > > Civilized societies come and go. They go because > they become effete and weak and are supplanted > by more violent and masculine societies which fill > the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate > emasculation. Everybody is supposed to be equal > but the dear (male) leaders are more equal. > > Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions > of years of evolution and genetic selection for > strength, violence and dominance. These are all > the purview of the male of the human species. > > Humanity has risen to the top of the animal > kingdom because of male dominance, strength, > violence and greater intelligence. > > Feminist types may not like it but I say, TOUGH! > At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world views: * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between hard work / productivity and financial reward. Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far. * Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will somehow help others. Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings and what they believe has historically existed (which is often incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a less defensible one. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 17:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4svl7e1o3dqfgf19cohmolgn9knj2d8kg3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729973 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: <courteously trimmed> >At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than >most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. Equal rights attempt to confer upon the less-well endowed equal abilities. It doesn't work because, just like criminals don't register their guns, the more-well endowed male will not give up their superior natural endowments in order to lower themselves to a female level that needs legislated equal rights. If females were, indeed, equal they would grab those rights for themselves. They would not need them legislated. >Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world >views: > >* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a >focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between >hard work / productivity and financial reward. Wrong. Liberals want to weaken everybody except a ruling class down to a subsistence-level existence. They want to raise taxes on productivity so as to squelch it. The only financial reward there is enjoyed by the ruling class at the expense of the enslaved class. >Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to >help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. No, liberals don't care about evidence because they just make it up as they go along to fit their ruling class dictates. >This >includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food >safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful >substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the >harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form >of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right >to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far. Taken too far and based upon bogus scientific evidence is right. Liberals want a free ride but they are too stupid to understand there is no free ride. They have Venezuela as a prime example of how socialism fails every time it's tried due to ruling class greed, mismanagement and lust for power but they ignore the failures. Liberals are stupid beyond belief and even more gullible. >* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, >males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing >wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will >somehow help others. No, conservatives support keeping the fruits of their labor. Conservative know that their time is a human right and their being taxed on their productivity to prop up the lazy and stupid and diseased is in violation of their GOD GIVEN rights to own their time. Conservatives have a proven record of greater charitable giving than liberals - much greater as conservatives morals call upon them the concept of Christian tithing. >Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings >and what they believe has historically existed (which is often >incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes >controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman >can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to >define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to >limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their >ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call >conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a >less defensible one. No, you have it all wrong. Conservatives don't give a hoot what others do as longs as it doesn't interfere with our God-given human rights. Leave us alone, let us produce uninhibited and untaxed and unregulated and there will naturally be such abundance that life will be better for all including indolent and stupid liberals. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 15:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c1bmg1.eif.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #729985 |
On 2019-03-02 3:27 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > <courteously trimmed> > >> At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than >> most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. > > Equal rights attempt to confer upon the less-well endowed equal abilities. > It doesn't work because, just like criminals don't register their guns, > the more-well endowed male will not give up their superior natural > endowments in order to lower themselves to a female level that needs > legislated equal rights. If females were, indeed, equal they would grab > those rights for themselves. They would not need them legislated. > >> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world >> views: >> >> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a >> focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between >> hard work / productivity and financial reward. > > Wrong. Liberals want to weaken everybody except a ruling class > down to a subsistence-level existence. They want to raise taxes > on productivity so as to squelch it. The only financial reward there > is enjoyed by the ruling class at the expense of the enslaved class. > >> Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to >> help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. > > No, liberals don't care about evidence because they just make it > up as they go along to fit their ruling class dictates. > >> This >> includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food >> safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful >> substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the >> harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form >> of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right >> to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far. > > Taken too far and based upon bogus scientific evidence is right. > Liberals want a free ride but they are too stupid to understand > there is no free ride. They have Venezuela as a prime example > of how socialism fails every time it's tried due to ruling class > greed, mismanagement and lust for power but they ignore the > failures. Liberals are stupid beyond belief and even more gullible. > >> * Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, >> males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing >> wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will >> somehow help others. > > No, conservatives support keeping the fruits of their labor. Conservative > know that their time is a human right and their being taxed on their > productivity to prop up the lazy and stupid and diseased is in violation > of their GOD GIVEN rights to own their time. Conservatives have a > proven record of greater charitable giving than liberals - much greater > as conservatives morals call upon them the concept of Christian tithing. > >> Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings >> and what they believe has historically existed (which is often >> incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes >> controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman >> can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to >> define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to >> limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their >> ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call >> conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a >> less defensible one. > > No, you have it all wrong. Conservatives don't give a hoot what others > do as longs as it doesn't interfere with our God-given human rights. > Leave us alone, let us produce uninhibited and untaxed and unregulated > and there will naturally be such abundance that life will be better for > all including indolent and stupid liberals. > and then up your bum grand daddy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <TKDeE.89250$mQ7.31278@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #729985 |
On 2019-03-02, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: ><courteously trimmed> > >>At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than >>most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. > > Equal rights attempt to confer upon the less-well endowed equal abilities. > It doesn't work because, just like criminals don't register their guns, > the more-well endowed male will not give up their superior natural > endowments in order to lower themselves to a female level that needs > legislated equal rights. If females were, indeed, equal they would grab > those rights for themselves. They would not need them legislated. The bad guys will always get guns or whatever it is that is illegal. In fact in most cases, organized crime will make a profit off it. So how did prohibition work out? The war on drugs? etc.... -- Ratchet Jaw The Locked and Loaded Jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 03:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lien7ehtm9mtjparcb31d1gibicv2o7mio@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #729991 |
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:48:19 GMT, Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> wrote: >On 2019-03-02, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >><courteously trimmed> >> >>>At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than >>>most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. >> >> Equal rights attempt to confer upon the less-well endowed equal abilities. >> It doesn't work because, just like criminals don't register their guns, >> the more-well endowed male will not give up their superior natural >> endowments in order to lower themselves to a female level that needs >> legislated equal rights. If females were, indeed, equal they would grab >> those rights for themselves. They would not need them legislated. > >The bad guys will always get guns or whatever it is that is illegal. >In fact in most cases, organized crime will make a profit off it. > >So how did prohibition work out? >The war on drugs? >etc.... I've already shown him how criminals get their guns on the black market and he just freaked out. Interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 00:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5f7bh$vdt$3@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #729985 |
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 17:27:56 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > wrote: > <courteously trimmed> > >>At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than >>most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals. > > Equal rights attempt to confer upon the less-well endowed equal > abilities. It doesn't work because, just like criminals don't register > their guns, > the more-well endowed male will not give up their superior natural > endowments in order to lower themselves to a female level that needs > legislated equal rights. If females were, indeed, equal they would grab > those rights for themselves. They would not need them legislated. > >>Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world >>views: >> >>* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a >>focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between >>hard work / productivity and financial reward. > > Wrong. Liberals want to weaken everybody except a ruling class down to a > subsistence-level existence. They want to raise taxes on productivity so > as to squelch it. The only financial reward there is enjoyed by the > ruling class at the expense of the enslaved class. > >>Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to >>help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. > > No, liberals don't care about evidence because they just make it up as > they go along to fit their ruling class dictates. > >>This includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and >>food safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful >>substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the >>harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form >>of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right >>to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far. > > Taken too far and based upon bogus scientific evidence is right. > Liberals want a free ride but they are too stupid to understand there is > no free ride. They have Venezuela as a prime example of how socialism > fails every time it's tried due to ruling class greed, mismanagement and > lust for power but they ignore the failures. Liberals are stupid beyond > belief and even more gullible. > >>* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, >>males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing >>wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will >>somehow help others. > > No, conservatives support keeping the fruits of their labor. > Conservative know that their time is a human right and their being taxed > on their productivity to prop up the lazy and stupid and diseased is in > violation of their GOD GIVEN rights to own their time. Conservatives > have a proven record of greater charitable giving than liberals - much > greater as conservatives morals call upon them the concept of Christian > tithing. > >>Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings >>and what they believe has historically existed (which is often >>incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes >>controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman >>can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to >>define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to >>limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their >>ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call >>conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a >>less defensible one. > > No, you have it all wrong. Conservatives don't give a hoot what others > do as longs as it doesn't interfere with our God-given human rights. > Leave us alone, let us produce uninhibited and untaxed and unregulated > and there will naturally be such abundance that life will be better for > all including indolent and stupid liberals. Nice kookrant-- Wait, WHAT??? > Conservatives don't give a hoot what others do as longs as it doesn't > interfere with our God-given human rights. Again: WHAT??? Conservatives have always been busybodies seeking to regulate everything, even what goes on inside bedrooms and bathrooms and women's bodies. https://books.google.ca/books?id=vKFiDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=conservative+regulation+in+the+bedroom&source=bl&ots=GPC5EZ3DAW&sig=ACfU3U1Ex7kjumrbocBMMvPn2MCvwKT7ug&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjW1sjh2-TgAhUyooMKHfExC0k4ChDoATAFegQICRAB https://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/why_do_conservatives_hate_freedom/ https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/07/27/texas-republicans-revive-their-bathroom-bill https://pai.org/blog/global-day-action-reminds-us-womens-bodies-still-political-control/ https://iwhc.org/2017/11/trumps-giving-power-ultra-conservatives/ -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 19:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lt8m7e9ajgc7bq2gi6492f8n1430felf2h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730005 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: <...> >Conservatives have always been busybodies seeking to regulate everything, >even what goes on inside bedrooms and bathrooms and women's bodies. > >https://books.google.ca/books?id=vKFiDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=conservative+regulation+in+the+bedroom&source=bl&ots=GPC5EZ3DAW&sig=ACfU3U1Ex7kjumrbocBMMvPn2MCvwKT7ug&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjW1sjh2-TgAhUyooMKHfExC0k4ChDoATAFegQICRAB > >https://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/why_do_conservatives_hate_freedom/ > >https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/07/27/texas-republicans-revive-their-bathroom-bill > >https://pai.org/blog/global-day-action-reminds-us-womens-bodies-still-political-control/ > >https://iwhc.org/2017/11/trumps-giving-power-ultra-conservatives/ A pack of liberal lie web sites. Proof that liberals accuse others of that which they, themselves, embrace. Liberals want to rule, first and foremost. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 21:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5fcgi$12q0$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730007 |
On 3/2/2019 7:49 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: > > <...> > >> Conservatives have always been busybodies seeking to regulate everything, >> even what goes on inside bedrooms and bathrooms and women's bodies. >> >> https://books.google.ca/books?id=vKFiDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=conservative+regulation+in+the+bedroom&source=bl&ots=GPC5EZ3DAW&sig=ACfU3U1Ex7kjumrbocBMMvPn2MCvwKT7ug&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjW1sjh2-TgAhUyooMKHfExC0k4ChDoATAFegQICRAB >> >> https://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/why_do_conservatives_hate_freedom/ >> >> https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/07/27/texas-republicans-revive-their-bathroom-bill >> >> https://pai.org/blog/global-day-action-reminds-us-womens-bodies-still-political-control/ >> >> https://iwhc.org/2017/11/trumps-giving-power-ultra-conservatives/ > > A pack of liberal lie web sites. Proof that liberals accuse others > of that which they, themselves, embrace. Liberals want to rule, > first and foremost. Like them liberal commie fascists like in the happy countries where people get good health care and don't have to live in a tent behind the WalMart because they don't have sad billionaires to honor and support in the style they richly deserve? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5fn26$f39$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730007 |
On 3/2/2019 7:49 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote: >> https://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/why_do_conservatives_hate_freedom/ >> >> https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2017/07/27/texas-republicans-revive-their-bathroom-bill >> >> https://pai.org/blog/global-day-action-reminds-us-womens-bodies-still-political-control/ >> >> https://iwhc.org/2017/11/trumps-giving-power-ultra-conservatives/ > > A pack of liberal lie web sites. The *Economist* is a "liberal lie web site"?! What the fuck are you *on*? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 23:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q5foh8$l96$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730005 |
On 3/2/2019 6:32 PM, Libtard wrote: > On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 17:27:56 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> <courteously trimmed> >> <snit crap> >> >> No, you have it all wrong. Conservatives don't give a hoot what others >> do as longs as it doesn't interfere with our God-given human rights. >> Leave us alone, let us produce uninhibited and untaxed and unregulated >> and there will naturally be such abundance that life will be better for >> all including indolent and stupid liberals. > > Nice kookrant-- > > Wait, WHAT??? > >> Conservatives don't give a hoot what others do as longs as it doesn't >> interfere with our God-given human rights. > > Again: WHAT??? > > Conservatives have always been busybodies seeking to regulate everything, > even what goes on inside bedrooms and bathrooms and women's bodies. > inside womens bodies, is that what makes you squirm, libtard ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 10:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1o3uzes.1vcctjd1ww3xguN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #730049 |
SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > Paul Derbyshire in his ludicrous "Libturd" leisure suit mooted: > > Crapstain Neal Warren aka Gergory Hall > > <crapstain.neal@fake.yacht_mooter> skidmarked: > >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 13:50:06 -0700, > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: [...] > >> No, you have it all wrong. Conservatives don't give a hoot what others > >> do as longs as it doesn't interfere with our God-given human rights. > >> Leave us alone, let us produce uninhibited and untaxed and unregulated > >> and there will naturally be such abundance that life will be better for > >> all including indolent and stupid liberals. > > > > Nice kookrant-- > > > > Wait, WHAT??? > > > >> Conservatives don't give a hoot what others do as longs as it doesn't > >> interfere with our God-given human rights. > > > > Again: WHAT??? > > > > Conservatives have always been busybodies seeking to regulate everything, > > even what goes on inside bedrooms and bathrooms and women's bodies. > > > > inside womens bodies, is that what makes you squirm, libtard ? Paul doesn't know much about that. -- \|/ (((Ï))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web