Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	talk.politics.guns, sci.physics, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Climate change could make female orgasms rare and cause human extinction.
Date	2019-03-02 13:50 -0700
Message-ID	<ge08juFqa7mU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <lq8l7et6jc8ueopb1lf21apv6fhb8kgmce@4ax.com> <gdvmggFm9ehU4@mid.individual.net> <e39l7e9i5j1hdjcrp5rqucb962vocitn98@4ax.com> <MPG.36e466fbc7426f5d996783@news.altopia.com> <hfjl7elra0ooumnr3bg2fv2hfemv74vprk@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/2/19 11:46 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The great and wise greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> ¤ On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> ¤ >On 3/2/19, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> ¤ >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Snit wrote:
>> ¤ >>
>> ¤ >> <...>
>> ¤ >>
>> ¤ >>> Notice how you cannot defend your support for abuse so you lash out in
>> ¤ >>> anger. Your position cannot be defended. Even you know this. Thanks for
>> ¤ >>> making that clear.
>> ¤ >>
>> ¤ >> Evolution proves my position, you fool!
>> ¤ >
>> ¤ >Incorrect.
>> ¤
>> ¤ No, very obviously correct. Humanity has risen to
>> ¤ the top of the food chain not because of wimps and
>> ¤ pussies but because of the stronger more intelligent
>> ¤ and more violent alpha males passing on more of their
>> ¤ superior genetics than the weaker, stupider and meeker
>> ¤ beta males.
>> ¤
>> ¤ >> Manly men
>> ¤ >> have always risen to the top and contributed more
>> ¤ >> than their fair share of superior genes to the pool.
>> ¤ >
>> ¤ >What do you mean by "manly"? And do you see the only measure of success
>> ¤ >as having more children?
>> ¤
>> ¤ Manly means being intelligent, strong, violent when necessary,
>> ¤ and being possessed of greater virility which means impregnating
>> ¤ a greater number of top-tier females even if it means raping them.
>> ¤ This is an historical fact. Rape doesn't really exist. It is a figment
>> ¤ of the female imagination. Copulation occurs when the stronger
>> ¤ participant desires it to happen. That's a fact and no amount
>> ¤ of feminization of the western male will change it.
>>
>> That theory may apply to wolf packs, but not a civilized society.
> 
> Civilized societies come and go. They go because
> they become effete and weak and are supplanted
> by more violent and masculine societies which fill
> the feminine vacuum. Socialism is the ultimate
> emasculation. Everybody is supposed to be equal
> but the dear (male) leaders are more equal.
> 
> Civilization doesn't and cannot overcome millions
> of years of evolution and genetic selection for
> strength, violence and dominance. These are all
> the purview of the male of the human species.
> 
> Humanity has risen to the top of the animal
> kingdom because of male dominance, strength,
> violence and greater intelligence.
> 
> Feminist types may not like it but I say, TOUGH!
> 

At least you are more open about your special entitlement views than 
most conservatives. I back equal rights, as do most liberals.

Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world 
views:

* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a 
focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between 
hard work / productivity and financial reward.

Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to 
help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. This 
includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food 
safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful 
substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the 
harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form 
of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right 
to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.

* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, 
males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing 
wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will 
somehow help others.

Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings 
and what they believe has historically existed (which is often 
incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes 
controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman 
can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to 
define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to 
limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their 
ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call 
conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a 
less defensible one.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Thread

csiph-web