Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #702773 > unrolled thread

A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-15 05:53 -0400
    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 20:19 -0400
      Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:59 -0400
        Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 11:44 +0100
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 07:07 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 12:57 +0100
              Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 08:04 -0400
                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:21 +0100
                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:10 -0400
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:04 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:24 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 10:41 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:09 -0400
              Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:15 -0400
                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:04 -0400
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:11 -0600
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 08:32 -0400
                    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 22:14 -0400
                      Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:13 +0000
                        Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-26 03:22 -0400
                          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:12 -0400
                          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 12:39 -0700
                            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-27 02:38 -0400
                              Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0700
                                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-27 18:41 -0400
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-18 10:38 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 22:43 -0700
              Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 09:55 -0400
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:34 -0700
        Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:23 -0400
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 10:26 -0400
            Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 17:53 -0400
              Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:11 +0000
                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 18:44 -0400
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:02 +0000
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:13 -0400
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-19 00:41 -0400
                    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:26 -0400
                Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:01 -0400
                  Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:28 -0400
                    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:48 -0400
                      Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:20 -0500
        Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:07 -0400
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:16 -0400
          Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:06 -0600
    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:42 -0700
      Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 18:01 -0400
    Re: A summer of fire, heat and flood puts a focus on adapting to climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-22 11:46 +0000

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#704695

On 9/26/2018 3:22 AM, Scout wrote:
> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:pof837$mhp$50@dont-email.me...
>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm
>>
>> SPNAK!
> 
> If you think conjecture, assertion, hypothesis, and unsupported claims 
> is a SPNAK! then it's no wonder that you're so stupid.
> 
> There is ZERO proof presented to support the assertions of man made 
> climate change, and the assertions that it's tied to man's activities is 
> just that assertions.<SPANK>
https://skepticalscience.com/Hansen-1988-prediction-advanced.htm

https://skepticalscience.com/a-comprehensive-review-of-the-causes-of-global-warming.html

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2003/2002GL016377.shtml

"Our results strengthen the case for an anthropogenic influence on climate."

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2004/2004GL019998.shtml

"Observed DTR over land shows a large negative trend of ~0.4°C over the 
last 50 years that is very unlikely to have occurred due to internal 
variability. This trend is due to larger increases in minimum 
temperatures (~0.9°C) than maximum temperatures (~0.6°C) over the same 
period. Analysis of trends in DTR over the last century from five 
coupled climate models shows that simulated trends in DTR due to 
anthropogenic forcing are much smaller than observed. This difference is 
attributable to larger than observed changes in maximum temperatures in 
four of the five models analysed here, a result consistent with previous 
modelling studies."

http://www.math.nyu.edu/~gerber/pages/documents/santer_etal-science-2003.pdf

"Comparable increases are evident in climate model experiments. The 
latter show that human-induced changes in ozone and well-mixed 
greenhouse gases account for ~80% of the simulated rise in tropopause 
height over 1979–1999. Their primary contributions are through cooling 
of the stratosphere (caused by ozone) and warming of the troposphere 
(caused by well-mixed greenhouse gases). A model predicted fingerprint 
of tropopause height changes is statistically detectable in two 
different observational (“reanalysis”) data sets. This positive 
detection result allows us to attribute overall tropopause height 
changes to a combination of anthropogenic and natural external forcings, 
with the anthropogenic component predominating."

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5732/284.abstract

"[the increase in ocean heat content] cannot be explained by natural 
internal climate variability or solar and volcanic forcing, but is well 
simulated by two anthropogenically forced climate models. We conclude 
that it is of human origin, a conclusion robust to observational 
sampling and model differences. Changes in advection combine with 
surface forcing to give the overall warming pattern. The implications of 
this study suggest that society needs to seriously consider model 
predictions of future climate change."

I could go on, but the first skepticalscience link has lots of further 
reading links, including to journal articles.

If you're wondering what the fuck just happened to you, well, to put it 
in language that right-wingers will understand, science just bent you 
over and made you its bitch.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704738

On 9/26/18 12:22 AM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:pof837$mhp$50@dont-email.me...
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:14:44 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>
>>> Much like man is currently presented during climate change that has been
>>> going on for millions of years, and will continue to change long after
>>> we're gone.
>>
>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm
>>
>> ----------
>> Multiple sets of independent observations find a human fingerprint
>> on climate change.
>> ----------
>>
>> SPNAK!
> 
> If you think conjecture, assertion, hypothesis, and unsupported claims 
> is a SPNAK! then it's no wonder that you're so stupid.
> 
> There is ZERO proof presented to support the assertions of man made 
> climate change, and the assertions that it's tied to man's activities is 
> just that assertions.

Serious request for you... can you find ANY relevant scientific site -- 
any at all -- which backs your view?

My guess: you cannot.

This is ANOTHER area where you simply are rejecting evidence and 
studies. It is a big difference between the left and right -- the left 
TENDS to accept evidence. There ARE exceptions, such as the many on the 
left who claim vaccinations cause autism, the fear of power lines 
causing cancer, GMO fear, etc. But overall people on the left tend to 
accept science more than those on the right.

> They imply they understand everything about the process,

No, they do not. To be clear you made this up.

> and yet the 
> real world events regularly don't even begin to match the claims these 
> idiots are making about what will occur, when, and by how much. I'm not 
> talking minor errors, but stuff of a magnitude that would be considered 
> 'not even in the ball park' sort of error.

The models have repeatedly proved to be very accurate.

> So again, we see you sold a bill of goods with NO factual support that 
> shows these claims and assertions are even remotely correct.

Your ignorance of the science is not a reason to doubt the science.

> Free Hint: The Earth has been hotter than it is now, within the memory 
> of man, and it's been colder, and all before man's activities could have 
> possibly had any impact on either.

Are you suggesting you thought of the fact there have been fluctuation 
and all the major models and those who have worked on them oddly left 
this out? If so that is a very odd idea! If not, well, what are you even 
suggesting?

> So with Millions of years of climate change and what amounts to a single 
> snapshot understanding of the latest frame of that movie....no one can 
> say whether this change is largely natural, artificial or in-between. 
> Those that claim to know are trying to sell you a pig in a poke.

By all means show the studies that back this view. You MIGHT be able to 
hand-pick some outliers but you will be hard pressed to do so. And, of 
course, even if you do you will be HEAVILY hand picking.

> The fact that their models are wildly off and continue to be would show 
> that there is a serious lack of understanding in the causes, events and 
> results of what drives climate change. Indeed, some models are so 
> crafted that NO MATTER WHAT CONDITIONS YOU INPUT you will get an endless 
> upwards temperature trend for as long as you care to project into the 
> future.

Please name the models you mean.

> In short, the trend is inherent in the model....NOT the data.

You reject the science (evidence, data, logic, etc.). Fair enough.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704832

"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message 
news:g125ioF208aU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 9/26/18 12:22 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:pof837$mhp$50@dont-email.me...
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:14:44 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>> Much like man is currently presented during climate change that has 
>>>> been
>>>> going on for millions of years, and will continue to change long after
>>>> we're gone.
>>>
>>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> Multiple sets of independent observations find a human fingerprint
>>> on climate change.
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>
>> If you think conjecture, assertion, hypothesis, and unsupported claims is 
>> a SPNAK! then it's no wonder that you're so stupid.
>>
>> There is ZERO proof presented to support the assertions of man made 
>> climate change, and the assertions that it's tied to man's activities is 
>> just that assertions.
>
> Serious request for you... can you find ANY relevant scientific site -- 
> any at all -- which backs your view?

Yes.

> My guess: you cannot.

You seem to spend more time guessing than actually doing research. Maybe 
that's your problem.
 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704927

On 9/26/18 11:38 PM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message 
> news:g125ioF208aU1@mid.individual.net...
>> On 9/26/18 12:22 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message 
>>> news:pof837$mhp$50@dont-email.me...
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, 
>>>> melt!
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:14:44 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Much like man is currently presented during climate change that has 
>>>>> been
>>>>> going on for millions of years, and will continue to change long after
>>>>> we're gone.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm
>>>>
>>>> ----------
>>>> Multiple sets of independent observations find a human fingerprint
>>>> on climate change.
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> If you think conjecture, assertion, hypothesis, and unsupported 
>>> claims is a SPNAK! then it's no wonder that you're so stupid.
>>>
>>> There is ZERO proof presented to support the assertions of man made 
>>> climate change, and the assertions that it's tied to man's activities 
>>> is just that assertions.
>>
>> Serious request for you... can you find ANY relevant scientific site 
>> -- any at all -- which backs your view?
> 
> Yes.

By all means point to it.


>> My guess: you cannot.
> 
> You seem to spend more time guessing than actually doing research. Maybe 
> that's your problem.
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
> 

You want me to do the research you fear? What?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704960

"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message 
news:g14r35Fij99U17@mid.individual.net...
> On 9/26/18 11:38 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message 
>> news:g125ioF208aU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> On 9/26/18 12:22 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Nadegda" <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in message 
>>>> news:pof837$mhp$50@dont-email.me...
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, 
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:14:44 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Much like man is currently presented during climate change that has 
>>>>>> been
>>>>>> going on for millions of years, and will continue to change long 
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> we're gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> Multiple sets of independent observations find a human fingerprint
>>>>> on climate change.
>>>>> ----------
>>>>>
>>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>
>>>> If you think conjecture, assertion, hypothesis, and unsupported claims 
>>>> is a SPNAK! then it's no wonder that you're so stupid.
>>>>
>>>> There is ZERO proof presented to support the assertions of man made 
>>>> climate change, and the assertions that it's tied to man's activities 
>>>> is just that assertions.
>>>
>>> Serious request for you... can you find ANY relevant scientific site --  
>>> any at all -- which backs your view?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> By all means point to it.

You mean the evidence which I've already pointed out to you and which you 
flatly refused to consider?

 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703335

On 9/18/2018 6:44 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor
> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
> "The sky is falling!"
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> that these solutions will address, or that man can
>>> even change the climate change that is occurring.
>>>
>>
>> If we can cause it, we can un-cause it.
>>
> We didn't cause it, we just triggered the change that was
> ready and waiting to happen.  The change is now past the
> tipping-point and cannot be reversed, no matter how much
> wishful thinking you and your ilk misguidedly throw at it.

Plus, we can pray and have thoughts, and the hurricanes won't be able to 
get to us and bring floods and pestilence because we have very strong 
leaders who know a thing or two and can make fantastic deals.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704032

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pnr2kk$obi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, 
melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...


> 
> On 9/18/2018 6:44 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
> > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor
> > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
> > "The sky is falling!"
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >>> that these solutions will address, or that man can
> >>> even change the climate change that is occurring.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If we can cause it, we can un-cause it.
> >>
> > We didn't cause it, we just triggered the change that was
> > ready and waiting to happen.  The change is now past the
> > tipping-point and cannot be reversed, no matter how much
> > wishful thinking you and your ilk misguidedly throw at it.
> 
> Plus, we can pray and have thoughts, and the hurricanes won't be able to 
> get to us and bring floods and pestilence because we have very strong 
> leaders who know a thing or two and can make fantastic deals.

Soros paid you to say that.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704092

On 9/22/2018 1:43 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pnr2kk$obi$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says...
>> On 9/18/2018 6:44 AM, Sn!pe wrote:
>>> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor
>>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:
>>> "The sky is falling!"
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> that these solutions will address, or that man can
>>>>> even change the climate change that is occurring.
>>>>>
>>>> If we can cause it, we can un-cause it.
>>>>
>>> We didn't cause it, we just triggered the change that was
>>> ready and waiting to happen.  The change is now past the
>>> tipping-point and cannot be reversed, no matter how much
>>> wishful thinking you and your ilk misguidedly throw at it.
>>
>> Plus, we can pray and have thoughts, and the hurricanes won't be able to
>> get to us and bring floods and pestilence because we have very strong
>> leaders who know a thing or two and can make fantastic deals.
> 
> Soros paid you to say that.

Direct deposit!  Twice a month, just like clockwork!

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703361

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <1nvbn1y.1bor5pne278ulN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, 
snipeco.2@gmail.com says...


> 
> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor 
> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared:  
> "The sky is falling!" 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > that these solutions will address, or that man can 
> > > even change the climate change that is occurring.
> > >
> >
> > If we can cause it, we can un-cause it.
> >
> 
> We didn't cause it, we just triggered the change that was 
> ready and waiting to happen.  The change is now past the 
> tipping-point and cannot be reversed, no matter how much 
> wishful thinking you and your ilk misguidedly throw at it.

Exactly what I was tempted to tell her, but you can't change what a fool 
believes.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703322

On 9/18/2018 5:59 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/17/2018 8:19 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:pnikq6$184s$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> Businesses and governments face mounting evidence of the need to 
>>> adapt to climate change:
>>
>> Sure, the mounting evidence that there are a bunch of ignorant
> 
> Not ignorant.

Says "kensi" which stands as absolute proof.

>> people demanding solutions to a problem
> 
> As is our right.

but a right denied anyone whose opinion you disagree with. It doesn't 
get more unamerican than that.

>> that hasn't been shown to be caused by man,
> 
> https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm

Failed cartoonist paid propaganda site. Only pseudoscience there!
"Kensi" does not know the difference.

>> that these solutions will address, or that man can even change the 
>> climate change that is occurring.
> 
> If we can cause it, we can un-cause it.

More insane rambling babble. Get a degree in science, "kensi". You libs 
think you can pass yourselves off as knowing science but you are clearly 
drooling nonsense to anyone with real science/engineering knowledge. You 
are a disgusting, dishonest fraud. Go put the toothpaste back in the tube.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703329

On 9/18/2018 9:23 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 5:59 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/17/2018 8:19 PM, Scout wrote:
>>> people demanding solutions to a problem
>>
>> As is our right.
> 
> but a right denied anyone whose opinion you disagree with.

Substantiate that accusation, koOk.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703406

On 9/18/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 9:23 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 9/18/2018 5:59 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 9/17/2018 8:19 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>> people demanding solutions to a problem
>>>
>>> As is our right.
>>
>> but a right denied anyone whose opinion you disagree with.
> 
> Substantiate that accusation, koOk.
> 
Every leftist post is substantiation!
(Obviously includes all of yours)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703412

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:53:29 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 9/18/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 9/18/2018 9:23 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 9/18/2018 5:59 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 9/17/2018 8:19 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>> people demanding solutions to a problem
>>>>
>>>> As is our right.
>>>
>>> but a right denied anyone whose opinion you disagree with.
>> 
>> Substantiate that accusation, koOk.
>
> Every leftist post is substantiation!
> (Obviously includes all of yours)

That is incorrect.

Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly 
this time.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703425

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:11:01 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

<...>

>Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly 
>this time.

Please substantiate this:

                     /"\
                    |\./|
                    |   |
                    |   |
                    |>~<|
                    |   |
                 /'\|   |/'\..
             /~\|   |   |   | \
            |   =[@]=   |   |  \
            |   |   |   |   |   \
            | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
            |                   /
             \                 /
              \               /
               \    _____    /
                |--//''`\--|
                | (( +==)) |
                |--\_|_//--|


-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, 
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is 
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, 
she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in 
accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the 
slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way." 

-- Capt. Neal ®

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703429

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:44:41 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:11:01 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>>Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly
>>this time.
> 
> Please substantiate this:
> 
>                      /"\
>                     |\./|
>                     |   |
>                     |   |
>                     |>~<|
>                     |   |
>                  /'\|   |/'\..
>              /~\|   |   |   | \
>             |   =[@]=   |   |  \
>             |   |   |   |   |   \
>             | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
>             |                   /
>              \                 /
>               \               /
>                \    _____    /
>                 |--//''`\--|
>                 | (( +==)) |
>                 |--\_|_//--|

Why the heck are you wearing a *woman's* wedding ring, Glzzurgl? Got a 
fetish you're too shy to be more explicit about?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703447

On 9/18/2018 6:44 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:11:01 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>> Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly
>> this time.
> 
> Please substantiate this:
> 
>                       /"\
>                      |\./|
>                      |   |
>                      |   |
>                      |>~<|
>                      |   |
>                   /'\|   |/'\..
>               /~\|   |   |   | \
>              |   =[@]=   |   |  \
>              |   |   |   |   |   \
>              | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
>              |                   /
>               \                 /
>                \               /
>                 \    _____    /
>                  |--//''`\--|
>                  | (( +==)) |
>                  |--\_|_//--|
> 
> 
Oh my! You should have posted a "trigger warning" for these sensitive 
women, Sir Greg. You may have just committed a felony. (Oh wait, Hillary 
lost the election...nevermind)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703461

"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote in message 
news:6av2qdtuoemlmsk7mkutrhd0qlgf5fhk7c@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 22:11:01 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda 
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>>Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly
>>this time.
>
> Please substantiate this:
>
>                     /"\
>                    |\./|
>                    |   |
>                    |   |
>                    |>~<|
>                    |   |
>                 /'\|   |/'\..
>             /~\|   |   |   | \
>            |   =[@]=   |   |  \
>            |   |   |   |   |   \
>            | ~   ~   ~   ~ |`   )
>            |                   /
>             \                 /
>              \               /
>               \    _____    /
>                |--//''`\--|
>                | (( +==)) |
>                |--\_|_//--|
>

Hey, you stoled that from me, nearly 20 years ago!

I'm going to sue you, and I MEA*N IT!!!

If Christine Blasey can make up false allegations,
against a Supreme Court Justice nominee, than anyone can;
you males will be dead, soon.  Count on it!  LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703483

On 9/19/2018 12:41 AM, Catalina wrote:

> If Christine Blasey can make up false allegations,

Proof they were made up, ko0k?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703443

On 9/18/2018 6:11 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:53:29 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 9/18/2018 10:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 9/18/2018 9:23 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 9/18/2018 5:59 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 9/17/2018 8:19 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>> people demanding solutions to a problem
>>>>>
>>>>> As is our right.
>>>>
>>>> but a right denied anyone whose opinion you disagree with.
>>>
>>> Substantiate that accusation, koOk.
>>
>> Every leftist post is substantiation!
>> (Obviously includes all of yours)
> 
> That is incorrect.
> 
> Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly
> this time.
> 
How about you go sit rocking in the corner as any mental case would do? 
And do it properly this time. Your insanity is obvious. You are fooling 
nobody except your fellow (is that sexist and gender-oppressive?) commie 
travelers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703484

On 9/18/2018 9:01 PM, benj wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 6:11 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Please substantiate the accusation, as kensi requested. Do it properly
>> this time.
>
> How about you go sit rocking in the corner as any mental case would do?

Erm, that's *your* department, not Nadegda's.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web