Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #693369 > unrolled thread

We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 16:05 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-09 16:11 -0700
      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-09 19:40 -0700
        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-09 20:09 -0700
        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-09 20:20 -0700
          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-10 15:45 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-10 16:26 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-10 21:19 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-11 13:54 -0700
              Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-11 13:59 -0700
                Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-11 14:10 -0700
                  Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-11 15:26 -0700
                    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-13 10:17 -0700
                      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-13 12:45 -0700
                      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-07-13 14:39 -0700
                        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-14 09:56 -0700
                          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-14 11:31 -0700
                Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-07-11 15:25 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-10 09:22 +1000
      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-09 16:36 -0700
        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-11 09:30 +1000
          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-10 17:51 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-07-11 11:40 +1000
              Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-10 18:56 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-09 17:15 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-10 23:34 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-11 14:11 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-07-17 14:04 +1000
      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 04:47 -0400
      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-17 16:12 -0700
        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-07-18 11:47 +1000
          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-17 19:39 -0700
          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-17 22:48 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-17 23:13 -0700
              Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 12:10 -0400
                Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-18 15:29 -0700
                  Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 19:26 -0400
                    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-07-18 22:22 -0700
                      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:13 -0400
                        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-19 15:00 -0700
          Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-18 15:55 -0700
            Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-18 16:06 -0700
        Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-17 21:03 -0700
    Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:11 -0700
      Re: We Are Working on an Anti-Matter Bomb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-19 13:14 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#693524

On 10/07/2018 9:36 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>
>>
>> **Indeed. Anti-matter/matter annihilation devices should prove to be
>> almost 50% efficient at converting matter into energy. By comparison a
>> fusion bomb allows a conversion rate of approximately 0.7%.
>>
>> I can visualise some potential problems with containment however.
>>
>> -- 
>> Trevor Wilson
>> www.rageaudio.com.au
> 
> Where do we get anti matter from
> before it is contained?

**Particle accelerators like CERN.

> Was it not with real matter then?

**Anti-matter IS real matter.

> How then could it not have already
> annihilated?

**It will be annihilated when it comes into contact with matter.

> 
> And how can you contain anti matter
> in a real matter container?

**Theories abound, but some kind of magnetic containment seems likely. 
In a vacuum, of course.

> 
> Mitchell Raemsch
> 


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693531

On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:30:50 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 9:36 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> >>>
> >>
> >> **Indeed. Anti-matter/matter annihilation devices should prove to be
> >> almost 50% efficient at converting matter into energy. By comparison a
> >> fusion bomb allows a conversion rate of approximately 0.7%.
> >>
> >> I can visualise some potential problems with containment however.
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Trevor Wilson
> >> www.rageaudio.com.au
> > 
> > Where do we get anti matter from
> > before it is contained?
> 
> **Particle accelerators like CERN.

No. They cannot create anti matter...
They make more energy of motion.

> > Was it not with real matter then?
> 
> **Anti-matter IS real matter.

If matter all has a common origin
the annihilation would have already
taken place at that beginning.

> > How then could it not have already
> > annihilated?
> 
> **It will be annihilated when it comes into contact with matter.

How did it not come into contact with matter before?

> > 
> > And how can you contain anti matter
> > in a real matter container?
> 
> **Theories abound, but some kind of magnetic containment seems likely. 
> In a vacuum, of course.

When it is not in a vacuum in its beginning it
annihilates right off so you then get no anti matter...


Mitchell Raemsch


> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693535

On 11/07/2018 10:51 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:30:50 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 10/07/2018 9:36 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Indeed. Anti-matter/matter annihilation devices should prove to be
>>>> almost 50% efficient at converting matter into energy. By comparison a
>>>> fusion bomb allows a conversion rate of approximately 0.7%.
>>>>
>>>> I can visualise some potential problems with containment however.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>
>>> Where do we get anti matter from
>>> before it is contained?
>>
>> **Particle accelerators like CERN.
> 
> No. They cannot create anti matter...
> They make more energy of motion.

**Perhaps you should inform the scientists at CERN that they don't know 
what they're talking about:

https://home.cern/topics/antimatter

"At CERN, physicists make antimatter to study in experiments. The 
starting point is the Antiproton Decelerator, which slows down 
antiprotons so that physicists can investigate their properties."

> 
>>> Was it not with real matter then?
>>
>> **Anti-matter IS real matter.
> 
> If matter all has a common origin
> the annihilation would have already
> taken place at that beginning.

**You should publish your hypothesis.

> 
>>> How then could it not have already
>>> annihilated?
>>
>> **It will be annihilated when it comes into contact with matter.
> 
> How did it not come into contact with matter before?

**If it did, then the two would have annihilated each other.

> 
>>>
>>> And how can you contain anti matter
>>> in a real matter container?
>>
>> **Theories abound, but some kind of magnetic containment seems likely.
>> In a vacuum, of course.
> 
> When it is not in a vacuum in its beginning it
> annihilates right off so you then get no anti matter...

**Very likely, yes.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693537

On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 6:40:41 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 11/07/2018 10:51 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:30:50 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2018 9:36 AM, mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Monday, July 9, 2018 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> **Indeed. Anti-matter/matter annihilation devices should prove to be
> >>>> almost 50% efficient at converting matter into energy. By comparison a
> >>>> fusion bomb allows a conversion rate of approximately 0.7%.
> >>>>
> >>>> I can visualise some potential problems with containment however.
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Trevor Wilson
> >>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
> >>>
> >>> Where do we get anti matter from
> >>> before it is contained?
> >>
> >> **Particle accelerators like CERN.
> > 
> > No. They cannot create anti matter...
> > They make more energy of motion.
> 
> **Perhaps you should inform the scientists at CERN that they don't know 
> what they're talking about:

You bet Trevor.

> 
> https://home.cern/topics/antimatter
> 
> "At CERN, physicists make antimatter to study in experiments. The 
> starting point is the Antiproton Decelerator, which slows down 
> antiprotons so that physicists can investigate their properties."

They are just heavier matter by motion Trevor.

> > 
> >>> Was it not with real matter then?
> >>
> >> **Anti-matter IS real matter.
> > 
> > If matter all has a common origin
> > the annihilation would have already
> > taken place at that beginning.
> 
> **You should publish your hypothesis.

A common origin at the Big Bang of matter and anti matter
shows they would have then at the absolute beginning
annihilated.

> > 
> >>> How then could it not have already
> >>> annihilated?
> >>
> >> **It will be annihilated when it comes into contact with matter.
> > 
> > How did it not come into contact with matter before?
> 
> **If it did, then the two would have annihilated each other.

That would be the very first event of the universe...
or a complete annihilation.

> 
> > 
> >>>
> >>> And how can you contain anti matter
> >>> in a real matter container?
> >>
> >> **Theories abound, but some kind of magnetic containment seems likely.
> >> In a vacuum, of course.
> > 
> > When it is not in a vacuum in its beginning it
> > annihilates right off so you then get no anti matter...
> 
> **Very likely, yes.


Is there anti light?

No. There is no anti world Trevor...

> 
> 
> -- 
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693388

_______ ahahahahaha "reber G=emc^2" the Yiddisher
SchweineHUND <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> cranked
himself because...
>
SwineBert read something he posted but SwineBert
does-not-want-others-to-see  {{see items (1) to (5)
below}} ... So Bert quickly morphed & behaved like a
dog that tries to bury his OWN shit, by Bert attempting
to cover-up and refusing to EXPLAIN why Bert posted
 the following:
>
(1)
On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, Face-Shitter Glazier wrote:
Harlow Campbell HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com,
& Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net
& Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>:
"I'll be sitting on your faces to take a shit & say: "Open wide".
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
>
(2)
On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, JewPigBert Glazier
said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser.
For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser."
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
"Benj, you can thank me in advance". - TreBert. ... addinng
>
(3)
On 03Aug2017:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears."
>
(4)
On 25Mar2008, Graveyard Vandal Glazier wrote in:
<https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J>
"Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh
when it seeps down on your face". --  Bert
>
(5)
On 24Jun2018 SwineBert Glazier said to
Mark Earnest <gmearnest@att.net> "your nose is
in a shit bucket all the time. Eat shit and you fit" -- Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693556

On 7/9/2018 4:05 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> 
https://youtu.be/4dy6k27c5tA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#693634

On 7/9/2018 4:05 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> 

Strange mention of zero-point energy here:

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/09/wikileaks-podesta-email-leak-about-ets-also-mentions-zero-point-energy-heres-what-that-is/

Humm...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694236

On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> 

First catch your tiger.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694249

On 7/17/2018 12:04 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>
> 
> First catch your tiger.
> 
> Sylvia.

"Sylvia", everyone here (except Boinker) knows that Star Trek science is 
real. Anti-matter is how photon torpedoes work. That is a given!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694348

On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> > 
> 
> First catch your tiger.
> 
> Sylvia.

Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the two,as needed.Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694364

On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>
>>
>> First catch your tiger.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the two,as needed.Bert
> 

It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). Where 
are you going to get the energy from?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694374

On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 6:47:51 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> >>>
> >>
> >> First catch your tiger.
> >>
> >> Sylvia.
> > 
> > Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the two,as needed.Bert
> > 
> 
> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
> efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). Where 
> are you going to get the energy from?
> 
> Sylvia.

That bomb can't be put together...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694402

On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>
>>>
>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the 
>> two,as needed.Bert
>>
> 
> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
> efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). Where 
> are you going to get the energy from?

Hard Core Sci-Fi:
_________________
Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. I 
think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be it. He 
also said that the only thing in the natural universe that can match 
something like the alien reactor is a black hole.

The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many times 
more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within a 
virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 being 
bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into anti-matter and a 
gravity wave that can be radically amplified.

Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring within 
itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets with 115 
naturally occurring.

Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
travel in the blink of an eye.
_________________

https://youtu.be/BJYDrugEtxY

;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694406

On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the 
>>> two,as needed.Bert
>>>
>>
>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
>> efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). 
>> Where are you going to get the energy from?
> 
> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
> _________________
> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. I 
> think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be it. He 
> also said that the only thing in the natural universe that can match 
> something like the alien reactor is a black hole.
> 
> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many times 
> more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
> anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within a 
> virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 being 
> bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into anti-matter and a 
> gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
> 
> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring within 
> itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets with 115 
> naturally occurring.
> 
> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
> travel in the blink of an eye.

There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a hyper 
deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a fraction 
of a blink of a human eye.

> _________________
> 
> https://youtu.be/BJYDrugEtxY
> 
> ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694457

On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>
>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate the 
>>>> two,as needed.Bert
>>>>
>>>
>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
>>> efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). 
>>> Where are you going to get the energy from?
>>
>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
>> _________________
>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. I 
>> think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be it. 
>> He also said that the only thing in the natural universe that can 
>> match something like the alien reactor is a black hole.
>>
>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
>> anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within a 
>> virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 being 
>> bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into anti-matter and a 
>> gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
>>
>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets with 
>> 115 naturally occurring.
>>
>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
>> travel in the blink of an eye.
> 
> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a hyper 
> deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a fraction 
> of a blink of a human eye.

Babbling Trek nonsense.
Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows all 
gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all the 
kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one more 
government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. Job is to 
throw chaff into the wind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694524

On 7/18/2018 9:10 AM, benj wrote:
> On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>
>>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate 
>>>>> the two,as needed.Bert
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done as 
>>>> efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like it). 
>>>> Where are you going to get the energy from?
>>>
>>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
>>> _________________
>>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. I 
>>> think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be it. 
>>> He also said that the only thing in the natural universe that can 
>>> match something like the alien reactor is a black hole.
>>>
>>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
>>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
>>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
>>> anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within a 
>>> virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 being 
>>> bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into anti-matter and 
>>> a gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
>>>
>>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
>>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets with 
>>> 115 naturally occurring.
>>>
>>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
>>> travel in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a hyper 
>> deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a fraction 
>> of a blink of a human eye.
> 
> Babbling Trek nonsense.
> Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows all 
> gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all the 
> kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one more 
> government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. Job is to 
> throw chaff into the wind.

I did mention Sci-Fi. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694552

On 7/18/2018 6:29 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/18/2018 9:10 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate 
>>>>>> the two,as needed.Bert
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done 
>>>>> as efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like 
>>>>> it). Where are you going to get the energy from?
>>>>
>>>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
>>>> _________________
>>>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. 
>>>> I think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be 
>>>> it. He also said that the only thing in the natural universe that 
>>>> can match something like the alien reactor is a black hole.
>>>>
>>>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
>>>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
>>>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
>>>> anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within 
>>>> a virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 
>>>> being bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into 
>>>> anti-matter and a gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
>>>>
>>>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
>>>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets with 
>>>> 115 naturally occurring.
>>>>
>>>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
>>>> travel in the blink of an eye.
>>>
>>> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a 
>>> hyper deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a 
>>> fraction of a blink of a human eye.
>>
>> Babbling Trek nonsense.
>> Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows all 
>> gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all the 
>> kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one more 
>> government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. Job is to 
>> throw chaff into the wind.
> 
> I did mention Sci-Fi. ;^)

Um yes you did. Just confirming your assessment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694586

On 7/18/2018 4:26 PM, benj wrote:
> On 7/18/2018 6:29 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/18/2018 9:10 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate 
>>>>>>> the two,as needed.Bert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done 
>>>>>> as efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like 
>>>>>> it). Where are you going to get the energy from?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
>>>>> _________________
>>>>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... efficient. 
>>>>> I think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, well, so be 
>>>>> it. He also said that the only thing in the natural universe that 
>>>>> can match something like the alien reactor is a black hole.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
>>>>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
>>>>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say the 
>>>>> anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy within 
>>>>> a virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something like 115 
>>>>> being bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays into 
>>>>> anti-matter and a gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
>>>>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets 
>>>>> with 115 naturally occurring.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep space 
>>>>> travel in the blink of an eye.
>>>>
>>>> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a 
>>>> hyper deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a 
>>>> fraction of a blink of a human eye.
>>>
>>> Babbling Trek nonsense.
>>> Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows 
>>> all gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all 
>>> the kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one 
>>> more government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. Job 
>>> is to throw chaff into the wind.
>>
>> I did mention Sci-Fi. ;^)
> 
> Um yes you did. Just confirming your assessment.

I have to admit that it can be fun to think about such things. Even 
though none of it can be proved. Well, afaict, they did actually manage 
to create a little 115 on Earth.

https://www.livescience.com/41424-facts-about-ununpentium.html

;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694623

On 7/19/2018 1:22 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/18/2018 4:26 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 7/18/2018 6:29 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 7/18/2018 9:10 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First catch your tiger.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate 
>>>>>>>> the two,as needed.Bert
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done 
>>>>>>> as efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like 
>>>>>>> it). Where are you going to get the energy from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
>>>>>> _________________
>>>>>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... 
>>>>>> efficient. I think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, 
>>>>>> well, so be it. He also said that the only thing in the natural 
>>>>>> universe that can match something like the alien reactor is a 
>>>>>> black hole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
>>>>>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
>>>>>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say 
>>>>>> the anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy 
>>>>>> within a virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something 
>>>>>> like 115 being bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays 
>>>>>> into anti-matter and a gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
>>>>>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets 
>>>>>> with 115 naturally occurring.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep 
>>>>>> space travel in the blink of an eye.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a 
>>>>> hyper deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a 
>>>>> fraction of a blink of a human eye.
>>>>
>>>> Babbling Trek nonsense.
>>>> Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows 
>>>> all gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all 
>>>> the kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one 
>>>> more government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. 
>>>> Job is to throw chaff into the wind.
>>>
>>> I did mention Sci-Fi. ;^)
>>
>> Um yes you did. Just confirming your assessment.
> 
> I have to admit that it can be fun to think about such things. Even 
> though none of it can be proved. Well, afaict, they did actually manage 
> to create a little 115 on Earth.
> 
> https://www.livescience.com/41424-facts-about-ununpentium.html
> 
> ;^)

"Moscovium is a radioactive, synthetic element about which little is known."

When little is known that opens the kook door to making up all manner of 
fantasies as to what it can do. I think Lazar once saw a saucer-ship 
made of this metal!

The True "fun" of these things is like reading a whodoneit. It's a test 
of your forensic ability to separate truth from lies and fantasy. And 
it's made even more fun by the fact that those in authority (who people 
like Odd take as gospel) are some of those lying about things. Does the 
murderer ever just tell the truth and admit the crime? What fun would 
that be? The fact that the crime seems "impossible" does not mean there 
is not an explanation at the end of the book.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694690

On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 8:13:33 AM UTC-7, benj wrote:
> On 7/19/2018 1:22 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 7/18/2018 4:26 PM, benj wrote:
> >> On 7/18/2018 6:29 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>> On 7/18/2018 9:10 AM, benj wrote:
> >>>> On 7/18/2018 2:13 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>> On 7/17/2018 10:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/17/2018 6:47 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 18/07/2018 9:12 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:04:11 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/07/2018 9:05 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Its better than an H-Bomb for good reason.Bert
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> First catch your tiger.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Man will create anti-matter when needed.Time lapse will seperate 
> >>>>>>>> the two,as needed.Bert
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It takes a lot of energy to create anti-matter, even if it's done 
> >>>>>>> as efficiently at theoretically possible (currently nothing like 
> >>>>>>> it). Where are you going to get the energy from?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hard Core Sci-Fi:
> >>>>>> _________________
> >>>>>> Bob Lazar says the Alien reactor is basically 99.9999... 
> >>>>>> efficient. I think he mentioned 100% efficient before wrt limits, 
> >>>>>> well, so be it. He also said that the only thing in the natural 
> >>>>>> universe that can match something like the alien reactor is a 
> >>>>>> black hole.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The reactor creates anti-matter and a gravitational wave through 
> >>>>>> expertly tuned tubes via a mini particle accelerator that is many 
> >>>>>> times more powerful that anything we have on Earth. He does say 
> >>>>>> the anti-matter hits a gaseous medium and turns into pure energy 
> >>>>>> within a virtually perfect thermoelectric converter.  Something 
> >>>>>> like 115 being bombarded thus morphing it into 116 that decays 
> >>>>>> into anti-matter and a gravity wave that can be radically amplified.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Earth does not have the necessary element 115 naturally occurring 
> >>>>>> within itself. However, some binary star systems posses planets 
> >>>>>> with 115 naturally occurring.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anti-matter for the energy; gravitational wave for hyper deep 
> >>>>>> space travel in the blink of an eye.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is no StarTrek or StarWars conversations going on during a 
> >>>>> hyper deep jump, into another galaxy perhaps. The jump happens in a 
> >>>>> fraction of a blink of a human eye.
> >>>>
> >>>> Babbling Trek nonsense.
> >>>> Bob Lazar, the technician who pretends to be a physicist who knows 
> >>>> all gummint secrets? Bwahahahaha! He's fit in perfect here with all 
> >>>> the kooks pretending to know physics. My guess is Lazar is just one 
> >>>> more government shill like Sagan, "kensi", Nads and all the rest. 
> >>>> Job is to throw chaff into the wind.
> >>>
> >>> I did mention Sci-Fi. ;^)
> >>
> >> Um yes you did. Just confirming your assessment.
> > 
> > I have to admit that it can be fun to think about such things. Even 
> > though none of it can be proved. Well, afaict, they did actually manage 
> > to create a little 115 on Earth.
> > 
> > https://www.livescience.com/41424-facts-about-ununpentium.html
> > 
> > ;^)
> 
> "Moscovium is a radioactive, synthetic element about which little is known."
> 
> When little is known that opens the kook door to making up all manner of 
> fantasies as to what it can do. I think Lazar once saw a saucer-ship 
> made of this metal!
> 
> The True "fun" of these things is like reading a whodoneit. It's a test 
> of your forensic ability to separate truth from lies and fantasy. And 
> it's made even more fun by the fact that those in authority (who people 
> like Odd take as gospel) are some of those lying about things. Does the 
> murderer ever just tell the truth and admit the crime? What fun would 
> that be? The fact that the crime seems "impossible" does not mean there 
> is not an explanation at the end of the book.

If we can't fuse Hydrogen at low temperatures how would
we be fusing higher elements that would require even more?
They don't exist long enough to measure.
No. There are no man made elements. Science thinks
its doing something that its not.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web