Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #686921 > unrolled thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
      Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
          Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
        Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                  They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

#687368

Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 26 May 2018 07:43:50 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>
>>The irony of you fellows is *palpable*.
>
> *You fellows* is so elitist, dude. It's your
> bigotry that's palpable.

LOL

You know they say that humans really aren't very good at logic, just
feeeeeeelings.

-- 
Do something unusual today.  Pay a bill.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687620

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> benj wrote:
>>
>> Doomsdrzej wrote:

(lies snipped)

> The irony of you fellows is *palpable*.

We're supposed to be elucidated by some right-wing liar claiming that
Cuba and North Korea are socialist "utopias".  Right-wing
propagandists claiming that that's what the left "wants".

Yeah, right.

It's same whine of shitty lying Linux haters, when their insulting
assholery got them plonked.

Self-nuking dipshits, they are.

-- 
"So much for chrisv's claims of a 'zero day' killfile."  -  lying
asshole "-hh", implying dishonesty on my part, but in fact simply too
stupid to figure-out what a "zero day plonk" is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687181

On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:17:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>
>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>> 
>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>> 
>
>They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in 
>your own little fantasy world.

The left has already ensured that their men have lost all semblance of
masculinity. They have no strength, no dominating quality, no
leadership skills... Hell, they can't even get a hard-on anymore.

That's how much liberalism has contributed to the male gender over the
last hundred years.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687186

On 5/26/18 8:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:17:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>
>>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>>>
>>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>>>
>>
>> They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in
>> your own little fantasy world.
> 
> The left has already ensured that their men have lost all semblance of
> masculinity. They have no strength, no dominating quality, no
> leadership skills... Hell, they can't even get a hard-on anymore.
> 
> That's how much liberalism has contributed to the male gender over the
> last hundred years.
> 
What?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687353

On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:45:58 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>On 5/26/18 8:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:17:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: 
>>> On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>
>>>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>>>>
>>>
>>> They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in
>>> your own little fantasy world.
>> 
>> The left has already ensured that their men have lost all semblance of
>> masculinity. They have no strength, no dominating quality, no
>> leadership skills... Hell, they can't even get a hard-on anymore.
>> 
>> That's how much liberalism has contributed to the male gender over the
>> last hundred years.
>> 
>What?

Not to mention also having had adversely affected their hearing.
LOL!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687361

On 5/27/18 9:36 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:45:58 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 5/26/18 8:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:17:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>>>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in
>>>> your own little fantasy world.
>>>
>>> The left has already ensured that their men have lost all semblance of
>>> masculinity. They have no strength, no dominating quality, no
>>> leadership skills... Hell, they can't even get a hard-on anymore.
>>>
>>> That's how much liberalism has contributed to the male gender over the
>>> last hundred years.
>>>
>> What?
> 
> Not to mention also having had adversely affected their hearing.
> LOL!

What?


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687365

On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:

>On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:45:58 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>On 5/26/18 8:38 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:17:12 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: 
>>>> On 5/25/2018 4:49 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:15:34 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>>>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They know that which is why they are that way. It's so comfy to live in
>>>> your own little fantasy world.
>>> 
>>> The left has already ensured that their men have lost all semblance of
>>> masculinity. They have no strength, no dominating quality, no
>>> leadership skills... Hell, they can't even get a hard-on anymore.
>>> 
>>> That's how much liberalism has contributed to the male gender over the
>>> last hundred years.
>>> 
>>What?
>
>Not to mention also having had adversely affected their hearing.
>LOL!

ROFL! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687853

Doomsdrzej wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>
>It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>always remain in the dark about everything.

That's the same obviously false claim that you made of the advocates
who filtered trolls posts, back your "true Linux advocate" days,
"Slimer".

Say, I found another good example of your extremist thinking, as you
requested.

>> "Slimer" wrote:
>>>
>>> Bill Gates is spending a lot of his time sterilizing the parasites on
>>> the African continent. I used to be against it but now I realize that
>>> he's doing the world a service because not only do they breed like
>>> rabbits, they don't have the resources to sustain even a fraction of
>>> themselves and don't even have the intelligence to begin to
>>> contemplate how they might. If they keep producing children as they
>>> do, not only with they migrate to places where they are truly
>>> unwelcome, they will destroy the white race entirely.

You're welcome.

Or, is that considered middle-of-the-road thinking, in your neck of
the woods?

-- 
"And there in a nutshell we see how Desktop linux is going nowhere
fast. People who need income are terrified a freetard will simply
steal all their hard work and give it away."  -  "True Linux advocate"
Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687858

On 5/30/18 1:03 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Doomsdrzej wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> I've no need for more right-wing lies, today, thanks.
>>
>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>> always remain in the dark about everything.
> 
> That's the same obviously false claim that you made of the advocates
> who filtered trolls posts, back your "true Linux advocate" days,
> "Slimer".
> 
> Say, I found another good example of your extremist thinking, as you
> requested.
> 
>>> "Slimer" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bill Gates is spending a lot of his time sterilizing the parasites on
>>>> the African continent. I used to be against it but now I realize that
>>>> he's doing the world a service because not only do they breed like
>>>> rabbits, they don't have the resources to sustain even a fraction of
>>>> themselves and don't even have the intelligence to begin to
>>>> contemplate how they might. If they keep producing children as they
>>>> do, not only with they migrate to places where they are truly
>>>> unwelcome, they will destroy the white race entirely.
> 
> You're welcome.
> 
> Or, is that considered middle-of-the-road thinking, in your neck of
> the woods?
> 

Slimer demands special entitlements for Christians, males, whites, and 
the rich. This is the common in conservative thinking.

Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world 
views:

* Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a 
focus on investing in the future and building a stronger tie between 
hard work / productivity and financial reward.

Additionally, Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to 
help ensure clean air and water, safe food, and human rights. This 
includes following the scientific evidence about climate change and food 
safety, and things like setting levels of lead and other harmful 
substances allowed, and even to wanting to do research to reduce the 
harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools. This is a form 
of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they are right 
to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.

* Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, 
males, heterosexuals, and the wealthy, with a focus on redistributing 
wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that this will 
somehow help others.

Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings 
and what they believe has historically existed (which is often 
incorrect), or even just based on their own religion. This includes 
controlling which consenting adults can marry each other, what a woman 
can do with her own body, and even insisting the government gets to 
define YOUR gender. They also work to create regulations on voting to 
limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a voice they know their 
ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right to call 
conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a 
less defensible one.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687987

chrisv wrote:

>Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>
>>It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>always remain in the dark about everything.
>
>That's the same obviously false claim that you made of the advocates
>who filtered trolls posts, back your "true Linux advocate" days,
>"Slimer".
>
>Say, I found another good example of your extremist thinking, as you
>requested.

Here's another one:

>> "Slimer" wrote:
>>>
>>>I can't help but notice that behind every idiotic social movement
>>>(Communism, feminism, affirmative action), there's always some
>>>ridiculous little Jew.
>>>
>>>It's almost as if they _wanted_ to destroy the fabric of society, the
>>>family unit and the white race

-- 
"So when's the last time you went to work for free, you shabby
hypocrite?"  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687988

On 5/31/18 11:24 AM, chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>
>>> It's an attitude such as this one which guarantees that the left will
>>> always remain in the dark about everything.
>>
>> That's the same obviously false claim that you made of the advocates
>> who filtered trolls posts, back your "true Linux advocate" days,
>> "Slimer".
>>
>> Say, I found another good example of your extremist thinking, as you
>> requested.
> 
> Here's another one:
> 
>>> "Slimer" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can't help but notice that behind every idiotic social movement
>>>> (Communism, feminism, affirmative action), there's always some
>>>> ridiculous little Jew.
>>>>
>>>> It's almost as if they _wanted_ to destroy the fabric of society, the
>>>> family unit and the white race
> 

Slimer claims to be a moderate. He lies about a lot of things.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687089

On Fri, 25 May 2018 08:57:51 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>Doomsdrzej wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>>I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>>>Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>>>between socialism and communist dictatorship.  
>>
>><https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>
>>
>>>They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist utopias".  They
>>>lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>>>to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>>>They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>>>socialism.
>>
>> (Ridiculous right-wing propaganda, hoping to fool the fools, snipped.)
>
>It's people like you who are the extremists.  So, naturally, that's
>what you accuse your "opponents" of being.

How am I an extremist of _anything_, pray tell?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687095

On 5/25/18 1:43 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 08:57:51 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>>>> Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>>>> between socialism and communist dictatorship.
>>>
>>> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>
>>>
>>>> They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist utopias".  They
>>>> lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>>>> to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>>>> They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>>>> socialism.
>>>
>>> (Ridiculous right-wing propaganda, hoping to fool the fools, snipped.)
>>
>> It's people like you who are the extremists.  So, naturally, that's
>> what you accuse your "opponents" of being.
> 
> How am I an extremist of _anything_, pray tell?
> 

You listen to and BELIEVE Alex Jones. And you push your extremist 
bigotry repeatedly.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687055

On 5/25/18 6:17 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 07:55:47 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> benj wrote:
>>
>>> I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway (snip lies)
>>
>> I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>> Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>> between socialism and communist dictatorship.
> 
> <https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/vladimir_lenin_136421>
> 
>> They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist"utopias".  They
>> lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>> to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>> They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>> socialism.
> 
> And you lie about the fact that you have any understanding of
> socialism's main objective.
> 
You implication is there is a large group pushing for socialism. That is 
not true.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687046

On 5/25/2018 8:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
> benj wrote:
> 
>> I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway (snip lies)
> 
> I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
> Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
> between socialism and communist dictatorship.

You mean like YOU are tying to fool those too stupid to see that 
socialism and communism are in essence the same thing. YOu hope by word 
games to spin a large fantasy that minor details make all the difference.

> They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist"utopias".  They
> lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
> to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
> They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
> socialism.

Lefties have ALWAYS sold their collective schemes as "Utopias", 
"worker's paradises" and the "answer" to world evil. And now Chrisv 
pretends that they never said it! It's funny!

Again he makes the argument that A is not B because there are some minor 
differences in degree here and there as if that changed the basic 
structure. It does not. if you are giving part of your authority over 
your own life, your work power, and your possessions to someone else 
(government) to redistribute among the group as THEY see fit then 
clearly you have given away a portion of your freedom over your own 
life. Usually that sort of thing is called slavery.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687049

On 5/25/18 8:27 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/25/2018 8:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> benj wrote:
>>
>>> I can tell you why Rolf focuses on Norway (snip lies)
>>
>> I can tell you why right-wing propagandists focus on Cuba and North
>> Korea.  They hope to fool those who are too stupid to differentiate
>> between socialism and communist dictatorship.
> 
> You mean like YOU are tying to fool those too stupid to see that 
> socialism and communism are in essence the same thing. YOu hope by word 
> games to spin a large fantasy that minor details make all the difference.

First: they are not the same thing.

Second: there is essentially NOBODY in the USA pushing for true 
Socialism. There are people pushing for a Social Democracy.

Three: If you use the common usage of "socialism", the right wing pushes 
for a LOT more than does the left... they just push to have the costs 
and risks of the rich "socialized". Look at Walmart and McDonald's -- 
they have much of their labor costs "socialized". Look at the costs of 
using ancient stores of carbon... much of that is "socialized".

>> They lie that communst dictatorships are "socialist"utopias".  They
>> lie that socialism means "handing property and responsibilities over
>> to an all-knowing government that will decide what is best for you."
>> They want people to forget that there is a middle-ground, democratic
>> socialism.
> 
> Lefties have ALWAYS sold their collective schemes as "Utopias", 
> "worker's paradises" and the "answer" to world evil. And now Chrisv 
> pretends that they never said it! It's funny!

There is no perfect system... but a social democracy would be clearly 
better than the oligarchy the US now lives under.

> Again he makes the argument that A is not B because there are some minor 
> differences in degree here and there as if that changed the basic 
> structure. It does not. if you are giving part of your authority over 
> your own life, your work power, and your possessions to someone else 
> (government) to redistribute among the group as THEY see fit then 
> clearly you have given away a portion of your freedom over your own 
> life. Usually that sort of thing is called slavery.

We live in a society. As such we are taxed. There is no real "other" way 
in ANY modern, high tech culture. You can play victim and say this means 
you are a slave, but that is just silly.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687060

benj wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

When did my filter for you expire, anyway?

-- 
'Which "open standard" formats would these be? The ones that are still
non standard or the MS Office ones which are used in 95% or more of
businesses?'  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687000

On Friday, May 25, 2018 at 2:38:52 AM UTC+10, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
> 
The first two, they have got rid of many little capitalists, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687083

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>
>SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>
>Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>" I aint saying she's a gold digger, 
>  but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>
>Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>"Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?

-- 

The Mountain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687104

On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
> 
>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>
>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>
>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>
>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
> 
> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
> 
As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
our own eyes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web